Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.1 and NAT-Traversal
> Alex: > Bering 1.1 kernel is patched with all the patches included here: > http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.1/development/kernel/ > and here: > http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.1/development/freeswan-1.99/ > > Apparently I did something wrong either applying the NAT > Traversal patches or > in my kernel config file. Any idea ? Jacques, I can't really say. Something you can check for is when you start ipsec without activating nat_traversal in ipsec.conf, the log file should read "nat traversal disabled" or something similar. I use Super FreeS/WAN which seems to work fine. It consists of FreeS/WAN with a set of patches that were tested together, including the algo patch. On my page, there is the compiled kernel and a description of the compilation process. So I recommend either - using my kernel, modules and ipsec.conf, although I'm not quite happy with the compilation of the ipsec user space stuff - compile a new kernel with Super FreeS/WAN, which is now in version 1.99.5.1. My description of the kernel compilation should make this easy. Cheers Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub <=> 3 Windows computers What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add an auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a remote computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be routed to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP that I can access from remote locations. Any thoughts... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
Lance Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: >Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub ><=> 3 >Windows computers >What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add >an >auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a >remote >computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be >routed >to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP that >I can >access from remote locations. Any thoughts... This should help: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bumodem.html Cu -- Lars Kneschke http://www.kneschke.de written with FeLaMiMail http://www.saunalahti.fi/sakarit/kerro-lisaa/bart.gif http://www.disinfopedia.org/ --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] iptraf and ncurses on Bering 1.0/1.1
Ales, As I now know, all this requires is the terminfo files to work. Take the standard "termcap" file from your main Linux system, and remove all the terminal definitions that you'll never use (and probably never heard of), leaving just the sections which define the terminals you need, and then copy the reduced file to /etc on Bering. Then copy the corresponding files in /usr/share/terminfo/ The default in Bering is "linux" which should go into /usr/share/terminfo/l/ Some applications apparently need to see them in /etc/terminfo/..., so just to be sure I've added a link to /usr/share/terminfo. Hope that helps, Adrian -Original Message- From: Ales Curk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 March 2003 20:39 To: Adrian Wooster Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] iptraf and ncurses on Bering 1.0/1.1 Helo! I have also tryed to install iptraf. I also installed sshd but when I try to run iptraf true ssh client from my bering 1.1 I recieved folowing warning Warning: unable to tag this process Press Enter to continue Error opening terminal: xterm. What is wrong? BTW: While I was working on my bering locally I receaved errors about opening terminal. Just like you. -- Ales :) On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Adrian Wooster wrote: > Has anyone had success in using iptraf.lrp and libncurs.lrp on Bering? > > When I've loaded as instructed, iptraf returns errors about opening terminal > linux which I assume means its having problems with ncurses. The recommended > ncurses package certainly appears to have loaded correctly. > > I seem to remember ntop.lrp has a similar issue at the console, but works > okay from the web interface. > > Can anyone help? > > Adrian > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
Hi! Be advised, this is from a UK perspective. Cons: 1) Cost of the call as you move further away from your "personal ISP" 2) I am under the impression that the low pass filter at your exchange is disabled for ISP dial-in lines, which enables the speeds about 33K. 3) If the system goes down, it's not going to come back up until you go home and fix it, meaning no remote access. Pros: 1) Very private access to your network with decent authentication. 2) Good if there are no 'free' ISPs available I guess. 3) No wait toll free support line! Just ask the questions in a mirror ;) James. > -Original Message- > From: Lance Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP? > > As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: > Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub <=> 3 > Windows computers > What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add an > auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a remote > computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be > routed > to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP that I > can > access from remote locations. Any thoughts... > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? > You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. > What are you waiting for? > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] new WISP-Dist build 2546
Unfortunately the hostap driver included in that release does not support 802.1x and therefore RADIUS. So we have to wait until hostap CVS stabilizes. However I'm also thinking about putting some kind of authentication scheme for use in our network, I'm not sure that I will go with RADIUS though. Marty Buchaus wrote: This has fixed the lock up's I was getting with Teletronics and the Teletronics High power 20db cards.. Goog Catch.. Does this current driver allow for radius mac authentication? if so is the patch or complile option included in this build? if not, This would be an excellent additional feature to your WIP compileation.. Great work by the way.. Vladimir Ivaschenko wrote: Hello All, A new WISP-Dist test build (2546) is available from http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads/. I did stress testing of Prism and Cisco cards on Soekris and Teletronics boards and found several stability issues in the drivers. The good news is it seems that I've been able to overcome them. Hostap driver is reverted to an old version used in 2.4.18-based WISP-Dist releases, as new one from CVS seems to be very unstable, at least in slow motherboards. Cisco driver was updated to the new version Cisco released a couple of days, and looks to be quite stable as well (the previous Cisco driver could end up with card being locked up and not able to send anything). Also trafshow utility is included. This is a quite useful utility to look at per-host traffic statistics, especially if your system is not powerful enough to run ntop. -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivaschenko Thunderworx - Systems Engineer (RHCE) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD?
Hi folks, I couldn't get my new Bering CD to boot. I remembered from an earlier post that one Bering user noted he had to modify his isolinux.cfg file to look like "default linux rw initrd=initrd.lrp ..." by including the rw value. What puzzles me is that Jacques' documentation doesn't mention this being necessary, and I personally have never had to include this parameter when I've made my Bering CD's in the past, and they've seemed to work fine until now. Comments??? Thank you. Craig --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] My weblet doesn't work :-(
Hi folks, I've made a new Bering CD, made it just like I've always done in the past...but when I open my browser and try to view the weblet (http://192.168.1.254/)... I get a Cannot find server message. Suggestions? Thank you. Craig --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
Hey Lance, Why not just VPN to the box behind Bering: If the box is running XP-Pro, enable remote desktop and surf away. If the box is either Windows 2000 Server or Advanced Server, enable Terminal Services on the box, Terminal Service into it, and then surf away? Best Regards, Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lance Dunn Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 1:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP? As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub <=> 3 Windows computers What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add an auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a remote computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be routed to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP that I can access from remote locations. Any thoughts... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
AW: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
Lance, > What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add an > auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a remote > computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer > be routed > to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP > that I can > access from remote locations. Any thoughts... For this setup, you need a ppp daemon (pppd) to pick up the incoming call and establish a ppp connection with your remote computer. There are a bunch of packages in http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/packages-list.html one of which might be good for you. The ppp daemon will likely add a new interface, and you'll have to set up Firewall rules (probably also NAT / Masquerading) on the LEAF box to get the Internet connection. In Switzerland, your setup would be more expensive than a direct Internet connection. We have to pay for all phone calls and the phone call to an ISP is cheaper than the one to a private modem. But with free local phone calls, your situation might be different. Regards Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
AW: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD?
> Betreff: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD? The rw parameter is not needed for the 2.4.18 kernel (Bering 1.0), but it is needed for newer kernels (2.4.20 of Bering 1.1), starting with 2.4.19 or 2.4.20. - Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD?
Alex, O.K., I'm confused. Why does it work without the rw parameter if you're using a floppy disk...but not a CD? Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Rhomberg Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 8:04 AM To: Craig Caughlin; LEAF Subject: AW: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD? > Betreff: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD? The rw parameter is not needed for the 2.4.18 kernel (Bering 1.0), but it is needed for newer kernels (2.4.20 of Bering 1.1), starting with 2.4.19 or 2.4.20. - Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] RE: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD?
Graig: The rw parameter is needed for post 2.4.18 kernel whatever the boot media is (floppy, cd-rom, disk...). If you do not put it your initial fs is mounted Read-only and therefore you cannot create directories needed at the initial stage of the boot process. By the way my documentation mention this: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bucdrom.html See end of paragraph 8.4 Jacques Alex, O.K., I'm confused. Why does it work without the rw parameter if you're using a floppy disk...but not a CD? Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Rhomberg Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 8:04 AM To: Craig Caughlin; LEAF Subject: AW: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD? > Betreff: [leaf-user] rw parameter necessary for bootable CD? The rw parameter is not needed for the 2.4.18 kernel (Bering 1.0), but it is needed for newer kernels (2.4.20 of Bering 1.1), starting with 2.4.19 or 2.4.20. - Alex --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo - SPECIAL ADSL L'ADSL à partir de 15,95 EUR/mois et le modem ADSL offert ? C'est en exclusivité chez Tiscali ! Pour profiter de cette offre, cliquez ici: http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise à conditions. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Shoreall 1.4.0 Released
This is a major release of Shorewall.
Function from 1.3 that has been omitted from this version includes:
1) The MERGE_HOSTS variable in shorewall.conf is no longer
supported. Shorewall 1.4 behavior is the same as 1.3 with
MERGE_HOSTS=Yes.
2) Interface names of the form : in
/etc/shorewall/interfaces now generate an error.
3) Shorewall 1.4 implements behavior consistent with
OLD_PING_HANDLING=No. OLD_PING_HANDLING=Yes will generate an error
at startup as will specification of the 'noping' or 'filterping'
interface options.
4) The 'routestopped' option in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces and
/etc/shorewall/hosts files is no longer supported and will generate
an error at startup if specified.
5) The Shorewall 1.2 syntax for DNAT and REDIRECT rules is no longer
accepted.
6) The ALLOWRELATED variable in shorewall.conf is no longer
supported. Shorewall 1.4 behavior is the same as 1.3 with
ALLOWRELATED=Yes.
7) The 'multi' interface option is no longer supported. Shorewall will
generate rules for sending packets back out the same interface
that they arrived on in two cases:
a) There is an _explicit_ policy for the source zone to the
destination zone. An explicit policy names both zones and does not
use the 'all' reserved word.
b) There are one or more rules for traffic for the source zone to
or from the destination zone including rules that use the 'all'
reserved word. Exception: If the source and the destination are
the same zone then the rule must be explicit - it must name the zone
in both the SOURCE and DESTINATION columns.
Changes for 1.4 include:
1) shorewall.conf has been completely reorganized into logical
sections.
2) LOG is now a valid action for a rule (/etc/shorewall/rules).
3) The firewall script and version file are now installed in
/usr/share/shorewall.
4. Late arriving DNS replies are now silently dropped in the common
chain by default.
5) In addition to behaving like OLD_PING_HANDLING=No, Shorewall 1.4 no
longer unconditionally accepts outbound ICMP packets. So if you want
to 'ping' from the firewall, you will need the appropriate rule or
policy.
6) CONTINUE is now a valid action for a rule (/etc/shorewall/rules).
7) 802.11b devices with names of the form wlan now support the
'maclist' option.
8) IMPORTANT: Shorewall now REQUIRES the iproute package ('ip'
utility).
9) Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN - RFC 3168) may now be turned
off on a host or network basis using the new /etc/shorewall/ecn
file. To use this facility:
a) You must be running kernel 2.4.20
b) You must have applied the patch in
http://www.shorewall/net/pub/shorewall/ecn/patch.
c) You must have iptables 1.2.7a installed.
10) The /etc/shorewall/params file is now processed first so that
variables may be used in the /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf file.
11) Packets with state INVALID are now silently dropped.
12) Shorewall now gives a more helpful diagnostic when the 'ipchains'
compatibility kernel module is loaded and a 'shorewall start'
command is issued.
13) The SHARED_DIR variable has been removed from shorewall.conf. This
variable was for use by package maintainers and was not documented
for general use.
14) Shorewall now ignores 'default' routes when detecting masq'd
networks.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net
Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] My weblet doesn't work :-(
Craig Caughlin wrote: Hi folks, I've made a new Bering CD, made it just like I've always done in the past...but when I open my browser and try to view the weblet (http://192.168.1.254/)... I get a Cannot find server message. Suggestions? Thank you. Craig more /var/log/syslog Look for any messages there about things being denied. tail /etc/inetd.conf Look for this line to be there and uncommented (no # sign prefixing it) www stream tcp nowait sh-httpd/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sh-httpd cat /etc/hosts.allow cat /etc/hosts.deny Try to see if you are allowing your local lan access to tcpwrapper enabled stuff started via inetd (I don't know if sh-httpd is). Matt --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 03:39 am, Lance Dunn wrote: > As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: > Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub <=> 3 > Windows computers > What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add an > auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a remote > computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be routed > to the INTERNET? This would save me having to pay for another ISP that I > can access from remote locations. Any thoughts... You don't want the modem to "auto-answer", but rather let the 'mgetty.lrp' package do all of that. The best documentation I've seen for doing this with LEAF exists here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/thc/dox/pppserv.txt -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net http://www.guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] tcpdump for Bear-Uclibc-1.1
Hi Larry, Does a .lrp for tcpdump exist for Bearing-Uclibc-1.1? I have looked but not found, but I might be blind. I could use one to look at some incoming packets. If not tcpdump something similar, need to look at data from an internal analog serial modem. I could use a Bering version if a Bering-Uclibc is not available, just not as easy. I would expect both version would be good to have available. Thanks in advance. no, we haven't been ignoring you - even if it might seem that way. Sorry it took so long to respond. No, there's currently no .lrp for tcpdump, and I've run into a few problems while trying to compile it for uClibc (I'm using the buildtool environment, and something isn't quite working yet). Be assured we're looking into it, and we should be able to provide you with a tcpdump package sooner or later (hopefully sooner). So, I guess I'm asking you for more patience - sorry about that. But I wanted to make sure that you didn't think nobody noticed or cared about your question. Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LEAF as an ISP?
Please consider that even V.90 modems will only give you 33,6 at most on both downlink and uplink. Sincerely, Sebastiano. > >As a user of Bering (and happily) I have a pretty simple setup: > >Internet <=> Cable Modem <=> Eth0 NIC <=> LEAF <=> Eth1 NIC <=> Hub > ><=> 3 > >Windows computers > >What I would like to do is complicate the issue. Is it possible to add > >an > >auto-answer modem (not a WinModem) to the LEAF computer and have a > >remote > >computer dial up the LEAF modem and then have the remote computer be > >routed > >to the INTERNET? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] tcpdump for Bear-Uclibc-1.1
Hi Martin, On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Martin Hejl wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:17:47 +0100 > From: Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Larry Platzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] tcpdump for Bear-Uclibc-1.1 > > Hi Larry, > > > Does a .lrp for tcpdump exist for Bearing-Uclibc-1.1? > > I have looked but not found, but I might be blind. > > I could use one to look at some incoming packets. > > If not tcpdump something similar, need to look at data from an internal > > analog serial modem. > > I could use a Bering version if a Bering-Uclibc is not available, just not > > as easy. I would expect both version would be good to have available. > > > > Thanks in advance. > no, we haven't been ignoring you - even if it might seem that way. Sorry > it took so long to respond. > > No, there's currently no .lrp for tcpdump, and I've run into a few > problems while trying to compile it for uClibc (I'm using the buildtool > environment, and something isn't quite working yet). Be assured we're > looking into it, and we should be able to provide you with a tcpdump > package sooner or later (hopefully sooner). > > So, I guess I'm asking you for more patience - sorry about that. But I > wanted to make sure that you didn't think nobody noticed or cared about > your question. > > Martin > I have patience, and hope other have too! Hope others do/will have patience with me! I want to document "active-filter in pppd" but have had trouble making it work right and hoped tcpdump would help! I had a private email telling me where to obtain a non tested static tcpdump, but have run into trouble. tcpdump running with multicasts only coming in the active-filter idle time out works! with multicast and pings and ping replies coming in active-filter never idle timeout occurs. ping = icmp: echo request ping reply = icmp: echo reply I have tried expressions on tcpdump to show only the ping and ping reply, and have had multicast only work. tcpdump -i ppp0 'icmp[0] = 8 or icmp[0] = 0 ' does show icmp: echo request and icmp: echo reply packets. tcpdump -i ppp0 'ether[0] & 1 != 0' This shows the multicast packets. tcpdump -i ppp0 'ether[0] & 1 != 0 or icmp[0] =8 or icmp[0] = 0 ' only shows the ping request and ping reply packets so what happened to the multicast packets? I need what ever expression used in tcpdump to see the multicast packets and ping request and reply to place on an active-filter statement! For mine own use I can ignore the "ping packets" but think it would be good to have in place and properly documented! Does anyone have good suggestions or need some information to help solve the problem. Thank You in Advance! Larry Platzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] tcpdump for Bear-Uclibc-1.1
Hi Larry,
I need what ever expression used in tcpdump to see the multicast packets
and ping request and reply to place on an active-filter statement!
For mine own use I can ignore the "ping packets" but think it would be
good to have in place and properly documented!
Does anyone have good suggestions or need some information to help solve
the problem.
I'm sorry - I can't help with that. I have no experience with actually
running tcpdump whatsoever (I've only used ethereal in the past, and
badly at that - the few times I needed it, it was easier to sort through
tons of unneeded/irrelevant info rather than spend the time going
through the docs to find out how to craft the expressions to only catch
the info one wants).
I hope somebody else can help you out with that - in the mean time, I
will surely do my best to provide a "native" (i.e. non-static) version
of tcpdump for Bering uClibc.
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do, but it surely sounds
interesting ("active filtering" surely sounds like a nice buzz-word to
put into some product specs ;-)).
Martin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] tcpdump for Bear-Uclibc-1.1
Hi, > tcpdump running > with multicasts only coming in the active-filter idle > time out works! > with multicast and pings and ping replies coming in active-filter >never idle timeout occurs. > ping = icmp: echo request > ping reply = icmp: echo reply > > I have tried expressions on tcpdump to show only the ping and ping > reply, and have had multicast only work. > > tcpdump -i ppp0 'icmp[0] = 8 or icmp[0] = 0 ' > does show icmp: echo request and icmp: echo reply packets. > > tcpdump -i ppp0 'ether[0] & 1 != 0' > This shows the multicast packets. > tcpdump -i ppp0 'ether[0] & 1 != 0 or icmp[0] =8 or icmp[0] = 0 ' > only shows the ping request and ping reply packets > so what happened to the multicast packets? > > I need what ever expression used in tcpdump to see the > multicast packets > and ping request and reply to place on an active-filter statement! http://www.tcpdump.org/#lists is probably the place you want to go. P --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Backup
If I modify index.htm in the /var/sh-www directory, which of the packages in the backup menu do I choose to make a backup? The weblet package? I'm using DCD 1.0.2. ~Doug --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] My weblet doesn't work :-(
Hi folks, That's odd. I tried all of Matts' suggestions, and everything seemed fine. When I use the weblet from an older version of Bering it works fine. Any comments? Is there any reason not to use the older version of weblet.lrp if it works? Thank you. Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Schalit Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:07 AM To: LEAF Subject: Re: [leaf-user] My weblet doesn't work :-( Craig Caughlin wrote: > Hi folks, > I've made a new Bering CD, made it just like I've always done in the > past...but when I open my browser and try to view the weblet > (http://192.168.1.254/)... I get a Cannot find server message. Suggestions? > > Thank you. > Craig more /var/log/syslog Look for any messages there about things being denied. tail /etc/inetd.conf Look for this line to be there and uncommented (no # sign prefixing it) www stream tcp nowait sh-httpd/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/sh-httpd cat /etc/hosts.allow cat /etc/hosts.deny Try to see if you are allowing your local lan access to tcpwrapper enabled stuff started via inetd (I don't know if sh-httpd is). Matt --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] OpenSSL for Bering uCLibc 1.1
Hi all, do somebody already compiled OpenSSL for the Bering uClibc Version?? If yes, can i get a copy of the lrp file. Thanks for your help Guillermo --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe
Hi all again! I am having trouble finding source code for the Bering kernel. I thought it would be in here: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel / But there doesn't seem to be a kernel in there at all let alone the source code. Is it available or does it need to be made up from the basic 2.4.20 kernel (available from Kernel.org?). Thanks again. David Pitts IT Services Manager Reid Library University of Western Australia Telephone: (08) 9380 3492 Fax: (08) 9380 1012 -Original Message- From: David Pitts Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 11:32 AM To: Lynn Avants Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe Thanks Lynn. I will check the conf file. The other things are all true. Ie I use 192.168.1.xxx and eth1. David Pitts IT Services Manager Reid Library University of Western Australia Telephone: (08) 9380 3492 Fax: (08) 9380 1012 -Original Message- From: Lynn Avants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 11:16 AM To: David Pitts Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe On Monday 17 March 2003 08:21 pm, David Pitts wrote: > Thanks Lynn. > > The uDHCP package did work better but still not quite right. The > client was fine, worked like a charm, first time. The server appears > to load but doesn't serve addresses. I don't remember if I said that > before, but it was doing the same thing before you modified it. I > just copied the package to my floppy and edited syslinux.cfg to add it > and remove pump and dhcpd. Is that the right process? Yes, that is the right order. I haven't had any problems with the server portion working with Bering-1.0. By chance, are you using "eth1" for an internal interface, the "192.168.1.0" network addressing for your LAN, and enabled "dhcp" for the "loc" section of Shorewall? If any changes are made from the default Bering settings that affect these things, you must also make the proper changes to /etc/udhcpd.conf for the program to work. Just a WAG since I haven't had any problems myself in testing. > On the other question (cuseeme) I have contacted a fella who has > developed a couple of patches which are available on patch-o-matic. > However, I don't have the resources to make any thing of that. He is > prepared to compile the things for me though if he can. Can you tell > me what flavour of Linux LEAF is based on? I believe its Debian from > memory? And can you tell me if the kernel 'newnat' support? Or maybe > Jaques can? Debian Slink for the userland stuff and Debain Woody for the kernel. Jacques has the necessary patches posted in his /devel directory. "newnat" is something I can't say I have ever heard of. > What do you know about patch-o-matic? Can it create modules or must > it patch the kernel? It patches the kernel source. > I'm sorry if this seems too much off the LEAF track but I would > appreciate any assistance. NP -- ~Lynn Avants Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net http://www.guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, David Pitts wrote: > Hi all again! I am having trouble finding source code for the Bering > kernel. I thought it would be in here: > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel > / > But there doesn't seem to be a kernel in there at all let alone the > source code. Is it available or does it need to be made up from the > basic 2.4.20 kernel (available from Kernel.org?). See http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bdev.html In particular, http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bdkernel.html#AEN43 The procedure is generally the same, regardless of the specific kernel or patch versions. --- Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go Live... DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] re: Leaf as an ISP
Thank you all for your help. I have been given lots to digest and try and I appreciate it all gratefully. A hasty implementation is precluded by my schedule, but I will get started ASAP and probably be bugging you again with setup problems. I hope you will bear with me... Again - thanks --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] smb.lrp smb-2.lrp, smb-2b.lrp
Greetings, What are the difference amony smb.lrp, smb-2.lrp and smb-2b.lrp ? Thx. newton __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
