[leaf-user] RE: PPPoE

2006-01-03 Thread Kevin
 I use Charles' Dachstein - get the help and iso file from here

http://leaf-project.org/doc/guide/install-dachstein/ds-contents.html




   1. PPPoE (Peter Nosko)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:21:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Peter Nosko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [leaf-user] PPPoE

Hello all.  I've been away from LEAF forums for ages, and am still running
E2B.  I recently switched to a Verizon FIOS, giving up my static IP.  What
distribution is current and supports a PPPoE connection?  I can't tell
what's active from leaf.sourceforge.net anymore.



--__--__--

___
leaf-user mailing list
leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


End of leaf-user Digest



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637alloc_id=16865op=click

leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/


RE: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-11 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation
I didn't think of this when you first posted.  My ISP limits each cable
modem to pulling 1 or 2 addresses at a time.  If you don't know what was
going on, you would swear your DHCP client or NIC was malfunctioning...

- Bob Coffman

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of and hansen
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password


Hello again

I turned off my modem over night, and now it all runs
perfect
pump gets it´ address
Thanks..!
I was´t able to get an IP under win2000 on a third MAC
address either
so powering off the modem over night, released this
DHCP trust

Regards
Lasse

Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter
og virusscan


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


RE: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-10 Thread Jørn Eriksen
Lasse,

Looks to me like you are in Denmark - what provider are U using?  Maybe there is
soneone else on the list that have set something up with you provider...

Best regards
Jørn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of and hansen
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password


Hi Eric

Thanks for your development of this BeringLinux
and thanks for rapid response


are you sure your new provider does use pppoe and not
another method to connect.
pppoe without an user and a password is unusual.

No... but now i learned that i have i cable
connection, but i got the same equipment
as with my previous ISP, but they used PPPoE :)

another strange symptom is  that your ISP doesn't
answer any
PADI . so you don't get a  channel number.
This is all on a level before any authentication,
compression and so on starts.

So possible causes are
1.  you don't need pppoe but for example pump  ( ask
your provider)

pump is up

2. you have an hardware problem

eliminated i use the same hardware now (on macos with
dhcp configuration, so pump it is)

3. your provider has an hardware problem on the
access concentrator
4. another , i didn't think of
5 I made a mistake :)

this is ware i am now:
all fresh bering1.2 floppy only with my net drivers
edited
but pump complains:
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: starting at
(uptime 0 days, 0:01:31) Wed Dec 10 02:11:28 2003
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: PUMP: sending
discover
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: opcode: 1
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hw: 1
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hwlength:
6
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hopcount:
0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: xid:
0x022b6656
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: secs: 0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: flags:
0x
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: ciaddr:
0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: yiaddr:
0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
server_ip: 0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
bootp_gw_ip: 0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hwaddr:
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
servername:
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: bootfile:

Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
0x63 0x82 0x53 0x63
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
53 1 0x01
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
0xff

also tried dhclient, no luck

help.. :))

regards lasse

Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og
virusscan


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-10 Thread and hansen
Hi again

Lynn Avants wrote:

Protocols and equipment do not necessarily mean
the same thing. I'm a firm believer that the only
reason
any ISP uses PPPoE is to try and leverage the extra
money out of a static ip connection

Is pump, your interfaces file, and shorewall all
configured to
get a dhcp lease? IIRC, the default Bering image is
setup for
a dhcp cable connection by default (granted that the
correct
driver is loaded for your hardware/NIC).

You are prob. right with the PPPoE and money :)
All standrart Bering1.2 image with my NIC´ i place
But still i don´t get a IP
I´ included a lot of debug info at the bottom of my
mail
all pastet from weblet, so my NIC are ok

---

Ray Olszewski wrote:

Lynn's advice is correct here, except that ask your
provider betokens 
more optimism than I have on a day-to-day basis about
the helpfulness 
of 
ISPs. If your provider is as unhelpful as I'm used to
seeing, see how 
they 
say to connect a Windows computer to their system
(they always tell you 
*that*, normally in the written materials you get
with your 
hardware).  Possibilities are:

1. In Networking, check obtain an IP address
automatically. 
This means the ISP uses DHCP, so follow Lynn's advice
on pump.

2. Install and run a custom app that the ISP
provides. This 
probably means they use PPPoE.

Once you know with a bit more certainty which type of
connection you 
are 
trying for, you can review your configuration for
errors (and get help 
here, after providing the customary details about
what you try and how 
it 
fails, as you started to do with the PPPoE attempt).

Yes :)) my ISP only support Windows and MacOSX+9, but
lets see what time
will bring to linux, thats a other discussion.
My connection is a ADSL-512/128 thats what i get of
info
but now i know that it´s a cable with a fixed IP, so
pump
must be it ?

---

Jørn wrote:

Looks to me like you are in Denmark - what provider
are U using?  Maybe 
there is
soneone else on the list that have set something up
with you 
provider...

It´s tele2/get2net ADSL


Best danish and internationale
Regards Lasse








weblet rip:

::Interfaces::
1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue 
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo
2: dummy0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop 
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:0d:6d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:2a:43 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope
global eth1
5: eth2:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:2a:4d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

::Routes::
192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src
192.168.1.254


::Statistics::
1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue 
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd
00:00:00:00:00:00
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast 
 
10020   0   0   0 

TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier
collsns 
10020   0   0   0 

2: dummy0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop 
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast 
 
0  00   0   0   0 

TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier
collsns 
0  00   0   0   0 

3: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:0d:6d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast 
 
0  00   0   0   0 

TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier
collsns 
1368   40   0   0   0 

4: eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:2a:43 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast 
 
7840   68   0   0   0   0 

TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier
collsns 
38099  66   0   0   0   0 

5: eth2:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 100
link/ether 00:0b:2b:02:2a:4d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast 
 
0  00   0   0   0 

TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier
collsns 
0  00   0   0   0   


::Packet Filter::
Shorewall-1.4.2 Chain  at  - Wed Dec 10 16:32:49 UTC
2003

Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target prot opt in out source 
 destination 

0 0 DROP  !icmp --  *  *  
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
   state INVALID 
0 0 ACCEPT all  --  lo *  
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
   
0 0 eth0_inall  --  eth0   *  
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
   
0 0 eth1_inall  --  eth1   *  
0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   

Re: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-10 Thread Victor McAllister

sorry my poor layout, but i use a stupid web mail.
as i have written before, my connection rightnow
written this mail, i use macos with dhcp enablet
so im using a cable connection
i know i´t not a real fixt IP but i get, the same
IP always, ok
 

Assuming that you have the network card working in your LEAF box  - you 
may be running into the mac address problem.  Some cable providers set 
up their DHCP to only give an IP to a particular network card - by mac 
address.  When you try to switch to the LEAF box - it sees a different 
network (mac address) card and refuses to issue an IP to that machine.  
Possible fix is to turn off the cable modem for several minutes.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78alloc_id371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-10 Thread and hansen
Ok.. thats a lot of things to try out, thanks
I´ll give a word when it all blows up here :)

PS. chill out man, and thanks again

Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og 
virusscan


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-09 Thread and hansen
Hi Eric

Thanks for your development of this BeringLinux
and thanks for rapid response


are you sure your new provider does use pppoe and not
another method to connect.
pppoe without an user and a password is unusual.

No... but now i learned that i have i cable
connection, but i got the same equipment
as with my previous ISP, but they used PPPoE :)

another strange symptom is  that your ISP doesn't
answer any
PADI . so you don't get a  channel number.
This is all on a level before any authentication,
compression and so on starts.

So possible causes are
1.  you don't need pppoe but for example pump  ( ask
your provider)

pump is up

2. you have an hardware problem

eliminated i use the same hardware now (on macos with
dhcp configuration, so pump it is)

3. your provider has an hardware problem on the
access concentrator
4. another , i didn't think of
5 I made a mistake :)

this is ware i am now:
all fresh bering1.2 floppy only with my net drivers
edited
but pump complains:
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: starting at
(uptime 0 days, 0:01:31) Wed Dec 10 02:11:28 2003 
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: PUMP: sending
discover 
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: opcode: 1
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hw: 1
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hwlength:
6
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hopcount:
0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: xid:
0x022b6656
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: secs: 0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: flags:
0x
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: ciaddr:
0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: yiaddr:
0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
server_ip: 0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
bootp_gw_ip: 0.0.0.0
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: hwaddr: 
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq:
servername: 
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: bootfile:

Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
0x63 0x82 0x53 0x63
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
53 1 0x01
Dec 10 02:11:28 firewall pumpd[19684]: breq: vendor:
0xff

also tried dhclient, no luck

help.. :))

regards lasse

Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og 
virusscan


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-09 Thread Lynn Avants
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 07:48 pm, and hansen wrote:
 No... but now i learned that i have i cable
 connection, but i got the same equipment
 as with my previous ISP, but they used PPPoE :)

Protocols and equipment do not necessarily mean
the same thing. I'm a firm believer that the only reason
any ISP uses PPPoE is to try and leverage the extra
money out of a static ip connection


 So possible causes are
 1.  you don't need pppoe but for example pump  ( ask

 your provider)

 pump is up

Is pump, your interfaces file, and shorewall all configured to
get a dhcp lease? IIRC, the default Bering image is setup for
a dhcp cable connection by default (granted that the correct
driver is loaded for your hardware/NIC).
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Re: PPPoE without username and password

2003-12-09 Thread Ray Olszewski
Lynn's advice is correct here, except that ask your provider betokens 
more optimism than I have on a day-to-day basis about the helpfulness of 
ISPs. If your provider is as unhelpful as I'm used to seeing, see how they 
say to connect a Windows computer to their system (they always tell you 
*that*, normally in the written materials you get with your 
hardware).  Possibilities are:

1. In Networking, check obtain an IP address automatically. This 
means the ISP uses DHCP, so follow Lynn's advice on pump.

2. Install and run a custom app that the ISP provides. This 
probably means they use PPPoE.

Once you know with a bit more certainty which type of connection you are 
trying for, you can review your configuration for errors (and get help 
here, after providing the customary details about what you try and how it 
fails, as you started to do with the PPPoE attempt).

At 09:20 PM 12/9/2003 -0600, Lynn Avants wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 07:48 pm, and hansen wrote:
 No... but now i learned that i have i cable
 connection, but i got the same equipment
 as with my previous ISP, but they used PPPoE :)
Protocols and equipment do not necessarily mean
the same thing. I'm a firm believer that the only reason
any ISP uses PPPoE is to try and leverage the extra
money out of a static ip connection
 So possible causes are
 1.  you don't need pppoe but for example pump  ( ask

 your provider)

 pump is up
Is pump, your interfaces file, and shorewall all configured to
get a dhcp lease? IIRC, the default Bering image is setup for
a dhcp cable connection by default (granted that the correct
driver is loaded for your hardware/NIC).




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278alloc_id=3371op=click

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Re: PPPoE help

2003-01-15 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Bentzy Sagiv wrote:

Hello Charles!

I found you at http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/

I'm a linux newbie looking for veteran's sympathy :).

My goal is to enable a diskless computer to connect an ISP using PPtP and/or
PPPoE.
This computer loads it's linux image from a boot server at the LAN.

I have an SDK enabling me to modify the (2.4.14)kernel image to be
downloaded (the output is an initrd file).
I have a build.sh file which I can to modify.

I think your experience can help me and I will really appreciate your help.


Thanks in advance!!

Bentzy Sagiv
Vidyatel Ltd.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Start browsing the leaf site:
http://leaf-project.org

There are several disk-images available that support PPPoE, and you 
should be able to easily modify them to load packages remotely, or you 
could create a large initial ramdisk image that included all required 
packages.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving 
your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL 
certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get 
started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[Leaf-user] Re: PPPoE DNS problem, Help please.

2001-12-06 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

 I am using EigerStein_contrib_img_pppoe-beta0.4.exe

 I am having trouble getting the nameservers from my ISP known by LRP.
 Example ping www.yahoo.com yields: ping: unknown host www.yahoo.com
 What else must I do?  I would like the address's picked up from ppp so
when
 they change I don't have to do anything.

 I have set:USEPEERDNS=yes in  etc/ppp/ppp0e.conf

 # cat /etc/resolv.conf
 # This file was generated by /etc/rcS.d/S39network. It may be overwritten!
 search  private.network
 nameserver  192.168.1.254
 nameserver  127.0.0.1

 FYI

 I have found that to get this image to connect to a Bell ADSL modem on
 startup I had to create a file called /etc/ppp/firewall-masq and back it
up
 with the ppp stuff.

Try setting CONFIG_DNS=NO in /etc/network.conf...

Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)



___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user



[Leaf-user] Re: pppoe

2001-06-22 Thread Kenneth Hadley

- Original Message -
From: Liam Tumulty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:54 AM
Subject: pppoe


 Hi, I'm putting together a linux router and got your image up and running
 (thanks), but would like to use some of the features in the new EigerStein
 Pre/release.

Not at the moment, since I'm waiting for a final release, but if that doesnt
happen by the end of next month then I will release a image based on the
most recent Pre-release

 Your disk throws an error with pppoe saying that inetd is out of date. The
 new release seems to erase pppoe.lrp after this error.

???
Ive never seen this error, are you trying to use rp-pppoe v.3.0?

 I'm still working out merging your pppoe into this new release, but was
 wondering if you had any plans for compiling a RP-pppoe 3.0 based package?

yes, it would be part of the next image I will release

 Also, do you have a list of what other changes from the standard
EigerStein
 distribution (if any) you made?

The Image is based on EigerStein2BETA, and as for the changes to tell you
the truth ive completly forgotton, but if you like I could find out.

 Thanks for your help,
 -Liam


No prob,

-Kenneth Hadley


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user