[Leaf-user] Dachstein migration successful! - General routing question.

2002-03-07 Thread Boyd Kelly

Got my ip aliasing/forwarding and all working on dachstein.  Very happy
about that.  Great piece of work!

Now for an interesting problem:

One guy behind my leaf firewall needs a securemote (Checkpoint)
connection to company b.  He has a Win2k workstation.  As I understand
from searching the newsgroups, this isn't possible with Linux, although
I would love to be corrected on that one.

So I am looking for some opinions on a solution.  Could I just do some
routing magic on the win2k workstation to bypass the leaf router only
for that securemote ip address?  For something like that to work would
the workstation need a second nic?  Or can I just plug all the
Internet/Leaf wires into the same switch, and then give computer 3 a
default gateway of 208.x.x.1 for the address in question?

Any security issues?



  [Internet]
  |
 eth0  208.x.x.13
  |
  LEAF Box (DF 208.x.x.1) |
  |
 eth1  192.168.1.254
  |
  ---
  | |
  Computer 2Computer 3  (needs to use
securemote client)
(192.168.1.2)  (192.168.1.3)


Thanks very much,

Boyd

___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



RE: [Leaf-user] Dachstein migration successful! - General routing question.

2002-03-07 Thread Richard Doyle

FWIW, a quick check on google for "securemote linux nat" turned up
http://www.phoneboy.com/faq/0372.html and
http://www.phoneboy.com/faq/0141.html.

-Richard

> Got my ip aliasing/forwarding and all working on dachstein.
> Very happy
> about that.  Great piece of work!
>
> Now for an interesting problem:
>
> One guy behind my leaf firewall needs a securemote (Checkpoint)
> connection to company b.  He has a Win2k workstation.  As I understand
> from searching the newsgroups, this isn't possible with
> Linux, although
> I would love to be corrected on that one.
>
> So I am looking for some opinions on a solution.  Could I just do some
> routing magic on the win2k workstation to bypass the leaf router only
> for that securemote ip address?  For something like that to work would
> the workstation need a second nic?  Or can I just plug all the
> Internet/Leaf wires into the same switch, and then give computer 3 a
> default gateway of 208.x.x.1 for the address in question?
>
> Any security issues?
>
>
>
>   [Internet]
>   |
>  eth0  208.x.x.13
>   |
>   LEAF Box (DF 208.x.x.1) |
>   |
>  eth1  192.168.1.254
>   |
>   ---
>   | |
>   Computer 2Computer 3  (needs to use
> securemote client)
> (192.168.1.2)  (192.168.1.3)
>
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> Boyd
>
> ___
> Leaf-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
>


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein migration successful! - General routing question.

2002-03-08 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

> One guy behind my leaf firewall needs a securemote (Checkpoint)
> connection to company b.  He has a Win2k workstation.  As I understand
> from searching the newsgroups, this isn't possible with Linux, although
> I would love to be corrected on that one.

Sounds a lot like the securemote client is simply an IPSec implementation.
There are lots of details about masquerading an IPSec connection in the list
archives, and all the gory details can be found in the VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO.

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user