Re: [lfs-support] Sanity Check Failed in GCC Pass 2

2016-09-04 Thread Rob
Thanos Baloukas  wrote:
> If you don't find something, post some info for the host
> and the output of version-check.sh

I  deleted /tools and started over again. This time, we had no errors. Still 
not sure what steps I might have missed though.
Oh well. As long as it's working.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Sanity Check Failed in GCC Pass 2

2016-09-04 Thread Thanos Baloukas

On 04/09/2016 06:55 μμ, Rob wrote:

In conducting the sanity check in section 5.10:
echo 'int main(){}' > dummy.c
cc dummy.c
readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
cc dummy.c
got the following output
/usr/bin/ld: 
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../crti.o: 
unrecognized relocation (0x2b) in section `.init'
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I am following LFS 7.10 RC1. I do not understand enough of the inner workings 
of linking to debug this issue. The pages on google are seemingly directed at 
experienced programmers--something which I am not.
What went wrong here?


Check lfs user's bash history to be sure that you run
the book's commands correctly. Check if you used the correct
tarball versions also. You can do this with command "history|less" on
a terminal as user lfs, or open /home/lfs/.bash_history with an editor.

If you don't find something, post some info for the host
and the output of version-check.sh

--
Thanos
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


[lfs-support] Sanity Check Failed in GCC Pass 2

2016-09-04 Thread Rob
In conducting the sanity check in section 5.10:
echo 'int main(){}' > dummy.c
cc dummy.c
readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
cc dummy.c
got the following output
/usr/bin/ld: 
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../crti.o: 
unrecognized relocation (0x2b) in section `.init'
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I am following LFS 7.10 RC1. I do not understand enough of the inner workings 
of linking to debug this issue. The pages on google are seemingly directed at 
experienced programmers--something which I am not.
What went wrong here?
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style