Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?

[Evert van Dijken]

But what if the ancestor died in South America? ;-)
Evert

2008/11/24 GeoSci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agreed!
> Keith
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Elizabeth Richardson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And of course sometimes we might forget that Canada and Mexico are in North
>> America. But in 1666/67 Canada did not yet exist, so the ancestor might
>> actually have died there, though if it had been Mexico the source might have
>> been clearer. To answer the OP's question, I would enter what the source
>> says as guessing at anything would be just as inaccurate. At some future
>> time, you may learn a the actual location and you can enter it then, even
>> adding a note as to the earlier entry if you like.
>>
>> Elizabeth
>> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?
>>
>>
>>> Or- perhaps - North America - we in the US often forget that Canada,
>>> Mexico, as well as the countries of Central and South America are all
>>> part of "America".
>>> \Keith
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Cathy Vallevieni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:

 I have an ancestor that a source states died in "America" in 1666/7.

 I don't have a location or colony.

 What would you enter in the Location (i.e. America or Colonial America or
 ???)

 Thanks.

 Cathy
 Orange County, CA
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages:
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry
>
> Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?

[GeoSci]

Agreed!
Keith

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Elizabeth Richardson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And of course sometimes we might forget that Canada and Mexico are in North
> America. But in 1666/67 Canada did not yet exist, so the ancestor might
> actually have died there, though if it had been Mexico the source might have
> been clearer. To answer the OP's question, I would enter what the source
> says as guessing at anything would be just as inaccurate. At some future
> time, you may learn a the actual location and you can enter it then, even
> adding a note as to the earlier entry if you like.
>
> Elizabeth
> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message - From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?
>
>
>> Or- perhaps - North America - we in the US often forget that Canada,
>> Mexico, as well as the countries of Central and South America are all
>> part of "America".
>> \Keith
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Cathy Vallevieni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have an ancestor that a source states died in "America" in 1666/7.
>>>
>>> I don't have a location or colony.
>>>
>>> What would you enter in the Location (i.e. America or Colonial America or
>>> ???)
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Cathy
>>> Orange County, CA
>>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



-- 
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?

[Elizabeth Richardson]

And of course sometimes we might forget that Canada and Mexico are in North 
America. But in 1666/67 Canada did not yet exist, so the ancestor might 
actually have died there, though if it had been Mexico the source might have 
been clearer. To answer the OP's question, I would enter what the source 
says as guessing at anything would be just as inaccurate. At some future 
time, you may learn a the actual location and you can enter it then, even 
adding a note as to the earlier entry if you like.


Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson

- Original Message - 
From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?



Or- perhaps - North America - we in the US often forget that Canada,
Mexico, as well as the countries of Central and South America are all
part of "America".
\Keith

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Cathy Vallevieni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

I have an ancestor that a source states died in "America" in 1666/7.

I don't have a location or colony.

What would you enter in the Location (i.e. America or Colonial America or
???)

Thanks.

Cathy
Orange County, CA






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?

[GeoSci]

Or- perhaps - North America - we in the US often forget that Canada,
Mexico, as well as the countries of Central and South America are all
part of "America".
\Keith

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Cathy Vallevieni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an ancestor that a source states died in "America" in 1666/7.
>
> I don't have a location or colony.
>
> What would you enter in the Location (i.e. America or Colonial America or
> ???)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cathy
> Orange County, CA
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



-- 
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] What would you call "America" in 1666?

[Cathy Vallevieni]

I have an ancestor that a source states died in "America" in 1666/7.

I don't have a location or colony.

What would you enter in the Location (i.e. America or Colonial America or ???)

Thanks.

Cathy
Orange County, CA



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Male Children Changes Name by Deed Poll

[Mark K]

How do I show that the male child changes his name by deed poll.
I have shown his children with his new name (as the birth certificates) but not 
sure what to do about his surname.  I currently show both in the surname field 
with his birth name normal and new name in brackets.
 
 
_
Time for change? Find your ideal job with SEEK.
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%3Ftracking%3Dsk%3Atl%3Ask%3Anine%3A0%3Ahottag%3Achange&_t=757263783&_r=SEEK_tagline&_m=EXT


Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[Elizabeth Richardson]

So how do the AKAs show in reports? Don't the women still show up with their 
birth names? And when Jane Smith is shown married to John Doe, don't you 
know her surname is now Doe? It seems like a waste of time to bother with 
this. Only if she retains her birth name would I make a note of it. I do, 
however, use the AKA field for the name a person used most commonly, 
particularly when it is not an obvious shortening of the given name. My 
niece, for instance, goes by "Red", although her given name is Kristin.


Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson


- Original Message - 
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports



Elizabeth

I concur, and I happen to be one of those who do so wish to put married 
names in the AKAs. After all (even today) most women use their married name 
for longer than their maiden name.


Ron Ferguson

_

*New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages  - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:52:10 -0900

I agree that reports should be showing the birth name. However, I don't 
know

that you "should" put married names in the AKA field. You "could" do so if
you wish.

Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson

- Original Message - 
From: "Michele Lewis"

To:
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports



Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name. The correct way
to enter females is my maiden name. All married names should be in the
AKA field.

michele


- Original Message - 
From: "GeoSci"

To: "Legacy User Group"
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports



Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts. But
reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
legal. Any way to change the legal last name? This would also apply
to a legal name change of any kind.

Ideas??

--
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1

_
See the most popular videos on the web
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454061/direct/01/

Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[ronald ferguson]

Keith,
 
I believe you to be correct here. I have always considered that AKAs are 
primarily for legal names, such as those given after the registration of the 
birth, through marriage or by deed-poll.
 
I also use them where there are standard(?) spelling variations due to 
illiteracy eg. "Hayes" and "Heyes" which for the same person may vary in parish 
registers, birth, marriage, death certificates etc. Both names being perfectly 
valid.
 
I do not use them for nick-names, or what one might call familiar names such as 
"Dan" for "Daniel", "Jim" for "James" and so on, as I consider that is what the 
quoted name option is for.

Ron Ferguson
 
_ 

*New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages  - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk 
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: 
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ 
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: 
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ 
_ 






> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:55:12 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
> 
> Discovered my problem after my post - SORRY! I do always enter
> females by their birth (maiden) name. One of my AKAs was sneaking
> into the picture and caught my eye - a close read showed that is was
> marked correctly.
> 
> I would guess that I would have to use the AKA field for a legally
> changed name too - ie) My mother was married a second time - divorced
> and wished to return to her previous husband's last name so that it
> would again match her children and grandchildren. The courts granted
> this - so her death cert., etc. show the first married name rather
> than the later one. Confusing but workable with the AKA system.
> 
> Thanks
> Keith
> 
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Michele Lewis
>  wrote:
>> Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name. The correct way to
>> enter females is my maiden name. All married names should be in the AKA
>> field.
>>
>> michele
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "GeoSci" 
>> To: "Legacy User Group" 
>> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
>>
>>
>>> Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
>>> maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts. But
>>> reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
>>> legal. Any way to change the legal last name? This would also apply
>>> to a legal name change of any kind.
>>>
>>> Ideas??
>>>
>>> --
>>> Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry
>>>
>>> Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
>>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1
>>>
_
BigSnapSearch.com - 24 prizes a day, every day - Search Now!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/

Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[ronald ferguson]

Elizabeth
 
I concur, and I happen to be one of those who do so wish to put married names 
in the AKAs. After all (even today) most women use their married name for 
longer than their maiden name.

Ron Ferguson
 
_ 

*New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages  - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk 
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: 
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ 
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: 
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ 
_ 






> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:52:10 -0900
> 
> I agree that reports should be showing the birth name. However, I don't know 
> that you "should" put married names in the AKA field. You "could" do so if 
> you wish.
> 
> Elizabeth
> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Michele Lewis" 
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
> 
> 
>> Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name. The correct way 
>> to enter females is my maiden name. All married names should be in the 
>> AKA field.
>>
>> michele
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - 
>> From: "GeoSci" 
>> To: "Legacy User Group" 
>> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
>>
>>
>>> Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
>>> maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts. But
>>> reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
>>> legal. Any way to change the legal last name? This would also apply
>>> to a legal name change of any kind.
>>>
>>> Ideas??
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry
>>>
>>> Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
>>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1
_
See the most popular videos on the web 
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454061/direct/01/

Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[GeoSci]

Discovered my problem after my post - SORRY!  I do always enter
females by their birth (maiden) name.  One of my AKAs was sneaking
into the picture and caught my eye - a close read showed that is was
marked correctly.

I would guess that I would have to use the AKA field for a legally
changed name too - ie)  My mother was married a second time - divorced
and wished to return to her previous husband's last name so that it
would again match her children and grandchildren.  The courts granted
this - so her death cert., etc. show the first married name rather
than the later one.  Confusing but workable with the AKA system.

Thanks
Keith

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Michele Lewis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name.  The correct way to
> enter females is my maiden name.  All married names should be in the AKA
> field.
>
> michele
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Legacy User Group" 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports
>
>
>> Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
>> maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts.  But
>> reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
>> legal.  Any way to change the legal last name?  This would also apply
>> to a legal name change of any kind.
>>
>> Ideas??
>>
>> --
>> Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry
>>
>> Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages:
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1807 - Release Date: 11/23/2008
> 10:59 AM
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



-- 
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[Elizabeth Richardson]

I agree that reports should be showing the birth name. However, I don't know 
that you "should" put married names in the AKA field. You "could" do so if 
you wish.


Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson

- Original Message - 
From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports


Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name.  The correct way 
to enter females is my maiden name.  All married names should be in the 
AKA field.


michele


- Original Message - 
From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Legacy User Group" 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports



Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts.  But
reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
legal.  Any way to change the legal last name?  This would also apply
to a legal name change of any kind.

Ideas??

--
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[Michele Lewis]

Your reports should be showing the female's MAIDEN name.  The correct way to 
enter females is my maiden name.  All married names should be in the AKA 
field.


michele


- Original Message - 
From: "GeoSci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Legacy User Group" 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:39 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports



Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts.  But
reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
legal.  Any way to change the legal last name?  This would also apply
to a legal name change of any kind.

Ideas??

--
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp










No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1807 - Release Date: 11/23/2008 
10:59 AM




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing a Bibliography Report and Footnotes Report

[Leon Chapman]

You need to select Reports > All Reports and select a report
Ancestors, Descendants, Descendant Narrative for example - assume
Descendant.

Then select Report Options button at bottom of Options for Descendant Books
and then select the Sources Tab.

There you have options to print a Bibliograhpy, Footnotes, etc.

Chap

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What are the steps to print out a Bibliography Report and also a Footnote
> Report?
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>


-- 
___
Leon Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Printing a Bibliography Report and Footnotes Report

[Jean]

What are the steps to print out a Bibliography Report and also a Footnote 
Report?



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0

[Kirsten Bowman]

Keith:

Do you have a secret update or something??  When I produce a report,
identical sources repeat for every instance when they're cited.  A
1-generation report that should have about a dozen sources suddenly has 45.
When the report is created as an RTF file or opened in Word much of the
source formatting is lost while the source count increases to 83.  I hardly
consider this "fixed."  (Using 7.0.0.55)

Of course, if you know a way around the problem I'd love to hear it!

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of GeoSci
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0


MANY of the problems are solved - even in the sourcing.  I believe
there will probably be an update before Christmas although that is
only my thinking.  Easiest install is to go to the LEGACY HOME tab
within the program and look to the right for the UPDATE.  It appears
to stall at about 27% complete - be patient - it will go on and
finish.

Enjoy
Keith


> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leona Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Have waited to upgrade to Vers. 7.0 from 6.0 for some time and think I am
>> ready to do this for myself for Christmas!  Have the bugs all been worked
>> out?  Anything special I need to know about the downloading process?  Do
I
>> uninstall the previous version first?  Does my data automatically go into
>> the new version?  Seems like I saw some exchanges about where the program
>> should be located - Program files or C:  drive, which is where my current
>> version is located.  Thanks for any help so I don't wind up with a
problem
>> to have to write in about.  Leona Cook
>>
--
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0

[GeoSci]

MANY of the problems are solved - even in the sourcing.  I believe
there will probably be an update before Christmas although that is
only my thinking.  Easiest install is to go to the LEGACY HOME tab
within the program and look to the right for the UPDATE.  It appears
to stall at about 27% complete - be patient - it will go on and
finish.

Enjoy
Keith


> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leona Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Have waited to upgrade to Vers. 7.0 from 6.0 for some time and think I am
>> ready to do this for myself for Christmas!  Have the bugs all been worked
>> out?  Anything special I need to know about the downloading process?  Do I
>> uninstall the previous version first?  Does my data automatically go into
>> the new version?  Seems like I saw some exchanges about where the program
>> should be located - Program files or C:  drive, which is where my current
>> version is located.  Thanks for any help so I don't wind up with a problem
>> to have to write in about.  Leona Cook
>>
-- 
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] "Master" versus "Geo" location in the Master Locations Geo Database

[Jenny M Benson]

Cathy Vallevieni wrote
There are three sections and each has a choice for "Master" and "Geo". 
I read the "Help" but still could not understand what the differences 
are and when to select Master and when to select Geo.


The Master selections are what you currently have in your Master 
Locations list.  The Geo selections are what the Geo Location Database 
entry is.  You can choose, in each section, whether you want to use your 
version or the version in the Geo Location Database.


So, for example, I have an entry in my Master Locations list which reads 
"" .  On that 3-section screen, this 
location shows as:


Master: 
Geo:  Clifton, Passaic, New Jersey, USA

Master: 
Geo:  Clifton, Passaic, NJ, USA

Master:  N405152.0506   W0740946.313
Geo:  N405130  W0740951

In the first instance, I will opt to retain the Master version because 
the <> indicate to me that I have not proved this location, but 
calculated it from other information.


In the second instance, I will again retain the Master version because I 
want to retain the <> and just abbreviating New Jersey doesn't make much 
difference.


In the third instance, I might opt to select the Geo version because 
it's probably more accurate and I don't need all the decimal places.


Hope that makes it clear for you.
--
Jenny M Benson


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0

[Heather Stovold]

I'll have a go at answering your questions   congrats on your Christmas
present to yourself.

To your question about all the bugs being worked out - well, it would be
impossible to EVER say that ALL the bugs have been worked out on any
software - but I think most of the big ones have. I think there are some
reporting ones still, but don't really keep track.

For downloading - I don't think there was anything too special.  I usually
choose to download the whole thing to my computer and install from there.  I
would do a backup of all your databases BEFORE switching to V7 - just in
case.

You don't need to uninstall the previous version if you are going to install
it to the same location V6 was installed, or if you are going to use both
versions.  (There isn't generally a need to use more than one version - I
can think of a couple of reasons, but generally you wouldn't want to.)  If
you want to install V7 to a different place than V6 was - then I would
uninstall V6

When you open your existing data files in V7, they will go through a
conversion process.  It is straightforward, and has no issues that I am
aware of.  You won't be able to use that file in V6 anymore.  (Note, if you
use the Clooz program and use the same data file in Legacy and in Clooz
(linked data) - the Clooz program doesn't recognize V7 files so you
would want to make a copy of your datafile to use in Clooz before you open
the file in Legacy V7 - and then keep them seperate.   If you don't use
Clooz, then don't worry about this note)

Where you install the program is up to you - works no matter where you
install it.

Hope this helps!




On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leona Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Have waited to upgrade to Vers. 7.0 from 6.0 for some time and think I am
> ready to do this for myself for Christmas!  Have the bugs all been worked
> out?  Anything special I need to know about the downloading process?  Do I
> uninstall the previous version first?  Does my data automatically go into
> the new version?  Seems like I saw some exchanges about where the program
> should be located - Program files or C:  drive, which is where my current
> version is located.  Thanks for any help so I don't wind up with a problem
> to have to write in about.  Leona Cook
>
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0

[Kirsten Bowman]

Leona:

No, the bugs most certainly have *not* been worked out--but I surely hope
they will be exterminated by Christmas.  Although I like the concept of
SourceWriter very much, v7 makes a terrible botch of sources in reports.

When you download v7 it will overwrite your old v6.  And once you open your
database in v7 you can't take it back to v6 unless you saved a copy.  Some
users have gone back to v6 (Sherry posted instructions), and some of us are
just gritting our teeth and hoping for a new update--Soon!  In fairness,
though, I should say that there seem to be quite a few users who are not
affected by the bugs.  Much depends on what you do with the data--produce a
web site, print books, post gedcoms, etc.

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leona
Cook
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:56 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup
Subject: [LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0


Have waited to upgrade to Vers. 7.0 from 6.0 for some time and think I am
ready to do this for myself for Christmas!  Have the bugs all been worked
out?  Anything special I need to know about the downloading process?  Do I
uninstall the previous version first?  Does my data automatically go into
the new version?  Seems like I saw some exchanges about where the program
should be located - Program files or C:  drive, which is where my current
version is located.  Thanks for any help so I don't wind up with a problem
to have to write in about.  Leona Cook





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Upgrading to Vers. 7.0

[Leona Cook]

Have waited to upgrade to Vers. 7.0 from 6.0 for some time and think I am 
ready to do this for myself for Christmas!  Have the bugs all been worked 
out?  Anything special I need to know about the downloading process?  Do I 
uninstall the previous version first?  Does my data automatically go into 
the new version?  Seems like I saw some exchanges about where the program 
should be located - Program files or C:  drive, which is where my current 
version is located.  Thanks for any help so I don't wind up with a problem 
to have to write in about.  Leona Cook 




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Surname after divorce on reports

[GeoSci]

Several in my files have gone through divorces - and returned to a
maiden name (or previous married name) - through the courts.  But
reports show the divorces surname since that was the last one that was
legal.  Any way to change the legal last name?  This would also apply
to a legal name change of any kind.

Ideas??

-- 
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry

Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
McCain-McKane-O'Kane DNA Group 1


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Gen Searcher]

Hello Jennifer and Evert
I think I have solved the problem
I had the option of Replace wife's name with husband's Surname in the index view

When I selected the option =Don't generate Married names = it removes the names 
from what I thought was a ghost spouse
Regards
John
- Original Message - 
From: "Gen Searcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse


Hello Jennifer
No Catherine should not be married and I don't know who the ghost is
all it states on the marriage screen is (under Married names)  Wife's married 
name= Catherine
John
- Original Message - 
From: "Jennifer Trahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse


> John,
> 
> Is Catherine supposed to be married? Who is her husband supposed to be?  I 
> had the exact same problem with the preferred marriage references. I had a 
> ghost spouse called Unknown by Legacy (Unknown actually showed up in family 
> view in the space where his name should have been). However, the person 
> married to Unknown was actually not married. I deleted the marriage and then 
> selected the option to fill in all empty MRINs before creating new ones. 
> After that, when I would select this individual from the index and then go to 
> her family view, the new couple with her old MRIN would show up in family 
> view. That's when I did check/repair, which fixed everything. I got the same 
> message as you did about the preferred marriage references.
> 
> Jennifer
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:14:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse
> 
> Hello Evert
> Yes I did and I don't get the message now. However when I access the family 
> 1323 it does not show up in the marriage list. But the spouse Catherine 
> DEVINE shows in the Name List and the index
> When I go to the family file for her and click on Marriage Info (which is 
> blank) it shows Catherine as wife married name without husbands name
> John
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse
> 
> 
>> Did you run another Check/Repair?
>> Evert
>> 
>> 
>> 2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> hello Listers
>>> I have a problem as follows
>>> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>>>
>>> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
>>> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
>>> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
>>> Regards
>>> John
>>> Manchester
>>> England
>>> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
>>> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>>>
>>> Date: 11-23-2008
>>>
>>> Please check this file very carefully.
>>>
>>> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
>>> this file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
>>> that does not exist:
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>> Archived messages:
>>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages: 
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>> 
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.c

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Gen Searcher]

Hello Jennifer
No Catherine should not be married and I don't know who the ghost is
all it states on the marriage screen is (under Married names)  Wife's married 
name= Catherine
John
- Original Message - 
From: "Jennifer Trahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse


> John,
> 
> Is Catherine supposed to be married? Who is her husband supposed to be?  I 
> had the exact same problem with the preferred marriage references. I had a 
> ghost spouse called Unknown by Legacy (Unknown actually showed up in family 
> view in the space where his name should have been). However, the person 
> married to Unknown was actually not married. I deleted the marriage and then 
> selected the option to fill in all empty MRINs before creating new ones. 
> After that, when I would select this individual from the index and then go to 
> her family view, the new couple with her old MRIN would show up in family 
> view. That's when I did check/repair, which fixed everything. I got the same 
> message as you did about the preferred marriage references.
> 
> Jennifer
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:14:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse
> 
> Hello Evert
> Yes I did and I don't get the message now. However when I access the family 
> 1323 it does not show up in the marriage list. But the spouse Catherine 
> DEVINE shows in the Name List and the index
> When I go to the family file for her and click on Marriage Info (which is 
> blank) it shows Catherine as wife married name without husbands name
> John
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse
> 
> 
>> Did you run another Check/Repair?
>> Evert
>> 
>> 
>> 2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> hello Listers
>>> I have a problem as follows
>>> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>>>
>>> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
>>> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
>>> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
>>> Regards
>>> John
>>> Manchester
>>> England
>>> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
>>> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>>>
>>> Date: 11-23-2008
>>>
>>> Please check this file very carefully.
>>>
>>> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
>>> this file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
>>> that does not exist:
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>> Archived messages:
>>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages: 
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>> 
>> 
>>
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Evert van Dijken]

If she isn't married and there are no children, just add a spouse with
a name which is easy to remember.
Remove the marriage link (Right click on the marriage bar) and after
the marriage link is removed you can delete the dummy husband. Don't
know if this works.
Evert

2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Evert
> Yes I did and I don't get the message now. However when I access the family 
> 1323 it does not show up in the marriage list. But the spouse Catherine 
> DEVINE shows in the Name List and the index
> When I go to the family file for her and click on Marriage Info (which is 
> blank) it shows Catherine as wife married name without husbands name
> John
> - Original Message -
> From: "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse
>
>
>> Did you run another Check/Repair?
>> Evert
>>
>>
>> 2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> hello Listers
>>> I have a problem as follows
>>> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>>>
>>> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
>>> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
>>> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
>>> Regards
>>> John
>>> Manchester
>>> England
>>> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
>>> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>>>
>>> Date: 11-23-2008
>>>
>>> Please check this file very carefully.
>>>
>>> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
>>> this file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
>>> that does not exist:
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>> Archived messages:
>>>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages:
>>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] "Master" versus "Geo" location in the Master Locations Geo Database

[Cathy Vallevieni]

Can someone tell me what is the difference between "Master" and "Geo" 
on the following screen in Legacy Deluxe Version 7.0.0.55:


View
Master List
Master Locations List
Select a Location and click the globe (Geo Options Menu)
Geo Location List
Search a location then click Select which takes you to a screen 
titled "Merge Location"


There are three sections and each has a choice for "Master" and 
"Geo".  I read the "Help" but still could not understand what the 
differences are and when to select Master and when to select Geo.


Thank you.

Cathy
Orange County, California



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Jennifer Trahan]

John,

Is Catherine supposed to be married? Who is her husband supposed to be?  I had 
the exact same problem with the preferred marriage references. I had a ghost 
spouse called Unknown by Legacy (Unknown actually showed up in family view in 
the space where his name should have been). However, the person married to 
Unknown was actually not married. I deleted the marriage and then selected the 
option to fill in all empty MRINs before creating new ones. After that, when I 
would select this individual from the index and then go to her family view, the 
new couple with her old MRIN would show up in family view. That's when I did 
check/repair, which fixed everything. I got the same message as you did about 
the preferred marriage references.

Jennifer



- Original Message 
From: Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:14:39 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

Hello Evert
Yes I did and I don't get the message now. However when I access the family 
1323 it does not show up in the marriage list. But the spouse Catherine DEVINE 
shows in the Name List and the index
When I go to the family file for her and click on Marriage Info (which is 
blank) it shows Catherine as wife married name without husbands name
John
- Original Message - 
From: "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse


> Did you run another Check/Repair?
> Evert
> 
> 
> 2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> hello Listers
>> I have a problem as follows
>> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>>
>> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
>> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
>> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
>> Regards
>> John
>> Manchester
>> England
>> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
>> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>>
>> Date: 11-23-2008
>>
>> Please check this file very carefully.
>>
>> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
>> this file.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ==
>>
>> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
>> that does not exist:
>>
>> ==
>>
>>
>>
>>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>> removed.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>> removed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages:
>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


  


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Gen Searcher]

Hello Evert
Yes I did and I don't get the message now. However when I access the family 
1323 it does not show up in the marriage list. But the spouse Catherine DEVINE 
shows in the Name List and the index
When I go to the family file for her and click on Marriage Info (which is 
blank) it shows Catherine as wife married name without husbands name
John
- Original Message - 
From: "Evert van Dijken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse


> Did you run another Check/Repair?
> Evert
> 
> 
> 2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> hello Listers
>> I have a problem as follows
>> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>>
>> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
>> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
>> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
>> Regards
>> John
>> Manchester
>> England
>> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
>> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>>
>> Date: 11-23-2008
>>
>> Please check this file very carefully.
>>
>> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
>> this file.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ==
>>
>> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
>> that does not exist:
>>
>> ==
>>
>>
>>
>>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>> removed.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been 
>> removed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>> Archived messages:
>>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines: 
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages: 
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy on a Mac

[s2f]

Sorry about  the question - I resolved the issue.


 ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
> Bob,
>  
> There are loads of references to this in the Archives, *address at the end of 
> every email*.
>  
> As I have said many times, Legacy is Microsoft Access based.
> 
> Ron Ferguson
>  
> _ 
> 
> *New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages  - Blogs
> http://www.fergys.co.uk 
> View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: 
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ 
> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: 
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ 
> _ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:05:24 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy on a Mac
> > 
> > Are there any plans underway to have a Legacy program for us MAC users? I 
> > am currently running Legacy on my iMac through a virtual machine under 
> > Fusion, but would like to have a native MAC program and get away from 
> > Windows if possible. I am having printer issues between the MAC OS X and 
> > Windows XP that is driving me bonkers.
> > 
> > Soliciting opinions and advice.
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> _
> Win £1000 John Lewis shopping sprees with BigSnapSearch.com
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Evert van Dijken]

Did you run another Check/Repair?
Evert


2008/11/23 Gen Searcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hello Listers
> I have a problem as follows
> I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;
>
> When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but 
> he/she is not shown in the marriage list
> I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
> Regards
> John
> Manchester
> England
> Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
> VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb
>
> Date: 11-23-2008
>
> Please check this file very carefully.
>
> It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in 
> this file.
>
>
>
>
>
> ==
>
> There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
> that does not exist:
>
> ==
>
>
>
>  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been removed.
>
>
>
>  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been removed.
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Ghost spouse

[Gen Searcher]

hello Listers
I have a problem as follows
I did  a Check/repair under file maintenance and got the message below ;

When I go to these individuals they appear to be linked to a spouse but he/she 
is not shown in the marriage list
I need to delete these two ghost connections but how ?
Regards
John
Manchester
England 
Check/Repair of Legacy Family File: C:\Legacy 6 Standard\Data\MASTER FILE 
VERSION  7 De Luxe.fdb

Date: 11-23-2008

Please check this file very carefully.

It's a good idea to run another Check/Repair after you verify the items in this 
file.

 

 

==

There are 2 Individual record(s) that reference a Preferred Marriage record 
that does not exist:

==

 

  Individual: RIN 1323.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been removed.

 

  Individual: RIN 2174.  The Preferred Marriage reference has been removed.



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy on a Mac

[ronald ferguson]

Bob,
 
There are loads of references to this in the Archives, *address at the end of 
every email*.
 
As I have said many times, Legacy is Microsoft Access based.

Ron Ferguson
 
_ 

*New Tutorial* Publish your Web Pages  - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk 
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: 
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ 
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: 
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ 
_ 






> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:05:24 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy on a Mac
> 
> Are there any plans underway to have a Legacy program for us MAC users? I am 
> currently running Legacy on my iMac through a virtual machine under Fusion, 
> but would like to have a native MAC program and get away from Windows if 
> possible. I am having printer issues between the MAC OS X and Windows XP that 
> is driving me bonkers.
> 
> Soliciting opinions and advice.
> 
> Bob
> 
_
Win £1000 John Lewis shopping sprees with BigSnapSearch.com
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/117442309/direct/01/

Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing emails

[Jenny M Benson]

Wynthner wrote
Wouldn't the easiest way be to just create another Master Source 
"Correspondence, Joe Bloggs<->Fanny Adams"


I could do that, and almost certainly would if I had several instances 
of correspondence between 2 particular other people.  Being a dedicated 
lumper, it goes against my grain to do that if it means numerous Master 
Sources each relating to just 1 item!  So far, that's mostly the case.

--
Jenny M Benson


Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

[LegacyUG] Legacy on a Mac

[s2f]

Are there any plans underway to have a Legacy program for us MAC users?  I am 
currently running Legacy on my iMac through a virtual machine under Fusion, but 
would like to have a native MAC program and get away from Windows if possible. 
I am having printer issues between the MAC OS X and Windows XP that is driving 
me bonkers.

Soliciting opinions and advice.

Bob




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp