[liberationtech] World University and School

[Scott MacLeod]

World University and School seeks 17 year olds from all countries in the
world, first in English, to apply and matriculate online this autumn (as
WUaS accredits on CC MIT OCW in 7 languages and CC Yale OYC) ...
http://worlduniversityandschool.org ... for free CC OCW undergraduate
Bachelor's degrees (then planned Ph.D., law and M.D. as well as I.B. high
school).

WUaS seeks to become the Stanford / Harvard of the internet in all ~200
countries' main and official languages with time.

Add your name and email to the sign up sheet here ...
http://worlduniversityandschool.org ... or if you know someone who might be
interested.

Classes will be live in group video with MIT and Yale faculty (in video)
and with planned Stanford / MIT / Harvard graduate students as instructors
facilitating sections while learning to become faculty.

Best,
Scott

https://twitter.com/WorldUnivAndSch


-- 

- Scott MacLeod - Founder & President
- http://worlduniversityandschool.org
- http://scottmacleod.com

- World University and School - like Wikipedia with best STEM-centric
OpenCourseWare - incorporated as a nonprofit university and school in
California, and is a U.S. 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt educational organization.
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

[liberationtech] Ideas to Improve Stanford Liberationtech

[Yosem Companys]

Hi All,

Thanks to Rich's message about the benefits of open-source mailing lists,
it looks as though we will keep the mailing list as is, except that we will
send a daily digest from Twitter in case anyone wants to discuss the news
items for that day (rather than create a dedicated news list).

The only other ideas proposed in this thread are below. They look good.
Anyone have any feelings pro or con Bram's proposal? Any concerns? If not,
anyone want to help make them a reality?

We are understaffed as some of our grants have run out, so we would be very
grateful t anyone who wants to volunteer to help make these new projects
happen.

Thanks,
Yosem



On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Bram Wets  wrote:

> Hi Yosem and all,
>
> Thanks for the invitation to share some ideas for Liberationtech.
>
> Idea 1:
> An idea list where the Liberationtech community can post ideas for
> projects, upvote (and downvote) them, put your name with an idea to
> contribute.
> This would facilitate your call for ideas/projects ;-)
> I actually like the format of software bugtracking. It maybe can be used
> for such an idea list. Or a github-like structure with pullrequests...
>
> Idea 2:
> An overview of tips, good practices, tools and apps for secure
> communication and digital privacy. And the organisations and platforms that
> work on this topic.
> Yes, there is a lot out there and some organizations already have done
> terrific work. So the focus has to be on the overview, not on doing all
> there work over again.
> Additionally we can add good practices in how to reach people and teach
> them those privacy tools.
>
> Best regards,
> Bram Wets
>
>
> Bram Wets
> co-founder
> PRIVACY TRAINING CENTER
> www.privacytraining.org
>
> Unencrypted e-mail can be read by anyone! Talk to me in private using
> encryption. Here's my PGP public key: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/
> lookup?op=get=0x919C9EBCA0430B96
>
> Yosem Companys  schreef op 1 februari 2017
> 06:00:57 CET:
>
>> We are Stanford Liberatiiontech.
>>
>> Our home page is here: http://cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/libtech.
>>
>> To sign up to our 4K-strong mailing list, click here: https://mailman.
>> stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
>>
>> We have also curated a list of Liberationtech content at
>> https://twitter.com/Liberationtech.
>>
>> If you prefer to read our list as a newspaper, you could always check our
>> Paper.li account: http://paper.li/Liberationtech#/
>>
>> Our Liberationtech blog has been dead for a while, but we are working on
>> reviving it. If you are interested in helping out, please let us know.
>>
>> We also have a series of listservs on topics related to Liberationtech.
>> The most important lists are the following:
>>
>>- Events: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/
>>liberationtech-events
>>- Jobs: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/
>>liberationtech-jobs
>>- CfP: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/
>>liberationtech-cfp
>>
>> For the aforementioned lists, we try to compile a list of all events, job
>> opportunities, and call for papers related to Liberationtech from all over
>> the world.
>>
>> It's not a comprehensive list, so your assistance would be helpful. If
>> you hear of a job, event, or cfp that would be of benefit to Liberationtech
>> subscribers, please let us know.
>>
>> Finally, we want to take Liberationtech to the next level. What that
>> means, we don't know. But the world has changed a lot since we started back
>> in 2008: Censorship is on the rise. Internet freedom is on the decline. And
>> we have become much more of a community of hackers and cybersecurity
>> professionals who seek to protect vulnerable communities around the world.
>>
>> So if you have ideas of projects you would like to see us take on, please
>> let us know. We want the Liberationtech community to drive the process. Any
>> idea is welcome. Dream big or small. Just let us know how you think we can
>> best help.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yosem
>> (One of the moderators)
>>
>
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] Should we start a new Stanford liberationtech-news list?

[Yosem Companys]

OK, so how about we create a digest of the day's Tweets on @Liberationtech
and send them every morning? Then subscribers will receive one email a day
and decide if any of the tweets are worth discussing.

Does anyone know of a good app that does this? I've found a lot of apps
online that claim to do so, but the majority are dead.

Thanks,
Yosem

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Andrés Pacheco  wrote:

> I'm all for more news, total, aren't we swamped with spam already as it
> is? So libre tech news from the twitter feed would help improve the ratio
> of spam to good stuff in our inbox.
>
> Tagging is for sissies and I assume this list is full of superduper smart
> techies nerds that don't need no stinking badges to filter classify sort
> autodeletearchivefile incoming email, oh god how much I miss now emacs
> mhmail, "la última Coca-Cola del desierto, or isn't it?
>
> BTW I'm unemployed starting 2 days gym now svdcresfy to join the
> resistance, drop me a live if you have something anywhere that you might
> think would interest me in the world of 
> ICT4-dev-social/migrant/youth/anybody's
> Justice etc
>
> Regards | Saludos,
>
> Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
> 
>
> > On Feb 5, 2017, at 2:59 PM, José María Mateos 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 03:41:18PM +0100, carlo von lynX wrote:
> >>> - I'd rather have two mailing lists only: one for discussions (all
> >>> type   of discussions) and one for announcements. If everything goes
> >>> into the   same list, at least have the announcements clearly tagged
> >>> so they can   be easily filtered.
> >>
> >> Okay, but please start with a clone of the subscriptions
> >> so we don't have to manually subscribe both to recreate
> >> the status quo.
> >>
> >> Also, please put an automatic Reply-To: in the announcements
> >> that leads to the discussion list. I personally would still
> >> merge both streams into the same folder because I find it
> >> interesting whenever libtech people have a comment to add to
> >> a piece of news.
> >
> > Agree with this.
> >
> >>>   - An e-mail with news every 10 minutes may be too much. Wouldn't
> >>> it be   better to have a daily news digest of some sort? Then anyone
> >>> could   start a discussion based on it.
> >>
> >> I guess most of us absorb the "news" by just grasping what
> >> the subject line says, then decide what is worth digging
> >> into. A digest format would impede that kind of fast absorption.
> >> Anyone who prefers digests can still choose the digest feature
> >> of the mailing list software... right?
> >
> > Yes, as long as the Twitter news is sent to a list that doesn't include
> the discussions per se (or are flagged with a [Twitter] tag in the subject
> line so they can be filtered.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > JMM.
> > --
> > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/
> mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change
> password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/
> mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change
> password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
>
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] Facebook: Building Global Community - What's your response to Mark Zuckerberg?

[Yosem Companys]

I know. I agree.

I have never been thrilled with Steven's selection of Facebook for
pro-democracy groups.

To protect your privacy and security, stay off Facebook.

But, to build movements, create an account on Facebook (or Twitter or any
other dominant centralized social network) and try to get as many people to
join.

One vision we had on Diaspora was to create a HootSuite like app that would
integrate all of your social networking sites on one dashboard and enable
you to decide how public you wanted to be. You wanted to connect with a
friend? You could do it directly from your own server to your friend's own
server without an intermediary. You wanted to advertise something more
broadly on Facebook or Twitter? You could do that too. Unfortunately,
Diaspora never moved away from its pod focus to build a better HootSuite.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Cristina [efecto99] 
wrote:

> On 17/02/17 17:24, Thomas Delrue wrote:
>
> On February 17, 2017 1:32:46 PM EST, Steven Clift  
>  wrote:
>
> I invite everyone to read and comment on Mark Zuckerberg's important
> "Building Global Community" letter:
>
>  https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity
>
> This is a special Facebook Group I've created to connect lots of
> disparate communities for a unified conversation that I will share
> with my contacts at Facebook.
>
> You'll find a link to his letter and posts organized by the five key
> questions Mark asks and posts to share media reports and 
> more:https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502366400151315/
>
> Or jump straight to his letter: http://po.st/zuckglobal
>
> Also, while I don't have my first tele meeting with a foundation on
> this until next week, now seems like a good time to share
> E-Democracy's draft proposal for Local Civic Facebook 
> Groups:http://po.st/civicfacebookgroupsgoogledoc
>
> Zuckerberg's letter highlights the absolutely vital role of "engaged
> leaders" creating "meaningful groups." E-Democracy's magic mix is
> supporting YOU - those leaders - in local communities working to
> create local community and civic life Facebook Groups that foster
> inclusive and supportive local online communities that foster civic
> engagement and informed communities. So, if you want to add your city
> to the list of the 22 cities with volunteer interest, email me 
> -cl...@e-democracy.org - with "Civic Facebook Groups" in the subject
> line. We drafted most of this proposal in December, so we are ecstatic
> that Facebook's next mission is so well aligned with our scrappy work.
>
> Thanks,
> Steven Clift
> E-Democracy.org
>
> P.S. You can jump in deeper now (we are just getting started):
>
>
> "Facebook guy tells world it needs to use more Facebook or face bad times",  
> is that roughly the right summary of his 'insights' or am I way off?
>
> --
> Thomas
> (Sent from my mobile device,  please forgive brevity or typos.)
>
> It seems as a joke if wouldn't be posted HERE, on *Liberation tech*
> mailing list: since when Facebook serves to the liberation of people!? I
> must be reading a lot of fake news about Facebook the last5 years? (and
> i think I'm getting short).
>
> So funny...
>
> My 1st impulse to answer this email was to simply put:
>
> One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
> One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
> In the Land of Mordor   Surveillance where the Shadows lie.
>
> 99
>
>
> --
> Esta comunicación puede ser legal y/o ilegalmente recogida, almacenada y
> utilizada por distintos actores. Si duda sobre el contenido a compartir,
> evite enviarlo sin cifrar.
>
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/
> mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change
> password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
>
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] Facebook: Building Global Community - What's your response to Mark Zuckerberg?

[Cristina [efecto99]]

On 17/02/17 17:24, Thomas Delrue wrote:
> On February 17, 2017 1:32:46 PM EST, Steven Clift  
> wrote:
>> I invite everyone to read and comment on Mark Zuckerberg's important
>> "Building Global Community" letter:
>>
>>  https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity
>>
>> This is a special Facebook Group I've created to connect lots of
>> disparate communities for a unified conversation that I will share
>> with my contacts at Facebook.
>>
>> You'll find a link to his letter and posts organized by the five key
>> questions Mark asks and posts to share media reports and more:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502366400151315/
>>
>> Or jump straight to his letter: http://po.st/zuckglobal
>>
>> Also, while I don't have my first tele meeting with a foundation on
>> this until next week, now seems like a good time to share
>> E-Democracy's draft proposal for Local Civic Facebook Groups:
>> http://po.st/civicfacebookgroupsgoogledoc
>>
>> Zuckerberg's letter highlights the absolutely vital role of "engaged
>> leaders" creating "meaningful groups." E-Democracy's magic mix is
>> supporting YOU - those leaders - in local communities working to
>> create local community and civic life Facebook Groups that foster
>> inclusive and supportive local online communities that foster civic
>> engagement and informed communities. So, if you want to add your city
>> to the list of the 22 cities with volunteer interest, email me -
>> cl...@e-democracy.org - with "Civic Facebook Groups" in the subject
>> line. We drafted most of this proposal in December, so we are ecstatic
>> that Facebook's next mission is so well aligned with our scrappy work.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steven Clift
>> E-Democracy.org
>>
>> P.S. You can jump in deeper now (we are just getting started):
>>
> "Facebook guy tells world it needs to use more Facebook or face bad times",  
> is that roughly the right summary of his 'insights' or am I way off? 
>
> --
> Thomas
> (Sent from my mobile device,  please forgive brevity or typos.)
It seems as a joke if wouldn't be posted HERE, on *Liberation tech*
mailing list: since when Facebook serves to the liberation of people!? I
must be reading a lot of fake news about Facebook the last5 years?
(and i think I'm getting short).

So funny...

My 1st impulse to answer this email was to simply put:

One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor   Surveillance where the Shadows lie.

99


-- 
Esta comunicación puede ser legal y/o ilegalmente recogida, almacenada y
utilizada por distintos actores. Si duda sobre el contenido a compartir,
evite enviarlo sin cifrar.
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

Re: [liberationtech] Would you like to help us tweet?

[Minna Aslama]

@aslama

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Yosem Companys 
wrote:

> If so, please send me an email, and we will add you to our Stanford
> Twitter team.
>
> --
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations
> of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/
> mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change
> password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
>



-- 
Dr. Minna Aslama Horowitz
Helsinki & New York
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

[liberationtech] Would you like to help us tweet?

[Yosem Companys]

If so, please send me an email, and we will add you to our Stanford Twitter
team.
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.

[liberationtech] Brainstorming and a potential call to action

[Yosem Companys]

I agree with many of your points, Alberto.

Our list has been part of many important turning points in grassroots
cybersecurity and privacy over the years, but we have mostly talked, rarely
turned to action as a community.

We have vetted a lot of lousy programs and helped many developers
understand that cybersecurity and privacy is a difficult space. You can't
just build an app over night and expect activists to use it. Their lives
are at stake.

We could create a grassroots action network for Liberationtech. If we did,
how would we do it? And this question applies to all of our subscribers.
Should we even go there?

Should we try to fix some of the problems we see in the community? Should
we try to raise money and donate money to great crypto projects? Or should
we start a wiki to document all the good and bad solutions and to explain
to newbies how to enter the cybersecurity / privacy domain?

I just feel we could be more active than we have been so far. We have been
around now for nearly a decade. A lot of Liberationtech research was done
at Stanford but very rarely did it create practical self-sustaining
organizations.

Any ideas by the group? We host this community at Stanford, but it is your
community, so you should share with us your dreams for making the world a
better place through Liberationtech.

Best,
Yosem

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Alberto Cammozzo 
wrote:

> Difficult question, Yosem.
> I would try splitting it in two.
>
> First, what causes tide turns in general?
>
> Hard to answer by numbers besides a generic "80/20 rule", but seems
> there are other possible triggers besides marketing.
> Malcolm Gladwell in "The Tipping Point" suggests that (1) few people
> have the power to orient masses (2) some message may be irresistible if
> rightly packaged, and (3) the context -even small details- may be very
> important.
> If marketing has to be excluded, I would concentrate on the context, the
> environment.
> Environmental concerns may take time to break through, but once grasped,
> they easily become part of the common sense.
> The concept of "pollution" of the communicative environment may be very
> effective in this sense: I can't elaborate on that in short, but see the
> "Privacy is the new Green" mantra...
> A paper by Jack Balkin is also enlightening on the concept of
> "algorithmic nuisance" (externalize social costs)  [1].
> This would contribute to a tide change towards decentralization, since
> lack of privacy (data appropriation) is fueling centralized platforms.
>
>
>
> Second, what specific events or technology can trigger a decentralized
> turn?
>
> I think it may be useful to distinguish the /application/ from the
> /infrastructure/ upon which the application is based.
> Facebook is an application, the Web, browsers and TCP/IP suite are the
> infrastructure upon which FB is built. Same with Gmail and SMTP+IMAP+POP...
> VC is willing to invest in a lucrative /application/, but not an
> infrastructure that everybody will take advantage from.
> From a VC point of view, funding a decentralized infrastructure is
> financing free riders.
>
> The "distributed effort" tries to build an infrastructure AND also
> applications that use it, which makes it very hard.
> DNS and Certificates are all are part of a centralized architecture.
> Security and trust in client/server architectures are also an issue.
> A decentralized tide turn does not only mean some new applications
> replacing centralized ones, like Facebook vs Myspace: it's more like
> TCP/IP supplanting SNA and Bitnet
> Consider that an application can also be turned into an infrastructural
> component, as happened when Netscape went Open Source with Mozilla: the
> browser stopped being an application and become part of the infrastructure.
> Think also of the GNU/Linux/Debian/LAMP ecosystem as an enabling
> environment... [2].
>
> That said, we can imagine some way the context may change in favor of a
> distributed application+infrastructure.
> (1) a new distributed application offers something irresistible that
> centralized apps don't have and may find not favorable to offer: lower
> costs, higher performance, new functions, better UX.
> (2) some "privacy Chernobyl" catastrophe changes general attitude
> towards privacy: in that case Diaspora's existing community may
> represent the critical mass triggering an infrastructural revolution.
> (3) governmental market regulation actions split monopolies
> (4) some competitor, fearing of being pushed out of business, releases
> its code in F/OSS, helping the decentralized effort and contributing
> with a user base. Imagine Google opensourcing its G+ platform in a move
> against Facebook: very unlikely, but this would turn a vertical,
> centralized SN application into a new infrastructural layer of the
> communicative ecosystem upon which new business could thrive...
>
> Without contextual changes I believe we're in path dependency.
>
> Bests,
>
> 

Re: [liberationtech] Facebook: Building Global Community - What's your response to Mark Zuckerberg?

[F LM]

Relevant: 

Zuckerberg removed a line about monitoring private messages from his Facebook 
manifesto

http://mashable.com/2017/02/16/mark-zuckerberg-manifesto-ai/#OSZDnazMKkqD

FL

> On 17-02-2017, at 17:24, Thomas Delrue  wrote:
> 
>> On February 17, 2017 1:32:46 PM EST, Steven Clift  
>> wrote:
>> I invite everyone to read and comment on Mark Zuckerberg's important
>> "Building Global Community" letter:
>> 
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity
>> 
>> This is a special Facebook Group I've created to connect lots of
>> disparate communities for a unified conversation that I will share
>> with my contacts at Facebook.
>> 
>> You'll find a link to his letter and posts organized by the five key
>> questions Mark asks and posts to share media reports and more:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502366400151315/
>> 
>> Or jump straight to his letter: http://po.st/zuckglobal
>> 
>> Also, while I don't have my first tele meeting with a foundation on
>> this until next week, now seems like a good time to share
>> E-Democracy's draft proposal for Local Civic Facebook Groups:
>> http://po.st/civicfacebookgroupsgoogledoc
>> 
>> Zuckerberg's letter highlights the absolutely vital role of "engaged
>> leaders" creating "meaningful groups." E-Democracy's magic mix is
>> supporting YOU - those leaders - in local communities working to
>> create local community and civic life Facebook Groups that foster
>> inclusive and supportive local online communities that foster civic
>> engagement and informed communities. So, if you want to add your city
>> to the list of the 22 cities with volunteer interest, email me -
>> cl...@e-democracy.org - with "Civic Facebook Groups" in the subject
>> line. We drafted most of this proposal in December, so we are ecstatic
>> that Facebook's next mission is so well aligned with our scrappy work.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Steven Clift
>> E-Democracy.org
>> 
>> P.S. You can jump in deeper now (we are just getting started):
>> 
>> 1. Supportive Communities:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502355863485702/
>> 
>> 2. Safe Community:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502356546818967/
>> 
>> 3. Informed Community:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502358683485420/
>> 
>> 4. Civically-Engaged Community:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502359110152044/
>> 
>> 5. Inclusive Community:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502359536818668/
>> 
>> Other Conversations:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502366996817922/
>> 
>> Media Reports:
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/buildingglobalcommunity/permalink/502367900151165/
> "Facebook guy tells world it needs to use more Facebook or face bad times",  
> is that roughly the right summary of his 'insights' or am I way off? 
> 
> --
> Thomas
> (Sent from my mobile device,  please forgive brevity or typos.)
> -- 
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
> list guidelines will get you moderated: 
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
> change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
> compa...@stanford.edu.
-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of 
list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, 
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at 
compa...@stanford.edu.