[Libreoffice] [PATCH] +question RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for calc_core_tools
Hello, Here's a patch for calc/sc/source/core/tools I compiled it and it's ok. Hope it's ok ! How can we replace createFromAscii in this kind of line : OUString::createFromAscii(aPropNames[i]) Is it possible with another trick than RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM ? Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) calc_core_tools.txt.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] High Contrast Cleanup
Hi Sebastian, On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:13 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: So who would be able to make sure that we don't bundle the high contrast icons in our buld anymore (and either purge those files or move them to a high contrast theme...) ? Hah ! it is you I guess - you just volunteered. Currently our hicontrast theme is built by packimages/pack/makefile.mk: # generate the HiContrast icon set $(MISC)$/hicontrast.flag .PHONY : $(PERL) $(SOLARENV)$/bin$/hicontrast-to-theme.pl $(SOLARSRC)$/default_images $(MISC)$/hicontrast $(TOUCH) $@ We need to fixup this hicontrast-to-theme.pl script - so that we can base it from a (new) base-directory as well; say ooo_custom_images/highcontrast We need to move and rename the lch_ and sch_ etc. variants into lc_ and sc_ variants in that directory incrementally, as they are removed from the code; ie. git mv'ing the ones that Joseph has identified across [ I believe git will do this efficiently ]. That is mostly a matter of tweaking / testing the hicontrast-to-theme.pl script and doing some git movement - can you look at that Sebastian ? The key is (of course) to only move/rename those files for which we already have patches :-) Thanks ! Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 01:55 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: - I suppose we want to get rid of unpacking of the installation sets for smoketest, and instead use ooinstall directly ;-) This used to work - I wrote the patch myself ;-) having said that it used (AFAIR) the same pass fifteen magic arguments to make_installer.pl that was used in ooinstall - so, a tad fragile. So yes; I don't think we should use EPM, it should be disabled by default (it takes time), and should use ooinstall for the smoketest ;-) HTH, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 01:55 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Norbert, Caolán McNamara píše v Po 08. 11. 2010 v 13:47 +: There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: The smoketest passes every time for me. FWIW # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f0a3aab45ce, pid=31378, tid=139682275239680 There's clearly a problem, and we should find out what it is. So... What's your distro and version. Versions of java and versions of gcc and glibc ? I have spent most of today trying to get smoketest to work (initially I had similar problems as you, on SLED11 [with some SP1 updates], x86-64), and here are the observations: - you do not want to do make dev-install before make smoketest You see, this is now somewhat confusing. We need a single way to build LibreOffice because I can't tell if you're talking about the makefile in build or the one in rawbuild where there are two different dev-install targets, and I can see that they seem to do two slightly different things, and there isn't a make smoketest in the inner Makefile of course. What I have been doing (with 100% success rate to date on Fedora 14 FWIW) is to run make in the rawbuild dir, and run build in the smoketest dir. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] High Contrast Cleanup
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:33:22 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Hah ! it is you I guess - you just volunteered. HAH; I should have known :) We need to fixup this hicontrast-to-theme.pl script - so that we can base it from a (new) base-directory as well; say ooo_custom_images/highcontrast Busy right now, I'll have a look at it next week if nobody beats me to it. The key is (of course) to only move/rename those files for which we already have patches :-) AHA, I should have known that there is a catch! :). But isn't there a fallback mechanism? I'd rather move all images in one go and either use the fallback mechanism or have the build break until we fix all the mentions of the hi-contrast icons. Probably something that I could try in a feature branch. Sebastian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [QA] Existing practice open questions
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:55:02AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: * list of assignees is too small - we'd need more subject area experts Not sure if such a small area worths mentioning, but I try to take care of RTF export bugs (as my time permits) + git-specific issues. pgpK4zpe3jrFt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] +question RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for calc_core_tools
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:29 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here's a patch for calc/sc/source/core/tools I compiled it and it's ok. Hope it's ok ! It looks good to me, pushed, thanks for this. How can we replace createFromAscii in this kind of line : OUString::createFromAscii(aPropNames[i]) Can't really, at least not with a trivial change. Could always unroll the loop and use OUString::createFromAscii(first one); OUString::createFromAscii(second one); etc, but probably not worth it. I suggest skipping those and have a look at e.g. svtools and svl for loads of easier hanging fruit in some shared libs if calc is running out of easy ones to fix. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] bin/g clone now possible
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:49:45PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
I have updated the bin/g script so that it is now possible to use it for
cloning the repos.
Hi,
Nice! Though I think it would make sense to allow just running 'bin/g
clone' without any parameters, as I think most of the cases we want the
same base url for build.git and the other repos. :)
Patch attached, OK to push?
Thanks.
From b1245b53c462170e219d935be4985c74ba92edaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:06:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] bin/g: make clone work without a parameter
---
bin/g |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/g b/bin/g
index 347522d..3828ea6 100755
--- a/bin/g
+++ b/bin/g
@@ -176,6 +176,11 @@ for DIR in $DIRS ; do
[ -z `git diff-index --name-only HEAD --` ] exit 0
fi
;;
+clone)
+if [ -z $FILES ]; then
+EXTRA=$(git config remote.origin.url|sed
's|/[^/]\+$||')/${DIR}
+fi
+;;
esac
[ $REPORT_REPOS = 1 ] echo = $DIR =
--
1.7.3.2
pgpOegUwbPvvX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:55:44PM +0800, David Nelson wrote: I'm just giving you a heads-up because I was contacted by�Jason Warner of Canonical ([1]jason.war...@canonical.com�and�jasoncwarner on Freenode) And because of this you spam this list with a unsolicited job offer? Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [QA] Existing practice open questions
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:55 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: * encourage people to add stack traces for crashes / hangs to their bugs - merge stack trace dupes from fdo - is there a floss tool to do fuzzy stack trace matching? I thought the gnome bugzilla had a script or something to do this on bugzilla attachments, but I don't see mention of it with some casual searching. * when a crash happens - want proper crash reporting - suggest to install debug packages, point to wiki page for further help, for obtaining proper backtraces. Along the lines of http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Bugreport_OOo I think. As an aside, for the last two points, for the fedora builds all app crashes go through abrt and it does a lot of the backtrace generation, backtrace duplication, auto-install debug packages etc, so most of the above isn't an issue for our specific Linux distro builds, though that's not 100% helpful for the other OSes and vanilla packages. But maybe abrt is worth a look at to pull some goodies from. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
Hi Rene, :-) On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 18:23, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:55:44PM +0800, David Nelson wrote: I'm just giving you a heads-up because I was contacted by Jason Warner of Canonical ([1]jason.war...@canonical.com and jasoncwarner on Freenode) And because of this you spam this list with a unsolicited job offer? Well, I did not think of it as *spamming* as such, because it concerns a vacancy of specific interest to LibO developers, with one of the projects valued supporters and partners, and I am *certain* there are guys out there who will be interested in the idea. :-) David Nelson ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:49:33PM +0800, David Nelson wrote: Well, I did not think of it as *spamming* as such, because it concerns It's a unsolicited commercial mail. And bulk because it's on a ml which gets to many people. That perfectly fits the definition of spam. Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 11:23 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:55:44PM +0800, David Nelson wrote: I'm just giving you a heads-up because I was contacted by�Jason Warner of Canonical ([1]jason.war...@canonical.com�and�jasoncwarner on Freenode) And because of this you spam this list with a unsolicited job offer? FWIW I reckon its fairly on-topic. It is a LibreOffice related job offer, and I'm happy to see Canonical weigh in. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 11:23 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:55:44PM +0800, David Nelson wrote: I'm just giving you a heads-up because I was contacted by�Jason Warner of Canonical ([1]jason.war...@canonical.com�and�jasoncwarner on Freenode) And because of this you spam this list with a unsolicited job offer? Grüße/Regards, Personally I think it would be great if they can attract some friendly face already active on this list/community, so I think putting this offer out on the list where the LibO devs hang out is perfectly acceptable. Noel ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [QA] Existing practice open questions
Hi *. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: [...] If you need additional info from the reporter, Kendy suggested this: - 8 - Whiteboard: infoprovider:addr...@of.the.info.provider I'd prefer aliases like reporter (missing info from reporter) or dev (missing input from other developer) or triage (request for info by triage team, confirmation with other OS and the like) Desirable/Missing = [...] * list of assignees is too small - we'd need more subject area experts Along that line - would it be possible to create corresponding Components with appropriate default owner than having the reporter to look it up (maybe along with a I'm not sure what to pick style category)? The current list of subject areas seems sufficiently high-level for that. wrt needmoreinfo clearing - I guess it isn't possible to extend bugzilla on fdo to prompt the user with an I supplied all requested information checkbox when commenting? I know I saw something like that aleady in other bugzillas, don't remember whether it was on Mandriva's or Gnome's or some other one. ciao Christian ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:03:32 +0100, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: It's a unsolicited commercial mail. Réne, we say on the *initial* page on http://documentfoundation.org about the foundation: It welcomes corporate participation, e.g. by sponsoring individuals to work as equals alongside other contributors in the community. and on the development page we say: Come and join us! Subscribe to our mailing lists and support us with your skills! We have basically asked for these types of mails and I am very happy to see them coming in. Independent on which organizatino will be paying the bill. This one is very much on-topic. Also, it has not been the organization sending the mail, but one individual who (rightfully) thought people could be interested to get more resources to dedicate time to LO. But I am going to shut up now on this thread. Sebastian pgpTpTWFa8RYP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22:09PM +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: It welcomes corporate participation, e.g. by sponsoring individuals to work as equals alongside other contributors in the community. Yes. Come and join us! Subscribe to our mailing lists and support us with your skills! How is support us with your skills! indentical to post a job offer? We have basically asked for these types of mails and I am very happy to I disagree. We asked for participation, yes, but... organization sending the mail, but one individual who (rightfully) thought people could be interested to get more resources to dedicate time to LO. True. I didn't say anything about http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/11/msg00180.html, but IMHO this post crossed the line. Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Canonical has a vacancy for a LibO specialist software engineer
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:10:02PM +, Wols Lists wrote: This is a *single* email (aplified by the list, yes), sent to a bunch of Wrong. disc...@documentfoundation.org got one too. So two mails, amplified by two lists. And on TDF list, it is *not* LibO-related. Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] removal of solenv/bin/converttags.pl
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 10:40 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: In solenv/bin/ we have converttags.pl which does nothing but going through the source, replacing [TITLE] and [PRODUCTNAME] tags which don't occur at all in our source code, so I believe this script is obsolete. Seems like sdk/odk/util/makefile.pmk uses it - is that itself not used ? does look like an odd tool though ;-) Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for calc_filter
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 11:44 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here's a patch for calc/sc/source/filter Looks good, some duplication with the previous patch I think, but applied the test. Thanks. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Minutes technical group call
hey guys i noticed you guys are looking to shrink the download size of windows installer download. 1) help should stay where it is. 2) are there any language packs included with libreoffice yet? On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:01:50PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: Thanks to Thorsten for taking the minutes, of the call last Thursday: + Rene - concerned wrt. start-center per-lang switching + Michael - the code is pushed working + Petr - just pushed the updated/split BrOffice branding, so start-center should work too FSVO of work. I said that you get the wrong branding in the wrong product sometimes, and that still is the case (though it's quite minor): LibreOffice install: LANG=something except pt_BR - everything LibreOffice branded LANG=pt_BR - Splash, Title bar and everything else LibreOffice *except+ Startcenter image BrOffice.org install[1]: LANG=something except pt_BR - title etc. BrOffice.org *except* Startcenter image LANG=pt_RB - everything BrOffice.org branded am i the only one which finds this weird? My other point was that LANG=pt_BR doesn't necessarily mean people wanting BrOffice. what for people here in Europe? Wanting a pt_BR-translated LibO and nothing else? Grüße/Regards, René [1] implemented by diverting files away and exchangin them with BrOffice counterparts. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [QA] Existing practice open questions
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:55 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: New bugs come in, get assigned to the libreoffice-b...@lists.freedesktop.org bug alias (throw me a mail if you want to be added there), and then get triaged / assigned to developers. Hello Thorsten, Could you add my address to this list then, triage for Base/data-source bugs would be my primary focus. Thanks Drew ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Fix spaetz's change to framework
Plus a lot of trailing white space cleanup... image_count.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Replaced createFromAscii with RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 11:17 -0300, Santiago Alessandri wrote: Here goes a patch for the base repo. It's my first patch, hoping it's fine :-) Yes, looks good. So now pushed, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for calc_ui
Hello, Here's a patch for calc/sc/source/ui (except unoobj previously sent). Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) calc_ui.txt.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Minutes technical group call
Hi, short update ... Am 11.11.2010 15:01, schrieb Michael Meeks: * L10n + additional libreoffice strings, waiting for string freeze, get PO files, then you translate this. need a date. We will hopefully have tomorrow as date (l10n list has already been notified). + some teams have asked to update the sdf files - in theory Andre has commit access, but at the moment not able to build sdf files, such that they are similar to the ones in the repo. Andre is referring to the big ones inside l10n module. don't know what templates have been used there - cannot build an sdf file that's similar to the ones from OOo + need to grok existing tooling (Fridrich / Petr) Petr did provide some tooling, and .. + 4 south african langs, by friedel wolf and dwaine - five langs. I processed those languages (with Petr's help). So in case there are more requests, either me or Petr can handle these requests (but it's manual work at the moment). It's not to complicated, so other people can help as well. regards, André ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] ooo/OOO330_m14 merged into libreoffice-3-3
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:51:55PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Either we can merge the entire libreoffice-3-3 there, or we can merge just ooo/OOO330_m14, and continue cherry picking between master and libreoffice-3-3. +1 for merging libreoffice-3-3 branch to master. OTOH - if we disable/revert something on the branch, we will most probably revert it (by the merge) in the master too. Well, assuming the reasons for the revert still holds true on master... And anyway, this shouldn't happen that much on a stable branch, should there? :) Even with this risk, merging from libreoffice-3-3 to master is my preferred choice, I am more afraid of forgetting something (happens so often!), than of accidentally disabling something. Also, when we start merging more regularly, we can do the fixes that should appear in both branches in libreoffice-3-3 only, and they will be merged anyway. ACK. Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PATCH] add /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin to the gen{brk, ccode, cmn} searchpath
--- configure.in |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index b92e597..0b812c2 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -5399,15 +5399,15 @@ if test -n $with_system_icu -o -n $with_system_libs \ AC_LANG_PUSH([C++]) AC_MSG_CHECKING([for unicode/rbbi.h]) AC_TRY_CPP(unicode/rbbi.h, AC_MSG_RESULT([checked.]), AC_MSG_ERROR([icu headers not found.])) - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENBRK, genbrk, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENBRK, genbrk, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENBRK; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\genbrk\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \genbrk\]) fi - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCCODE, genccode, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCCODE, genccode, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENCCODE; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\genccode\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \genccode\]) fi - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCMN, gencmn, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCMN, gencmn, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENCMN; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\gencmn\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \gencmn\]) fi -- 1.7.3.1 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD
---
bin/install-artwork |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/install-artwork b/bin/install-artwork
index 7695e4a..621cde3 100755
--- a/bin/install-artwork
+++ b/bin/install-artwork
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ dest=$2
echo do artwork tweaks ...
+if test z`uname -s` = zOpenBSD; then
+ TAR=gtar
+else
+ TAR=tar
+fi
+
if test -d $dest/setup_native; then
mkdir -p $dest/setup_native/source/win32/nsis
cp $src/ooobitmap_*.bmp $dest/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ || echo
no nsis installer images to copy
@@ -43,7 +49,7 @@ if test -d $dest/default_images; then
cp $src/layout/*.png $dest/default_images/res/commandimagelist
cp $src/layout/*.png
$dest/ooo_custom_images/industrial/res/commandimagelist
cp $src/layout/*.png $dest/ooo_custom_images/tango/res/commandimagelist
- tar -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images ooo_custom_images
| tar -C $dest -xf-
+ ${TAR} -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images
ooo_custom_images | tar -C $dest -xf-
# Extra command images
cp -f $src/icons/*.png $dest/default_images/res/commandimagelist/ ||
exit 1
--
1.7.3.1
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] first time on the list
Jonathan, Please contact Peter Poeml for the mirror, if that's still an offer... best, Charles. Le Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:30:34 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com a écrit : hey guys i would like to try and help out in LO development. what is the bulk language that its coded in? is it java? also would the project be interested in me hosting a european mirror? Regards ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 21:32 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
- tar -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images ooo_custom_images
| tar -C $dest -xf-
+ ${TAR} -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images
ooo_custom_images | tar -C $dest -xf-
Want to replace the other tar at the end of the line while you're at
it ? rather than mix two tars, not that I guess it really matters.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] use the correct tar binary on OpenBSD
Oh sure I missed that. Otherwise can I push it?
On (2010-11-11 20:55), Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 21:32 +0100, Robert Nagy wrote:
- tar -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images ooo_custom_images
| tar -C $dest -xf-
+ ${TAR} -C $src/layout --exclude=.svn -cf- default_images
ooo_custom_images | tar -C $dest -xf-
Want to replace the other tar at the end of the line while you're at
it ? rather than mix two tars, not that I guess it really matters.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Minutes technical group call
2010/11/11 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net: Hi, short update ... Am 11.11.2010 15:01, schrieb Michael Meeks: * L10n + additional libreoffice strings, waiting for string freeze, get PO files, then you translate this. need a date. We will hopefully have tomorrow as date (l10n list has already been notified). + some teams have asked to update the sdf files - in theory Andre has commit access, but at the moment not able to build sdf files, such that they are similar to the ones in the repo. Andre is referring to the big ones inside l10n module. don't know what templates have been used there - cannot build an sdf file that's similar to the ones from OOo + need to grok existing tooling (Fridrich / Petr) Petr did provide some tooling, and .. I wrote two scripts: extractfix.pl and mergefix.pl http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/extractfix.pl http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/mergefix.pl extractfix.pl extracts only new and changed lines from an updated sdf file mergefix.pl merges the result of extractfix.pl into the original sdf in order to have a minimal diff. I tested these tools successfully on the Breton file that the translator submitted on the other day to the l10n list. (I'll commit the changes later.) Best regards, Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] first time on the list
Hi, Am 11.11.2010 um 21:53 schrieb Charles-H. Schulz: Jonathan, Please contact Peter Poeml for the mirror, if that's still an offer... best, Charles. We are already got in contact. Thanks for taking care, Charles! Peter ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] add /usr/local/sbin and /usr/local/bin to the gen{brk, ccode, cmn} searchpath
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0100, Robert Nagy wrote: diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index b92e597..0b812c2 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -5399,15 +5399,15 @@ if test -n $with_system_icu -o -n $with_system_libs \ AC_LANG_PUSH([C++]) AC_MSG_CHECKING([for unicode/rbbi.h]) AC_TRY_CPP(unicode/rbbi.h, AC_MSG_RESULT([checked.]), AC_MSG_ERROR([icu headers not found.])) - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENBRK, genbrk, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENBRK, genbrk, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENBRK; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\genbrk\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \genbrk\]) fi - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCCODE, genccode, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCCODE, genccode, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENCCODE; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\genccode\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \genccode\]) fi - AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCMN, gencmn, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin]) + AC_PATH_PROG(SYSTEM_GENCMN, gencmn, [], [$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin]) if test -z $SYSTEM_GENCMN; then AC_MSG_ERROR([\gencmn\ not found in \$PATH, install the icu development tool \gencmn\]) fi Can that be made conditional on OpenBSD, please? I've seen already too many f*ups because someone had old libraries/binaries in /usr/local (on Linux), so I'd want to prevent that from happening if possible and this makes it even more likely to happen (though admittedly this shouldn't be the case for the ICU utilities) Grüße/Regards, René ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] ooo/OOO330_m14 merged into libreoffice-3-3
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:04:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:51:55PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Either we can merge the entire libreoffice-3-3 there, or we can merge just ooo/OOO330_m14, and continue cherry picking between master and libreoffice-3-3. +1 for merging libreoffice-3-3 Sure, other projects are doing it like this already, i.e git.git has the same policy (features go to master, fixes to maint, then maint is merged to master regularly). pgprQ7dEhxHBs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] bin/g clone now possible
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:59:37PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Indeed - looks great, please go ahead! :-)
Pushed.
I'm attaching one more patch - I just realised symlinks under rawbuild
are not created after clone.
After applying the patch, one can proceed with:
git clone url
cd build
bin/g clone
to get the sources ready under rawbuild - so no extra 'bin/g pull' is
needed.
Does it look OK?
Thanks.
From 259dc7ef7a29a117d986d01f4f47df0e15891842 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:58:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] bin/g: create symlinks under rawbuild after clone
---
bin/g |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/g b/bin/g
index 3828ea6..c865ff0 100755
--- a/bin/g
+++ b/bin/g
@@ -192,12 +192,15 @@ for DIR in $DIRS ; do
git $PAGER $COMMAND $EXTRA ${fil...@]}
RETURN=$?
+# now we can change the dir in case of clone as well
+[ $COMMAND = clone ] cd $DIR
+
# update stamp if the repo changed
NEWHEADREF=`git show-ref --head HEAD`
[ $HEADREF != $NEWHEADREF ] touch $CLONEDIR/repos_changed
case $COMMAND in
-pull)
+pull|clone)
# update links
for link in `ls` ; do
if [ ! -e $RAWBUILDDIR/$link ] ; then
--
1.7.3.2
pgp7lhWfLoDxc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements
Having grown very used to Excel defaults I find Calc very annoying to use. Now that contributing to LibreOffice looks sane I'm curious how receptive people would be to some patches for the following Calc conventions... SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Current Calc behaviour: =subtotal(9;a1:a5) Desired behaviour: =subtotal(9,a1:a5) I'm not sure if it would feasible to support both ; and , as argument seperators. DELETE CELL HELPER The delete cell helper dialog box pops up anytime I try to delete a cell or cell selection. It gives me options to delete some combination of text / numbers / date time / formulas / notes / formats / objects. Occassionally this is useful. For regular use, however, I just want the value of the cell deleted. The current behavior seems analogous to Paste Special (which is Shift-Control-V) and I wonder if it would be possible to have Delete delete only the cell value immediately and. Then a Delete Special... command could be added (perhaps Shift-Control-Delete) which would bring up the current delete dialog box. COPY PASTE TO A CELL WITH AN EXISTING VALUE The first time I copy and pasted a cell formula into another cell which already had something in it a dialog came up asking something like This cell already has a value. Are you sure you want to do copy a new value in? EXTREMELY annoying. So annoying that I skipped past it for the first few days without seeing the Show this dialog checkbox. Once I saw the option to hide the dialog I did so and I don't know how to get it back to quote exactly what it says. I can't really think of any reason for this dialog to exist at all but at least it can be dismissed so its not quite so bad as the delete dialog. Still would anybody object if I submitted a patch to kill it? Thanks to everyone involved in this project! Its great to see some momentum gathering. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements
At 8:21pm -0500 Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Patrick Bakker wrote: SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Current Calc behaviour: =subtotal(9;a1:a5) Desired behaviour: =subtotal(9,a1:a5) I believe OpenOffice has supported both semicolon and comma since at least 3.0. Take a look at Tools-Options-Calc-Formula. DELETE CELL HELPER The delete cell helper dialog box pops up anytime I try to delete a cell or cell selection. It gives me options to delete some combination of text / numbers / date time / formulas / notes / formats / objects. Occassionally this is useful. For regular use, however, I just want the value of the cell deleted. This is perhaps not the most intuitive, but the behavior parallels that of at least 2 operating systems user interface choices: One one OS: - If you select a file and hit Del key, it says Hey! Are you sure?! - If you select a file and hit Shift+Del, it doesn't ask. Another OS: - Del key moves it to the trash. - Shift+Del permanently removes the file right then. Same idea, but slightly different UI experience. I've gotten into the habit of pressing Shift+Del myself, but I agree it was annoying until I figured that out. Rather than change that default, what about putting some simple text in that dialog box, along the lines of Tip: if you want the default action, press Shift+Del. COPY PASTE TO A CELL WITH AN EXISTING VALUE The first time I copy and pasted a cell formula into another cell which already had something in it a dialog came up asking something like This cell already has a value. Are you sure you want to do copy a new value in? EXTREMELY annoying. So annoying that I skipped past it for the first few days without seeing the Show this dialog checkbox. Once I saw the option to hide the dialog I did so and I don't know how to get it back to quote exactly what it says. I can't really think of any reason for this dialog to exist at all but at least it can be dismissed so its not quite so bad as the delete dialog. Still would anybody object if I submitted a patch to kill it? Heh. With the power of Ctrl+Z at my fingertips, I agree that that dialog box could be seen as an annoyance. However, I have witnessed many times, a less than power-user bless that dialog so they didn't overwrite their data. In this light, I wouldn't be opposed to it's removal, provided LO informs the user when they have copied over data, and reminds them that they can undo the action. A less obtrusive method of informing them would be nice. Something akin to Firefox's dropdown bar, or IE's information bar would do nicely, I think. Thoughts? Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Replaced createFromAscii with RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in /dbaccess/source/ in base repo
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:03:31PM -0300, Santiago Alessandri wrote: Hi! I'm attaching the patch for changing the use of createFromAscii with RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in the directories: /dbaccess/source/shared/ /dbaccess/source/ui/app/ /dbaccess/source/ui/browser/ /dbaccess/source/ui/control/ /dbaccess/source/ui/dlg/ /dbaccess/source/ui/misc/ from the base repository. Released under LGPLv3+ / MPL. -- Santiago Alessandri I only changed lines like rtl::OUString aFoo = rtl::OUString(RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM(blah)); to rtl::OUString aFoo(RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM(blah)); , which is the form we prefer. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Calc usability improvements
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote: At 8:21pm -0500 Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Patrick Bakker wrote: SEMI-COLON INSTEAD OF COMMA AS FUNCTION ARGUMENT SEPARATOR Current Calc behaviour: =subtotal(9;a1:a5) Desired behaviour: =subtotal(9,a1:a5) I believe OpenOffice has supported both semicolon and comma since at least 3.0. Take a look at Tools-Options-Calc-Formula. I thought I had downloaded LibreOffice but I guess I haven't yet. I'm running OpenOffice 3.2.0 here and I don't have a Tools - Options - Calc - Formula. DELETE CELL HELPER The delete cell helper dialog box pops up anytime I try to delete a cell or cell selection. It gives me options to delete some combination of text / numbers / date time / formulas / notes / formats / objects. Occassionally this is useful. For regular use, however, I just want the value of the cell deleted. This is perhaps not the most intuitive, but the behavior parallels that of at least 2 operating systems user interface choices: One one OS: - If you select a file and hit Del key, it says Hey! Are you sure?! - If you select a file and hit Shift+Del, it doesn't ask. Another OS: - Del key moves it to the trash. - Shift+Del permanently removes the file right then. Same idea, but slightly different UI experience. I've gotten into the habit of pressing Shift+Del myself, but I agree it was annoying until I figured that out. Rather than change that default, what about putting some simple text in that dialog box, along the lines of Tip: if you want the default action, press Shift+Del. I didn't know about the Shift + Delete keystroke which helps. Having two work around the easiest keystroke still feels wrong - especially with undo/redo capability. The most common action should map to the simplest keybinding I would think. COPY PASTE TO A CELL WITH AN EXISTING VALUE The first time I copy and pasted a cell formula into another cell which already had something in it a dialog came up asking something like This cell already has a value. Are you sure you want to do copy a new value in? EXTREMELY annoying. So annoying that I skipped past it for the first few days without seeing the Show this dialog checkbox. Once I saw the option to hide the dialog I did so and I don't know how to get it back to quote exactly what it says. I can't really think of any reason for this dialog to exist at all but at least it can be dismissed so its not quite so bad as the delete dialog. Still would anybody object if I submitted a patch to kill it? Heh. With the power of Ctrl+Z at my fingertips, I agree that that dialog box could be seen as an annoyance. However, I have witnessed many times, a less than power-user bless that dialog so they didn't overwrite their data. In this light, I wouldn't be opposed to it's removal, provided LO informs the user when they have copied over data, and reminds them that they can undo the action. A less obtrusive method of informing them would be nice. Something akin to Firefox's dropdown bar, or IE's information bar would do nicely, I think. Yeah, I don't see the value in this warning at all but if it is useful at all to anybody I would think a less obtrusive, after the fact quiet notification that existing date was overwritten would make more sense to me. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for calc_ui
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:45:53PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here's a patch for calc/sc/source/ui (except unoobj previously sent). Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Good, but I changed lines like rtl::OUString foo = rtl::OUString(RTL_CONSTASCII_STRINGPARAM(foo)); to rtl::OUString foo(RTL_CONSTASCII_STRINGPARAM(foo)); , which is the form we prefer. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
