Re: gcc make check
On 7/25/07, Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was investigating the gcc-4.1.2 build and got the output below. What was surprising to me is that there were no unexpected failures. Should the comments in the book about expecting some failures be changed? IIRC, the last time I ran the 4.1.2 testsuite, I also had no failures. That wasn't during a bootstrap, though. Oh, I don't remember what happened with mudflap. Manuel, do you still have the test logs from the LFS jhalfs run you did the other day? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gcc make check
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:01:27PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote: On the Pentium-IV machin I have no current testsuites logs right now. On the AMD64 machine I have the logs for a normal build, a 3-iterations build and a build using MAKEFLAGS=-j3. On all of them the results are identical: LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_2_release revision 121944 Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu [...] === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times this 0 XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test [...] === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) [...] The unique diference with Bruce's result are the 2 unexpected successes in gcc. I'm seeing exactly the same on an AMD64 running 32-bit and built from LFS-svn-2006-12-09 (gcc-4.1.1, ld-2.17, glibc-2.5), currently running kernel 2.6.22-rc1. Looking back at my packages from December, I can see that these were the standard versions of binutils and glibc, without any branch update patches. Running /lib/libc.so.6 in chroot shows '2.5' even though we have a branch update patch applied. As a matter of form, should we in future change how we produce branch_update patches so that there is some sort of date identifier produced when asking for the version, the way that most distros do ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gcc make check
El Jueves, 26 de Julio de 2007 18:28, Dan Nicholson escribió: IIRC, the last time I ran the 4.1.2 testsuite, I also had no failures. That wasn't during a bootstrap, though. Oh, I don't remember what happened with mudflap. Manuel, do you still have the test logs from the LFS jhalfs run you did the other day? On the Pentium-IV machin I have no current testsuites logs right now. On the AMD64 machine I have the logs for a normal build, a 3-iterations build and a build using MAKEFLAGS=-j3. On all of them the results are identical: LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_2_release revision 121944 Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times this 0 XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes 12408 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 66 # of unsupported tests 69 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.1.2 === gcc tests === Running target unix XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dI-M.c scan-file (^|n)cmdlne-dI-M.*: [^n]*cmdlne-dI-M.c XPASS: gcc.dg/cpp/cmdlne-dM-M.c scan-file (^|n)cmdlne-dM-M[^n]*: [^n]*cmdlne-dM-M.c === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 38985 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 99 # of untested testcases 28 # of unsupported tests 246 /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.1.2 === libmudflap tests === Running target unix === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes 1799 === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes 3398 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 12 # of unsupported tests 324 The unique diference with Bruce's result are the 2 unexpected successes in gcc. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: gcc make check
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:31 AM Subject: gcc make check I was investigating the gcc-4.1.2 build and got the output below. What was surprising to me is that there were no unexpected failures. Should the comments in the book about expecting some failures be changed? -- Bruce Hello Bruce. I had similar results with gcc-4.3.0-exp testsuite first (months ago) and last time I tried it (few days ago). I should have the testsuite log somewhere (I posted to Alexander first time I tried gcc-4.3.0), if interested I could search and post it here or as attachment. Luca -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
gcc make check
I was investigating the gcc-4.1.2 build and got the output below. What was surprising to me is that there were no unexpected failures. Should the comments in the book about expecting some failures be changed? -- Bruce $ ../gcc-4.1.2/contrib/test_summary|grep -A7 Summ === g++ Summary === # of expected passes12408 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 66 # of unsupported tests 69 /usr/src/gcc/gcc-build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ version 4.1.2 -- === gcc Summary === # of expected passes38985 # of expected failures 101 # of untested testcases 28 # of unsupported tests 246 /usr/src/gcc/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.1.2 -- === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes1799 === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors) -- === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes3398 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 12 # of unsupported tests 324 Compiler version: 4.1.2 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
