On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:10:03PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> I've done a test build with git version of glibc, and all other
> packages updated. I've forgotten the beta version of autoconf.
I thought I was out on a limb with autoconf ;-) So far, apart from
automake tests it looks good - but I have not (at this point) built
most of the packages I identified as using it.
>
> The patch for gcc pass 2 is not needed anymore.
>
> But the sed or the whole patch for binutils gold tests is (are)
> still needed. I haven't had the time to get to the exact
> requirements...
>
Agreed.
> With the git version of glibc, one more test fails, besides misc/tst-
> ttyname (BTW, Ken, when this one does not fail, isn't it in the
> UNSUPPORTED list?): io/tst-lchmod.
>
I'll need to find logs where it did not fail, so far I've only been
looking at the machine where I'm experimenting.
> I also have a lot of failures in gcc tests:
> 6 in libstdc++ (the usual locale/time_get/get_time failures
> 7 in gcc (gcc.dg/asan/pr80166.c in various conditions)
> 17 in g++ (all in g++.dg/coroutines/torture)
>
Ooh. I'll need to look at past (gcc-10.1) failures to see if those
match any of my past results.
> Also, as reported in ticket #4700, all pipeline tests fail with the new
> check version. I've proposed a sed, which I hope can be further
> simplified...
>
> All in all, the build went ok. And the system boots (in a VM) without
> difficulty.
>
> Pierre
>
I'll try and follow-up in the next day or two.
ĸen
--
Juliet's version of cleanliness was next to godliness, which was to
say it was erratic, past all understanding and was seldom seen.
-- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
