Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 22:06, Arno Teigseth wrote: > I don't have a clue about how to interpret this. But if these are > function calls, maybe about a million calls are much? tried with kcachegrind: 6000 calls/second to Application::Yield in core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx (I think) kcachegrind screenshot http://derp.co.uk/51b93 Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6s2bQACgkQEMIGVCc8BjCxOgCgiLvux5UHzDQdSsI18d2FzVKr N7IAnRk3oc5MVFQps2WnjuhSUwnjF8ae =PHwY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK thanks to moggi on libreoffice-dev irc, I installed valgrind. Found that running in one terminal: valgrind --trace-children=yes --tool=callgrind ./swriter and in another terminal, after about 2 mins of "empty swriter document idle" doing this: callgrind_control -b 28236 (the actual swriter PID) gives this: PID 28236: /home/arno/sys/libreoffice-git/core/solver/unxlngx6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin - --writer --splash-pipe=6 [requesting 'Status'...] Frame: Backtrace for Thread 1 [ 0] _int_free (967869 x) [ 1] free_check (983990 x) [ 2] free (449741 x) [ 3] operator delete(void*) (322182 x) [ 4] GtkHookedYieldMutex::ThreadsEnter() (322183 x) [ 5] GdkThreadsEnter (161078 x) [ 6] 0x00059cf0 (161078 x) [ 7] g_main_context_prepare (161147 x) [ 8] 0x00042ed0 (161130 x) [ 9] g_main_context_iteration (161010 x) [10] GtkData::Yield(bool, bool) (161010 x) [11] GtkInstance::Yield(bool, bool) (161010 x) [12] Application::Yield(bool) (161009 x) and a lot more, to be read at http://pastebin.com/YuEvQC4y I don't have a clue about how to interpret this. But if these are function calls, maybe about a million calls are much? Compared to GIMP running idle for 5 minutes, and it had just about 5500 calls to different things... Hope this tells someone something. best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6sv00ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBDdQCfcKW5nLDZJkSQ3JFxt2waYkwc 9WsAoLqzdWTYKhGGDPqsUBmT6fpAVh3N =HmDk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 21:20, Arno Teigseth wrote: > What puzzles me is that LO isn't very slow, it's just using lots of > CPU... Eh, I'd like to correct that. Just opened a document and it's very slow. The doc is just about 3200 pages, but it takes forever to search for a word. A few weeks ago this took maybe 1-2 secs for a search&replace all. Now it takes like 2 minutes... Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6suAkACgkQEMIGVCc8BjC1PwCeLaxk/guFhJ0gb9y4YIaByszE uM4AnijgA6g0dgmMGQJqs9GWmaKZplMV =fT9c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] 3.4.4rc1 fails to build in kde4 vcl
On Saturday 29 October 2011 21:30:29 Andreas Radke wrote: > Compiling: vcl/unx/source/dtrans/config.cxx > /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx: In member function 'void > KDEXLib::setupEventLoop()': > /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx:252:34: error: > 'GetUnixSelectFunction' is not a member of 'QInternal' > /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx:253:34: error: > 'SetUnixSelectFunction' is not a member of 'QInternal' This is probably due to Qt 4.8 and not our bug I guess. -- Andrea ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 16:38, Kevin Hunter wrote: > At 1:12am -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Jean-baptiste Faure wrote: >> I already noticed these cpu problems in my own build since 2 or >> 3 days, but I can't be more precise. >> >> Does somebody has a clue about the cause (which commit?) of this >> CPU consumption? > > I don't specifically, but my hunch is that it's some interaction > with the newly merged GTK code. I've noticed the same CPU > utilization, but -- like you -- have been unable to say exactly > what triggers it; I can only say when I started noticing it. +1 for "I don't know either". here are my cents for behaviour (1 day old build): LO "welcome screen": ~0% CPU. good. LO swriter with empty text doc: ~50% CPU (one core). Not so good LO impress, the first wizard window: ~100% CPU (one core). Not good. LO scalc, empty sheet: several %, can't remember right now. (all with zero input activity). What puzzles me is that LO isn't very slow, it's just using lots of CPU... best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6stG0ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBZFACgrxyCM1APxkSEUbBzbi1OVKRg wNoAoOaVwKbKjhAJTa1+6/6OS6yIXiss =/H0M -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] how to 'make' a single target?
Hi, On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 06:17:09PM -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote: > I'm currently working in the sc/ module, and I'm in the "make small > change, re-compile, make small change, re-compile" stage. This is > proving very cumbersome, however, as I'm unable to re-make just the > affected files. For instance, note my attached output, showing the > output of > > $ make -j1 | head; sleep; make -j1 | head The attached output indeed should never happen. What file did you touch to generate it? > Should not at least the first 3 completed executions no longer need > to be re-executed? Yes. Could you check the timestamps of /home/kevin/devel/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.d being newer than /home/kevin/devel/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.o and that again being newer than /home/kevin/devel/libreoffice/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.cxx , please? > Are there any pointers for me on how I can compile _just the exact_ > piece of code on which I'm working (and affected other snippets, of > course)? You can build without unitchecks by doing a: (. ../Env.Host.sh && make build) You make it ignore header dependencies by doing a: (. ../Env.Host.sh && make gb_FULLDEPS= build) Then only objects get rebuild if you touched the cxx directly. If you do a: (. ../Env.Host.sh && make gb_FULLDEPS= -W `readlink -f source/filter/dif/difexp.cxx` build) only difexp.cxx gets recompiled and relinked, even if it wasnt directly changed. Best, Bjoern ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] how to 'make' a single target?
Hello Kevin, 2011/10/30 Kevin Hunter : > Hullo List, > > I'm currently working in the sc/ module, and I'm in the "make small change, > re-compile, make small change, re-compile" stage. This is proving very > cumbersome, however, as I'm unable to re-make just the affected files. For > instance, note my attached output, showing the output of > > $ make -j1 | head; sleep; make -j1 | head > > Should not at least the first 3 completed executions no longer need to be > re-executed? > > This is frustrating because it results in a latency of 5+ minutes on my slow > 2-core machine before I can see the results of a code change. > > Are there any pointers for me on how I can compile _just the exact_ piece of > code on which I'm working (and affected other snippets, of course)? > Use make build -srj2 but leave out the "build" at least once before creating the patch or pushing your changes. What needs most time is linking and executing our unit tests and with make build you skip the tests. Regards, Markus ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestions for improving the look 'n' feel of LibreOffice
Hi Kevin, all Thats good to hear :). I've just created this small mock-up, of what I think could be a good solution: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Toxicbits What do you think? Greetings Alex Am Sa 29 Okt 2011 23:37:47 CEST schrieb Kevin Hunter: At 12:57pm -0400 Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Alexander Wilms wrote: There's a short summary with a few examples in this document: http://ubuntuone.com/7m7AXgeh7OIwGBiCOHAjGh 1) It would be useful if the user could define alternating colors for table rows/columns and maybe even export Styles for text/shapes/tables formatting and coloring to a xml file or something for easy exchange. I concur that this would be very helpful, at least in my line(s) of work. I hope, however, that it could be more general than just "every other" row/column. For instance, there are times I need every 3rd row to be colored, or I need a set of 2 rows colored every 2 rows. Something like Row 1: color 1 Row 2: color 1 Row 3: color 2 Row 4: color 2 Row 5: color 1 Row 6: color 1 Row 7: color 2 Row 8: color 2 etc. I've done this manually to date, but having a general description or way to handle this would be *very* nice. As to how difficult it would be to implement? I don't know. I'm not working in that part of the code. However, I'll bet an interested (coding) party would have an easier time going about it if there were an actual use-case/specification. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] how to 'make' a single target?
Hullo List, I'm currently working in the sc/ module, and I'm in the "make small change, re-compile, make small change, re-compile" stage. This is proving very cumbersome, however, as I'm unable to re-make just the affected files. For instance, note my attached output, showing the output of $ make -j1 | head; sleep; make -j1 | head Should not at least the first 3 completed executions no longer need to be re-executed? This is frustrating because it results in a latency of 5+ minutes on my slow 2-core machine before I can see the results of a code change. Are there any pointers for me on how I can compile _just the exact_ piece of code on which I'm working (and affected other snippets, of course)? Thanks, Kevin $ . Env.Host.sh $ cd sc/ $ echo; make -j1 | head; echo -e "\n-\nFinished 1st round\n-"; sleep 2s; make -j1 | head [ build CXX ] sc/source/filter/dif/difexp R=[...] && S=$R/libreoffice && O=$S/solver/unxlngx6.pro && W=$S/workdir/unxlngx6.pro && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/ $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/ && ccache g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DENABLE_GRAPHITE -DENABLE_GTK -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -DGCC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include/c++/4.6.1 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -DHAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DPRODUCT -DSUPD=350 -DUNIX -DUNX -DVCL -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT-Wall -Wendif-labels -Wextra -Wshadow -Wsign-promo -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=c++0x -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -O2 -c $S/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.cxx -o $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.o -MMD -MT $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.o -MP -MF $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.d -I$S/sc/source/filter/dif/ -I$O/inc/stl -I$S/sc/source/core/inc -I$S/sc/source/filter/inc -I$S/sc/source/ui/inc -I$S/sc/inc -I$S/sc/inc/pch -I$W/Misc/sc/ -I$O/inc/external -I$O/inc -I$O/include -I$S/solenv/unxlngx6/inc -I$S/solenv/inc -I$S/res -I$S/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I$W/oox/inc/ -I$O/inc -I$O/inc/offapi -I$O/inc/udkapi touch /home/kevin/devel/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difexp.d [ build CXX ] sc/source/filter/dif/difimp R=[...] && S=$R/libreoffice && O=$S/solver/unxlngx6.pro && W=$S/workdir/unxlngx6.pro && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/ $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/ && ccache g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DENABLE_GRAPHITE -DENABLE_GTK -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -DGCC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include/c++/4.6.1 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -DHAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DPRODUCT -DSUPD=350 -DUNIX -DUNX -DVCL -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT-Wall -Wendif-labels -Wextra -Wshadow -Wsign-promo -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=c++0x -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -O2 -c $S/sc/source/filter/dif/difimp.cxx -o $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difimp.o -MMD -MT $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difimp.o -MP -MF $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difimp.d -I$S/sc/source/filter/dif/ -I$O/inc/stl -I$S/sc/source/core/inc -I$S/sc/source/filter/inc -I$S/sc/source/ui/inc -I$S/sc/inc -I$S/sc/inc/pch -I$W/Misc/sc/ -I$O/inc/external -I$O/inc -I$O/include -I$S/solenv/unxlngx6/inc -I$S/solenv/inc -I$S/res -I$S/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I$W/oox/inc/ -I$O/inc -I$O/inc/offapi -I$O/inc/udkapi touch /home/kevin/devel/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/dif/difimp.d [ build CXX ] sc/source/filter/excel/colrowst R=[...] && S=$R/libreoffice && O=$S/solver/unxlngx6.pro && W=$S/workdir/unxlngx6.pro && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/ $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/ && ccache g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DENABLE_GRAPHITE -DENABLE_GTK -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -DGCC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/include/c++/4.6.1 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -DHAVE_THREADSAFE_STATICS -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DPRODUCT -DSUPD=350 -DUNIX -DUNX -DVCL -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT-Wall -Wendif-labels -Wextra -Wshadow -Wsign-promo -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=c++0x -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -O2 -c $S/sc/source/filter/excel/colrowst.cxx -o $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/colrowst.o -MMD -MT $W/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/colrowst.o -MP -MF $W/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/colrowst.d -I$S/sc/source/filter/excel/ -I$O/inc/stl -I$S/sc/source/core/inc -I$S/sc/source/filter/inc -I$S/sc/source/ui/inc -I$S/sc/inc -I$S/sc/inc/pch -I$W/Misc/sc/ -I$O/inc/external -I$O/inc -I$O/
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
At 1:12am -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Jean-baptiste Faure wrote: I already noticed these cpu problems in my own build since 2 or 3 days, but I can't be more precise. Does somebody has a clue about the cause (which commit?) of this CPU consumption? I don't specifically, but my hunch is that it's some interaction with the newly merged GTK code. I've noticed the same CPU utilization, but -- like you -- have been unable to say exactly what triggers it; I can only say when I started noticing it. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Suggestions for improving the look 'n' feel of LibreOffice
At 12:57pm -0400 Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Alexander Wilms wrote: There's a short summary with a few examples in this document: http://ubuntuone.com/7m7AXgeh7OIwGBiCOHAjGh 1) It would be useful if the user could define alternating colors for table rows/columns and maybe even export Styles for text/shapes/tables formatting and coloring to a xml file or something for easy exchange. I concur that this would be very helpful, at least in my line(s) of work. I hope, however, that it could be more general than just "every other" row/column. For instance, there are times I need every 3rd row to be colored, or I need a set of 2 rows colored every 2 rows. Something like Row 1: color 1 Row 2: color 1 Row 3: color 2 Row 4: color 2 Row 5: color 1 Row 6: color 1 Row 7: color 2 Row 8: color 2 etc. I've done this manually to date, but having a general description or way to handle this would be *very* nice. As to how difficult it would be to implement? I don't know. I'm not working in that part of the code. However, I'll bet an interested (coding) party would have an easier time going about it if there were an actual use-case/specification. Cheers, Kevin ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Replace (Byte|Uni|Xub_)String with O(U)String: Fill() method is missing
Hi, the deprecated string classes have a Fill(n,c) method which fills a string with a single character c repeated n times. I found ~50 occurrences of Fill() using "git grep", so it might be worth to add a Fill() method to OUString. Maybe the name of the new method could be a bit more verbose e.g. fillWithChar(). Probably I would have to add something similar to "OUString fillWithChar(sal_uInt32 nNumber,|sal_Unicode cChar=' '|)" to ustring.hxx and something like rtl_ustr_fillWithChar() to ustring.c| |Obviously I need some assistance...any hint is welcome. Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] 3.4.4rc1 fails to build in kde4 vcl
Compiling: vcl/unx/source/dtrans/config.cxx /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx: In member function 'void KDEXLib::setupEventLoop()': /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx:252:34: error: 'GetUnixSelectFunction' is not a member of 'QInternal' /build/src/build/vcl/unx/kde4/KDEXLib.cxx:253:34: error: 'SetUnixSelectFunction' is not a member of 'QInternal' R=/build/src && S=$R/build && O=$S/solver/340/unxlngx6.pro && W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/ && mkdir -p $W/Dep/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/ && g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DCUI -DENABLE_GRAPH ITE -DENABLE_GTK -DENABLE_KDE4 -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -DGCC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.6.2 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DPRODU CT -DPRODUCT_FULL -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSUPD=340 -DUNIX -DUNX -DVCL -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXMLOFF_DLLIMPLEMENTATION -Wall -Wendif-labels -Wextra -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Woverloaded-v irtual -Wshadow -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fvisibility=hidden -pipe -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -O2 -c $S/xml off/source/text/XMLIndexObjectSourceContext.cxx -o $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexObjectSourceContext.o -MMD -MT $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexObjectSourceContext.o -MF $W/Dep/CxxObject/xmloff/s ource/text/XMLIndexObjectSourceContext.d -I$S/xmloff/source/text/ -I$O/inc/stl -I. -I$O/inc/stl -I$O/inc/external -I$O/inc -I$S/solenv/unxlngx6/inc -I$S/solenv/inc -I$S/res -I$S/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/lib/jvm/jav a-7-openjdk/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk/include/linux -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk/include/native_threads/include -I$S/xmloff/inc -I$S/xmloff/inc/pch -I$O/inc/offuh [ build CXX ] xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexSimpleEntryContext R=/build/src && S=$R/build && O=$S/solver/340/unxlngx6.pro && W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/ && mkdir -p $W/Dep/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/ && g++ -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DCUI -DENABLE_GRAPH ITE -DENABLE_GTK -DENABLE_KDE4 -DENABLE_LAYOUT=0 -DENABLE_LAYOUT_EXPERIMENTAL=0 -DGCC -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.6.2 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -DLINUX -DNDEBUG -DOPTIMIZE -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DPRODU CT -DPRODUCT_FULL -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSUPD=340 -DUNIX -DUNX -DVCL -DX86_64 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXMLOFF_DLLIMPLEMENTATION -Wall -Wendif-labels -Wextra -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Woverloaded-v irtual -Wshadow -fPIC -fmessage-length=0 -fno-common -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fvisibility=hidden -pipe -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -O2 -c $S/xml off/source/text/XMLIndexSimpleEntryContext.cxx -o $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexSimpleEntryContext.o -MMD -MT $W/CxxObject/xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexSimpleEntryContext.o -MF $W/Dep/CxxObject/xmloff/sour ce/text/XMLIndexSimpleEntryContext.d -I$S/xmloff/source/text/ -I$O/inc/stl -I. -I$O/inc/stl -I$O/inc/external -I$O/inc -I$S/solenv/unxlngx6/inc -I$S/solenv/inc -I$S/res -I$S/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7- openjdk/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk/include/linux -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk/include/native_threads/include -I$S/xmloff/inc -I$S/xmloff/inc/pch -I$O/inc/offuh [ build CXX ] xmloff/source/text/XMLIndexSourceBaseContext dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngx6.pro/slo/KDEXLib.obj' ArchLinux gcc 4.6.2 qt 4.8.0rc1 kdelibs 4.7.2 Any fix known? CC'ing our qt/kde maintainers -Andy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failure in binfilter - bf_offwrp, Linux Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
Le 29/10/2011 18:09, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : Hi Bjoern, Does applying: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/ubuntufixes-binfilter.diff;h=193fe9f297bdf132b23689eb7baae861b2a8f506;hb=refs/heads/ubuntu-oneiric-3.4 help? If so, please push to master if nobody objects. Thanks, will try it out and report back. I have no commit rights however, should the patch be OK. Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failure in binfilter - bf_offwrp, Linux Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 06:30:22PM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote: > Attempting to build binfilter from master (fresh pull) : > > Entering /home/alex/LODEV/core/binfilter/filter/source/bf_offwrp > > Making:libbf_wrapperlo.so > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_sdlib.a(sd_sdlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SdDrawDocShell::ClassFactory()': > sd_sdlib.cxx:(.text+0x34e): undefined reference to > `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_sdlib.a(sd_sdlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SdGraphicDocShell::ClassFactory()': > sd_sdlib.cxx:(.text+0x5c0): undefined reference to > `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_ysch.a(sch_schlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SchChartDocShell::ClassFactory()': > sch_schlib.cxx:(.text+0x354): undefined reference to > `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_ysm.a(starmath_smlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SmDocShell::ClassFactory()': > starmath_smlib.cxx:(.text+0x348): undefined reference to > `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_swlib.a(sw_swlib.o): In function > `binfilter::SwDocShell::ClassFactory()': > sw_swlib.cxx:(.text+0xc62): undefined reference to > `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' > ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_swlib.a(sw_swlib.o):sw_swlib.cxx:(.text+0xed2): > more undefined references to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory > const*)' follow > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > dmake: Error code 1, while making > '../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_wrapperlo.so' Does applying: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=blob;f=patches/ubuntufixes-binfilter.diff;h=193fe9f297bdf132b23689eb7baae861b2a8f506;hb=refs/heads/ubuntu-oneiric-3.4 help? If so, please push to master if nobody objects. Best, Bjoern ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Build Failure in binfilter - bf_offwrp, Linux Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
Hi all, FYI Attempting to build binfilter from master (fresh pull) : Entering /home/alex/LODEV/core/binfilter/filter/source/bf_offwrp Making:libbf_wrapperlo.so ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_sdlib.a(sd_sdlib.o): In function `binfilter::SdDrawDocShell::ClassFactory()': sd_sdlib.cxx:(.text+0x34e): undefined reference to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_sdlib.a(sd_sdlib.o): In function `binfilter::SdGraphicDocShell::ClassFactory()': sd_sdlib.cxx:(.text+0x5c0): undefined reference to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_ysch.a(sch_schlib.o): In function `binfilter::SchChartDocShell::ClassFactory()': sch_schlib.cxx:(.text+0x354): undefined reference to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_ysm.a(starmath_smlib.o): In function `binfilter::SmDocShell::ClassFactory()': starmath_smlib.cxx:(.text+0x348): undefined reference to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_swlib.a(sw_swlib.o): In function `binfilter::SwDocShell::ClassFactory()': sw_swlib.cxx:(.text+0xc62): undefined reference to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_swlib.a(sw_swlib.o):sw_swlib.cxx:(.text+0xed2): more undefined references to `SotFactory::PutSuperClass(SotFactory const*)' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libbf_wrapperlo.so' Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36991, 37030, 37077, 37179, ||37195, 37277, 37429, 37488, ||37499, 37622, 37799, 38000, ||38544, 38956, 39159, 39236, ||39447, 39510, 40243, 42339 --- Comment #219 from Rainer Bielefeld 2011-10-29 08:43:22 PDT --- Argh, something went terribly wrong here, please excuse me for the SPAM. Hope this post fixed the unintended removing of many bugs, please excuse me for the SPAM! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|33634, 42339, 36957, 36991, | |37008, 37013, 37014, 37015, | |37017, 37030, 37045, 37077, | |37108, 37129, 37179, 37195, | |37252, 37277, 37317, 37356, | |37370, 37429, 37487, 37488, | |37499, 37516, 37520, 37579, | |37584, 37590, 37620, 37622, | |37658, 37668, 37763, 37771 | Depends on|37799, 37825, 37869, 37888, | |37930, 37942, 38000, 38095, | |38374, 38544, 38590, 38623, | |38956, 39159, 39236, 39447, | |39510, 39517, 40079, 40571, | |40701, 40854, 41022 | --- Comment #218 from Rainer Bielefeld 2011-10-29 07:38:28 PDT --- "Bug 42339 - EDITING and VIEWING cell borders differs from expected and print" exists at least since OOo 1.1.4., so I can't see any founding why this one should have become such a high priority suddenly. "33634 - VIEWING: No difference between cell border 0,5pt and 1,0pt" is rated as "minor" in the bug, so I also can't see any reason for a listing here. Both ones are too far away from a blocker to be listed here, because of that I remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Glib errors with Linux 32bit build
Hi all, With a build from master today on 32bit Linux, I keep getting : GLib-CRITICAL **: g_ascii_strncasecmp: assertion `s1 != NULL' failed in the console. Build options : ./autogen.sh --enable-ext-mysql-connector --with-system-mysql --with-epm --enable-ext-scripting-beanshell --enable-ext-scripting-javascript --enable-python=auto --disable-mozilla --disable-build-mozilla --without-junit Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36678, which changed state. Bug 36678 Summary: Missing user-defined dictionaries with a specified language attribute via "Spelling and Grammar" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36678 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||FIXED Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #217 from Mikeyy 2011-10-29 06:36:18 PDT --- Finally found bug that I experience offten since most of company use Excel 2003 and few of us use LO 3.4.3 XLS files saved by CALC have split added on top - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Mikeyy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Mikeyy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33634, 42339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #216 from Mikeyy 2011-10-29 06:17:55 PDT --- Like to nomiante 2 bugs. Have one more, but wasn't able to find it reported. No difference between different border thikness - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33634 Borders behaviour irradical, not WYSIWYG - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation fault in building tail_build project
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, LOH KOK HOE wrote: >> >> May I know is there a way to use the make 3.82 and not removing make 3.81? > > export GNUMAKE=/path/to/make-3.82 or install it at /opt/lo/bin/make Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation fault in building tail_build project
Hi *, On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, LOH KOK HOE wrote: > > May I know is there a way to use the make 3.82 and not removing make 3.81? export GNUMAKE=/path/to/make-3.82 ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation fault in building tail_build project
Thanks for your help. I have the make 3.82 downloaded. May I know can I instruct the build to use the latest version of make 3.82. I was using Ubuntu, currently using version 3.81, and not really want to remove the old version and install a new one because there are dependencies using make 3.81. May I know is there a way to use the make 3.82 and not removing make 3.81? THanks @! On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:57 AM, LOH KOK HOE wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have just downloaded the latest source code from GIT, following the > > developer guideline in making the build. But it failed in tail_build > > project. When attempting the individual build on tail_build project, I > get > > this output "No environment set!". > > You have overlooked the message that tell you to source Env.Host.sh > see in the output you quoted the line that says: > > source ./Env.Host.sh > > > > > Below are a snapshot of the output during the build from top level, > hoping > > this could give out some hints on fixing this issue. > > > > - Output Snapshot - > > > > [ build CXX ] unoxml/source/rdf/CURI > > [ build CXX ] unoxml/source/rdf/CLiteral > > [ build CXX ] unoxml/source/rdf/librdf_repository > > [ build CXX ] unoxml/source/rdf/librdf_services > > [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libunoxmllo.so > > [ build DEP ] SRS:sw/res > > [ build SRS ] sw/res > > [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libswdlo.so > > /bin/bash: line 1: 10810 Segmentation fault make -s -r -j2 build > > gb_PARTIALBUILD=T > > dmake: Error code 139, while making 'all' > > You are most likely using an unpatched gnu make 3.81 with -j > 1 > there should have been a warning at configure time about that. something > like > "* - make 3.81 is prone to crashes with parallelism > 1. Since > --with-num-cpus was explicitely given, it is honored, but do not > complain when make segfault on you." > > Anyway, you either need to disable (i.e do not specify > --with-num-cpus) the build parallelism or install and use a gnu make > 3.82 or a patched 3.81 version. > You can find a usable 3.82 version at > git://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools > > Norbert > ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] patch for fdo#33047
Hello, I put a proposed patch on the bugtracker 33047 (with comments associated), could someone to take a look at it ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33047#c9 Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-patch-for-fdo-33047-tp3462977p3462977.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
