[leaf-user] Shorewall 2.0.2a

2004-05-17 Thread Roger E McClurg




Tom,
 Is the Shorewall 2.0.2a.lrp package compatible with iptables version 1.2.8
found in Bering 1.2. If the answer is yes, is there anything I should look
out for in upgrading (aside from the upgrade issues on the Shorewall web
site)?

Best Regards,

Roger McClurg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.





---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: Shorewall 2.0.2a

2004-05-17 Thread Tom Eastep
Roger E McClurg wrote:
 Is the Shorewall 2.0.2a.lrp package compatible with iptables version 1.2.8
found in Bering 1.2.
I can't speak for the 1.2.8 iptables on Bering 1.2 but I'm running 
Shorewall 2.0.2 here on a Mandrake system with iptables 1.2.8.

If the answer is yes, is there anything I should look
out for in upgrading (aside from the upgrade issues on the Shorewall web
site)?
Not that I'm aware of.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Shorewall 2.0.2a LRP

2004-05-17 Thread rawdata
I seem to have encountered an anomaly whilst upgrading my Bering 1.2 box 
to the aforementioned version of Shorewall.  The new restore feature 
attempts to create a file in /var/lib/shorewall, which does not exist at 
boot time.  This causes Shorewall to abend.  The most concise solution I 
could muster at 3AM was to add the following to the beginning of 
/etc/init.d/shorewall (before EXECUTION BEGINS HERE): 

if [ ! -d /var/lib/shorewall ]; then
mkdir /var/lib/shorewall
fi

Is this enough to rate a 2.0.2b, Tom? 

:Christopher Harewood



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall 2.0.2a LRP

2004-05-17 Thread Tom Eastep
rawdata wrote:
I seem to have encountered an anomaly whilst upgrading my Bering 1.2 box 
to the aforementioned version of Shorewall.  The new restore feature 
attempts to create a file in /var/lib/shorewall, which does not exist at 
boot time.  This causes Shorewall to abend.  The most concise solution I 
could muster at 3AM was to add the following to the beginning of 
/etc/init.d/shorewall (before EXECUTION BEGINS HERE): 

if [ ! -d /var/lib/shorewall ]; then
mkdir /var/lib/shorewall
fi
Is this enough to rate a 2.0.2b, Tom? 

Note that var/lib/shorewall/ is in shorewall-2.0.2a.lrp but apparently 
that isn't sufficient to satisfy the archane .lrp package system.

In any event, I'm getting out of the .lrp business entirely. KP will be 
building the .lrp Shorewall packages effective shortly.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] USB Keyboard

2004-05-17 Thread Roger E McClurg




Has anyone managed to get a USB keyboard to work with a Bering 1.2 machine?
I can't seem to find the correct drivers.

Roger



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] invalid gzip magic

2004-05-17 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 13 May 2004 04:56 pm, Brock Nanson wrote:
[...]
 I've got a rather remote Bering box (1.2 I believe) that's gone bad on
 me.  The user tells me it starts the boot then gets to a point where it
 says:

 installing root: gunzip: invalid gzip magic

 As you'd expect, everything following fails because root hasn't been
 installed and the kernel eventually panics.

Sounds like it was compressed wrong with gzip on a different computer or
the package was backed up on a running system after running for a while. 
It's a stab in the dark, but both have happened to me in the past.
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] ExtremeWare OS - Linux Based

2004-05-17 Thread Lynn Avants
On Thursday 13 May 2004 09:51 am, Calvin Webster wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 23:06, Lynn Avants wrote:

 That's right. According to the ExtremeWare XOS Concepts Guide (at
 http://www.extremenetworks.com/services/documentation/swuserguides.asp),
 the software performs as a virtual router, allowing one physical switch
 to be split into several virtual routers. It runs on their Black
 Diamond 10K switches.

Which pretty much does *not* make it a switch at all.
I hate it when companies don't use the correct teminology.


   NW quotes Extreme as saying modifications were made in the Linux
   kernel to improve the packet forwarding capabilities of the software,
   as well as hardening its security
 
  Hmmm
 
   They also say that Extreme says that in accordance with the GPL, it
   will be pushing its changes to Linux back to the open-source
   community.
 
  That is always a plus. :)

 Yes, in more ways than one - The more widespread commercial Linux
 offerings there are, the more accepted related open source projects will
 be in the enterprise.

True, but the hardening likely has to do with the limiting of normal options
of the kernel itself due to compiling outside of a true patch like grsecurity
releases (that LEAF distro's use as well).


   I'm wondering what LEAF developers think about this?
 
  Sounds like they're attempting to take on Cisco.

 I've viewed Extreme Networks as a serious contender for some time now.
 I'm sure they are on Cisco's radar screen. Cisco is probably more
 worried about 3Com, though, since they have a more mature enterprise
 support structure and reputation.

They probably are on the radar screen. After Linksys started using Linux,
Cisco immediately bought them out. I doubt they are worried about 3com
as most of their units are running a scaled-down version of Cisco's IOS.


   The article also mentioned how pleased developers of the XORP project
   were. There was a previous article posted about that project too. Can
   someone tell me if/how XORP and LEAF are related? Do they share
   resources or benefit from one another's work?
 
  To my knowledge XORP and LEAF are not related in any way outside of
  using the linux kernel.

 Too bad, I'm reading about progress in both projects. Although their
 design goals differ significantly, both might benefit from some level of
 collaboration.

Possibly so, outside of LEAF being primarily developed by volunteers in their
free time. 
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] RE: USB Keyboard (Roger E McClurg)

2004-05-17 Thread Vic Berdin
Hi

 --__--__--

 Message: 5
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Roger E McClurg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 16:13:15 -0400
 Subject: [leaf-user] USB Keyboard

 Has anyone managed to get a USB keyboard to work with a Bering 1.2
machine?
 I can't seem to find the correct drivers.

 Roger

This response is not Bering-centric but it *should* work for Bering also.
Here's how my modules script loads my needed USB drivers:

---
usbcore
usb-ohci
input
hid
keybdev
---

Above modules were generated by following Kernel build options:

Input core support
  M Input core support -- generates input.o
  M Keyboard support   -- generates keybdev.o
  M Mouse support  -- generates mousedev.o

(mousedev.o for USB mice also works if you need it)

USB Support
  M Support for USB-- generates usbcore.o
  M OHCI ( -- generates usb-ohci.o (HW specific, yours may
require UHCI)
  M Human Interface device...  -- generates hid.o


Other info/findings:


I experience repetitive instances of keyed-in characters if I compile all of
the
above modules into my Kernel. Thus, I had to make do with a script-based
insmodding
of USB modules upon startup (LEAF-influence).

HTH  best regards,

Vic

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.672 / Virus Database: 434 - Release Date: 4/28/2004



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562alloc_id=6184op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html