Re: [leaf-user] wisp-dist bld 2397 losing prism2_interrupt

2003-02-06 Thread Vladimir I.
Try the latest test image.

wispdist wrote about [leaf-user] wisp-dist bld 2397 losing prism2_interrupt:
 I am currently using the soekris two slot boards and when I run two radio
 cards at once I see two problems.
 
 1.  sometimes I get the following error in the /var/log/messages
 
 Feb  5 15:16:10 HiGu{GeRh}-GaGr-OrCo-Ca-bsr0-AP1 kernel: netcs1:
 prism2_interrupt: hw not ready; skipping events 0x8000
 Feb  5 15:16:10 HiGu{GeRh}-GaGr-OrCo-Ca-bsr0-AP1 kernel: netcs1:
 prism2_interrupt: hw not ready; skipping events 0x
 
 This only happens when the card is in AP mode.  All radio associations and
 data stop.  A restart fixes the problem until it happens again.   I have had
 a few units do this about once a month.
 Also, it has only happened when using two radio cards at once
 
 2.  When trying to view the associations list, I can only view one card (
 when both are in AP mode w/ different channels and essid's ).
 
 both cards are working and radios are associating and traffic working.
 But, in the /proc/net/prism2  directory I have two wlan0 listings.  since
 they are the same name, I cannot look at one of them.  It appears the one I
 can cd into is a race condition.So I cannot get to the second card's
 settings.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 thanx
 J.
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
 http://www.vasoftware.com
 
 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Systems Engineer (RHCE)


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



RE: [leaf-user] modules aren't loading at boot

2003-02-06 Thread Luis.F.Correia
[...]
Sweet! fixed, it works!!  Thanks for the quick comments.  Might I suggest
that this 255-
character limit section be put into the IDE-hd and other media sections?

This 255 character limit is a known limit of the Kernel commandline.

But yes, it should appear in BOLD in every doc.


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



[leaf-user] Has anyone had success getting PUMP to receive a hostname via DHCP?

2003-02-06 Thread Garrett E. Martin
Title: Message



After reading the 
man pages and other posts, it looks like PUMP should be able to update the 
hostname from the option on the DHCP server... I don't seem to be able to make 
it happen however.

Any direction or 
assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks


Garrett E. Martin, MCSE, 
MCP Director of 
Technology Services Johnson, Price  
Sprinkle PA 1-888-704-0636Asheville, NC 



smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature


Re: [leaf-user] Using a wireless router with LEAF (Dachstein, Bering)

2003-02-06 Thread Ed Tetz
I did the same thing.

For 3 months I was at my sister-in-law's, and was leaf-less; so I bought a 
Linksys Wireless Access Point/Router/4 Port switch combo. After getting into 
my new house, I am using the switch for my internal network, and I don't use 
the WAN port, since Leaf is doing that job for me. If you wanted in a 
separate location in the house, then you could connect any switched port to 
you main switch's uplink port, or use a cross-over cable.

Keeping everyone on one subnet makes it easier, but does leave you open to 
war-drivers, or neighbours sneaking in. Most AP's allow you to restrict 
access to MAC addresses, and there is WEP (although it is lightweight). If 
you want more security, you could add a second nic in your leaf box and then 
only allow that subnet to get out, and not to your wired network. It just 
depends on your level of paranoia. ;-)

Cheers,
-edt




Edward Tetz
MCSE, MCDBA, MCT, A+, CTT+, CIW MA, CIW CI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





From: Todd Pearsall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED],leaf 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Using a wireless router with LEAF (Dachstein, 
Bering)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:58:30 -0500

Not sure if this is what you want to do but...

I recently wanted to add some wireless nodes to my existing wired network.
What I really needed was just an Access Point that I would hang off a drop
in the middle of the house to get wireless service through the house.  When
I looked around the wireless routers were cheaper and more readily 
available
the wireless access points so I bought one (D-Link).

Since I didn't need the router functions thanks to LEAF I turned off DHCP
serving, assigned it an IP on my network for management and plugged a cable
from the my switch into one of the LAN ports and left the WAN port empty.
It works fine as a access point and has three free ports I can use for the
computer and PS2 near the access point.

- Todd

- Original Message -
From: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 7:34 PM
Subject: [leaf-user] Using a wireless router with LEAF (Dachstein, Bering)


 Hi all.  What's the simplest way to go about this?  I'd like to cut the
tether to my notebook.  Is
 it as simple as hooking up the router off the hub on my internal network
and letting it create a
 separate subnet?  Thanks.

 =

 -
 Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 This is a good place for a tagline.

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
 http://mailplus.yahoo.com


 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
 http://www.vasoftware.com
 
 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
 SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.0: ntpsimpl.lrp - Polling NTP Servers toofrequently

2003-02-06 Thread Matt Schalit


Brad Fritz wrote:

Jay,

On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:21:24 +1100 Jay Langford wrote:



I was recently contacted by the admin of my NTP service who informed me that
he had been receiving a large increase in NTP requests from various sources
to his servers lately. (Note: I did contact him before I started using his
service.)



As someone else suggested, your job as sysop generally includes
setting up a local timeserver that all you computers synch to.
That means ntpd.  Not sure if ntpsimpl can do this.

You'll want to list about five external servers in ntp.conf
so you spread the load.  That's a general good idea, not just
to spread the load, but really because ntp become much more
accurate when it can poll five servers and determine which one
is really the better one.  Remember that an external ntp time
server across town may be several more router hops away than an
ntp server in the next state.  Let ntp figure it out.  Give it
many servers.

Then point all your internal comps to your LEAF ntpd,
as the other fellow suggested.





I've checked the documentation on
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/documentation.html but can't seem to find out
where I can check (and decrease if necessary) the poll intervals.. does
anyone know where I should be looking



Not positive, but maxpoll:

http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/html/confopt.html




Go ahead and skim the Poll Interval Control section here:
 http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/html/ntpd.html
and then think twice about messing with it.  I can tell you
that, given an ntpd that's been running for a few days and a
CMOS battery that's not dead w/a decent crystal, you won't poll
too often.





Also: Is it possible to use ntpdate to update my routers time once (say in
the morning) and get ntpsimpl to look at the system (cmos) clock instead of
polling the servers listed in ntpsimpl config files... If so, can someone
point me in the right direction to achieving this I would be most
appreciative..



Again this is mostly speculation, but...

Commenting out the server directives in ntp.conf should prevent
ntpd from polling other servers.  I assume (but you know what they
say about that) ntpd uses the local system time when there are no
external servers to consult.  A line like:

  04 20   * * *   rootntpdate some.ntp.server  hwclock --systohc

in /etc/crontab will sync your system and hardware clocks with
some.ntp.server every morning at 4:20am.

--Brad




Yes you can make ntpdate run once at boot, and then start
ntpsimpl at some point down the road with a cron command.
When ntpsimpl starts, it will poll, that's how it's designed.

If you need help with cron, Brad is your man ;-)

You asked about getting ntpsimpl to look at the system clock.
The way you do that is by listing your CMOS clock's IP address
in the ntp.conf file.  Here's an example one from a Unix box
that could use a few more servers, but hey, it was handy:

broadcastclient no
server clock.isc.org
server clock.via.net
server 192.5.41.41
server 127.127.1.0
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 5
driftfile /etc/inet/ntp.drift
enable pll monitor stats
disable auth bclient
statistics loopstats peerstats



127.127.x.x.  That's the local time server.  Linux may use a
different last two octets than .1.0.  Don't know.  But regardless,
if you get that right, then notice the fudge statement:
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 5
That tells ntpd that the local clock is a stratum 5 time server,
and because the other servers are stratum 2 or 1 (promise ;-), ntpd
knows to trust the stratum 2's and 1's more than 5's and relies on
the external clocks.  The only time it uses the local CMOS clock
is when it can't reach the other servers.

But in your case, you could list all stratum 2 or 3 servers,
and fudge your local clock to stratum 1,or 2.  That would
certainly have an affect on what gets polled and relied upon.
Be sure to watch your logs.

Good Luck,
Matt



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Corrections to Creating a Firewall Using Dachstein

2003-02-06 Thread Mike Noyes
João,
Please submit documentation bug reports in our bug tracker on
SourceForge (Category: documentation). Thanks.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=13751atid=113751


On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 06:58, João Miguel Neves wrote:
 I was following the Creating a firewall using Dachstein document in
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/guide/install-dachstein/ds-contents.html and I 
found a couple of bugs. As I haven't found a e-mail address to send bugs to, I 
thought I should share it...
 
 Creating a Firewall Using Dachstein
 Version 0.1
 
 Modify your Firewall for a Static Internal IP Address
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/guide/install-dachstein/ds-intstatic.html
 
 Step 14 refers to eth1_BROADCAST and it should refer to INTERN_NET.
 
 Step 15 refers to eth1_BROADCAST and it should refer to INTERN_IP.

-- 
Mike Noyes mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/  http://sitedocs.sf.net/  http://ffl.sf.net/




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Bering, Diagnosing Weblet LRP status warnings

2003-02-06 Thread Brian Miller SMITH
Thanks, a bit out of my depth and unfortunately the log file got so big that 
it froze the firewall machine, hence cannot give you an exceprt of messages 
for 193.163.220.4 . I had to remove daemontl to stop the machine from 
freezing due to the log file getting bigger than the available space. Is 
there a way to save the log file to hdd and or have it stop logging when the 
space is low. I have configure bering to run (boot) from a hdd, but I think 
the whole firewall is running in ram (if Iam not mistaken)


Thank you



From: Eric Wolzak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Miller SMITH [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering, Diagnosing Weblet LRP status warnings
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:37:59 +0100

Hello Brian

the actuall number of packet logs is not that important.
for example edonky and programms like that make a lot connection
trys
Your summary shows that almost all connections came from
193.163.220.4  proxy-scanner.eris.dk

The intersting thing would be to see what kind of packages
the ones from or to this ip are.
 I have the following message

 Thu Feb 6 09:49:28 UTC 2003

 firewall Firewall Status: error

 You have 438 denied or rejected packets in your recent packet logs.

 See the messages in the log files for details
 Or check the hits sorted by port or by IP adress


 and when  I look at the log file this is what it has (excerpt)

 Feb 6 08:31:05 firewall kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=
 MAC=00:60:08:08:6d:f3:00:03:4b:ab:10:0e:08:00 SRC=144.134.250.37
 DST=203.217.17.249 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=120 ID=41523 DF 
PROTO=TCP
 SPT=1146 DPT=3511 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
token apart this means

at feb 6 08:31:05 the  Shorewall chain net2all DROP dropped a
package comeing from the eth0 interface (IN=eth0) and was mend
for the firewall (  OUT= )
(info on eth0 MAC=00:60:08:08:6d:f3:00:03:4b:ab:10:0e:08:00)
The source addres from this package was:  SRC=144.134.250.37
and the destination ( DST=203.217.17.249) which should have been
your external ip at that moment. The protocoll was TCP the src port
1146 and the destination port  3511
further Package information : length 48 Type of service 00
Timetolive 120The syn bit was set so it was a start of
communication
( LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=120 ID=41523 DF
PROTO=TCP
 SPT=1146 DPT=3511 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 )

You should read now some of the denyed or dropped packages from
the 193.163.220.4 host.  It might seem that you have outgoing
connections to this host that are blocked ( IN= resp OUT= ) and if the
ports are changeing  ( than it might be a scan) or that it is allways the
same port that tries to connect ( for example with a configuration
error) -

 hits port Service
 42 1080
 28 8080 webcache
 28 6552
 28 23 telnet


 sorted by ip address

 Hits IP-Adress Date
 406  193.163.220.4 Feb 6
 7  24.192.28.48 Feb 6
 6  202.129.102.26 Feb 6
 6  144.134.250.37 Feb 6
 4  192.168.1.254 Feb 6
 3  24.123.122.189 Feb 6
 3  203.59.187.164 Feb 6
 3  203.45.122.188 Feb 6

 what does it mean?? am i being attacked or is it something in shorwall 
that
 I have not configured properly?

good luck
Eric Wolzak
member of the bering crew


_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] GRUB and LRP problem

2003-02-06 Thread Spiro Philopoulos
I'm trying to use GRUB to boot off a FAT16 hard drive partition (100MB in size,
located in the first cylinders of the disk). I installed GRUB succesfully and
on bootup everything goes well until the system tries to load the initrd image
to ramdisk, at which point I get a kernel panic proceeded by some DOS data
jibberish. The odd thing is that the first time I tried it it worked, but later
on when I repartitioned my drive and started all over I get this problem, even
though I used the same partition scheme. One thing to note is that when I try
the install GRUB from floppy, it fails to find (the optional?) fat_stage1_5
even though it's located in /boot/grub/ on the FAT partition, because the file
name is cut-off after the eigth character (is there a way around this BTW?).
Has anybody used GRUB with a hard drive succesfully? Any help/info would be
greatly appreciated. 

BTW, thanks to Simon Blake for his GRUB mini-howto.


Procedure used for GRUB (in case it's useful for solving the problem):

- Partition the HD. 100MB FAT16 partition is first partition on the drive.
- Format the partitions.
- Install an MBR using 'fdisk /MBR' from DOS boot disk (GRUB wouldn't work
otherwise)
- Install GRUB stage binary images in /boot/grub/ on FAT partition,  edit
menu.lst.
- Install GRUB using the GRUB boot floppy:
   root (hd0,0)
   setup (hd0)
-- 


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc - ulogd: load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulog_*.so - File not found

2003-02-06 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 06 February 2003 05:41 am, Laurentiu Drob wrote:
 Lynn Avants wrote:
  It sounds as if your shared libraries are compiled for a path that are
  NOT where the libraries are actually stored at on the LEAF box. This is
  likely a compile time option.

 The error message says:
 ... ulogd.c:449 load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulogd_MYSQL.so -
 File not found
 and that's where all the plugins are: in /usr/lib/ulogd/. All
 plugins specified in ulogd.conf are loaded [BASE, LOGEMU,... those
 from ulogd-0.98/extensions directory], except MYSQL or PGSQL :( May be
 ulogd_MYSQL.so is not a shared library, although it looks like one :)
   Who knows ...

OK, the program is looking for the *SQL.so files in /usr/lib/ulogd.
The missing *SQL.so files are found by hand in the /usr/lib/ulogd
directory. Right?

That would leave the options of the permissions being non-accessable
by the program (wrong error I would think though) OR the program is
actually looking for those shared libraries elsewhere. (hard-coded in the
binary)  Third option, you think they're there but they're not (unlikely  ;-).

I can't attempt it myself, since I don't have a machine (yet) running uClibc,
but I think these are the feasible options for the error. I may be able to 
help more with a more verbatose logging of the error sequence and the
output of 'ls -al /usr/lib/ulogd/'.
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] bandwith management

2003-02-06 Thread Matt Schalit
I was wondering if you ever got any help with
this Ronny?  It seems like a common question.

Are you sure shorewall can't do it?  I mean if you
have some intersting static NAT going on or maybe
MAC based filtering and you make a special chain for
that, are you sure you can't throttle a chain?

I'm just shooting in the dark because I'm not familiar
with tc, but I was sort of surprised when I first read
your post to find throttling by IP *wasn't* possible.


Good Luck,
Matt




Ronny Aasen wrote:

greetings

is there any sensible way of setting a limit on bandwith per ip address
in bering

as i understand tc.lrp can set a bandwith, but since i usemasq it would
set one limit on the external interface.

I need 1 different limit per internal ip address

mvh
Ronny Aasen




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



Re: [leaf-user] bandwith management

2003-02-06 Thread Tom Eastep


Matt Schalit wrote:

I was wondering if you ever got any help with
this Ronny?  It seems like a common question.

Are you sure shorewall can't do it?  I mean if you
have some intersting static NAT going on or maybe
MAC based filtering and you make a special chain for
that, are you sure you can't throttle a chain?

I'm just shooting in the dark because I'm not familiar
with tc, but I was sort of surprised when I first read
your post to find throttling by IP *wasn't* possible.



It is certainly possible but to make it work, you should read and 
understand the Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control (LARTC) HOWTO 
(http://www.lartc.org) and the Shorewall Traffic Control documentation 
(http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_control.htm).

Ronny: If you get it working, please consider writing a HOWTO and 
contributing it to the Bering or Shorewall projects.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc - ulogd: load_plugins: /usr/lib/ulogd/ulog_*.so- File not found

2003-02-06 Thread Laurentiu Drob
Lynn Avants wrote:
 OK, the program is looking for the *SQL.so files in /usr/lib/ulogd.
 The missing *SQL.so files are found by hand in the /usr/lib/ulogd
 directory. Right?


Right.

...  OR the program is
 actually looking for those shared libraries elsewhere. (hard-coded 
in the
 binary)  Third option, you think they're there but they're not 
(unlikely  ;-).


*SQL.so and the other libraries are plugins and their location is
specified in ulogd.conf so I can put them in /usr/lib/ulogd or
elsewhere. It's a function in ulogd.c which load these plugins:

/* plugin loader to dlopen() a plugins */
static int load_plugin(char *file)
{
  if (!dlopen(file, RTLD_NOW)) {
   ulogd_log(ULOGD_ERROR, load_plugins: %s - %s\n, file, dlerror());
   return 1;
  }
  ulogd_log(ULOGD_ERROR, ** LOADED PLUGIN: %s - %s\n, file, dlerror());
  return 0;
}

 I can't attempt it myself, since I don't have a machine (yet) 
running uClibc,
 but I think these are the feasible options for the error. I may be 
able to
 help more with a more verbatose logging of the error sequence and the
 output of 'ls -al /usr/lib/ulogd/'.

[root@ ulogd-0.98.bering]# ls -al /usr/lib/ulogd/
total 296
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Feb  7 08:45 .
drwxr-xr-x  134 root root69632 Feb  6 15:12 ..
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root45576 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd_BASE.so
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root46090 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd_LOGEMU.so
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root44518 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd_MYSQL.so
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root33230 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd_OPRINT.so
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root42300 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd_PGSQL.so

---

[root@ ulogd-0.98.bering]# ls -al ulogd
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root65645 Feb  7 08:44 ulogd

---

[root@lwd ulogd-0.98.bering]# which gcc
/usr/i386-linux-uclibc/usr/bin/gcc
[root@lwd ulogd-0.98.bering]# which ldd
/usr/i386-linux-uclibc/usr/bin/ldd

---

[root@lwd ulogd-0.98.bering]# ldd ulogd
 libdl.so.0 = /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/lib/libdl.so.0
 libc.so.0 = /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/lib/libc.so.0
 /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 =
/usr/i386-linux-uclibc/lib/ld-uClibc.so.0

---

Compilation output:

[root@ ulogd-0.98.bering]# ./ulogd.mk
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-pgsql --with-mysql
creating cache ./config.cache
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for pcap.h... no
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes
checking for opendir in -ldir... no
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for working const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
checking for vprintf... yes
checking for socket... yes
checking for strerror... yes
checking for MySQL files... found mysql in /usr
checking for mysql_real_escape_string support... found new MySQL
checking for PGSQL files... found pgsql in /usr
updating cache ./config.cache
creating ./config.status
creating extensions/Makefile
creating doc/Makefile
creating conffile/Makefile
creating libipulog/Makefile
creating mysql/Makefile
creating pgsql/Makefile
creating pcap/Makefile
creating Makefile
creating Rules.make
touch configure-stamp
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering'
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering/conffile'
gcc -g -O2   -DULOGD_CONFIGFILE=\/etc/ulogd.conf\
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -c conffile.c -o conffile.o
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering/conffile'
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering/libipulog'
gcc -g -O2   -DULOGD_CONFIGFILE=\/etc/ulogd.conf\
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -Iinclude
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -c libipulog.c -o libipulog.o
ld -i libipulog.o -o libipulog.a
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering/libipulog'
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/ulogd-0.98.bering/extensions'
gcc -g -O2   -DULOGD_CONFIGFILE=\/etc/ulogd.conf\
-I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -I.. -I../libipulog/include
-I../conffile -fPIC -o ulogd_BASE_sh.o -c ulogd_BASE.c
ulogd_BASE.c:387: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
ulogd_BASE.c:388: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
ulogd_BASE.c:389: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
ulogd_BASE.c:390: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
ulogd_BASE.c:391: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
ulogd_BASE.c:392: warning: 

[leaf-user] Using a wireless router with LEAF (Dachstein, Bering)

2003-02-06 Thread Camille King
Could somebody explain to me how to setup wireless networking (Linksys
AP/Router/4-Port Switch) and Bering? Right now, my setup is a p200 connected
my Linksys using one of the Lan ports. Then, my desktop is connected to
another port.

Although I understand that I need to change the Linksys to Static IP (IP
192.168.1.240) that follows the documentation and I'm supposed to disable
DHCP, what sort of settings does the network card take? If I disable DHCP,
do I give the network card a static IP as well? 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

CK



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html