Re: [leaf-user] D Link 520+
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 22:46, wing newton wrote: How about the latest version of DWL 650 ? Is there an AP driver for the latest 650 which is no longer using the Intersil chipset ? Thanks. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. From what I've heard, the newest revisions of the DWL-650 don't use the Intersil chipset, I could be wrong, best call Dlink about it. The linux-wlan-ng page has a pretty good summary of what cards are Intersil Prism based: http://www.linux-wlan.com/linux-wlan/ Good luck. Z --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] D Link 520+
Sorry, but the DWL-520+ (or any dlink + card) uses an unsupported Ti chipset. You're out of luck, best go pick up a prism 2/3 based card. Z On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Robert Chambers wrote: Which driver is used for the D Link 520+ Thank you Robert Chambers --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Anyone tried USR2415 card in Dachstein?
Lee- I briefly had one working in WISP-DIST using the hostap_plx driver, BUT you need to upgrade the firmware on the card for all the goodies to work. I purchased the combo pack from TigerDirect for $80 which includes two PCI/Wifi cards (USR 2415 and 2445). They seem to be an Intersil 2.5 reference implementation and could probably be flashed with any Intersil firmware. The one strange thing is that the 2415 is a 5v part whereas the 2445 is a 3.3v part. Dunno why USR did this... Mine were shipped with firmware 0.7 or 0.8, USR has an upgrade to 1.03 availible. You, of course, need winblows to flash the card. Good luck. Z On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 10:41, Lee Kimber wrote: Hi, Wondered if anyone has tried the US Robotics 2415 combined PCI adapter and 802.11b PC Card in a Dachstein box? A post on Seattlewireless says this Prism 2.5 chipset card works with the deprecated wvlan_cs driver so I'm wondering if this will work on Dachstein, where there only seems to be a wavelan.o module. See: http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/diskimages/dachstein-CD/CD-Contents/lib/mo dules/net/ Manufacturer's page is: http://www.usrobotics.com/products/networking/wireless-product.asp?sku=USR2415 I'm seeing a $76 price on it - prior to $30 mail in rebate - at: http://www.ecost.com/ecost/shop/detail.asp?dpno=975350 Thanks! Lee --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] WISP-DIST hostap_plx issues
Hello all- I am having a strange issue with my Prism 2.5 card (USR 2445)... Unfortunately my WISP box is sufficiently fubar'ed that it really didn't provide much good diagnostic information, so I threw it into my RH7.3 box and got the following: hermes.c: 16 Jan 2002 David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] orinoco.c 0.09b (David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others) orinoco_plx.c 0.09b (Daniel Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]) orinoco_plx: CIS: 5201:CA03:5600:F800:85FF:C817:2A04:8A67:7C5A:CE08:7EFF:801D:A505:C603:E567:C85A: orinoco_plx: Local Interrupt already enabled Detected Orinoco/Prism2 PLX device at 00:0d.0 irq:9, io addr:0xf080 eth1: Station identity 001f:0009:0001:0004 eth1: Looks like an Intersil firmware version 1.04 eth1: Ad-hoc demo mode supported eth1: IEEE standard IBSS ad-hoc mode supported eth1: WEP supported, 104-bit key eth1: MAC address 00:90:D1:06:19:A7 eth1: Station name Prism I eth1: ready eth1: Channel out of range (0)! eth1: Channel out of range (0)! hermes @ 0xf080: Timeout waiting for card to reset (reg=0x8000)! eth1: orinoco_reset failed in orinoco_plx_open()3eth0: Bus master arbitration failure, status 88f3. I've been on hold all night with USR about the problem, but of course as soon as I said linux, I was off their diagnostic chart and they refused to help until I had installed Windows (like that'll happen). I'm going to take the card to work and try it in one of our Windows 2000 laptops, but I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions as to what the problem might be... Thanks, Zack --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: IDE install with linux?
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:57, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: 2) If you are running from a windows 95/98 startup disk, you have to run 'lock' to allow low-level access to the hard drive. If you do not do this, syslinux will be unable to install the boot loader on the hard disk, and you will be unable to boot. You can skip this step if you are running a 'real' version of dos instead of a windows startup disk. I knew that was the case when running windows (perhaps also the reason why the win98 fdisk that I copied on to a win98 boot floppy refused to /MBR the hdd), but the original problem was why the linux version of syslinux when installed on the hdd wouldn't boot it... I don't run windows anymore (switched my desktop to Redhat, Gnome and evolution about a year ago) so breaking my Windowsless streak sucked ;) Z --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] IDE install with linux?
Hello all- I am having a rather baffling problem with installing WISP/Bearing on to a 1.0G IDE harddrive. The funny thing is, I can get the drive to work if I partition it and format it in Windows, but I can't get it to work if I do the same in linux. Here's what I am doing in linux: 1)fdisk /dev/hda 2)add 50MB FAT16 (type 6) partition as /dev/hda1 3)toggle bootable flag to true on /dev/hda1 4)use mkdosfs to create a FAT16 file system on the /dev/hda1 5)syslinux /dev/hda1 (using v1.52, also tried the -s option to no avail) 6)mount partition to /wisp (mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /wisp) 7)unzip wisp-dist_2290_pkg_wdist.zip to /wisp 8)edit /wisp/syslinux.cfg 9)install disk in router box and boot it, but it never finds the MBR that syslinux should have installed (right?)... It just sits there saying Invalid media or replace system disk (or whatever that error says). The destination box is a Dell XPS P200s with 32MB, and I've installed full distros on this box (and drive) before without any issues. I know that I must be missing something totally obvious, but I can't figure it out. At this point it's purely academic, as I can get it to work when installed under windows, but being that I don't run windows any more (had to take over a coworkers box to do it) it's a matter of pride that I can get it to work under Linux ;) Thanks, Zack --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [Leaf-user] motherboard with no vid card
www.soekris.com Z DC On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 12:41, Bernie Berg wrote: howdy... I'd like to make a minimalistic network appliance looking bearing firewall box... Is there a motherboard out there that will boot without a video card? since after the load all that would be needed is a network or serial connection... thanks for the info bernie ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein, Bearing, and DHCP
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 15:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, Last week I tried Bearing. It worked fine for about a day, then (when the previous lease expired?) my windows98 machine was assigned a local network address in the 169.-.-. range. The standard Bearing release evidently does not support DHCP for the local network. I forgot to go back and reconfigure the win machine not to use DHCP. Evidently, if windows is configured for DHCP and does not find a DHCP server, it auto assigns IP addresses. Just another of those 'special' features that is not well documented and causes confusion. Actually, that 169.x.x.x address is part of the DHCP RFC. So it's not windows being stupid again, it's just doing what it should. Thanks in advance, Frank Kamp DHCP is nice because you can update your DNS cache servers or whatever and not have to go and log into 5 different machines to change the settings. Makes it easy when a friend comes over and wants to plug in their laptop. Z signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Leaf-user] DAC960.o module needed
Howdy all- I need the module for a DAC960 SCSI RAID card (Mylex Acceleraid 250) for kernel 2.2.16 (I'm running lrp2.9.8). Does anyone have this module that they can send me? Or know of anyplace that I can download it? I don't have a 2.2.16 box around to compile on and I need this for my LRP disaster recovery disk. Thanks again, Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] George Metz' 2.4.3 image
Howdy all- I recently started toying with the idea of deploying a LEAF based firewall/VPN in our colo after I saw Exodus wants $4000/mo. for a managed Cisco Pix. I figure LEAF probably can save me some of that $48,000. So my questions revolve around the possibilities of using 2.4.3+ kernels in production and how exactly I get custom built kernels to boot. I would like to use a 2.4 kernel because I want the functionality of iptables, especially one-to-one NAT (what's that, static NAT?) for my production environment. I have an LRP 2.9.8 router (2.2.18) here at the corporate office, but it took me some while to get port forwarding working to my satisfaction (actually it was screwing around with BIND for an internal DNS, but then Jacques Nilo came out with the wonderful Tinydns package, hats off to you). So knowing that 2.4 kernels are definitely experimental, I grabbed George Metz' 2.4.3 distribution of his site and booted it up. It booted up fine (though I had issues with the newest syslinux, had to use 1.54 instead of 1.62), but it doesn't include IDE support (unless I totally missed something), so I can't mount and configure my HDD to boot off of... I didn't see any modules that looked like they provided IDE support and I thought that IDE was not a modularizable feature to begin with. Do I have this wrong? In hopes that I could do better myself, I compiled a 2.4.5 kernel off my Redhat 7.1 box and made it as a bzipped image... I replaced the 2.4.3 kernel with the new one and I get as far as Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel when it stalls. The kernel I built with initrd support and ramdisk support in hopes of using it with LEAF... What I don't know is if I compressed right (should I have included UPX support?). I read through the LEAF-devel guide, but this 2.4.3 distro looked to be using gcc 2.95? So I figured that I should be able to kernel compile on my RH7.1 box. Somebody please straighten me out! Thanks again... Zack ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
