Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-06 Thread Gene Young

Margaret Wilkinson wrote:


''you're the only person who has taken time to write that they miss it!''

Not so Sherry.
I used the 'Suggest a new feature' in Legacy itself to write about this issue 
some weeks ago. I did not have a reply.
I used the append multiple sources frequently in Version 6, and miss it from 
Version 7.
It was very easy to use, e.g. a husband and wife appear together in 1861, 1871, 
1881, 1891 and 1901 census.
Load the details and image of the relevant census on the old source clipboard.
Assign them to relevant family members in one stroke.
Any children can also use the same clipboard, not forgetting to delete any that 
don't apply after children have left home as well. (a couple of extra strokes, 
I know, but well worth the hassle of going back and forth)
There is a source perhaps for name, date and place of birth, relationship to 
mother, father, etc, all contained in one source clipboard, loaded with the 5 
census details.

I agree that it is sorely missed. There are a few comments that I have read 
from people who do not know how to use it, they think it it is too complicated 
or unnecessary - well they don't have to use it, do they?

Bring it back, please!!

Margaret



rant
I think the basic problem is that people who are unhappy with a feature or do not understand it are 
way more likely to complain about it than the people who use and love it are likely to write and 
praise it.  For every complainer there are usually a hundred who accept that that is the way it 
should be and have no reason to mention it, until it is taken away because of a handful of 
complainers.  This phenomenon is not restricted to Millenia.  The squeaky wheel gets the most grease 
syndrome is accepted business practice in too many companies.  Before a company removes any feature 
that customers have paid for it would be a sensible thing to survey the customer base as a whole 
rather than rely on a handful of whiners who, as we have seen, will never be totally happy.  This 
would apply to any business venture, not just Millenia.


I hope that in the future Millenia will post the question on the list before removing any feature 
based on a few complaints.  As I stated, people who are happy with a feature are usually the silent 
majority.

/rant

--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer  Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.ripway.com/egptech/



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-06 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
How do you know they all appear without entering them one at a time? Do you 
add them all to the same event? Also, these appear to be different events, 
in my opinion, so shouldn't carry the same source. I do have events where 
I've learned the same information from different sources, so these events 
carry more than one source. But I work with only one source at a time, so 
wouldn't ever be entering more than one source at a time.


Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson

- Original Message - 
From: Margaret Wilkinson


It was very easy to use, e.g. a husband and wife appear together in 1861, 
1871, 1881, 1891 and 1901 census.
Load the details and image of the relevant census on the old source 
clipboard.

Assign them to relevant family members in one stroke.
Any children can also use the same clipboard, not forgetting to delete any 
that don't apply after children have left home as well. (a couple of extra 
strokes, I know, but well worth the hassle of going back and forth)
There is a source perhaps for name, date and place of birth, relationship to 
mother, father, etc, all contained in one source clipboard, loaded with the 
5 census details.


I agree that it is sorely missed. There are a few comments that I have read 
from people who do not know how to use it, they think it it is too 
complicated or unnecessary - well they don't have to use it, do they?


Bring it back, please!!

Margaret



[LegacyUG] re: appending ?


J B Coats
Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:15:44 -0700

Below is my exchange concerning the use of the source clipboard v7 vs. v6.

Another point concerning the 'extra key strokes' of adding one source at a 
time from the possible 10 that can be added is 3 per source. If you had 4 
sources you would have 12 strokes for each individual that needed these same 
sources.


Whereas from the v6 you would load up to 5 and add them all at once.


I believe that using the option 'ALT 3 routine would cause more problems. 
Currently it would add ALL the sources in your clipboard for EVERY data 
field that was not blank.


I believe that the better solution would be to change the function of the 
'ALT 3' routine would be to add ALL the sources in your clipboard to ONLY 
the ONE field that you desired to source.


This would provide the best of this source routine actions from both v7  
v6.


till later _J_B_ J B Coats
--
=

- Original Message - From: Sherry/Support

To:
Sent: Thursday, 19 June, 2008 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Legacy Suggestion Report



I'll pass your comments on to the programmers. I never did figure out a way 
to use the multiple sources and you're the only person who has taken time to


write that they miss it!

Sherry
Customer Support
Millennia Corporation

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Legacy Suggestion Report

SuggestionReport: 0
Category:Legacy 7.0 Features
Subject:Adding multi Sources to single individule b. d. m. etc

Suggestion:The following is an LUG exchange concerning the loss to using the

multi source feature in V6 deluxe.

I agree that the V6 ability to add multi sources to a single item [like
birth] was very good.


Example, you have located a family on multi census records and want to use 
one clipboard click to add all the different sources to a single item [like


birth]

It's loss is already missed.
-

With the change in V7, now you have to quick load each source to the
clipboard and then click again to add it to a single item [like birth]


The other new button [or ALT-3] added is to add a single source to 'EVERY' 
item that is other than blank [like name,birth,bap,death,burial] which it


really ..OVERKILL.

Why not allow this same button add all the up to 5 sources to a single
highlighted item [like birth]

So far I have not located how to
ASSIGN MORE THAN ONE SOURCE AT A TIME
There seems to be no way to accomplish this feature.

I have been using the Help file for Clipboard Sources [5-1182] which
apprarently STILL need corrections.

Any assistance/comments would be appreciated

Thanks till later _J_B_ [V7.0.0.45 deluxe] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Original Message -

Sent: Sunday, 08 June, 2008 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 clipboard use

I guess I'm the weird one because I liked the 5
tabs. Now I will have to master the 'save and load'
feature.

I think the '5 tabs' are mentioned in the V7 Manual.

  Original Message-

Sent: Saturday, 07 June, 2008 10:47 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 clipboard use

Bring up the source detail is behaving as it always
has. In other words, when the clipboard button is
clicked, you have already assigned the master
source, and now you just need to enter the detail
information. Maybe you haven't yet set the clipboard
with the master source. Click on the top button to
do 

RE: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-06 Thread Ron Bernier
Gene,

I could not disagree with you more.  No software company, be it Millenia, 
Microsoft, or any other company has any obligation to let the customers decide 
how the software should be developed.  You, me, and all of the other folks who 
purchased Legacy purchased the software, not specific options in the software 
and not the rights to decide what should and should not be available in the 
software.  We definitely can voice our opinions, but Millenia and any other 
software developer has no obligation to let the people decide where the 
developments/sales of the software heads.  If you feel that is your right, then 
you need to purchase stock in the company - purchasing a copy of the software 
does not count.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gene Young
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 9:52 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?


rant
I think the basic problem is that people who are unhappy with a feature or do 
not understand it are
way more likely to complain about it than the people who use and love it are 
likely to write and
praise it.  For every complainer there are usually a hundred who accept that 
that is the way it
should be and have no reason to mention it, until it is taken away because of a 
handful of
complainers.  This phenomenon is not restricted to Millenia.  The squeaky wheel 
gets the most grease
syndrome is accepted business practice in too many companies.  Before a company 
removes any feature
that customers have paid for it would be a sensible thing to survey the 
customer base as a whole
rather than rely on a handful of whiners who, as we have seen, will never be 
totally happy.  This
would apply to any business venture, not just Millenia.

I hope that in the future Millenia will post the question on the list before 
removing any feature
based on a few complaints.  As I stated, people who are happy with a feature 
are usually the silent
majority.
/rant

--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer  Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.ripway.com/egptech/



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-06 Thread Gene Young

Ron Bernier wrote:

Gene,

I could not disagree with you more.  No software company, be it Millenia, 
Microsoft, or any other company has any obligation to let the customers decide 
how the software should be developed.  You, me, and all of the other folks who 
purchased Legacy purchased the software, not specific options in the software 
and not the rights to decide what should and should not be available in the 
software.  We definitely can voice our opinions, but Millenia and any other 
software developer has no obligation to let the people decide where the 
developments/sales of the software heads.  If you feel that is your right, then 
you need to purchase stock in the company - purchasing a copy of the software 
does not count.



I did not say anything about obligation, just good business practice.  Base decisions on what will 
please and accommodate the most users, not just a few.  If the majority say dump it, ok.  But, if 
more people want it, it just makes good business sense to keep it.


I think this subject has run its course and is back in Millenia's ball park.

--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer  Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.ripway.com/egptech/



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-06 Thread Wynthner
I would beg to differ...
If I buy a certain software package because of a particular way it does a 
certain thing and it works properly and then I buy the next upgrade and find 
that it has changed the way that certain function works I have a perfect right 
to feel somewhat less than warm and fuzzy about the company producing it and 
make those feelings public so that others are informed of the change and can 
avoid error of upgrading if they want that certain feature.
 
Companies who do not heed the complaints of their customers do so at their 
their own risk.



- Original Message 
From: Ron Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com 
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2008 11:08:13 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

Gene,

I could not disagree with you more.  No software company, be it Millenia, 
Microsoft, or any other company has any obligation to let the customers decide 
how the software should be developed.  You, me, and all of the other folks who 
purchased Legacy purchased the software, not specific options in the software 
and not the rights to decide what should and should not be available in the 
software.  We definitely can voice our opinions, but Millenia and any other 
software developer has no obligation to let the people decide where the 
developments/sales of the software heads.  If you feel that is your right, then 
you need to purchase stock in the company - purchasing a copy of the software 
does not count.


 




Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-05 Thread Fred Stanley
Why are you sending me all of these emails?  (25 this morning alone)


FMS Publisher's Rep, Inc
Fred Stanley
P.O. Box 30527  Midwest City, OK  73140
405.741.3733
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- On Fri, 9/5/08, J B Coats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: J B Coats [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?
To: Sherry/Support [EMAIL PROTECTED], LegacyUserGroup 
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 11:48 AM

Below is my exchange concerning the use of the source clipboardv7 vs. 
v6.

Another point concerning the 'extra key strokes' of adding one source
at a 
time from the possible 10 that can be added is 3 per source.  If you had 4 
sources you would have 12 strokes for each individual that needed these 
same sources.

Whereas from the v6 you would load up to 5 and add them all at once.

I believe that using the option 'ALT 3 routine would cause more problems. 
Currently it would add ALL the sources in your clipboard for EVERY data 
field that was not blank.

I believe that the better solution would be to change the function of the 
'ALT 3' routine would be to add ALL the sources in your clipboard to
ONLY 
the ONE field that you desired to source.

 This would provide the best of this source routine actions from both v7  
v6.

 till later _J_B_  J B Coats
 --
 =
- Original Message - 
From: Sherry/Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 June, 2008 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: Legacy Suggestion Report


 I'll pass your comments on to the programmers.  I never did figure out
a 
 way
 to use the multiple sources and you're the only person who has taken
time 
 to
 write that they miss it!

 Sherry
 Customer Support
 Millennia Corporation

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:56 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Legacy Suggestion Report

 SuggestionReport: 0
 Category:Legacy 7.0 Features
 Subject:Adding multi Sources to single individule b. d. m. etc
 Suggestion:The following is an LUG exchange concerning the loss to using 
 the
 multi source feature in V6 deluxe.

 I agree that the V6 ability to add multi sources to a single item [like
 birth] was very good.

 Example, you have located a family on multi census records and want to 
 use
 one clipboard click to add all the different sources to a single item 
 [like
 birth]

 It's loss is already missed.
 -

 With the change in V7, now you have to quick load each source to the
 clipboard and then click again to add it to a single item [like birth]

 The other new button [or ALT-3] added is to add a single source to 
 'EVERY'
 item that is other than blank [like name,birth,bap,death,burial]  which 
 it
 really ..OVERKILL.

 Why not allow this same button add all the up to 5 sources to a single
 highlighted item [like birth]

 So far I have not located how to
 ASSIGN MORE THAN ONE SOURCE AT A TIME
 There seems to be no way to accomplish this feature.

 I have been using the Help file for Clipboard Sources  [5-1182]  which
 apprarently STILL need corrections.

 Any assistance/comments would be appreciated

 Thankstill later  _J_B_  [V7.0.0.45 deluxe] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Original Message - 
Sent: Sunday, 08 June, 2008 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 clipboard use

 I guess I'm the weird one because I liked the 5
 tabs.  Now I will have to master the 'save and load'
 feature.

 I think the '5 tabs' are mentioned in the V7 Manual.
  
  Original Message-
 Sent: Saturday, 07 June, 2008 10:47 AM
 Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7 clipboard use

 Bring up the source detail is behaving as it always
 has. In other words, when the clipboard button is
 clicked, you have already assigned the master
 source, and now you just need to enter the detail
 information. Maybe you haven't yet set the clipboard
 with the master source. Click on the top button to
 do this first.

 Regarding the 5 different tabs. We actually removed  this because
1) it
 was hardly used; 2) when it was
 used, people thought it was supposed to do something
 else. Anyways, it was just way too confusing. We've  had many
people 
 now
 thank us for removing this. You  can still save/load clipboards
using 
 the
 save/load
 buttons. It is these buttons that most people
 wanted, and they perform the functions that users
 thought the 5 tabs were supposed to perform.

 Geoff Rasmussen

  Original Message-
 Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 7:39 AM

 When I select to arrow to use the clipboard, it goes
 directly to 'Add Source Detail'.

 I cannot find where to access the 5 tabs to add
 5 different sources.
 




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: 

Re: [LegacyUG] re: appending ?

2008-09-05 Thread Mike Fry

Fred Stanley wrote:

Why are you sending me all of these emails?  (25 this morning alone)


Because the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been subscribed to 
the list.


To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp 


Only you can unsubscribe. Do it and quit moaning.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg.



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp