RE: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd TTFN Antony Briggs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Georgalis Sent: 12 July 2002 01:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] hwclock error? I tried to set the clock today, but I get this error, I must be looking at the wrong man page. Can't find any more doc. How does the syntax belong? (Bering_rc2, soon to be rc3) (also tried hwclock --set --date=1026432127) # hwclock --set --date='07/11/02 19:59:49' date: invalid option -- - BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.04.04-20:23+) multi-call binary Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] The date command issued by hwclock returned unexpected results. The command was: date --date=07/11/02 19:59:49 +seconds-into-epoch=%s The response was: No usable set-to time. Cannot set clock. Thanks, // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases more http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:30:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' also tried # date 094500071202 # date 094500 # date 0945 no go. The busybox home page was not much help either. // George TTFN Antony Briggs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Georgalis Sent: 12 July 2002 01:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] hwclock error? I tried to set the clock today, but I get this error, I must be looking at the wrong man page. Can't find any more doc. How does the syntax belong? (Bering_rc2, soon to be rc3) (also tried hwclock --set --date=1026432127) # hwclock --set --date='07/11/02 19:59:49' date: invalid option -- - BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.04.04-20:23+) multi-call binary Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] The date command issued by hwclock returned unexpected results. The command was: date --date=07/11/02 19:59:49 +seconds-into-epoch=%s The response was: No usable set-to time. Cannot set clock. Thanks, // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases more http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
George Georgalis wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:30:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The command is just date hhnn[mmdd][] where n = minutes can't remember whether it's ddmm or mmdd I'm guessing mmdd # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' # date 071209452002.00 Fri Jul 12 09:45:00 CDT 2002 From woody: # date --help Usage: date [OPTION]... [+FORMAT] or: date [-u|--utc|--universal] [MMDDhhmm[[CC]YY][.ss]] hth -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 07:17, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: BTW: A quick search for hwclock on my search page (which indexes my site and my c0wz mirror) would have found this quickly (that's how I found it, but it helps that I rememberd it was there in the first place :-) http://search.steinkuehler.net/ I don't think the SF site search indexes anything other than the dynamic PHP content. Charles, You're correct. I believe this will change when we update our site to phpWebSite 0.8.2. Until then Google site search is your friend. http://www.google.com/ ntp site:leaf.sourceforge.net -- Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] hwclock error?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:17:52AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: # date 09450007122002 date: invalid date `09450007122002' also tried # date 094500071202 # date 094500 # date 0945 no go. The busybox home page was not much help either. I'm not sure the minimal busybox date command can be used by the hwclock command. The normal procedure is to set the system clock using date, rdate, ntpclient, or whatever, then copy the system time to the CMOS clock with the hwclock command. Something like: tempest: -root- # rdate time-A.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov Fri Jul 12 09:07:44 2002 tempest: -root- # hwclock --systohc --utc Yes, I routinely use rdate, and there appears to be systohc in the shutdown/startup scripts. I just found date and hwclock and it seemed like the way on lrp. Thanks for pointing out rdate. // George -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
