Re: [lfs-dev] Thoughts about LFS and systemd
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/25/2014 05:22 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I've been looking at systemd and had a thought that perhaps both could >> be put into a single LFS build. Looking at the installed package >> contents in the books, I see the following name collisions: >> >> systemd sysvinit eudev >> udevd >> udevadm udevadm >> halt halt >> init init >> poweroff poweroff >> reboot reboot >> runlevel runlevel >> shutdown shutdown >> telinit telinit >> >> I don't know if udevd is missing from the systemd page or is really not >> installed when doing a systemd build, but I suspect it has just been >> omitted from the page. >> > It's named systemd-udevd and it's installed in /lib/systemd. Ah, yes. The change in name seems unnecessary, but I remember now. A symlink might be appropriate if this approach turns out to be feasible. -- Bruce >> In any case, this cursory look indicates to me that both could be >> installed with custom names and a script written to swap the names and >> reboot to the desired system. I also suspect a sysV initialization >> could use the systemd version of udev and eudev would not be necessary. >> >> I have not looked at boot scripts or possibly different build options in >> other programs, but wanted to throw out the idea for comments. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] Thoughts about LFS and systemd
On 03/25/2014 05:22 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I've been looking at systemd and had a thought that perhaps both could > be put into a single LFS build. Looking at the installed package > contents in the books, I see the following name collisions: > > systemd sysvinit eudev >udevd > udevadm udevadm > halt halt > init init > poweroff poweroff > reboot reboot > runlevel runlevel > shutdown shutdown > telinit telinit > > I don't know if udevd is missing from the systemd page or is really not > installed when doing a systemd build, but I suspect it has just been > omitted from the page. > It's named systemd-udevd and it's installed in /lib/systemd. > In any case, this cursory look indicates to me that both could be > installed with custom names and a script written to swap the names and > reboot to the desired system. I also suspect a sysV initialization > could use the systemd version of udev and eudev would not be necessary. > > I have not looked at boot scripts or possibly different build options in > other programs, but wanted to throw out the idea for comments. > >-- Bruce > -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-dev] Thoughts about LFS and systemd
I've been looking at systemd and had a thought that perhaps both could be put into a single LFS build. Looking at the installed package contents in the books, I see the following name collisions: systemd sysvinit eudev udevd udevadm udevadm halt halt init init poweroff poweroff reboot reboot runlevel runlevel shutdown shutdown telinit telinit I don't know if udevd is missing from the systemd page or is really not installed when doing a systemd build, but I suspect it has just been omitted from the page. In any case, this cursory look indicates to me that both could be installed with custom names and a script written to swap the names and reboot to the desired system. I also suspect a sysV initialization could use the systemd version of udev and eudev would not be necessary. I have not looked at boot scripts or possibly different build options in other programs, but wanted to throw out the idea for comments. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
