Re: [lfs-dev] More issues with BLFS

2012-11-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Wolf wrote:
 I've noticed the issues I've pointed out getting fixed, so here's a
 couple more:

 - Tumbler has optional dependencies on GStreamer, libgsf, and libopenraw.
 - Wireshark has an optional dependency on libcap2.

 Lastly, and this is a matter of opinion, BLFS is lacking both an IDE and
 a programmer's editor. I would humbly suggest one or the other be added;
 I'd suggest Geany.

Many programmers will disagree.  Both vim and emacs are quite good 
programmer's editors.  I've used both vi (not sure about vim) and emacs 
since at least 1991.

We do have gdb and the front end, ddd, is just a cmmi program.  qdevelop 
and kdevelop are pretty straight forward too.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-dev] More issues with BLFS

2012-11-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
--- Em qui, 22/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:

 De: Bruce Dubbs
 Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] More issues with BLFS
 Para: LFS Developers Mailinglist
 Data: Quinta-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2012, 14:08
 Wolf wrote:
  I've noticed the issues I've pointed out getting fixed,
 so here's a
  couple more:
 

  Lastly, and this is a matter of opinion, BLFS is
 lacking both an IDE and
  a programmer's editor. I would humbly suggest one or
 the other be added;
  I'd suggest Geany.
 
 Many programmers will disagree.  Both vim and emacs are
 quite good 
 programmer's editors.  I've used both vi (not sure
 about vim) and emacs 
 since at least 1991.

I like geany very much and would vote for it in the book.

Having said that, I understood when Andy wrote that he liked it too, but
would not think it should be in the book, as emacs wass there. Never
used do not even know how it looks like.

Now, I mostly use and prefer vim, second is geany, rarely, gtk vim (yes,
I know Bruce cannot understand why someone would use gtk vim).

[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-dev] More issues with BLFS

2012-11-22 Thread Alice Wonder
On 11/22/2012 10:03 AM, Wolf wrote:
 On 11/22/2012 11:08 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 Wolf wrote:
 I've noticed the issues I've pointed out getting fixed, so here's a
 couple more:

 - Tumbler has optional dependencies on GStreamer, libgsf, and libopenraw.
 - Wireshark has an optional dependency on libcap2.

 Lastly, and this is a matter of opinion, BLFS is lacking both an IDE and
 a programmer's editor. I would humbly suggest one or the other be added;
 I'd suggest Geany.

 Many programmers will disagree.  Both vim and emacs are quite good
 programmer's editors.  I've used both vi (not sure about vim) and emacs
 since at least 1991.

 We do have gdb and the front end, ddd, is just a cmmi program.  qdevelop
 and kdevelop are pretty straight forward too.

  -- Bruce
 I meant a GUI program for code editing.
 Sorry if this message looks strange, Thunderbird is acting up.



emacs can be built against gui libraries.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page