RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Michele Lewis
Not only should identical sources not repeat [when they are back to back] but 
once you used a short source [subsequent citation] it should continue to use 
that short citation even if the details are slightly different.  The classic 
example is a book.

1st citation [no italics because I am using plain text]:

Leonard L. Slade Sr., compiler, Lamar County Heritage (Baltimore, MD: Gateway 
Press, Inc., 1978), 237.


Subsequent citations:

Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 237.
Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 142.
Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 68.

Even though the page number changes,,you should still be using the short 
citation.

Michele



-Original Message-
From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:vik...@rvi.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:35 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Jemima, Marianne, and Bob:

Identical source citations should not repeat in reports.  There are certain 
conditions that will cause them to do that but these can be corrected.  To get 
help from the LUG list you need to identify the specific report you're 
generating, whether the repetition is in footnotes, endnotes or bibliography, 
the format you're producing (RTF, HTML, or in the Preview).
If you'll be very thorough in posting the description of your condition someone 
will surely be able to solve the problem.

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Hello

Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work OK in 
reports?

I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and notice that 
the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the same source so it is 
repeating itself many times.

As I have already checked Ibid in
Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the report 
function.

I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot see any 
recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

Many thanks,

Jemima





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Robert Runion
I think I misspoke in my earlier message. When looking at the 'View'  -  
'Master Lists' - 'Source…' - 'edit' -  'Edit Master Source Definition' - 
and use the same 'name' for the 'Source List Name' and the 'Title', both 
'names' will appear in the same numbered end note of a book - which appeared to 
me to be duplications - perhaps not.  Should an entry in 'Title' be 
eliminated/omitted when it is identical to the entry in the  'Source List 
Name'? It appears that if I leave the 'Title' blank when entering Master 
Sources, the first appearance of the source in a book format will be the full 
reference reading with subsequent end notes showing as a cversion of the Master 
Source, somewhat like Michele indicated.

Also, I'm still trying to fathom the significance of a 'File ID' when applied 
to a Master Source and a 'File ID' as it may relate to a Detail entry.  If  I 
use the same 'File ID' number in both places (and here is where I must be in 
error), they appear in the end notes of the book as '…... ID: 1234 and Cit. ID: 
1234…' .  I've been using a Source Citation Report (selecting the 'number each 
source' feature during the build) and using those numbers from the resultant 
'File IDs' report to enter File ID's for my Master sources. If I also enter the 
same File ID for a detail, and do an 'Advanced Sourcing' routine to associate 
the information with all those persons using that Master source,  they will be 
identified to a 'Citation Report' with that 'Source Citation' (AKA File ID). 
This report is divided into two parts - the first one is the 'File ID' and the 
second is 'Source Citations'.  The report beomes extremely large very quickly 
when you may have 100-200 persons referenced in a singe source. The process to 
do the foregoing is rather lengthy and too long for this message, but the 
different File ID results in the end notes of a book (descendant narrative) are 
interesting. Positive observations or comments welcomed.

SgtBob


On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Michele Lewis wrote:

 Not only should identical sources not repeat [when they are back to back] but 
 once you used a short source [subsequent citation] it should continue to use 
 that short citation even if the details are slightly different.  The classic 
 example is a book.

 1st citation [no italics because I am using plain text]:

 Leonard L. Slade Sr., compiler, Lamar County Heritage (Baltimore, MD: Gateway 
 Press, Inc., 1978), 237.


 Subsequent citations:

 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 237.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 142.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 68.

 Even though the page number changes,,you should still be using the short 
 citation.

 Michele



 -Original Message-
 From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:vik...@rvi.net]
 Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:35 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Jemima, Marianne, and Bob:

 Identical source citations should not repeat in reports.  There are certain 
 conditions that will cause them to do that but these can be corrected.  To 
 get help from the LUG list you need to identify the specific report you're 
 generating, whether the repetition is in footnotes, endnotes or bibliography, 
 the format you're producing (RTF, HTML, or in the Preview).
 If you'll be very thorough in posting the description of your condition 
 someone will surely be able to solve the problem.

 Kirsten

 -Original Message-
 From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Hello

 Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work OK in 
 reports?

 I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and notice that 
 the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the same source so it is 
 repeating itself many times.

 As I have already checked Ibid in
 Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the report 
 function.

 I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot see any 
 recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

 Many thanks,

 Jemima





 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
 our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jemima,

Traditionally ibid worked well with basic sources, however, it is not, and
cannot be, applicable to Source Writer Sources, because the latter has a
separate statement for the 2nd appearance of a source. I would think that it
still works for basic sourcing, although I am open to contradiction, as I
have not checked this for years since I now have so few.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:00 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Thanks Marianne

I think I will report a suggestion.

Jemima

-Original Message-
From: mbstx [mailto:msz...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 18:47
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

I don't think it's available, and I think it should be.  I've had a horrible
time creating reports that require the use of ibid, and no longer use
Legacy to do so, I use just Word, which creates a LOT of extra work.
Marianne

-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy geneal...@ardenholme.co.uk
Sent: Mar 9, 2012 12:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Hello

Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work
OK in reports?

I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and
notice that the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the
same source so it is repeating itself many times.

As I have already checked Ibid in
Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the
report function.

I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot
see any recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

Many thanks,

Jemima





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 14:47, Robert Runion wrote:
 Also, I'm still trying to fathom the significance of a 'File ID' when
 applied to a Master Source and a 'File ID' as it may relate to a
 Detail entry.

I don't think I have ever seen a need to use both the Master File ID and
the Detail ID.

As a rule, my Master Sources are fairly general (GRO Birth
Certificates or 1871 England Census) so there is no one document or
image which relates to the Master Source and hence no need for a File
ID.  In the case of those examples I quoted, and others, there will be
numerous documents and/or images attached to numerous Source Details, so
there the Citation File Id relates to the particular document cited in
those particular Source Details.

Just occasionally there will be a a single document (or similar) which
is a Master Source and for which there are no distinguishing Source
Details, except perhaps the date of entry.  In that case, I will
identify the document with a MAster Source ID.
--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jenny,

Do you think that it might be there for extreme splitters :-)?

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

-Original Message-
From: Jenny M Benson
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:28 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

On 11/03/2012 14:47, Robert Runion wrote:
 Also, I'm still trying to fathom the significance of a 'File ID' when
 applied to a Master Source and a 'File ID' as it may relate to a
 Detail entry.

I don't think I have ever seen a need to use both the Master File ID and
the Detail ID.

As a rule, my Master Sources are fairly general (GRO Birth
Certificates or 1871 England Census) so there is no one document or
image which relates to the Master Source and hence no need for a File
ID.  In the case of those examples I quoted, and others, there will be
numerous documents and/or images attached to numerous Source Details, so
there the Citation File Id relates to the particular document cited in
those particular Source Details.

Just occasionally there will be a a single document (or similar) which
is a Master Source and for which there are no distinguishing Source
Details, except perhaps the date of entry.  In that case, I will
identify the document with a MAster Source ID.
--
Jenny M Benson




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 15:46, Ron Ferguson wrote:
 Do you think that it might be there for extreme splitters:-)?

!!

Even so, I don't think they'd need to use both, just one or the other.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread mbstx
Re Robert's comment on whether the Title should be omitted if identical to 
Source List Name, that's something that drives me crazy.  It's one more 
little quirk of Legacy that's easy to forget when making source entries 
according to Evidence Explained.  I also don't think omitting it solves the 
ibid problem.  Marianne

-Original Message-
From: Robert Runion sarge1...@cox.net
Sent: Mar 11, 2012 9:47 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

I think I misspoke in my earlier message. When looking at the 'View'  -  
'Master Lists' - 'Source…' - 'edit' -  'Edit Master Source Definition' - 
and use the same 'name' for the 'Source List Name' and the 'Title', both 
'names' will appear in the same numbered end note of a book - which appeared 
to me to be duplications - perhaps not.  Should an entry in 'Title' be 
eliminated/omitted when it is identical to the entry in the  'Source List 
Name'? It appears that if I leave the 'Title' blank when entering Master 
Sources, the first appearance of the source in a book format will be the full 
reference reading with subsequent end notes showing as a cversion of the 
Master Source, somewhat like Michele indicated.

On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Michele Lewis wrote:

 Not only should identical sources not repeat [when they are back to back] 
 but once you used a short source [subsequent citation] it should continue to 
 use that short citation even if the details are slightly different.  The 
 classic example is a book.

 1st citation [no italics because I am using plain text]:

 Leonard L. Slade Sr., compiler, Lamar County Heritage (Baltimore, MD: 
 Gateway Press, Inc., 1978), 237.


 Subsequent citations:

 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 237.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 142.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 68.

 Even though the page number changes,,you should still be using the short 
 citation.

 Michele



 -Original Message-
 From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:vik...@rvi.net]
 Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:35 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Jemima, Marianne, and Bob:

 Identical source citations should not repeat in reports.  There are certain 
 conditions that will cause them to do that but these can be corrected.  To 
 get help from the LUG list you need to identify the specific report you're 
 generating, whether the repetition is in footnotes, endnotes or 
 bibliography, the format you're producing (RTF, HTML, or in the Preview).
 If you'll be very thorough in posting the description of your condition 
 someone will surely be able to solve the problem.

 Kirsten

 -Original Message-
 From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Hello

 Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work OK in 
 reports?

 I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and notice 
 that the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the same source so 
 it is repeating itself many times.

 As I have already checked Ibid in
 Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the report 
 function.

 I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot see 
 any recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

 Many thanks,

 Jemima




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Robert Runion
On one of my four saved .fdb files ( I keep several copies just in case I screw 
up one so bad it needs to be trashed), I changed the data file .fdb to .mdb and 
opened it in Access.  I then opened 'tblSR' and deleted the column entitled 
'SrcTitle', then inserted a blank column and renamed it 'SrcTitle', saved it 
and closed Access. I then converted the .mdb file back to .fdb and opened it.  
The duplicate data appears to have been removed since I see only one Source 
title in the book endnotes.  Kind of a long way around, but I accomplished what 
I wanted.  If I later decide that I do need the 'Title', I can resort to one of 
my other saved .fdb files.

With regard to my earlier comments about 'File IDs', I'm beginning to question 
why I really need them.  I stopped entering File IDs after setting up 50 of the 
985 sources  with File IDs until I can rationalize whether to proceed with this 
process.

I have my Master Sources numbered in the MRIN-nn format, filed in boxes in that 
order, and also scanned them into my Docs file for addition to an individuals 
events, etc., if needed. As a further precaution, I add the MRIN-nn as a suffix 
to the end of the 'Source List Name' so that I have sources cross-referenced 
for each individual in my file.

Marianne has a point - I am not able to resolve the 'ibid' action, but at least 
my attempted 'fix' removes some of the data that is so redundant in a book 
endnote, but does have a cross-reference to show the source number for each 
individual's Event data.

Bob



 Re Robert's comment on whether the Title should be omitted if identical to 
 Source List Name, that's something that drives me crazy.  It's one more 
 little quirk of Legacy that's easy to forget when making source entries 
 according to Evidence Explained.  I also don't think omitting it solves the 
 ibid problem.  Marianne

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Runion sarge1...@cox.net
 Sent: Mar 11, 2012 9:47 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 I think I misspoke in my earlier message. When looking at the 'View'  -  
 'Master Lists' - 'Source…' - 'edit' -  'Edit Master Source Definition' - 
 and use the same 'name' for the 'Source List Name' and the 'Title', both 
 'names' will appear in the same numbered end note of a book - which appeared 
 to me to be duplications - perhaps not.  Should an entry in 'Title' be 
 eliminated/omitted when it is identical to the entry in the  'Source List 
 Name'? It appears that if I leave the 'Title' blank when entering Master 
 Sources, the first appearance of the source in a book format will be the 
 full reference reading with subsequent end notes showing as a cversion of 
 the Master Source, somewhat like Michele indicated.

 On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Michele Lewis wrote:

 Not only should identical sources not repeat [when they are back to back] 
 but once you used a short source [subsequent citation] it should continue 
 to use that short citation even if the details are slightly different.  The 
 classic example is a book.

 1st citation [no italics because I am using plain text]:

 Leonard L. Slade Sr., compiler, Lamar County Heritage (Baltimore, MD: 
 Gateway Press, Inc., 1978), 237.


 Subsequent citations:

 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 237.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 142.
 Slade, Lamar County Heritage, 68.

 Even though the page number changes,,you should still be using the short 
 citation.

 Michele



 -Original Message-
 From: Kirsten Bowman [mailto:vik...@rvi.net]
 Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:35 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Jemima, Marianne, and Bob:

 Identical source citations should not repeat in reports.  There are certain 
 conditions that will cause them to do that but these can be corrected.  To 
 get help from the LUG list you need to identify the specific report you're 
 generating, whether the repetition is in footnotes, endnotes or 
 bibliography, the format you're producing (RTF, HTML, or in the Preview).
 If you'll be very thorough in posting the description of your condition 
 someone will surely be able to solve the problem.

 Kirsten

 -Original Message-
 From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
 Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 AM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Hello

 Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work OK 
 in reports?

 I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and notice 
 that the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the same source so 
 it is repeating itself many times.

 As I have already checked Ibid in
 Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the report 
 function.

 I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot see 
 any recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

 Many thanks,

 Jemima




 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http

RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-10 Thread ArdenholmeGenealogy
Thanks Marianne

I think I will report a suggestion.

Jemima

-Original Message-
From: mbstx [mailto:msz...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 09 March 2012 18:47
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

I don't think it's available, and I think it should be.  I've had a horrible 
time creating reports that require the use of ibid, and no longer use Legacy 
to do so, I use just Word, which creates a LOT of extra work.  Marianne

-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy geneal...@ardenholme.co.uk
Sent: Mar 9, 2012 12:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Hello

Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work
OK in reports?

I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and
notice that the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the
same source so it is repeating itself many times.

As I have already checked Ibid in
Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the
report function.

I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot
see any recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

Many thanks,

Jemima




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-10 Thread Robert Runion
I too would like this feature - its distressing to see so many repeats of the 
same source when a book is prepared.

Bob

On Mar 10, 2012, at 4:00 AM, ArdenholmeGenealogy wrote:

 Thanks Marianne

 I think I will report a suggestion.

 Jemima

 -Original Message-
 From: mbstx [mailto:msz...@mindspring.com]
 Sent: 09 March 2012 18:47
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 I don't think it's available, and I think it should be.  I've had a horrible 
 time creating reports that require the use of ibid, and no longer use 
 Legacy to do so, I use just Word, which creates a LOT of extra work.  Marianne

 -Original Message-
 From: ArdenholmeGenealogy geneal...@ardenholme.co.uk
 Sent: Mar 9, 2012 12:23 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

 Hello

 Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the previous citations) work
 OK in reports?

 I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for an ancestor and
 notice that the sources at the end of this report are mostly of the
 same source so it is repeating itself many times.

 As I have already checked Ibid in
 Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it is working in the
 report function.

 I have just been checking the archives for this user group but cannot
 see any recent posts . Can anyone confirm this?

 Many thanks,

 Jemima




 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
 our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
 our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
 Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
 our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-10 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Jemima, Marianne, and Bob:

Identical source citations should not repeat in reports.  There are certain
conditions that will cause them to do that but these can be corrected.  To
get help from the LUG list you need to identify the specific report you're
generating, whether the repetition is in footnotes, endnotes or
bibliography, the format you're producing (RTF, HTML, or in the Preview).
If you'll be very thorough in posting the description of your condition
someone will surely be able to solve the problem.

Kirsten

-Original Message-
From: ArdenholmeGenealogy
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 10:23 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

Hello

Does the Ibid. (repeats what is listed in the
previous citations) work OK in reports?

I am trying to create an Ancestor book report for
an ancestor and notice that the sources at the end
of this report are mostly of the same source so it
is repeating itself many times.

As I have already checked Ibid in
Options/Customise/Sources, it doesn't look that it
is working in the report function.

I have just been checking the archives for this
user group but cannot see any recent posts . Can
anyone confirm this?

Many thanks,

Jemima





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp