Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How to get geolocation without problem into Wikidata

2019-05-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mi., 15. Mai 2019 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Shu Higashi :

> Thanks, Martin and Kathleen.
>
> I will let wikidata people know the operation as I described 1-4
> and tell them to be sure not to be engaged in "systematic attempt to
> aggregate"
> in order to avoid share-alike triggering.




from my understanding of the guidelines, if you proceed as described in
1-4, you will trigger share-alike. The geocoding guideline is explicit
about this:
"

If a Geocoder uses the OSM database to produce Geocoding Results and the
Geocoder is Publicly Used, then the OSM database is being Publicly Used
under the ODbL. * Individual* Geocoding Results are insubstantial database
extracts: *Individual* Geocoding Results that are based on a Direct Hit
contain an insubstantial amount of raw OSM data; ...

Consequently, if:

1. no modifications (or only trivial transformations) have been made to the
OSM database used by a Geocoder; *and *

2. *the Geocoding Results are not used to create a new database that
contains the whole or a substantial part of the original OSM database, then
*

the share-alike obligations of the ODbL are not triggered (per Section
4.4.b of the ODbL) 

*If Geocoding Results are used to create a new database that contains the
whole or a substantial part of the contents of the OSM database, this new
database would be considered a Derivative Database and would trigger
share-alike obligations under section 4.4.b of the ODbL.*

"


there is also a definition for "substantial" in the context of Geocoding
results:

"

A collection of Geocoding Results is not a substantial extract of the OSM
database provided:

1. only names, addresses, and/or latitude/longitude information are
included in the Geocoding Results, *and *

*2. the collection is not a systematic attempt to aggregate all or
substantially all Primary Features of a given type (as defined in the
Collective Database Guideline) within a geographic area city-sized or
larger. *

"


>From my understanding, wikidata is such a systematic attempt.

Cheers

Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


Re: [OSM-legal-talk] How to get geolocation without problem into Wikidata

2019-05-15 Thread Shu Higashi
Thanks, Martin and Kathleen.

I will let wikidata people know the operation as I described 1-4
and tell them to be sure not to be engaged in "systematic attempt to aggregate"
in order to avoid share-alike triggering.


2019-05-15 4:29 GMT+09:00, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk
:
> I think what's key for each individual Wikidata editor to know is that it's
> possible for even an individual to engage in a "systematic attempt to
> aggregate" per the Geocoding Guidelines, which is not allowed without
> triggering sharealike. Copying single lat/longs is permitted without
> sharealike.
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:47 PM Shu Higashi  wrote:
>
>> I wanted to tell Wikidata community in Japan how to get geolocation
>> from OSM without problem(trigger share-alike).
>> It will be a kind of guideline for them and each Wikidata editor may
>> do so individually.
>>
>> Shu
>>
>> 2019-05-14 8:08 GMT+09:00, Martin Koppenhoefer :
>> >
>> >
>> > sent from a phone
>> >
>> >> On 14. May 2019, at 00:14, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk
>> >>  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If by "Each wikidata people repeat this operation manually." you mean
>> that
>> >> each individual Wikipedia editor makes their own decision about
>> >> whether
>> to
>> >> copy the lat/long, and it is not a coordinated or automated effort
>> >> (not
>> a
>> >> "systematic attempt to aggregate" per the Geocoding Guidelines), then
>> >> it
>> >> is allowed.
>> >
>> >
>> > how could Wikidata not be considered a coordinated effort? I mean he is
>> > asking here, people are making plans how to proceed, how can this be
>> > „not
>> > coordinated“? Isn’t a plan to operate „individually“ already a kind of
>> > coordination (purposefully crafted to circumvent the licensing
>> provisions)?
>> >
>> > Cheers, Martin
>> > ___
>> > legal-talk mailing list
>> > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> legal-talk mailing list
>> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>>
>

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk