[leaf-user] Article on absolving network firewall
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/09/1758205tid=172tid=230tid=218 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
[leaf-user] Is this Hardware more effective than LEAF?
Hello, I came across this PCI Firewall card: http://www.netmaster.com/products/ggblade.shtml Does this card have any major technical advantages over LEAF? (I know LEAF has the advantage of affordability, but from a layman's standpoint, I'm just curious what are the advantages such a device has over LEAF.) _ http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc Weblet
I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why I get an error (red light) when I access weblet. I cannot find any good documentation for weblet. Is there another tool I can use other than weblet to monitor my firewall? _ MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Is the list still alive ?
Everyone is too busy port-forwarding their Bit Torrents :) _ Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn Premium. Get 2months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardware router?
A few days ago I posted: I was just wondering, what is the difference between having a LEAF box and just going out and buying a hardware router for fifty bucks. I have since received many valuable replies. I did receive one reply from a gentleman that I would like to post here for the LEAF archives: From : George Metz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent : February 28, 2004 10:11:41 AM To : joah moat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject : Re: [leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardwarerouter? It really does depend on what you're doing with the home network. Here's a couple of examples that preclude a (safe) Router-in-a-box setup from working well: 1. You want to run a small website for stories, artwork, family photos, etc. Port forwarding and virtual DMZ settings will still leave your entire network open to compromise if the server the website runs on is compromised. 2. You need to connect to a VPN from home for work reasons. Several of the router-in-a-box solutions do NOT play well with some VPN setups; most notably, I've seen numerous issues with Linksys routers and Nortel Contivity VPN switches using IPSec for connections. 3. Online games become more difficult, or sometimes impossible. For example, I have a Microsoft MN-500 that I got because my LEAF disk went dead in a move, and I was too busy to set one up. Both my wife and I play Asheron's Call, which is a game similar to Everquest. (One, I might add, that was published by Microsoft.) I ended up having to set up a new LEAF box just so the two of us could be logged into the game at the same time; apparently, it couldn't handle WEP encryption, DHCP (server and client), firewalling, AND actually allow for multiple UDP ports to be sent on a port-activation trigger. In fact, it actually managed to confuse which machine should receive which data, which indicates problems with basic NAT functionality, as well. After messing with Asheron's Call port configurations for a couple of weeks, I gave up, swapped in a LEAF box, and reset the port settings to default on both computers, and it worked flawlessly even with blocking all traffic of any kind. 4. You want something more than the dummy interface on the router, or you're slightly more paranoid than the average bear. I personally get a pretty big kick out of checking my logs every once in a while to see what bounced, then running down who owns them and trying to figure out if it's an idiot or a compromised box or what. Routers-in-a-box like the ones you're talking about are just barely adequate for home users with more than one computer and no idea of what they're doing. If you're a hobbyist, or are even just more aware than many of how easy it can be to compromise a system, LEAF blows away any combination of hardware router and software firewall I can think of, and it gives you far more options for packages, as well. George Metz _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE:[leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardware router?
I appreciate all the input I've received for this thread. I have had a chance to put things into my own perspective. I believe the greatest advantage LEAF has over a generic routers IS awareness. In principle, most of us would prefer to have a relative awareness of our surrounding: be it at home, at work, or driving our automobiles or even using public transportation. Granted at times its fun to sit oblivious at the back of the bus, but for the most part, we do better when we have an understanding of our world around us. Having a good firewall/router is only as good as you make it. LEAF provides a means to cultivate an understanding (well, this is the foundation of Linux really). Not knowing what's in the box is just another blind spot for someone to hijack you. Of course, in the end it's all conserved, so having a good faith is always good. I am grateful to this community and am proud of having an appliance firewall. All have a good week end. _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/featurespgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardwarerouter?
So, for home networking, ultimately someone is better off with a commercial hardware router by virtue of efficient power consumption and firmware updates. Ah well, it then must be a labour of love. From: Cokey de Percin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LEAF [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardwarerouter? Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:00:17 -0500 On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 23:11, joah moat wrote: I was just wondering, what is the difference between having a LEAF box and just going out and buying a hardware router for fifty bucks. _ Don't disagree with anything said previously, but there is at least one of these cheap hardware routers that is somewhat more flexable and you can get your hands on the source. The Linksys WRT54G (yea I know it's not $50, it's $85 and it's has 4 hardware ports + wireless) is Linux based and there is a site that is supplying a custom Linux image with IPSEC an more for it. The source for all of it is available. I have no idea what the through put is, but it does have _some_ of the flexablilty of LEAF and you can see what's in there. Check out http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/38267 Cokey -- -- F. 'Cokey' de Percin, DBA Email: CSC Work - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Columbia, South Carolina Home - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] What's the difference between LEAF and hardware router?
I was just wondering, what is the difference between having a LEAF box and just going out and buying a hardware router for fifty bucks. _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photospgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Leaf on Notebook
Hello, for your viewing pleasure I am providing you with a picture of my new Bering-uClibc2.1rc2 router on notebook: www.divinepainting.com You know though that having modified the RCDLINKS in my /etc/init.d/pcmcia (and /pcmcia_eth) I still had to include a sleep=30 command to get it to function properly. But yeah, I'm happy now, after six weeks of scraping things together I have succeeded. Hooray!! _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] How can I test my PCMCIA eth1?
I am too old to surrender now ... :) Well, let's see. I will be more specific with my configuration. I have a D-link 670 PCMCIA card with an extended bot (for plugin) on the top PCMCIA port. I have a 3com 589 PCMCIA card with a doggle (for plugin) on the bottom PCMCIA port. I have placed module 3c589_cs.o and this is required for the 3com card. The D-Link 670 card requires pcnet_cs.o module. This module is dependant upon crc32.o which is dependant upon 8390.o (the last two modules I have set for the kernel to load) and the pcnet_cs.o and 3c589_cs.o module I have set for the PCMCIA package to load. lsmod returns: Module Size Used by Not tainted 3c589_cs 8584 1 ds 6772 2 [3c589_cs] i82365 27184 2 pcmcia_core 41248 0 [3c589_cs ds i82365] softdog1508 1 ip_nat_irc 2128 0 (unused) ip_nat_ftp 2736 0 (unused) ip_conntrack_irc2864 1 ip_conntrack_ftp3472 1 83905784 0 (unused) crc322648 0 [8390] The 3com card always tries to init as eth0 (no matter if I have it connected to my network or connected to my cable modem). If I remove the 3com card and leave the D-link card in and connect the D-link card to the cable modem, then reboot: The D-link lights up with a dhcpcd connection and the led lights up. I have tried to obtain dhcpd server from the d-link card (as eth1). (ps returns that dhcpd -q is running.) I have tried connecting with windows XP and windows 98 and my ibook but to no avail. I never was much good at riddles. But I won't give up, I realise by virtue that all is conserved by principle of equilibrium. This requires matter, time, and even perception and human endeavours to share an equal gravity within our physical U. (GI:GO) It is only for the human conception of Energy that we remain skulking feverishly in the darkness. From: Henning Jebsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] How can I test my PCMCIA eth1? Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:01:35 +0100 joah moat wrote: What are some tests that I can conduct to determine the functionality of my Bering-uClibc2.1 PCMCIA eth1 (d-link 670)??? There are two led on my eth1, none of them light up. My eth0 led lights up green (and posts an dhcpdc IP fine). I can connect the card to windows networking using the existing Win95 on HD and the led lights up. If no LED lights after booting, you are lost so far. Did you try to ping that card ? I think a PING will certainly fail too. You dont need to go further unless the LEDs stay dark. You said, that the card is running (lighting) using Windows. To me it seems, you need another driver for that card. You *need* to make the LEDs light up. Did you try to restart all neccesary services by hand after booting ? svi pcmcia restart svi networking restart svi others ? restart and don't forget to look at syslog/messages ;-) Do you have another card to try with ? One of my both cards lights up, when the notebook is turned on, the other lights up, after pcmcia is started. The one needs software to be activated, the other needs only the computer turned on. Dont give up ;-) --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Almost there ...
Yeah, I know what you mean about people pleading for help then ignoring the help they receive. This should be a cardinal sin, but well, let me tell you alittle about the principle of Buddha (yeah I've factored him down too): Now here is a holy figure that indulges in many vices, we give him money in a pot, he has a pot belly and he's bald. How is it that this can be a suitable idol for worship I wondered, when I began one day thinking about the prohibition. Here we have a time in western history that practiced the abolition of alcohol: by virtue that alcohol was an evil to man and was unsuitable for his society. So a curfew was imposed and as surely as a leak in a dam will eventually erupt, so too did the prohibition finally desist for virtue of tolerance and better judgement. And so, this Buddha fellow is a testament to the principle that man should ultimately be given the experience of something before he decides if it is right or wrong. Even the smallest of weights across a (proportional) expanse of space can counterbalance the mightiest of Titans. --me(As long as you have your proportions right, you're laughing ...) But yeah, maybe your suggestion stayed with my subconscious mind for I finally decided to change cables and b-i-n-g-o: I was given the green light. But if you pardon my address: there was a more pressing matter that required my attention: that of the init sequencing in conjunction with mounting the PCMCIA services. There is a flaw here, for the init process does not allow for the PCMCIA latency. I believe this init/PCMCIA problem should be addressed in Bering-uClibc. From: Ray Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Almost there ... Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:29:05 -0800 At 03:00 AM 2/22/2004 +, joah moat wrote: Okay, I have made some more progress with my Bering-uClibc2.1rc2 on notebook: I made an error in my report this morning: lsmod does return the use of pcnet_cs.o module. (Darn, go figure I should prompt lsmod when the pcmcia services are still initializing.) But yeah, all the modules are there, and furthermore: ping 192.168.1.254 returns an average of .1 ms (so hooray I am getting a ping to my eth1). Futhermore, I was not connecting my cat-5 to a hub, I was connecting it directly to my PC network card, hence it was male to male (yuck). I decided to use a cross-over cable and lo and behold, there appeared a bright green led on my eth1. You know, I looked back over the threads involving your connection. I note that in your FIRST message, you said: My windows box cannot auto detect ip address from LEAF router, green light on my (PCMCIA) eth1 is off. The FIRST sentence of my response to this was: This sounds like it could be a hardware problem ... with the NIC, the cable to it, or the hub or switch it connects to. I find it discouraging when people ask for help, then ignore the help they get. But maybe I'm just in a bad mood tonight. But still, using this cross-over cable connection, I am still not able to ping from PC to router. Okay, now I guess I need to provide you with some info. But before I continue, is it possible to establish a connection with a cross-over cable, or do I require a network hub? (my-oh-my the intricacies.) In principle it is possible to establish a connection with a crossover cable; I've done it often (though never with the specific NIC you have). But one problem I have seen some NICs run into is determining the speed of the connection (100 Mbps vs 10 Mbps). NICs connected to hubs and switches handle this fine, but when the connection is NIC to NIC, sometimes they cannot manage to agree on a speed. The dmesg output you quoted at the end of your report, namely ... eth1: NE2000 (DL10022 rev 30): io 0x300, irq 5, hw_addr 00:05:5D:37:7F:65 eth1: found link beat eth1: link partner did not autonegotiate eth1: lost link beat :( eth1: found link beat :) eth1: link partner did not autonegotiate eth1: lost link beat :( ... suggests to me that you are having this problem. The *usual* symptom of this problem is that both ends falls back to 10 Mbps, not that they fail to communicate at all. But since I'm not familiar with the D-Link NIC on the LEAF end, and you haven't said what NIC is at the far end, I suppose you might be seeing a different symptom. So even if you hope eventually to do a direct connection between the two hosts, I would suggest borrow a hub (or buy one; at least in the US, small ones are dirt cheap) and use it when testing. If using a hub deals with the problem then it is a hardware limitation of one or the other of the NICs. Not really a problem for a Linux list, but if you now tell us the NIC at the other end, I suppose someone might have a bright idea. FOr example, the order in which you do things (boot the two machines and actually connect the NICs) might matter to the outcome. [details deleted
[leaf-user] How can I test my PCMCIA eth1?
What are some tests that I can conduct to determine the functionality of my Bering-uClibc2.1 PCMCIA eth1 (d-link 670)??? the ps command returns that 9060 root 372 S /usr/sbin/dhcpd -q eth1 ip addr returns: 4: eth1: BROADCAST, MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether oo==00:05:5d:37:7f:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1 dmesg returns: eth1: NE2000 (DL10022 rev 30): io 0x320, irq 5, hw_addr 00:05:5D:37:7F:65 My cable is good (cat 5), the network card on my PC box is good. There are two led on my eth1, none of them light up. My eth0 led lights up green (and posts an dhcpdc IP fine). I can connect the card to windows networking using the existing Win95 on HD and the led lights up. I just don't know what else to do to do. I am entertaining the possiblity of making my HD accessible for linux tools (through Bering-uClibc2.1). _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: LEAF on Notebook help
Ecxept that joe moat is still not up and running :( From: Henning Jebsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christian HOSTELET [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Re: LEAF on Notebook help Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:49:36 +0100 Christian HOSTELET wrote: The package pcmcia.lrp should be modified to contain two scripts in /etc/init.d The first script (/etc/init.d/pcmcia) is the standard one but with the RCDLINKS line changed to: RCDLINKS=S,S38 2,S13 3,S13 4,S13 5,S13 6,K87 GREAT ! Wonderful ! Let me hug you ;-). This change brought my notebook UP and RUNNING without any errors ! Shouldn't this be corrected in the package ? (Joe Moat also had the same problems with pcmcia like me) I'm so happy :-) Greetings ! --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Is Freesco better than LEAF?
Well, I confess, I downloaded Freesco last night. I just can't seem to get LEAF up and running on my notebook. Dhcp client is working fine (get an IP from my ISP) but my home network can't get an IP from Dhcp server. I originally downloaded Bering-uClib2.1 because it was current and still in development (with kernel 2.4). I had set up a Freesco box for a client three years ago and noticed then that support was lagging, hence I thought it would be a dead platform by now. I was very surprised last night to see the abundance of support, it was like exiting from a cemetary to turn around and see it again full of life, sparkling wine, bells, porn stars ... well, you get the picture. So, is Freesco better than LEAF? What are the advantages of LEAF over Freesco? Well, I'm not going to give up on LEAF just yet. I want to get LEAF running on my notebook, this has become my problem now, that of my stuborn pride. Hell, even if I have to wait until next month and hijack my LUG (and overhead), I want to resolve this. But, I will still wonder, which is better, LEAF of Freesco. Perhaps this is comparisson is trivial, like which vacation spot is better? All relative by degrees of conservation. Anyhow, back to my research. _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/viruspgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] head down, though feeling smug ...
I just noticed that there are 2 (very similar) packages: dhcpcd.lrp and dhcpd.lrp on disk. This is my lrpkg.cfg: root,config,etc,local,modules,iptables,dhcpcd,pcmcia,pcmutils,shorwall,ulogd,dnscache,dropbear,weblet I guess I should maybe fit dhcpd somewhere in that line? doh! (Now to investigate the differences of dhcpd and dhcpcd. _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Here be my interfaces file and daemon.log
Hello again, okay, here is my /etc/network/interfaces: # /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for LEAF network # # Loopback interface. auto lo iface lo inet loopback # Step 1: configure external interface # uncomment/adjust one of the following 4 options # Option 1.1 (default): eth0 / dynamic IP from pump/dhclient auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp # # Option 1.2: eth0 / Fixed IP (assumed to be 1.2.3.4). # (broadcast/gateway optional) #auto eth0 #iface eth0 inet static # address 1.2.3.4 # netmask 255.255.255.0 # broadcast 1.2.3.255 # gateway 1.2.3.1 # # Option 1.3: PPP/PPPOE (modem connected to eth0) #auto ppp0 #iface ppp0 inet ppp # pre-up ip link set eth0 up # provider dsl-provider eth0 # # Option 1.4: PPP modem #auto ppp0 #iface ppp0 inet ppp # provider provider # Step 2: configure internal interface # Default: eth1 / fixed IP = 192.168.1.254 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 # Step 3 (optional): configure DMZ # Default: eth2 / fixed IP = 192.168.1.100 #auto eth2 #iface eth2 inet static # address 192.168.1.100 # netmask 255.255.255.0 # broadcast 192.168.1.255 # Step 4 (optional): configure a bridge #auto br0 #iface br0 inet static # address 192.168.1.254 # netmask 255.255.255.0 # broadcast 192.168.1.255 # bridge_ports all # Step 5 (optional): configure ipv6 #iface eth1 inet6 static # address fec0:2::1 # netmask 64 # Step 6 (optional): configure v4tunnel #auto tun6to4 #iface tun6to4 inet6 v4tunnel # address 3ffe:8280:0:2001::2 # netmask 64 # gateway 3ffe:8280:0:2001::1 # endpoint 202.143.23.6 # ttl 254 here is my daemon.log: (note the dhcp errors) sigh Feb 18 17:29:45 firewall cardmgr[28088]: watching 2 sockets Feb 18 17:29:45 firewall cardmgr[25566]: socket 0: 3Com 589 Ethernet Feb 18 17:29:45 firewall cardmgr[25566]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o 21' Feb 18 17:29:45 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o Feb 18 17:29:46 firewall cardmgr[25566]: executing: './network start eth0 21' Feb 18 17:29:46 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Sample private network setup Feb 18 17:29:46 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Sample private network setup Feb 18 17:29:46 firewall init: Entering runlevel: 2 Feb 18 17:29:47 firewall dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth1 (0.0.0.0). Feb 18 17:29:47 firewall dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in your dhcpd.conf file for the Feb 18 17:29:47 firewall dhcpd: network segment to which interface eth1 is attached. Feb 18 17:29:47 firewall dhcpd: exiting. Feb 18 17:29:49 firewall inetd[30296]: Online and ready (2 sockets) Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + dhcpcd: MAC address = 00:60:08:8c:68:64 Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + dhcpcd: your IP address = 68.148.245.3 Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + dhcpcd.exe: interface eth0 has been configured with new IP=68.148.245.3 Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: socket 1: D-Link DFE-670-TXD Fast Ethernet Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o 21' Feb 18 17:29:54 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o Feb 18 17:29:55 firewall cardmgr[25566]: executing: './network start eth1 21' Feb 18 17:29:55 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Sample private network setup Feb 18 17:29:55 firewall cardmgr[25566]: + Sample private network setup Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Internet Software Consortium DHCP Server 2.0pl5 Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 The Internet Software Consortium. Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: All rights reserved. Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Please contribute if you find this software useful. Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/dhcp-contrib.html Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Listening on LPF/eth1/00:05:5d:37:7f:65/192.168.1.0 Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Sending on LPF/eth1/00:05:5d:37:7f:65/192.168.1.0 Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth0 (68.148.245.3). Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in your dhcpd.conf file for the Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: network segment to which interface eth0 is attached. Feb 18 17:30:43 firewall dhcpd: exiting. Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: Internet Software Consortium DHCP Server 2.0pl5 Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 The Internet Software Consortium. Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: All rights reserved. Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: Please contribute if you find this software useful. Feb 18 17:32:31 firewall dhcpd: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/dhcp-contrib.html Feb 18
[leaf-user] LEAF on Nootbook part x.
Okay, where and how can I place dhcpd in /etc/init.d/? I'm running Bering-uClibc2.1rc1 (should I be)? Here is the run down on my system: Address.txt: 1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo 2: dummy0: BROADCAST,NOARP mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,NOTRAILERS,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:60:08:8c:68:64 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 68.148.245.3/23 brd 68.148.245.255 scope global eth0 4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:05:5d:37:7f:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1 Here be cron.log: Feb 17 20:53:27 firewall /usr/sbin/cron[13888]: (CRON) INFO (pidfile fd = 3) Feb 17 20:53:27 firewall /usr/sbin/cron[20891]: (CRON) STARTUP (fork ok) Feb 17 20:53:27 firewall /usr/sbin/cron[20891]: (CRON) INFO (Running @reboot jobs) Feb 17 21:00:01 firewall /USR/SBIN/CRON[32119]: (root) CMD (/etc/multicron-p) This is my Daemon.log: Feb 17 20:53:09 firewall cardmgr[32692]: watching 2 sockets Feb 17 20:53:09 firewall cardmgr[14712]: socket 0: 3Com 589 Ethernet Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall cardmgr[14712]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o 21' Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall cardmgr[14712]: executing: './network start eth0 21' Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Sample private network setup Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Sample private network setup Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall init: Entering runlevel: 2 Feb 17 20:53:11 firewall inetd[98]: Online and ready (2 sockets) Feb 17 20:53:15 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + dhcpcd: MAC address = 00:60:08:8c:68:64 Feb 17 20:53:15 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + dhcpcd: your IP address = 68.148.245.3 Feb 17 20:53:16 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + dhcpcd.exe: interface eth0 has been configured with new IP=68.148.245.3 Feb 17 20:53:16 firewall cardmgr[14712]: socket 1: D-Link DFE-670-TXD Fast Ethernet Feb 17 20:53:16 firewall cardmgr[14712]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o 21' Feb 17 20:53:16 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o Feb 17 20:53:17 firewall cardmgr[14712]: executing: './network start eth1 21' Feb 17 20:53:17 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Sample private network setup Feb 17 20:53:17 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + Sample private network setup Feb 17 20:53:17 firewall cardmgr[14712]: + /etc/init.d/dhcpd: No such file or directory This is Messages.txt: Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ DETECT_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.10e Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: Initializing Cryptographic API Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: Freeing initrd memory: 282k freed Feb 17 20:53:07 firewall kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 80k freed Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall root: modutils module pcnet_cs could not be loaded Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: Software Watchdog Timer: 0.05, timer margin: 60 sec Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.2.7 Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: kernel build: 2.4.24 unknown Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: options: [pci] [cardbus] [apm] Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: Intel ISA/PCI/CardBus PCIC probe: Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: Vadem VG-468 rev 00 ISA-to-PCMCIA at port 0x3e0 ofs 0x00 Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: host opts [0]: none Feb 17 20:53:08 firewall kernel: host opts [1]: none Feb 17 20:53:09 firewall kernel: ISA irqs (scanned) = 3,4,5,7,10,11,12,15 status change on irq 15 Feb 17 20:53:09 firewall kernel: cs: memory probe 0x0d-0x0d: clean. Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x1f0-0x1f7 0x220-0x22f 0x268-0x26f 0x378-0x37f 0x388-0x38f 0x3c0-0x3e7 0x3f0-0x4d7 0x4e0-0x4ff Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0800-0x08ff: excluding 0x800-0x8d7 0x8e0-0x8ff Feb 17 20:53:10 firewall kernel: cs: IO port
[leaf-user] 3rd week of trying to LEAF
Yeah, a dreary three weeks of trudging through computer debris ... gigo: all good things in good time. I can ping out, (ping test to ping 64.29.201.21) this must mean that my eth0 is properly configured. My windows box cannot auto detect ip address from LEAF router, green light on my (PCMCIA) eth1 is off. When I type ifup eth1 I receive a message of RTNETLINK answers: FIle exists /etc/init.d/dhcpd: No such file or directory ip addr says 4: eth1 BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:95:5d:37:7f:65 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1 Also, syslog reports firewall dhcpcd[2649]: dhcpStart: ioctl SIOCGIFHWADDR: No such device I am the blind seeing with my fingers, xcept not really seeing, dho! Can any help me with what is happening with my current Bering-uClibc 2.1rc1 set-up? Are there other commands I can type to investigate what is happening? Any other logs I can set up? Thanks. _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356alloc_id=3438op=click leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc Module.dep question
There is no /lib/modules/2.4.24/kernel/drivers/net/ directory, do I need to create a directory for this 8390.o module? Module.dep file included with Bering-uClibc 2.1: /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o: /lib/modules/2.4.24/kernel/drivers/net/8390.o \ /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/ds.o \ /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/featurespgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.1 Module.dep question
In regards to the installation of D-Link DFE670TXD: I have placed all required modules in /lib/modules. The documentation is contrary. Have a look at this: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bipack2.html#id2907004 In order to have a working pcmcia package, you need to download in /lib/modules/pcmcia those modules which are necessary for your own PCMCIA card: Starting with Bering v1.0-rc2, pcmcia modules come from the pcmcia-cs package and NOT from the kernel. Non kernel mode PCMCIA support through pcmcia-cs appears more stable. There is an inconsistency in the Bering-uClibc documentation regarding PCMCIA. Installation manual states that you should allow all modules to be loaded in kernel. The above documentation states otherwise. Anyhow, I just can't seem to get my D-Link DFE670TXD to work. (Here's a best selling title for a Linux Manual: Why are we suckers for punishment when it comes to Linux.) There is a message in my /var/log/messages: firewall root: modutils module 8390 could not be loaded In my daemon.log it sates cardmgr [4684]: Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o I have placed all required modules (pcnet_cs.o 8390.o ds.o and pcmcia_core.o) within 3 directories: /lib/modules /lib/modules/2.4.24 /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia Can anyone offer suggestions as to what else I can try? _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/viruspgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Help required with LEAF PCMCIA
Okay, I've read through everything and I seem to be stuck (again), but can someone please help (I'll pay you back in cardma tokens): I have Bering u-Clibc 2.1 installed: I am here in the manual: --- In order to have a working pcmcia package, you need to download in /lib/modules/pcmcia those modules which are necessary for your own PCMCIA card: Starting with Bering v1.0-rc2, pcmcia modules come from the pcmcia-cs package and NOT from the kernel. Non kernel mode PCMCIA support through pcmcia-cs appears more stable. The PCMCIA drivers are here Two core modules are mandatory: pcmcia_core.o and ds.o and are provided with the pcmcia.lrp package. You will then need a socket driver (tcic.o or i82365.o for example) and your network card drivers. The interface provided by your pcmcia hardware (e.g. eth0 and ppp0) should NOT be put in the auto statement of the /etc/interface file. The /etc/pcmcia/network script will be launched by the cardmgr program which is launched by /etc/init.d/pcmcia script. The interface configuration will be then read from the interface file. See the Bering user's guide for practical examples --- I don't understand the last paragraph (the manuals all seem to say something different). Anyhow, I have placed modules 3C589_cs.o and pcnet_cs_o within /lib/modules/pcmcia. lsmod does indicates every necessary module except pcnet_cs.o is missing from the list. Anyhow, I'm going to post some log files here, can someone provide me with what might be wrong here: Messages: Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall syslogd 1.4.1: restart. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: No module symbols loaded. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: 24MB LOWMEM available. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: DMI not present. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Initializing CPU#0 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Memory: 22088k/24576k available (1003k kernel code, 2100k reserved, 99k data, 80k init, 0k highmem) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Buffer cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ DETECT_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.10e Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Initializing Cryptographic API Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 2048) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Freeing initrd memory: 282k freed Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 80k freed Jan 30 17:05:00 firewall kernel: Software Watchdog Timer: 0.05, timer margin: 60 sec Jan 30 17:05:01 firewall syslog: premature exit: No hostkeys available Jan 30 17:05:01 firewall kernel: Linux PCMCIA Card Services 3.2.7 Jan 30 17:05:01 firewall kernel: kernel build: 2.4.24 unknown Jan 30 17:05:01 firewall kernel: options: [pci] [cardbus] [apm] Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: Intel ISA/PCI/CardBus PCIC probe: Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: Vadem VG-468 rev 00 ISA-to-PCMCIA at port 0x3e0 ofs 0x00 Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: host opts [0]: none Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: host opts [1]: none Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: ISA irqs (scanned) = 3,4,5,7,10,11,12,15 status change on irq 15 Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall kernel: cs: memory probe 0x0d-0x0d: clean. Jan 30 17:05:03 firewall kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x1f0-0x1f7 0x220-0x22f 0x268-0x26f 0x378-0x37f 0x388-0x38f 0x3c0-0x3e7 0x3f0-0x4d7 0x4e0-0x4ff Jan 30 17:05:03 firewall
[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.1 and PCMCIA
I have installed Bering-uClibc 2.1 on my P90 notebook with PCMCIA.lrp for: 3Com 3C589D D-Link DFE-670TXD I have placed module 3c589_cs.o and pcnet_cs.o in /lib/modules/pcmcia The lsmod command will indicate that all required modules are available except for pcnet_cs.o SYSLOG: Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Cannot find map file. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Linux version 2.4.24 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)) #1 Sat Jan 10 20:32:30 CET 2004 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: BIOS-88: - 0009f000 (usable) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: BIOS-88: 0010 - 0180 (usable) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 6144 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: zone(0): 4096 pages. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: zone(1): 2048 pages. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: zone(2): 0 pages. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=linux initrd=initrd.lrp syst_size=6M log_size=2M init=/linuxrc rw root=/dev/ram0 boot=/dev/fd0u1680:msdos PKGPATH=/dev/fd0u1680 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Detected 90.003 MHz processor. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Calibrating delay loop... 179.40 BogoMIPS Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: CPU: Intel Pentium 75 - 200 stepping 05 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: PCI: System does not support PCI Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Initializing RT netlink socket Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Starting kswapd Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: ip_conntrack version 2.1 (192 buckets, 1536 max) - 320 bytes per conntrack Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: arp_tables: (C) 2002 David S. Miller Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: VFS: Mounted root (minix filesystem). Jan 30 17:05:00 firewall dhcpcd[5167]: dhcpStart: ioctl SIOCGIFHWADDR: No such device DAEMON.log Jan 30 17:05:01 firewall init: Entering runlevel: 2 Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall cardmgr[5209]: watching 2 sockets Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall inetd[7208]: Online and ready (2 sockets) Jan 30 17:05:02 firewall cardmgr[16849]: socket 0: 3Com 589 Ethernet Jan 30 17:05:03 firewall cardmgr[16849]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o 21' Jan 30 17:05:03 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o Jan 30 17:05:10 firewall cardmgr[16849]: executing: './network start eth0 21' Jan 30 17:05:10 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + dhcpcd: MAC address = 00:60:08:8c:68:64 Jan 30 17:05:10 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + dhcpcd: your IP address = 24.66.73.64 Jan 30 17:05:10 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + dhcpcd.exe: interface eth0 has been configured with new IP=24.66.73.64 Jan 30 17:05:10 firewall cardmgr[16849]: socket 1: D-Link DFE-670-TXD Fast Ethernet Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o 21' Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + Using /lib/modules/2.4.24/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + insmod: unresolved symbol ei_open Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + insmod: unresolved symbol ethdev_init Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + insmod: unresolved symbol ei_interrupt Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + insmod: unresolved symbol NS8390_init Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: + insmod: unresolved symbol ei_close Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: insmod exited with status 1 Jan 30 17:05:11 firewall cardmgr[16849]: modprobe exited with status 127 Jan 30 17:05:12 firewall cardmgr[16849]: get dev info on socket 1 failed: Resource temporarily unavailable MESSAGES: Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall syslogd 1.4.1: restart. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: No module symbols loaded. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: 24MB LOWMEM available. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: DMI not present. Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Initializing CPU#0 Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Memory: 22088k/24576k available (1003k kernel code, 2100k reserved, 99k data, 80k init, 0k highmem) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Inode cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel: Buffer cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Jan 30 17:04:59 firewall kernel:
RE: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.1 and PCMCIA
Sorry about the redundancy, my hotmail (gr) received an automated reply saying that it was having trouble with my send mail. Arg. Oh well. _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] I am having difficulty subscribing.
I have included my email address and password, I hit subscribe and it links me to another page that indicates an activation/verification email has been sent to me. But then I am not receiving any email. (I need some help setting up LEAF on my PCMCIA notebook.) _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photospgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LEAF and PCMCIA
Where would I find PCMCIA modules? (I don't understand the difference between modules and packages.) I have downloaded pcmcia.lrp pcmcia_hostap.lrp pcmcia_orinoco.lrp pcmcia_wlan.lrp pcmcia_xircom.lrp pcmutils.lrp? I have 220k available on my Bearing-uClibc 2.1 floppy. This is where I'm at in the docs: 6.4. Adding a new package To add a new package just copy it to the LEAF floppy and declare the name in the syslinux.cfg LRP= list. 6.5. Adding extra modules in /lib/modules You can add many features to your LEAF Bering distribution by adding extra kernel modules. Once you know which modules you need, download them from the LEAF Bering modules directory to a standard (1,44M formatted) floppy disk. Boot the LEAF Bering floppy. Once you see the LEAF menu, remove the LEAF floppy and replace it with the modules floppy. Then issue the following commands: mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt cd /mnt cp needed1.o needed2.o ... /lib/modules cd / umount /mnt lrcfg Through the LEAF Packages configuration menu select modules and declare those modules you need to load in /etc/modules. Remember to save and backup modules.lrp ! Important The LEAF Bering /etc/modules file contains templates to setup a bridge, to access to an IDE Hard-disk or CD-ROM and to activate USB. 6.6. Adding extra modules in /boot/lib/modules You can choose to load those extra kernel modules at the early stage of the boot process right after initrd filesystem is mounted. This is typically used to get access to a storage device where the remaining LEAF packages are stored. Once you know which modules you need, download them from the LEAF Bering modules directory to a standard (1,44M formatted) floppy disk. Boot the LEAF Bering floppy. Once you see the LEAF menu, remove the LEAF floppy and replace it with the modules floppy. Then issue the following commands: mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt cd /mnt cp needed1.o needed2.o ... /boot/lib/modules cd / umount /mnt lrcfg Through the LEAF Packages configuration menu select initrd and declare those modules you need to load in /boot/etc/modules. - K.-P. Kirchdörfer has provided me with some help (thanks), but ... I still am having some incomprehension :( but am determine :) Which of the above x.lrp should I use for PCMCIA? How do I edit to add the new packages to lrpkg.cfg on the floppy disk. _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcommpgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] I did receive a verification notice but ...
Hello, I did receive my subscription verification thank you. Althought, included in the message was an IP address that is not my own: We have received a request from 10.3.1.8 for subscription of your email addres My IP is in the 24. range and I do not have any IP masquerading, furthermore all of the other lug-mailing lists that I have subscribed to have returned with my correct IP address location. So, perhaps this is the reason for delay, perhaps you are already aware of the problem but iinanycase, just thought I'd send you people a head's up. _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/photospgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] LEAF and PCMCIA
Hello, I have an old P90 notebook that I wish to activate as a firewall. I have successfully installed Bering-uClibc on (1.68 Mb formatted) diskette. Upon initiation, some of the strings return: cannot find eth0 or eth1. I suspect that this has something to do with absent PCMCIA services. I have: 3Com Etherlink III-3C589S and D-Link DFE-670XD Fast Ethernet PC Card. I also have a partitioned 800 Mb HD with: Win95 installed and an empty 300Mb partition. The floppy has 70 kb space left on it. I have considered that I might have to mount my partition to include PCMCIA services but I would like to keep everything on floppy if possible. What is my best course? And also, how do I it :) Thank-you. _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/viruspgmarket=en-caRU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
