Re: [LU] Non LU: Anyone on the list from Keighley?

2012-09-01 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
This help?
http://www.keighleynews.co.uk/
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
http://www.myRay.org
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com

Auditing || Quality Control
http://www.MyDoctorExplains.com/alamo/

Blog:
http://www.DrMichaelBenjamin.com



On 2 September 2012 05:32, John Sykes  wrote:

> Really need to know if there's a local weekly or bi-weekly newspaper in
> Keighley.  I have a great story for them if there is one.
>
> Cheers
>
> Grampa Sykes
> __**_
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.**
> uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email 
> leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.**org
>
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
>
>
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Robert Heath
I also listened to the game on the radio.

Sorry if I am repeating myself from last year, but how atrocious are those
commentators on Yorks Radio? Their only virtue is that you know about a
goal quicker than any other medium. I really blame those smug
self-satisfied Radio 5 bastards who think the commentary is all about
themselves. The main bloke is bad enough, but Eddie Gray, as much as you
have to love the guy, is hopeless. He watches replays on his monitors and
says things like "That was really bad defending...look at that."

On 1 September 2012 23:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:

>
> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to
> me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the
> radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in
> midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few
> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and
> the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think on
> the ball.  It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park
> in Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this
> league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win
> from what I heard. Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not
> allowed to play.. Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed...
> guess we need a fast boy up front.  Will we survive until January? Thanks
> for report, Andy
>  > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
> > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: [LU] Blackburn
> >
> > This
> > was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
> > forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
> > ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
> > and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
> > down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
> > (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
> > exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
> > it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
> > that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
> > still be there.
> > When
> > that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
> > going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
> > to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
> > premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
> > them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
> > doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
> > I
> > think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
> > inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
> > the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which  were exposed
> > every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
> > was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
> > the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
> > who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
> > unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
> > cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
> > shirt. Amazing quality,
> > In
> > fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
> > now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
> > air.
> > So
> > how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
> > just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
> > started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
> > They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
> > Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
> > stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
> > area. Nothing has changed , he flapped time and time again and the
> > Blackburn defence began to creak. On one such occasion , we got lucky
> > and the ball fell to Diouf who poked it in. We then began to believe.
> > From
> > that moment on we steamrolled them, not through beautiful play but
> > from high energy,pressure football. The whole foundation of their
> > team collapsed and we saw more of the ball and began to run the game.
> > Colin instructed Diouf to go get the ball so he was given a free
> > reign, which actually at times saw him playing up front centrally
> > pushing the ineffective Becchio and McCormack out to the right and
> > left. He's a better striker than both of them.
> > We
> > came out second half full of energy and carried on where we left off.
> > Diouf was at the centre of everything, controlling, passing, holding
> > up play, playing through balls, crossing. A master class to the
> > players around him who just aren

[LU] Remember this?

2012-09-01 Thread Ralph Sheppard
http://thefootballattic.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/the-esso-collection-of-footba
ll-club.html

___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


[LU] Non LU: Anyone on the list from Keighley?

2012-09-01 Thread John Sykes
Really need to know if there's a local weekly or bi-weekly newspaper in 
Keighley.  I have a great story for them if there is one.


Cheers

Grampa Sykes
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Matt Anderson
Talking to a Leicester fan today and he was amazed peltier was our captain. Not 
captain material apparently.

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:45, Richard Walker  wrote:

> I've decided to upgrade Drury's score to 8. I thought he was really solid 
> today
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:31, Richard Walker  wrote:
> 
>> Mmmm ... Difficult one. I was looking at Peltier when the second went in, 
>> his head was down and he looked defeated . I suppose given he was at fault 
>> for both he probably wasn't feeling too good. Tom Lees was jeeing people on. 
>> I think you're looking at Pearce, Norris, Lees ( too young? ) or how about 
>> Diouf'. I know that might sound ridiculous but he does an awful lot of 
>> directing , pointing etc. ?? And has a great awareness of the pitch. He did 
>> get involved with the Blackburn fans at one point who soon turned on him.
>> Paddy Kenny is another option but then there's an argument about keepers 
>> being captain ?
>> 
>> Maybe Peltier will come good, he looked very shaky though and looks like a 
>> quiet sort of bloke.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:22, Andy Clayton  wrote:
>> 
>>> Do we have a captain Rich?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>> 
>>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:
>>> 
 It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
 think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home 
 this time around.
 
 I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
 the mo - who is challenging them ? 
 
 I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. 
 Austin deffo will be the first to get a suspension.
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:
 
> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to 
> me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the 
> radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge 
> in midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and 
> the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think 
> on the ball. 
> 
> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in 
> Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this 
> league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win 
> from what I heard.
> 
> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
> fast boy up front. 
> 
> Will we survive until January?
> 
> Thanks for report, Andy
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
>> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
>> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
>> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
>> 
>> This
>> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
>> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
>> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
>> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
>> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
>> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
>> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
>> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
>> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
>> still be there. 
>> When
>> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
>> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
>> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
>> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
>> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
>> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
>> I
>> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
>> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
>> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
>> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
>> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
>> the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
>> who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
>> unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
>> cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
>> shirt. Amazing quality,
>> In
>> fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long ball

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread wayne callaghan
Annabel Croft...  Isn't she a bit of an old dear now (Gilf?)

I'd give Diouf the captaincy:
Mouthy
Commanding
Clever
The only thing letting him down is the daft haircut.

-Original Message-

From: Richard Walker
Sent: 1 Sep 2012 21:49:07 GMT
To: Richard Walker
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [LU] Blackburn

Would you nail Annabel Croft ?

Just watching the tennis ?

I get the baby sitting job whilst wife is out in Leeds getting pissed and 
there's no fucker on the list

I'll try Lee Peltier on Twitter again  Funny

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:45, Richard Walker  wrote:

> I've decided to upgrade Drury's score to 8. I thought he was really solid 
> today
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:31, Richard Walker  wrote:
>
>> Mmmm ... Difficult one. I was looking at Peltier when the second went in, 
>> his head was down and he looked defeated . I suppose given he was at fault 
>> for both he probably wasn't feeling too good. Tom Lees was jeeing people on. 
>> I think you're looking at Pearce, Norris, Lees ( too young? ) or how about 
>> Diouf'. I know that might sound ridiculous but he does an awful lot of 
>> directing , pointing etc. ?? And has a great awareness of the pitch. He did 
>> get involved with the Blackburn fans at one point who soon turned on him.
>> Paddy Kenny is another option but then there's an argument about keepers 
>> being captain ?
>>
>> Maybe Peltier will come good, he looked very shaky though and looks like a 
>> quiet sort of bloke.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:22, Andy Clayton  wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have a captain Rich?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>>
>>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:
>>>
 It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
 think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home 
 this time around.

 I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
 the mo - who is challenging them ?

 I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. 
 Austin deffo will be the first to get a suspension.

 Sent from my iPad

 On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:

> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to 
> me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the 
> radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge 
> in midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and 
> the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think 
> on the ball.
>
> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in 
> Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this 
> league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win 
> from what I heard.
>
> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
> fast boy up front.
>
> Will we survive until January?
>
> Thanks for report, Andy
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
>> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
>> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
>> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
>>
>> This
>> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
>> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
>> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
>> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
>> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
>> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
>> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
>> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
>> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
>> still be there.
>> When
>> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
>> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
>> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
>> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
>> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
>> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
>> I
>> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
>> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
>> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
>> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
>> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
>> the ball was ine

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
Would you nail Annabel Croft ?

Just watching the tennis ? 

I get the baby sitting job whilst wife is out in Leeds getting pissed and 
there's no fucker on the list 

I'll try Lee Peltier on Twitter again  Funny

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:45, Richard Walker  wrote:

> I've decided to upgrade Drury's score to 8. I thought he was really solid 
> today
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:31, Richard Walker  wrote:
> 
>> Mmmm ... Difficult one. I was looking at Peltier when the second went in, 
>> his head was down and he looked defeated . I suppose given he was at fault 
>> for both he probably wasn't feeling too good. Tom Lees was jeeing people on. 
>> I think you're looking at Pearce, Norris, Lees ( too young? ) or how about 
>> Diouf'. I know that might sound ridiculous but he does an awful lot of 
>> directing , pointing etc. ?? And has a great awareness of the pitch. He did 
>> get involved with the Blackburn fans at one point who soon turned on him.
>> Paddy Kenny is another option but then there's an argument about keepers 
>> being captain ?
>> 
>> Maybe Peltier will come good, he looked very shaky though and looks like a 
>> quiet sort of bloke.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:22, Andy Clayton  wrote:
>> 
>>> Do we have a captain Rich?
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>> 
>>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:
>>> 
 It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
 think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home 
 this time around.
 
 I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
 the mo - who is challenging them ? 
 
 I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. 
 Austin deffo will be the first to get a suspension.
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:
 
> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to 
> me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the 
> radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge 
> in midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and 
> the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think 
> on the ball. 
> 
> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in 
> Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this 
> league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win 
> from what I heard.
> 
> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
> fast boy up front. 
> 
> Will we survive until January?
> 
> Thanks for report, Andy
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
>> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
>> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
>> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
>> 
>> This
>> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
>> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
>> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
>> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
>> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
>> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
>> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
>> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
>> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
>> still be there. 
>> When
>> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
>> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
>> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
>> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
>> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
>> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
>> I
>> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
>> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
>> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
>> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
>> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
>> the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
>> who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
>> unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
>> cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
>>

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
I've decided to upgrade Drury's score to 8. I thought he was really solid today

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:31, Richard Walker  wrote:

> Mmmm ... Difficult one. I was looking at Peltier when the second went in, his 
> head was down and he looked defeated . I suppose given he was at fault for 
> both he probably wasn't feeling too good. Tom Lees was jeeing people on. I 
> think you're looking at Pearce, Norris, Lees ( too young? ) or how about 
> Diouf'. I know that might sound ridiculous but he does an awful lot of 
> directing , pointing etc. ?? And has a great awareness of the pitch. He did 
> get involved with the Blackburn fans at one point who soon turned on him.
> Paddy Kenny is another option but then there's an argument about keepers 
> being captain ?
> 
> Maybe Peltier will come good, he looked very shaky though and looks like a 
> quiet sort of bloke.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:22, Andy Clayton  wrote:
> 
>> Do we have a captain Rich?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>> 
>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:
>> 
>>> It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
>>> think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home this 
>>> time around.
>>> 
>>> I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
>>> the mo - who is challenging them ? 
>>> 
>>> I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. 
>>> Austin deffo will be the first to get a suspension.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:
>>> 
 Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to 
 me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the 
 radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in 
 midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
 headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and 
 the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think 
 on the ball. 
 
 It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in 
 Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this 
 league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win 
 from what I heard.
 
 Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
 Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
 fast boy up front. 
 
 Will we survive until January?
 
 Thanks for report, Andy
 
 
 
 
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
> 
> This
> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
> still be there. 
> When
> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
> I
> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
> the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
> who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
> unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
> cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
> shirt. Amazing quality,
> In
> fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
> now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
> air.
> So
> how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
> just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
> started to pile on the pressure throu

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
Mmmm ... Difficult one. I was looking at Peltier when the second went in, his 
head was down and he looked defeated . I suppose given he was at fault for both 
he probably wasn't feeling too good. Tom Lees was jeeing people on. I think 
you're looking at Pearce, Norris, Lees ( too young? ) or how about Diouf'. I 
know that might sound ridiculous but he does an awful lot of directing , 
pointing etc. ?? And has a great awareness of the pitch. He did get involved 
with the Blackburn fans at one point who soon turned on him.
Paddy Kenny is another option but then there's an argument about keepers being 
captain ?

Maybe Peltier will come good, he looked very shaky though and looks like a 
quiet sort of bloke.

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:22, Andy Clayton  wrote:

> Do we have a captain Rich?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone.
> 
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:
> 
>> It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
>> think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home this 
>> time around.
>> 
>> I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
>> the mo - who is challenging them ? 
>> 
>> I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. Austin 
>> deffo will be the first to get a suspension.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to 
>>> me having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the 
>>> radio that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in 
>>> midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
>>> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and 
>>> the game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think on 
>>> the ball. 
>>> 
>>> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in Blackpool 
>>> and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this league. Still 
>>> ... no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win from what I 
>>> heard.
>>> 
>>> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
>>> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
>>> fast boy up front. 
>>> 
>>> Will we survive until January?
>>> 
>>> Thanks for report, Andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
 From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
 Subject: [LU] Blackburn
 
 This
 was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
 forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
 ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
 and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
 down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
 (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
 exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
 it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
 that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
 still be there. 
 When
 that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
 going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
 to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
 premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
 them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
 doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
 I
 think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
 inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
 the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
 every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
 was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
 the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
 who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
 unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
 cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
 shirt. Amazing quality,
 In
 fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
 now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
 air.
 So
 how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
 just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
 started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
 They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
 Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
 stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
 area. Nothin

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Andy Clayton
Do we have a captain Rich?

Sent from my iPhone.

On 1 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Richard Walker  wrote:

> It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I 
> think if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home this 
> time around.
> 
> I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at 
> the mo - who is challenging them ? 
> 
> I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. Austin 
> deffo will be the first to get a suspension.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to me 
>> having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the radio 
>> that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in 
>> midfield but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few 
>> headers at corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and the 
>> game I watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think on the 
>> ball. 
>> 
>> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in Blackpool 
>> and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this league. Still ... 
>> no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win from what I heard.
>> 
>> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
>> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a 
>> fast boy up front. 
>> 
>> Will we survive until January?
>> 
>> Thanks for report, Andy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
>>> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
>>> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
>>> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
>>> 
>>> This
>>> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
>>> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
>>> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
>>> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
>>> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
>>> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
>>> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
>>> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
>>> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
>>> still be there. 
>>> When
>>> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
>>> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
>>> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
>>> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
>>> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
>>> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
>>> I
>>> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
>>> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
>>> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
>>> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
>>> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
>>> the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
>>> who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
>>> unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
>>> cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
>>> shirt. Amazing quality,
>>> In
>>> fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
>>> now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
>>> air.
>>> So
>>> how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
>>> just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
>>> started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
>>> They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
>>> Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
>>> stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
>>> area. Nothing has changed , he flapped time and time again and the
>>> Blackburn defence began to creak. On one such occasion , we got lucky
>>> and the ball fell to Diouf who poked it in. We then began to believe. 
>>> From
>>> that moment on we steamrolled them, not through beautiful play but
>>> from high energy,pressure football. The whole foundation of their
>>> team collapsed and we saw more of the ball and began to run the game.
>>> Colin instructed Diouf to go get the ball so he was given a free
>>> reign, which actually at times saw him playing up front centrally
>>> pushing the ineffective Becchio and McCormack out to the right and
>>> left. He's a better striker than both of them. 
>>> We
>>> came out second half full of energy and carried on where we left off.
>>> Diouf was at the centre of everything, controlling, passing, holding
>>> up play, playing through balls, cro

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
It was brilliant mate - not much good football but we steamrolled them. I think 
if we keep that up we certainly won't be losing 10 games at home this time 
around.

I am worried about the squad depth - I mean Macca and Becchio are certs at the 
mo - who is challenging them ? 

I think we will rack up the suspensions though playing at that level. Austin 
deffo will be the first to get a suspension.

Sent from my iPad

On 1 Sep 2012, at 21:32, Andy Pyzer  wrote:

> Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to me 
> having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the radio 
> that we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in midfield 
> but i worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few headers at 
> corners this year though. Diouf has been class throughout and the game I 
> watched you can see he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think on the ball. 
>  
> It is a worry that the 2 football teams played us off the park in Blackpool 
> and Blackburn.. I guess a few more teams like that in this league. Still ... 
> no losses at ER so far and could easily have been a win from what I heard.
>  
> Watched the Blackpool Leicester game.. pool were not allowed to play.. 
> Beckford was greedy when he came on but has the speed... guess we need a fast 
> boy up front. 
>  
> Will we survive until January?
>  
> Thanks for report, Andy
>  
>  
> 
>  
> > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
> > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: [LU] Blackburn
> > 
> > This
> > was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
> > forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
> > ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
> > and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
> > down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
> > (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
> > exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
> > it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
> > that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
> > still be there. 
> > When
> > that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
> > going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
> > to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
> > premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
> > them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
> > doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
> > I
> > think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
> > inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
> > the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which were exposed
> > every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
> > was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
> > the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
> > who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
> > unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
> > cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
> > shirt. Amazing quality,
> > In
> > fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
> > now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
> > air.
> > So
> > how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
> > just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
> > started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
> > They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
> > Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
> > stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
> > area. Nothing has changed , he flapped time and time again and the
> > Blackburn defence began to creak. On one such occasion , we got lucky
> > and the ball fell to Diouf who poked it in. We then began to believe. 
> > From
> > that moment on we steamrolled them, not through beautiful play but
> > from high energy,pressure football. The whole foundation of their
> > team collapsed and we saw more of the ball and began to run the game.
> > Colin instructed Diouf to go get the ball so he was given a free
> > reign, which actually at times saw him playing up front centrally
> > pushing the ineffective Becchio and McCormack out to the right and
> > left. He's a better striker than both of them. 
> > We
> > came out second half full of energy and carried on where we left off.
> > Diouf was at the centre of everything, controlling, passing, holding
> > up play, playing through balls, crossing. A master class to the
> > players around him who just aren't capable of those levels of
> > composure and skill.
> > We
> > were dominating

Re: [LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Andy Pyzer

Thanks Rich, listened to game but waited for your match report - seems to me 
having only seen teh Wolves game on TV and heard all the rest on the radio that 
we still have defensive issues, Austin seems to be in charge in midfield but i 
worry about his discipline, I reckon he will get a few headers at corners this 
year though. Diouf has been class throughout and the game I watched you can see 
he has that extra 2 or 3 seconds to think on the ball.  It is a worry that the 
2 football teams played us off the park in Blackpool and Blackburn.. I guess a 
few more teams like that in this league. Still ... no losses at ER so far and 
could easily have been a win from what I heard. Watched the Blackpool Leicester 
game.. pool were not allowed to play.. Beckford was greedy when he came on but 
has the speed... guess we need a fast boy up front.  Will we survive until 
January? Thanks for report, Andy  
 > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 21:20:44 +0100
> From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: [LU] Blackburn
> 
> This
> was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
> forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
> ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
> and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
> down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
> (Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
> exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
> it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
> that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
> still be there.  
> When
> that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
> going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
> to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
> premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
> them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
> doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
> I
> think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
> inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
> the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which  were exposed
> every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
> was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
> the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
> who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
> unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
> cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
> shirt. Amazing quality,
> In
> fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
> now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
> air.
> So
> how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
> just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
> started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
> They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
> Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
> stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
> area. Nothing has changed , he flapped time and time again and the
> Blackburn defence began to creak. On one such occasion , we got lucky
> and the ball fell to Diouf who poked it in. We then began to believe.  
> From
> that moment on we steamrolled them, not through beautiful play but
> from high energy,pressure football. The whole foundation of their
> team collapsed and we saw more of the ball and began to run the game.
> Colin instructed Diouf to go get the ball so he was given a free
> reign, which actually at times saw him playing up front centrally
> pushing the ineffective Becchio and McCormack out to the right and
> left. He's a better striker than both of them. 
> We
> came out second half full of energy and carried on where we left off.
> Diouf was at the centre of everything, controlling, passing, holding
> up play, playing through balls, crossing. A master class to the
> players around him who just aren't capable of those levels of
> composure and skill.
> We
> were dominating and Blackburn were on the ropes. Norris and Austin
> upped the pace and were everywhere. Then came the equaliser, a high
> ball was played through, Becchio sort of went for it in the
> half-arsed way he does at times , you know the one, he's not really
> looking to win the header but looking for a foul, the ball missed
> them both and went through to an unmarked Macca. He took it on and
> smashed it in the net, a really well taken goal.  
> There
> really was only winner from here and we had many chances to bury
> them. Diouf took complete control and was teasing them with his
> deceptive skill. Pearce was unlucky to have his goal chalk

[LU] Blackburn

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
This
was a brilliant game, a full blooded affair which see sawed back and
forth. First thing to say is that Blackburn were a class apart on the
ball especially in the first half in which they ripped us apart time
and time again. They quickly raced into a 2-0 lead both goals coming
down their left. I've just ruffled a few feathers on Twitter
(Richleedsuk) by asking Peltier whether he was at fault or was he
exposed through lack of cover. He replied saying it didn't matter ,
it was the way they came back that was important. Can't argue with
that but you have to wonder whether our defensive frailities may
still be there.  
When
that 2nd goal went in people all around me were saying that this was
going to be an embarrassment. I couldn't disagree and was beginning
to think about the long season ahead. It was reality kicking in, a
premiership team against a cobbled together set of misfits most of
them from a team that got relegated. How stupid were we ? How daft to
doubt at a Neil Warnock team , they were never going to rollover.
I
think sticking Diouf on the right wing didn't work. He was drifting
inside as it is in his nature to try and get the ball when he sees
the front 2 struggling. This left large gaps which  were exposed
every time they broke. This led to both their goals. Our main problem
was a lack of movement up front and when the ball was played through
the ball was inevitably given away, the main culprit being Becchio
who won hardly anything in the air and when given to his feet he
unbelievably at times just gave it away. One time on the right, he
cut inside and with white shirts everywhere he found the only dark
shirt. Amazing quality,
In
fact, Becchio's heading ability is so poor that all long balls are
now aimed at Varney who is head and shoulders above Becchio in the
air.
So
how did we get back into it ? Well, we increased our work rate and
just got stuck in. We won a few free kicks in dangerous positions and
started to pile on the pressure through long balls into the area.
They began to flap, especially Robbo in nets who was awful. When at
Leeds I thought he was the equal of Nigel Martyn when it came to shop
stopping but he was always week coming for crosses and commanding his
area. Nothing has changed , he flapped time and time again and the
Blackburn defence began to creak. On one such occasion , we got lucky
and the ball fell to Diouf who poked it in. We then began to believe.  
From
that moment on we steamrolled them, not through beautiful play but
from high energy,pressure football. The whole foundation of their
team collapsed and we saw more of the ball and began to run the game.
Colin instructed Diouf to go get the ball so he was given a free
reign, which actually at times saw him playing up front centrally
pushing the ineffective Becchio and McCormack out to the right and
left. He's a better striker than both of them. 
We
came out second half full of energy and carried on where we left off.
Diouf was at the centre of everything, controlling, passing, holding
up play, playing through balls, crossing. A master class to the
players around him who just aren't capable of those levels of
composure and skill.
We
were dominating and Blackburn were on the ropes. Norris and Austin
upped the pace and were everywhere. Then came the equaliser, a high
ball was played through, Becchio sort of went for it in the
half-arsed way he does at times , you know the one, he's not really
looking to win the header but looking for a foul, the ball missed
them both and went through to an unmarked Macca. He took it on and
smashed it in the net, a really well taken goal.  
There
really was only winner from here and we had many chances to bury
them. Diouf took complete control and was teasing them with his
deceptive skill. Pearce was unlucky to have his goal chalked off for
what looked like a 50:50 scrap for the ball and then Becchio missed a
point blank header which was harder to miss, again he managed to pick
out the Blackburn man on the line, anywhere else it was a goal.
Lethal in the 6 yard box, you're having a laugh. A few mins later and
Becchio showed why some people actually think he is lethal in the 6
yard box when a ball managed to run right through to him at the near
lost. He stooped to prod it towards goal and what really should have
been an easy save, turned  into another blunder by Robbo has he
managed to turn into the net. Becchio's one and only positive
contribution to this match  A big one granted but it wasn't a
great goal.
We
took the lead just a bit too early and with 12 mins to go we stopped
dominating and they came into it again. They got a disputed free kick
on the left and the resulting attack resulted in the Blackburn player
back heeling it all too easily into an empty net. A poor goal. We
still had chances to nick it ( as did they) including a sitter for
Diouf who was out in within only the keeper to beat. He should have
scored. We all gave the team a standing ovation, it was a brillian

Re: [LU] 3 - 3

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
What a fucking game ! Brilliant.

How did Diouf miss that chance with the last kick?

Staying in tonight so will do full match report when I get home.

Sent from my iPhone

On 1 Sep 2012, at 17:00, Dr Michael Benjamin  wrote:

> Still seventh. Saw Howson & Snoddy. If that poison dwarf bastard hadn't sld 
> them.. 
> That out and out bastard.
> 
> On Sep 1, 2012 6:45 PM, "Andy Pyzer"  wrote:
> 
> shite
>  > From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> > To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:26:57 +0400
> > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: Re: [LU] 3 - 2
> >
> >
> >
> >  Bechio by sounds of it he missed a sitter 2 mins ago and also Austin, 
> > well on top, get in> From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> > > To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:17:26 +0400
> > > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > > Subject: Re: [LU] 2 - 2
> > >
> > >
> > > mcormack... not sure it is deserved but we'll take it
> > >  > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:54:17 +0100
> > > > To: mister@gmail.com
> > > > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > > > Subject: [LU] Half time
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into it. 
> > > > > Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a 
> > > > > bombardment from us.
> > > >
> > > > Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually 
> > > > moved Diouf into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real 
> > > > player.
> > > >
> > > > Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he 
> > > > captain - head down at 2-0
> > > > ?
> > > > ___
> > > > Leedslist mailing list
> > > > Info and options: 
> > > > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > > >
> > > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Leedslist mailing list
> > > Info and options: 
> > > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > >
> > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> >
> > ___
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >
> > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> 
> ___
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> 
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] 3 - 3

2012-09-01 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
Still seventh. Saw Howson & Snoddy. If that poison dwarf bastard hadn't sld
them..
That out and out bastard.
On Sep 1, 2012 6:45 PM, "Andy Pyzer"  wrote:

>
> shite
>  > From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> > To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:26:57 +0400
> > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: Re: [LU] 3 - 2
> >
> >
> >
> >  Bechio by sounds of it he missed a sitter 2 mins ago and also
> Austin, well on top, get in> From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> > > To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:17:26 +0400
> > > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > > Subject: Re: [LU] 2 - 2
> > >
> > >
> > > mcormack... not sure it is deserved but we'll take it
> > >  > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:54:17 +0100
> > > > To: mister@gmail.com
> > > > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > > > Subject: [LU] Half time
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into
> it. Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a
> bombardment from us.
> > > >
> > > > Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually
> moved Diouf into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real
> player.
> > > >
> > > > Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he
> captain - head down at 2-0
> > > > ?
> > > > ___
> > > > Leedslist mailing list
> > > > Info and options:
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > > >
> > > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Leedslist mailing list
> > > Info and options:
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > >
> > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> >
> > ___
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > Info and options:
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> >
> > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
>
> ___
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options:
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
>
>
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] 3 - 3

2012-09-01 Thread Andy Pyzer

shite  
 > From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:26:57 +0400
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] 3 - 2
> 
> 
> 
>  Bechio by sounds of it he missed a sitter 2 mins ago and also Austin, 
> well on top, get in> From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> > To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:17:26 +0400
> > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: Re: [LU] 2 - 2
> > 
> > 
> > mcormack... not sure it is deserved but we'll take it
> >  > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:54:17 +0100
> > > To: mister@gmail.com
> > > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > > Subject: [LU] Half time
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into it. 
> > > > Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a 
> > > > bombardment from us.
> > > 
> > > Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually moved 
> > > Diouf into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real player.
> > > 
> > > Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he 
> > > captain - head down at 2-0
> > > ?
> > > ___
> > > Leedslist mailing list
> > > Info and options: 
> > > http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > > 
> > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> >   
> > ___
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> 
> ___
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
  
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] 3 - 2

2012-09-01 Thread Andy Pyzer


 Bechio by sounds of it he missed a sitter 2 mins ago and also Austin, well 
on top, get in> From: andypy...@hotmail.com
> To: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk; mister@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:17:26 +0400
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: Re: [LU] 2 - 2
> 
> 
> mcormack... not sure it is deserved but we'll take it
>  > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:54:17 +0100
> > To: mister@gmail.com
> > CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> > Subject: [LU] Half time
> > 
> > > 
> > > Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into it. 
> > > Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a 
> > > bombardment from us.
> > 
> > Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually moved 
> > Diouf into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real player.
> > 
> > Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he captain 
> > - head down at 2-0
> > ?
> > ___
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> > 
> > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
> 
> ___
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
  
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


Re: [LU] 2 - 2

2012-09-01 Thread Andy Pyzer

mcormack... not sure it is deserved but we'll take it
 > From: richleed...@yahoo.co.uk
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 15:54:17 +0100
> To: mister@gmail.com
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Subject: [LU] Half time
> 
> > 
> > Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into it. 
> > Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a 
> > bombardment from us.
> 
> Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually moved 
> Diouf into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real player.
> 
> Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he captain - 
> head down at 2-0
> ?
> ___
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
> 
> PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
  
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


[LU] Half time

2012-09-01 Thread Richard Walker
> 
> Big gulf in class here but credit to us we're battling back into it. 
> Blackburn actually looking like their bottle is going a bit under a 
> bombardment from us.

Main worries for us - a lack of pace up front. Warnock has actually moved Diouf 
into to the centre as the main striker - he's our only real player.

Peltier - exposed time and time again in the first half. Why is he captain - 
head down at 2-0
?
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


[LU] Bruno Ribeiro

2012-09-01 Thread Damian Walsh
I felt thoroughly confused when I saw that Bruno Ribeiro was playing for
Blackburn. Thank God for Wikipedia.

I was already disoriented from seeing the score though.

Damian
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate


[LU] ustream tech advice

2012-09-01 Thread N If
Dear Omniscient list

I have a lovely new PC, BUT when I listen to LUTV through ustream, I get 2
seconds of sound which then stops. Same when I refresh.  Everytime.

I have no idea what's casuing it.

LUTV sounds fine.  BBC iplayer sounds fine.  All my other sound media play
fine.

Anyone any idea what I could try?

Cheers.

Leeds to win a hard fought game 4-1  Diouff brace, a Rodolfo rocket and a
Becchio tap in.

xxx
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate