Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way
Richard Fairhurst wrote: > In order to preserve anonymity while still allowing them to be taken through > into the new database, LWG has provided a list of the changesets edited by > anonymous-but-accepting-CTs mappers. This is available on planet.osm.org and > will be refreshed periodically. I believe both Frederik and Simon are using > it for their visualisation/tally services. OK, thanks to clarify thing. But the nodes i'm talking about are indicate in geofabrick tool "subhect to licence trouble" and i a explorer history for some nodes all users envolve have accepted CTs, except for the first one that has no user in history (i assume it was anonymous). One node history : <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/21462322/history> The area in geofabrick (nodes on the motorway) <http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.55431&lat=45.75814&zoo m=11&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_harmless,wtfe_line_harmless,wtfe_point _modified,wtfe_line_modified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wt fe_line_created_cp,wtfe_line_created> Perhaps there is no problems, but i'm worry. -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences : <http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/> ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way
Some aspect of the licence change is questionning me. Old anonymous edition (when OSM do not require registering) are ambigious to me : some say that those edits will be deleted. But i have some examples (close to me) of old nodes (anonymous) that where then improved sereval times and that support for example to big motorway. Those nodes where originally anonymous but where edited 6-8 times but users who accept new licence. What will happens to those nodes ? An example : <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/21462512/history> In this example only the nodes are old, the way is correct (only edited by user who accept licence). -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences : <http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/> ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Voluntary re-licensing begins
Cartinus wrote: > Yahoo aerial imagery is supplied under some terms (sorry too lazy to look them > up right now). Sometime in the past someone(s) from within the OSM project > asked them if tracing from those images to make a map was possible within > those terms. They answered: Yes, this is possible. > > Now can somebody explain to me why this would not be explicit permission? I think you could find your answer on the wiki : <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Yahoo#Legalities> Here, in France, one of the admin office that handle "cadastre" give OSM-Fr the right to use they map layer the same way and it's legal and got an explicit permission too : <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cadastre_Français/Condit ions_d%27utilisation> (sorry, only in french) -- Pierre-Alain Dorange ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
