Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way

[Pierre-Alain Dorange]

Richard Fairhurst 
wrote:

> In order to preserve anonymity while still allowing them to be taken through
> into the new database, LWG has provided a list of the changesets edited by
> anonymous-but-accepting-CTs mappers. This is available on planet.osm.org and
> will be refreshed periodically. I believe both Frederik and Simon are using
> it for their visualisation/tally services.

OK, thanks to clarify thing.

But the nodes i'm talking about are indicate in geofabrick tool "subhect
to licence trouble" and i a explorer history for some nodes all users
envolve have accepted CTs, except for the first one that has no user in
history (i assume it was anonymous).

One node history :


The area in geofabrick (nodes on the motorway)


Perhaps there is no problems, but i'm worry.

-- 
Pierre-Alain Dorange
OSM experiences : 


___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way

[Richard Fairhurst]

Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> Some aspect of the licence change is questionning me.
> 
> Old anonymous edition (when OSM do not require registering) 
> are ambigious to me : some say that those edits will be deleted.

Bit of confusion here.

OSM has always required registration. It's just that, originally, you had
the choice for your edits to be "anonymous": i.e. when they were shown (via
the API or data browser or whatever), they wouldn't be attributed with your
username or ID.

But the user ID was still recorded in the database. So we know who these
people are, and we know whether they've accepted the CTs. Many have.

In order to preserve anonymity while still allowing them to be taken through
into the new database, LWG has provided a list of the changesets edited by
anonymous-but-accepting-CTs mappers. This is available on planet.osm.org and
will be refreshed periodically. I believe both Frederik and Simon are using
it for their visualisation/tally services.

cheers
Richard



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Anonymous-nodes-edited-supporting-way-tp7099870p707.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

[OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way

[Pierre-Alain Dorange]

Some aspect of the licence change is questionning me.

Old anonymous edition (when OSM do not require registering) are
ambigious to me : some say that those edits will be deleted.

But i have some examples (close to me) of old nodes (anonymous) that
where then improved sereval times and that support for example to big
motorway.
Those nodes where originally anonymous but where edited 6-8 times but
users who accept new licence.

What will happens to those nodes ?

An example :


In this example only the nodes are old, the way is correct (only edited
by user who accept licence).

-- 
Pierre-Alain Dorange
OSM experiences : 


___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk