Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is listing at Contributors page qualifying as waiver for CC BY 4.0?

2020-10-23 Thread Simon Poole 
Just as a note, prior to the review of CC BY 4.0 compatibility by the 
LWG (and CC fwiw), we were very clear that 4.0 licensed material should 
-not- be imported, the importers knew this and were ignoring it at their 
own risk.


Simon

Am 23.10.2020 um 10:43 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk:

Is

"it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29 
 
"


(see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html 
 for the 
original text)

sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0?

As I understand CC BY 4.0 requires waiver for DRM related reasons, and 
that it would not

be sufficient.

For context see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway) 



___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is listing at Contributors page qualifying as waiver for CC BY 4.0?

2020-10-23 Thread Andrew Harvey 
Some here would say that when the publisher indicates their interpretation
of the license then we can rely on that instead going with our
interpretation of the license, but I am not a lawyer.

If they can sign the LWG waiver it makes things a lot easier, but it's not
the only option.

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk <
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Is
>
> "it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29
> "
>
> (see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html for the
> original text)
> sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0?
>
> As I understand CC BY 4.0 requires waiver for DRM related reasons, and
> that it would not
> be sufficient.
>
> For context see
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)
> ___
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

[OSM-legal-talk] Is listing at Contributors page qualifying as waiver for CC BY 4.0?

2020-10-23 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk 
Is 

"it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29
 "
(see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html for the 
original text)
sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0?

As I understand CC BY 4.0 requires waiver for DRM related reasons, and that it 
would not
be sufficient.

For context see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk