NienTsu Wu license statement
Hi all, All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license. Sincerely, NienTsu ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
Tommy wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: . + 5.4.4 RC2 status . no bugfix list has been published yet about RC1 and RC2 in the wiki https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.4#5.4.4_release nevermoind. it's fixed now --- Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
Michael Meeks wrote: . + 5.4.4 RC2 status . no bugfix list has been published yet about RC1 and RC2 in the wiki https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.4#5.4.4_release --- Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
Michael Meeks wrote: > * Release Engineering update (Christian) + 5.2.5 release status + announced today https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/5.2.5/RC1 this page is still empty. the list of fixed bugs has not been published yet. Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
5.2.4.1 RC bugfix list missing
hi there. the 5.2.4.1 RC bugfix list is not yet published here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.2#5.2.4_release don't know who has to take care about it. bye, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Community communication
Tor Lillqvist wrote: I would like to advise to create a group to make easier our communication, something like slack or a telegram group. Facebook? Oh, I forgot, nobody has ever heard of that. --tml @Tor somebody should collect these pearls and make an e-book out of them... :-) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Introducing myself
Nagar Akshay wrote: Hello everyone this is Akshay Nagar. I am currently pursuing Computer Science and Engineering 3rd year at NIT Jaipur, India. I want to intern at GSOC with libre office the coming year. welcome on board!!! I would like to get a tip about getting started and the prerequisites needed to start contributing. Looking forward to your cooperation, With regards, Akshay. best thing would be to start with an "easy hack". you can find more infos here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/EasyHacks#Progress bye, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: getting close to the 30000 RESOLVED bugs milestone
Tommy wrote: take a look here: http://tinyurl.com/ze4qyhj the count is now 29970 I know we already passed the 30K FIXED milestone if we count the CLOSED and VERIFIED bugs as well... anyway it's getting time to celebrate this new achievement soon... cheers, Tommy I wonder if we can identify who's gonna close the 3th bug It would be nice to give him/her a badge about this mileston. Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
getting close to the 30000 RESOLVED bugs milestone
take a look here: http://tinyurl.com/ze4qyhj the count is now 29970 I know we already passed the 30K FIXED milestone if we count the CLOSED and VERIFIED bugs as well... anyway it's getting time to celebrate this new achievement soon... cheers, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [ANN] LibreOffice 5.1.0 RC3 available
Christian Lohmaier wrote: Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the third release candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.0. > ... Bugzilla 5.1.0.3 rc item created ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Bugzilla: Update on Whiteboard -> Keywords migration
Robinson Tryon wrote: Hi all, The migration of several tags from the Whiteboard -> Keywords is now largely complete for Open bugs. > ... you really did a good job. Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote: Hi, Il 03/12/2015 17:02, Michael Meeks ha scritto: * Terni (Italy) Hackfest Update ? + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest/Terni2015 + Cloph to ask wrt. status. ... One group managed to post a patch that has been applied. Other groups got false positives. One participant posted a trivial patch on his own earlier this week. So we ended up with two new contributors :) please tell the bug numbers you fixed and write the achievements in the Terni hackfest wikipage. thumbs up!!! Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: QA Meeting About How To Move Regressions Forward
Joel Madero wrote: Hi All, QA is going to have a meeting second week of December about regressions and what we (QA) can realistically do to help move things forward. > ... 4) In the past we tried a hardHack list that we ultimately retired. Would it be possible to have a weekly 1-2 fully triaged (bisected regressions with good steps and all) brought up during the ESC to see if there are any takers? Any other thoughts really appreciated :) Best, Joel the number 4 seems a very good idea. +1 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: CAD software integration
Tor Lillqvist wrote: While at it, we should also start working on extending LO into the field of real-time process control, including defence and aerospace applications. --tml you forgot mind control and telepathy. think about a LibreOffice extension allowing to use the software without a keyboard... this is definitively something we should focus on it ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?
Joel Madero wrote: I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID IMHO the time spent to implement this new ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless... in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who don't provide necessary informations. To put this in context - this began after several users over the course of a few weeks got quite irate at the WFM/Invalid status. I don't understand why those people should feel irate or offended if the INVALID state is due to their deficiency to provide a valide testcase or answers to legitimate QA questions... most of the time you got an INVALID tag after 7 months of inactivity... so, again, no reason to blame QA if you can't answer questions after 7 months I tend to agree that INVALID is accurate but if ABANDONED and/or EXPIRED will make them feel better, that's fine. anyway, whatever you decide is ok for me. but I think we are paying too much attention to users who are not giving a valualble contribution to Bugzilla and LibO in general I really don't care much about feelings of bad bug submitters. probably most of them would deserve a PEBKAC status :-) This will mostly be used by the automatic pings and most QA people probably won't have to do much to maintain this new status. Best, Joel bye, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: 250 USD offer on FreedomSponsor to fix tdf#33082
Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Tommy, On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 06:07 +0100, Tommy wrote: I want to inform the developer community that an user offered 250 dollars to fix: Bug 33082 - Multiple operations are not tracked as change in change control https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33082 Hmm. So - just as a hyper-optimistic estimation - implementing change tracking for tables, including the file-format support (there is none in ODF as such) and so on is the order of a six man month type job: unit tests, filter work, core data structure pieces etc. I'm not a programmer so I had no idea how much effort was needed. thanks for the info. It is good to have people supporting and offering money for the work - but 6 man months is 8*5*4*6 hours -> 960 hours. No idea what you think a programmer should earn but $0.26/hr rate is below most estimations ;-) not a good salary indeed even those who built the pyramids were paid better :-) anyway as that user said, anyone is free to add a few bucks to the funding campaign Having said that - it is clear that this is an important missing feature. In general it would be good to split it into many bugs - some of the features are smaller and less problematic. HTH ! Michael. bye, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
250 USD offer on FreedomSponsor to fix tdf#33082
I want to inform the developer community that an user offered 250 dollars to fix: Bug 33082 - Multiple operations are not tracked as change in change control https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33082 here's the FreedomSponsors link: http://bit.ly/1QeQR1i ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
Michael Meeks wrote: * Highest-Priority bugs (aka "MABs"): 5.0: 11/47 - 20% 4.4: 10/70 - 14% 4.3: 6/67 - 8% 4.2: 12/132 - 9% 4.1: 4/79 - 5% 4.0: 11/81 - 13% old: 39/246 - 16% > Farewell MABs. Welcome HPBs. (I think we need a new acronym too). what about adding a total count at the bottom of the list? actually is: all: 93/722 - 13% ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Minutes of ESC call: 2015-08-13
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:21:45 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: * 4.3 MABs - what's the plan with them? (Kendy) + Re-check and prioritize -> anything more? (Robinson) https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=mab4.3 + will they became 5.0 MAB's or priority / severity? (Kendy) + restricing the priority / severity still in progress, so probably both (Robinson) should we move the 4.4 MABs too and have a single 5.0 MAB list? and what about 5.1.x ? a MAB list has never been creates since I thought the decision was to abandon MAB lists... ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [ANN] LibreOffice 5.0.1 RC1 available
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:23:05 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release candidate of LibreOffice 5.0.1 5.0.1.1 rc version added to Bugzilla ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Release notes LO 5.0 : nothing about Emoji autocorrection
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:05:32 +0200, Németh László wrote: Hi, I will extend the release notes soon about both new improvements here, the default Emoji, Greek alphabet etc. short name replacements ( http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-5-0&id=483390d66b1e1bd899410906f53f3124cacfe73d), and the new AutoCorrect method for immediately replacements inside words (this one is useful to define own in-word patterns for linguistics, mathematics, typography etc. ( http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-5-0&id=15c04e1f567e50aff850a65996c65e6465497710 ). Many thanks for your mail and your positive feedback, also thanks in advance to the translators. I will try to give some nice examples about the usage of this new feature, too. Best regards, Laszlo being an autocorrect maniac I really appreciated your continued efforts and improvements to the LibO autocorrect engine. thumbs up!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: MAB/Priority and Severity
On Sun, 31 May 2015 22:14:54 +0200, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All! So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. I will miss MABs... expecially the fact there were different list for the different codelines (is. mab4.3, mab4.4 and mab5.0) that was very useful for user to decide wheter to stick on the stable branch or move to the fresh branch just reading the list of the specific issues of each branch so is there any plan to generate a query about the new highest priority bugs which can separate all these issues in a fashion similar to current MABs lists? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Resignation from the ESC
On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:02:48 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hey, so I hereby resign from the ESC effective immediately. ... I enjoyed working with many great people but I believe that the project is developing in the wrong direction at the moment and that I should spend my free time in a better way. Regards, Markus sorry to hear that. you've been a great contributor to LibO so far. we will miss you. Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:07:33 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=75025&hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.2 MAB + 5/208 38/232 63/255 74/261 83/266 81/263 84/262 82/260 80/260 82/260 86/257 ... please anybody help to retest and migrate the very last 4 MABs from the 4.2.x list to the 4.3.x list. me and Robinson have retested most of the original 83 MABs that were still open at the time of 4.2.x EOL. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:13:33 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: + look at sorting spreadsheet / use-cases etc. (Eike) cf. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85490 ] [ some progress, Luke did some good work on JBF's doc. several use-cases where things are different, further fixes expected for 4.3.next+1 4.2.x new ? perhaps when we have most important ones fixed ] ... does this mean that an extra 4.2.8 release is under consideration? the 4.2.x branche EOL is set to november 19th which is in less than 1 week ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: new git bugzilla script
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:00:56 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hey, so I finally implemented a new git bugzilla script that should bring back the commit notifications in bugzilla for fixed bugs. As it is a complete new implementation you should report any problems as soon as possible thank Markus. one question: may we remove this test bug from the UNCONFIRMED list? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85461 should we change status to RESOLVED FIXED or NOTABUG or whatever you prefer? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] "No activity" warnings - EasyHacks
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:35:30 +0200, Joel Madero wrote: On 10/24/2014 02:59 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi, I've seen a "Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is open and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a newer version than the version reported in the original report to know that the bug is still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed over time and just never closed." warning in one of the EasyHacks (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30425). I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks when sending these, please? What would be the rationale for skipping them for easy hacks? These get fixed just as inadvertently as other bugs. Just curious Best, Joel maybe Jan is complaining of the spam that is generated in the dev list by any "retest ping" message that hits easy hacks. AFAIK every time an easy hack receives a new comment a notification is sent to the dev list. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:18:42 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: + 4.2.7 - due in week 40 - 29th Sept freeze. + Potential for new incremental releases sooner. what does this mean? will we see a 4.2.8 release too? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Minutes of ESC call: 2014-07-31
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:46:30 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: * Release Engineering update (Christian) + 4.2.6 status + will be released tomorrow (Friday) just to say that I did not see any release announcement yesterday and that we still have 4.2.5 in the download page. http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:17:11 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: ... * Open 4.3 MAB + 5/22 3/20 5/16 4/12 2/8 3/7 2/5 1/2 1/2 0/1 0/1 22% 15% + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=75025&hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.2 MAB + 71/207 71/205 73/200 64/190 62/184 49/165 18/128 19/124 18/123 24/120 20/112 34%34%36%33%33%29% 14%15%14% 20%17% + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=65675&hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.1 MAB + None - down to zero + many thanks to tommy27 ! now it's time to start monitoring the Open 4.4 MAB in the next ESC minutes. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 actually 1/1 open ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
LibreOffice 4.4 most annoying bugs
hi I created a new meta-issue for mab4.4 here's the link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79641 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: bug stats from deferred ESC call ...
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:01:54 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: ... * QA stats: + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html +227-144(+83 overall) many thanks to the top bug squashers: Jorendc 12 Joel Madero 12 Matt Turner 8 Jay Philips 7 Caolán McNamara 7 pierre-yves samyn7 Julien Nabet 6 Cor Nouws5 m.a.riosv5 hi, is there a way to have an "all time" or monthly or yearly standing of top bug squashers? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: How can I become a part of developer community?
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:05:46 +0200, Alex Bondarenko wrote: Hello. My name is Alex. ... degree from information technologies. Can I become a part of developers community and that I need to do for this? Thank you for attention. take a look at this: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Progress I know LibO devs suggest to new contributors to start with an easy hack first. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: opinion on SimpleProgramDebugger as a LibO debug tool
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:39:19 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: Hi, On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 05:08:29PM +0200, Tommy wrote: I stumbled upon this freeware application and I wonder if it may help doing backtraces or profiling under Window. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/simple_program_debugger.html unfortunately I have no experience to judge if the output of this software may be useful or not for QA and developers. so, please, give it a try and report if useful or useless. ... snip ... I understand if -- for QA purposes, when you don't set up a build environment -- other debuggers are useful, for a developer, the VS debugger is already there, so there is little point in experimenting with other debuggers. Miklos I'll try to be clearer: is this SimpleProgramDebugger a Windows alternative to Valgrind or other Linux tools that people use to do profiling, backtraces etc. etc. ? I have no experience at all with Linux and I don't have enough spare time to learn it, so I wonder if this Windows tool may be used by Windows users like me to obtain the same results as Linux users do with Valgrind. if yes, will the developers be able to interpret SimpleProgramDebugger's output like they already do with Valgrind? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
opinion on SimpleProgramDebugger as a LibO debug tool
I stumbled upon this freeware application and I wonder if it may help doing backtraces or profiling under Window. http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/simple_program_debugger.html unfortunately I have no experience to judge if the output of this software may be useful or not for QA and developers. so, please, give it a try and report if useful or useless. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
15000 resolved bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_status&query_format=report-table&product=LibreOffice&format=table&action=wrap congrats to the devs and QA for breaking another milestone in bugzilla. RESOLVED bug count is over 15K (and the real number is even larger if we consider VERIFIED and CLOSED bugs) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
mab4.3 page created
see it here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75025 it should collect only those bugs which appear in current 4.3 master branch ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: pre-release page not yet updated to offer 4.1.5 RC1 download
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:20:21 +0100, Tommy wrote: see webpage: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ and this bug report as well: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72853 4.1.5 RC1 has been releases few days ago https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.5_release 4.2.0 RC3 is correctly updated though. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
pre-release page not yet updated to offer 4.1.5 RC1 download
see webpage: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ and this bug report as well: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72853 4.1.5 RC1 has been releases few days ago https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.5_release ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Google Summer of Code 2014
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:05:12 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote: Friends, Just to keep you updated that the organization applications for the Google Summer of Code 2014 will start the Monday after FOSDEM[1]. Cheers Fridrich [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2014/help_page#2._What_is_the_program_timeline [2] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas is there a page with the list of previous GSoC completed tasks by year? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: QA Call Reminder: Monday @ 19:30 UTC
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:15:18 +0100, Robinson Tryon wrote: Hi all, The QA Team is having another one of our marvelous bi-weekly calls tomorrow. All are welcome! The agendum for the meeting and information on how to join via your phone or browser are available here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/December_02 If you're new to the project and would like to get more involved, we'd love to see you on the call! Cheers, --R sorry, I missed that because of work issues. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:14:41 +0200, Tommy wrote: an RC3 release notes link has to be added in the wiki. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.2_release actually only RC1 and RC2 are credited. the RC3 page actually exists: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.1.2/RC3 it is still not visible in the wiki though. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:19:32 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 10/3/13 5:58 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: + 4.1.2 RC3 status + on the mirror network + pending press release / announce. AI: + poke marketing / PR for announce (Cloph) Ready to release tomorrow, if necessary, will circulate PR to marketing private immediately. an RC3 release notes link has to be added in the wiki. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.2_release actually only RC1 and RC2 are credited. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC face-to-face ...
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:00:45 +0200, julien2412 wrote: About devs and bugs, perhaps it could be interesting to indicate in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/FindTheExpert if we want to be warned or not about every bug (concerning module associated to the dev)? (or perhaps ping only for important bugs) Julien +1 actually the Wiki page says: "The following table shows several experts, you can add the appropriate expert to CC of a confirmed (NEW) bug." so the devs who don't wanna be CC'ed on bugs should ask to be removed from that list to avoid annoyances. actually users and QA members have no clue from that table to discern who likes to be CC'ed and who doesn't. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: MAB 3.6 -> 4.0 migration over
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:21:44 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Tommy wrote: I'd wish to know what you finally decided for the future of MABs... are we going to merge them in a single list or just keep those list separated? From past discussions, having only one list seems like a workable solution. ... snip ... -- Thorsten I wonder if having 2 separate list would be an acceptable compromise. MAB release --> all MABs existing in current LibO final release (i.e. 4.0 + 4.1) MAB master --> all MABs existing just in master release (i.e. 4.2) once 4.2.0 is out, all surviving MABs go transferred to the MAB release list, and only new 4.3 master specific bugs are added to the list. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
MAB 3.6 -> 4.0 migration over
It's finally done. Today I confirmed and moved the last 2 surviving 3.6 MAB to the 4.0 MAB list. Final Stats about the old 3.x branches MABs are: * 3.6 MAB --> 161 fixed bugs * 3.5 MAB --> 209 fixed bugs * 3.4 MAB --> 114 fixed bugs * TOTAL --> 484 fixed bugs Current Stats about the 4.x branches are: * 4.2 MAB (open/total) --> 2/6 * 4.1 MAB (open/total) --> 14/91 * 4.0 MAB (open/total) --> 52/183 * TOTAL (open/total) --> 68/280 I'd wish to know what you finally decided for the future of MABs... are we going to merge them in a single list or just keep those list separated? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: is there a portable version of libre office for win 7 ?
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:11:29 +0200, Pedro wrote: Actually there are two portable versions. The one suggested by Christian and X-LibreOffice from winPenPack. You can get the latest version from http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1354 or choose any specific version from http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/ Hope this helps! I tried both version and I can tell that IMHO the winPenPack portable version is better that the one from PortableApps. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: QA Call Reminder: Friday @ 13:00 UTC
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:35:31 +0200, Robinson Tryon wrote: Hi all, Our bi-weekly public QA Call is tomorrow. All are welcome! The Agenda and information for joining-in are available here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/August_23 Cheers, --R as said in previous messages, I cannot join in august. I'm eager to join the september call. see you. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: LibreOffice Gerrit News 2013-06-17
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:54:37 +0200, Mat M wrote: To avoid having still more lines to scroll, could we get a consensus on itemizing ? Something like + fontsizedialog.ui widget in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4312 from Manal Alhassoun + Migrate CheckFields unit test to python in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4294 from David Ostrovsky + replace ShapeList::getNextShape with STL like iterator. in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4191 from mhofmann which cancels doubt of block start and keep us on a not so long mail. that "+" solution would be good for me IMHO some kind of separators would help readability of such long lists We could have separator for categories, btw. I t will help separating full mail into major blocks. HTH I agree. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: LibreOffice Gerrit News 2013-06-17
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:52:05 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: I'm not sure if it is only me, but those messages are hard to read, can we have new lines between different items (i.e. after the "in https://"; line)? or any other way to make it easier to tell which line belongs to which description? Regards, Khaled I agree.. could be that list be formatted from actual: fontsizedialog.ui widget in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4312 from Manal Alhassoun Migrate CheckFields unit test to python in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4294 from David Ostrovsky replace ShapeList::getNextShape with STL like iterator. in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4191 from mhofmann etc. etc to something like this: fontsizedialog.ui widget in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4312 from Manal Alhassoun Migrate CheckFields unit test to python in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4294 from David Ostrovsky replace ShapeList::getNextShape with STL like iterator. in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4191 from mhofmann etc. etc IMHO some kind of separators would help readability of such long lists ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.3 RC3 available
On Sat, 04 May 2013 14:53:24 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Dear Community, Release candidate 2 was built and is available via http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ - but is superseded by RC3 due to a showstopper found. The list of issues and fixed bugs for 4.0.3 RC2 is in our wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.0.3/RC2 Whereas the list of known issues and fixed bugs with 4.0.3 RC3 is available from here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.0.3/RC3 the RC3 page link is not yet visible in the release plan table: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.0#4.0.3_release ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Set RES_GRFATR_CROPGRF atrtibute from SwVirtFlyDrawObj
On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:52:32 +0200, Philippe Jung wrote: I confirm I am implementing visual crop in writer with drag and drop. This already exists in impress. Today I have crop handles. I have updated svx so that I can get endsdrdrag in writer without breaking crop in impress. I can resize the picture but I have difficulties in setting crop values. Will have a look at the extension you pointed. Philippe nice. are you aware of this bugzilla report? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555 you should take assignment for this bug and keep in touch with other developers interested in it. see: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555#c29 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Set RES_GRFATR_CROPGRF atrtibute from SwVirtFlyDrawObj
On Wed, 01 May 2013 12:13:55 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Philippe, Philippe Jung schrieb: Hi, I am working on implementing the Crop Image feature in Writer. Which one? In Impress/Draw we have .uno:Crop (That is used for cropping with the mouse) and .uno:GrafAttrCrop (That opens the crop dialog)? You can already crop images with Writer but not in a "visual mode" I think he's working on a visual crop tool such as the extension CropOOo. http://aoo-extensions.sourceforge.net/en/project/cropooo ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Basic Macro to Increment Chart's Range: Progress
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:55:08 +0100, Jonathan Levi wrote: I'm making progress toward a LibreOffice Basic macro to increment a spreadsheet chart's data range. First task is to get the range; here's what I've got: ... snip ... What I need is the piece of data saying that my data consists of rows 2 through 5 (row 1 contains the header). Any ideas? TIA, Jonathan this is the developer's list. if you need help with a macro try asking to some web forums with macro oriented subforums such as: http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewforum.phtml?f=9 http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewforum.php?f=20 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Please Add Barack Obama to Dictionary
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:42:03 +0200, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All, Not sure who is responsible for dictionary additions but a user has pointed out that Mitt Romney's name is in our dictionary but Obama comes out underlined. This is probably no good and could be interpreted (incorrectly) as a subliminal message by our team ;) Regards, Joel clearly unintentional. basically the problem is that Barack Obama, though American, has a non-american name and surname (originally from his father from Kenya) that's why it's not included by default in the US dictionary. if Barack Obama had italo-american origin and was called Matteo Rossi you would see again red underline from the spell-checker. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:36:28 +0200, Tommy wrote: mine was just a "donation" and has not to be intended as "I PAID so you MUST FIX IT !!!" since I have no coding skills, it was the only way I could concretely contribute to the fixing process. I hope I did not I hope I did not create too much problems with that... ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: fundings for EasyHack fdo#48729
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:22:25 +0200, Tommy wrote: . on the bug page a guy already offered his help. I keep my fingers crossed. WOW!!! a patch is already available and pushed to master by Tomaz Vajngerl!!! http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=78a39502de36c32d7aaf6e5bbde1f8df80fdd21f I'm going to test it as soon as a new master build is available. if the patch will reveal to be a good fix should I ask here to cherry-pick to 3.6.x? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: fundings for EasyHack fdo#48729
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:05:34 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Tommy, On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 05:49 +0200, Tommy wrote: Since I'm no developer but I'm very interest in a fix for this bug, I decided to donate money to support the devs. Many thanks for your donation. As I wrote in the bug, TDF does not do development for hire itself - yes, I know that. hovewer I'd liked to economically support the LibO team. but your suggestion of: I will also donate another 50 euros to the personal bank account of the hacker who will finally fix this. Will no doubt be gratefully received by the eventual fixer :-) Thanks for supporting the project ! Michael. on the bug page a guy already offered his help. I keep my fingers crossed. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
fundings for EasyHack fdo#48729
Bug 48729 - autocorrect limit. acor.dat with entry 65535: Loop and/or loss of acor data https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48729 Since I'm no developer but I'm very interest in a fix for this bug, I decided to donate money to support the devs. I have just sent a 50 euros wire bank transfer to the TDF bank account (IBAN: DE1266690003497390, BIC: VBPFDE66) check your account and you will see a 50 euros transfer with this infos: FUNDING FOR LIBO BUG 48729 - HTTPS://BUGS.FREEDESKTOP.ORG/SHOW_BUG.CGI?ID=48729 I will also donate another 50 euros to the personal bank account of the hacker who will finally fix this. The bug has 2 main part: 1- autocorrect entries is limit to 16^2 --> 65535 2- once the limit is reached the database gets erased the most important thing for me is actually to raise the number of entries (from 16^2 to 20^2 or 32^2) since I need to add more autocorrect terms in my LibreOffice. just fixing the database erase without raising that number of available entries would not help me, since my priority is to expand the autocorrect database capacity thank you, TOMMY -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: uscito LibO 3.6.0
sorry guys... that message was intended to the italian OOo/LibO newsgroup and not to the dev list. my mistake. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
uscito LibO 3.6.0
copio e incollo la mail ufficiale: The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements Berlin, August 8, 2012 - The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6, the fourth major release of the best free office suite ever, which provides a large number of new features and incremental improvement over the previous versions. Innovations range from invisible features such as improved performance and interoperability to the more visible ones such as user interface tweaks, where theming has improved to more closely match current design best-practice. A full list with screenshots is available here: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-6-new-features-and-fixes, because a picture says more than a thousand words. Wherever you look you see improvements: a new CorelDRAW importer, integration with Alfresco via the CMIS protocol and limited SharePoint integration, color-scales and data-bars in spreadsheet cells, PDF export watermarking, improved auto-format function for tables in text documents,, high quality image scaling, Microsoft SmartArt import for text documents, and improved CSV handling. In addition, there is a lot of contributions from the design team: a cleaner look, especially on Windows PCs, beautiful new presentation master pages, and a new splash screen. LibreOffice is becoming increasingly popular in corporate environments. During the last months, several large public bodies have announced their migration to the free office suite: the Capital Region of Denmark, the cities of Limerick in Ireland, Grygov in the Czech Republic, Las Palmas in Spain, the City of Largo in Florida, the municipality of Pilea-Hortiatis in Greece, and the Public Library System of Chicago. Dave Richards of the City of Largo has commented about the new release on his blog: "I have been testing LibreOffice 3.6 and am happy to see the progress. At this time all of our showstoppers are fixed and we probably will upgrade almost immediately when it's released. Nice work. CMIS is shaping up nicely. I'll be looking at 3.7 when it appears in the daily builds". In France, the MIMO Working Group - the ministries of Agriculture, Culture and Communication, Defence, Education, Energy, Finance Interior and Justice - with a total of 500.000 end users, has certified LibreOffice for deployment on every desktop. At the same time, the OSB Alliance joined the efforts of German and Swiss cities and communities sponsoring development on the LibreOffice codebase. Corporate users are joining consumers who quickly switched to LibreOffice. Giorgio Buccellati, Professor Emeritus of History and Near Eastern Languages at UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles), says: "LibreOffice is wonderful software. I am an avid user of the Hybrid PDF feature, which allows to exchange PDF files with all other users while preserving the possibility of editing the same document like a native file". LibreOffice 3.6 has been developed by the growing community of hackers gathered around The Document Foundation, thanks to a friendly and welcoming environment, and the compelling Free Software ethos. The community has surpassed the threshold of five hundred developers providing new features and patches since the announcement of the project on September 28, 2010. According to Ohloh, LibreOffice is the third largest developer community focusing on free software applications, after Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, and the largest to be independent from a single corporate sponsor. This result has been achieved in less than two years, and is now a benchmark for free software projects. The Document Foundation invites power users, able to help iron out any final wrinkles, to read the release notes carefully, install LibreOffice 3.6.0, and report any problems. More conservative users should stick with LibreOffice 3.5. Corporate users are strongly advised to deploy LibreOffice with the backing of professional support, from a company able to assist with migration, end user training, support and maintenance. LibreOffice 3.6 is available from: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/ To contribute to the further development of LibreOffice and The Document Foundation, you can donate at: http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/donate/ Short link to The Document Foundation blog: http://wp.me/p1byPE-j8 About The Document Foundation (TDF) The Document Foundation is an open, independent, self-governing, meritocratic organization, which builds on ten years of dedicated work by the OpenOffice.org Community. TDF was created in the belief that the culture born of an independent foundation brings out the best in corporate and volunteer contributors, and will deliver the best free office suite. TDF is open to any individual who agrees with its core values and contributes to its activities, and warmly welcomes corporate participation, e.g. by sponsoring individuals to work as equals alongside other contributors in the community. As of J
Re: How to add color scales to ODF?
On Thu, 10 May 2012 03:02:43 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Hey, I just reached a state where I can think about adding support for color scales into ODF. Normally this would not be such a big deal but for color scales we face several problems. snip do you know this extension? http://aoo-extensions.sourceforge.net/en/project/escaladecolores I do not know if this may help you or not ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Need help with debugging LO freeze
O n Thu, 03 May 2012 22:13:37 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote: Hi, I'm the author of LanguageTool, a style and grammar checker. We received a lot of reports that LO freezes for several seconds if LanguageTool is installed. I remember also this issue you filed: https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46765 I have now debugged this and it seems the problem occurs with LanguageTool but is actually in LO and will also affect other grammar checkers. interesting, maybe it affect the internal LibO spellchecker, right? snip In a nutshell: the freeze happens when SvxLinguConfigUpdate::UpdateAll() is called because it's slow. If we turn on caching in LngSvcMgr::getAvailableServices(), the freeze is gone. Any help is welcome. snip could you please take a look at it? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46805 it's another issue about spellchecking freeze... Micheal Meeks already patched a partial fix in master (-50% freeze time) I wonder if your bugfix may help reducing the remaining 50% as a lucky side effect. keeping my fingers crossed :-) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Regarding your commit: Add all the available themes to the list
On Sat, 05 May 2012 11:42:36 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: I know they are killed themes, but they does not break build and if user specify them it is pretty easy to adjust the code to actually load them if they want to waste their time on it. I would rather see the configure option for them disappear with disappearance of the folder itself. As I said in the former message, the possibility not to build classic and industrial was introduced few months ago by my commit and it was completely accidental (i slipped to check for those two dirs). so finally I know who is to blame for this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38175 just kidding :-) So I just consider this actual bugfix restoring the former state Anyway if you think that those two should not be built just sent the patch to the ml, and I think the dirs should be removed too if they are not used and built anwyay, we can restore them from git if anyone needs them. as you see in previous bug page it's possible to manually enable those missing themes ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH-3-5] speedup autocorrect database import ...
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:34:07 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: Large autocorrect databases cause quite some slowness on first keystroke for people; turns out we had quite a gratuitous N^2 on load there involving some ICU collation goodness ;-) It's still not ideal to have a multi-second freeze, but at least it's half the length it was ;-) Review appreciated, Thanks, Michael. here's another slowness issue with large replacement table. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49350 Deszi Szabolcs already brilliantly resolved the slow loading... however there's still a problem with slow closing. maybe the same methods applied to previous bugs to speed up things can be used here as well ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Regarding your commit: Add all the available themes to the list
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:48:19 +0200, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote: And two for Classic: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=grep&q=classical+icon The zip file in the Classic theme folder is a result of this bug, AFAIK: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38175 Personally, I see little reason for keeping either available as a theme choice, certainly not the Classic theme. None of our themes is exactly well-supported, so the fewer we have, the better (IMHO). Does that help? Astron. the Classic theme has still some irriducible estimators... you guys already have tried to get rid of it... but I've always found the way to hack LibO and keep using it... :-) CLASSIC THEME WILL NEVER DIE!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PUSHED][PATCH-3-5] speedup autocorrect database import ...
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:21:52 +0200, Tommy wrote: On Tue, 01 May 2012 14:45:32 +0200, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:34 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Large autocorrect databases cause quite some slowness on first keystroke for people Looks sane, pushed. Method is not one of beauty. C. so this means it will be in 3.5.4 right? sorry. did not notice the automated message in the bug page. yes, it will be in 3.5.4 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PUSHED][PATCH-3-5] speedup autocorrect database import ...
On Tue, 01 May 2012 14:45:32 +0200, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:34 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Large autocorrect databases cause quite some slowness on first keystroke for people Looks sane, pushed. Method is not one of beauty. C. so this means it will be in 3.5.4 right? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH-3-5] speedup autocorrect database import ...
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:34:07 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: Large autocorrect databases cause quite some slowness on first keystroke for people; turns out we had quite a gratuitous N^2 on load there involving some ICU collation goodness ;-) It's still not ideal to have a multi-second freeze, but at least it's half the length it was ;-) Review appreciated, Thanks, Michael. thanks Micheal. apart from the performance improvement I kept testing the LOdev and I did not find any issue or unwanted side-effect with your fix and existing autocorrect behaviour. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] fdo#42779: Implement icon theme lookaside directory
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:25:29 +0200, Muhammad Haggag wrote: From bugzilla (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42779): Currently if an artist wishes to do some icon theming they have to run some scripts when they save an image to re-pack (by zipping) their icon theme of interest, and then re-start LibreOffice. That is a bit of a pain. I understant, that's really a PITA :-) It would be lovely if the icon loading code could support a look-aside directory tree beside the icon-theme, and preferentially load from there if it is present. got the meaning of this patch. makes sense ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] fdo#42779: Implement icon theme lookaside directory
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:36:09 +0200, Gábor Stefanik wrote: This enables overriding icons found in an images.zip file with ones in a directory named "images" next to the zip file. Icon caching is also disabled when a lookaside directory is detected, so changes to the icons in the directory are applied immediately. Icons in a lookaside directory currently always take precedence over ones in zip files. hi, would you please explain me what's the purpose of this? I'm not polemic, I'm just curious ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] fdo#39999: Changing spelling preferences requires application restart
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:34:09 +0200, Dézsi Szabolcs wrote: Hi! Bug's page After applying this patch, checking 'Check uppercase words' in options works without restarting LO. It's very simple, a single line, but it took me a while to find the right place to start... :) I hope that the patch is OK. Szabolcs another nice one from you!!! and I still remember you fixed also OOo Bug 101726 - Speed up autocorrect replacement table loading time (that guys at OOo/Apache never fixed it) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=101726 since it seems that you are very good with spellchecking and autocorrect issue, would you please take a look at these? LibO Bug 44580 - EasyHack: share autocorrect replacement table for misc. language subgroups https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44580 LibO Bug 46805 - large autocorrect database make LibO freeze when start typing https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46765 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:46:55 +0200, Michael Meeks wrote: snip * Pending Action Items + [well underway] review and re-close 3.4.x MAB fixed in 3.5.x (Rainer) snip "MAB = most annoying bugs" is a registered trademark by Tommy however I'm gonna let you use it under LGPLv3+/GPLv3+/MPL licences :-) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:52:27 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: I closed all these bugs. There are still two open bugs that I think are fixed but need to talk to Noel about them. Calc should be now down to 5 open regression bugs. hi Markus. actually on the 3.4.x MAB page ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 ) I still see 22 opened bugs: 31606 32181 32709 32948 33915 34093 34548 34814 36482 36703 36742 36766 37529 38067 39006 39928 40289 40907 40948 41996 42537 43266 which closed bugs are you talking about? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:34:16 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Tommy, Thanks for your mail ! :-) On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 06:29 +0100, Tommy wrote: >+ about 1/2 of the calc regressions are already fixed in 3.5 >+ 3.4.x will get no more updates >+ no need to explain more, close them. > AA:+ review and re-close these / discuss in QA call (Rainer) I wonder what will happen to the still open 3.4.x most annoying bugs (23 bugs yet). https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Good question - I guess one for the QA call later today (it'd be great to have you there). I suppose we should (as you say) check that they are all either fixed in 3.5.x and/or make them 'most annoying' for 3.5. I guess volunteers to do that work (if that's what QA decides) are also appreciated :-) well, I can try to re-test the open "3.4.x MAB" on 3.5.1 to see which one could be considered FIXED and which one are still affecting the 3.5.x family so they could be moved to "3.5.x MAB" page. for example this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39006 is still reproducible in 3.5.1 (see my report) so could be added to "3.5.x MAB" I did not add it yet because I want official permission to do that. I'd also leave that bug on the "3.4.x MAB" page just for historical reference. probably Reiner anf the guys from QA could adda message at the bottom of the 3.4.x MAB page telling user that 3.4.x will be no longer developed so any further bug nomination should be done in the 3.5.x MAB page ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:10:34 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: snip * closing fixed bugs + about 1/2 of the calc regressions are already fixed in 3.5 + 3.4.x will get no more updates + no need to explain more, close them. + some already re-opened because not fixed in 3.4.x AA: + review and re-close these / discuss in QA call (Rainer) I wonder what will happen to the still open 3.4.x most annoying bugs (23 bugs yet). https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 I think that these bugs, if not present anymore in 3.5.x should be closed, while if still present in 3.5.x as well, should be moved to the 3.5.x most annoying bugs page * 3.5 most annoying bugs ... + 58 (of 168): older 57/157 58/153 52/145 49/140 44/132 41/124 32/104 28/93 21/76 23/71 35% 36%37%36%35%33%33%30% 30% 28% 32% I think we should look at the fixed/unfixed ratio in another way... the percentage looks almost the same week by week just because new bugs have been constantly added... also the number of unfixed bugs is rising for the same reason. so these numbers could be misunderstood as sign of immobility or worsening of the develepment cicle, shici is not IMHO. what I consider most important and encouraging for the devs and users is that the number of fixed bugs is growing, if you count backwards you have 110, 100, 95, 93 48 fixed bugs. so the most important thing is that the fixed bugs numbers is rising steadily and this should be put in first place!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: EasyHack proposition - Crop image functionality improvement (fdo#34555)
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:44:04 +0100, khagaroth wrote: Can some developer please look at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34555 and check if it's suitable to be filled as an EasyHack (and fill it if it is)? The current crop functionality in Writer and Calc is really ridiculously bad and source of many user complaints. All the needed functionality is already present in Draw. well, I started using the CropOOo extension and it does a nice job. http://aoo-extensions.sourceforge.net/en/project/cropooo ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.1.2 tag created (3.5.1-rc2)
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:39:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.1.2 tag for 3.5.1-rc2 release. Hi, is the RC2 going to be released "bit-per-bit" as 3.5.1 final? on the release plan page the publishing date is march 11th but I haven't seen an official release yet. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] fdo#33043: Would be nice if the 'Start Center' had an exit button
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:01:22 +0100, Dézsi Szabolcs wrote: Hi! https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33043 I added a new button to Start Center. It exits LibreOffice. I used the attached picture for testing, I'm not a designer :) snip what's the purpose of such a button? once you are in the start center you already can close everything simply hitting the "X" button in the right upper corner. please, understand I'm not criticizing your patch, I'm just curious to know why users would need it. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
It would be interesting to know if Dezsi personal build with the fix about slow loading replacement table has still the issue I'm describing here... maybe, if we are lucky, that fix could somehow have influence even on the freeze I'm describing. we were lucky!!! Deszi's patch fixed both issues!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH]fdo45671 calc cell background color simplified code for split button action
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:49:30 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: Hello all, Attached patch introduces simpler code to make the 'apply last used color'-part of the split button. This patch is for calc cell background color, the other split buttons are to follow. Becasue of that, some ifs have already been converted to switches. Winfried hi winfried, is this patch fixing this ancient OOo issue? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=10864 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:34:02 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 21:22 +0100, Tommy wrote: the 2nd longer freeze related to autocorrect is present in LibO 3.4.5 and earlier versions So - please file a bug, add your auto-correct file and the explanation of how to repeat it, and perhaps mention it in Julien's similar issue: https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46765 Perhaps then Dezsi will be interested to have a look at it, IMHO we are still -way- too slow if we're taking ~two seconds to load and install only 60k strings into an auto-correct dictionary, there must be some other silliness going on. HTH, Michael. did it: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46805 It would be interesting to know if Dezsi personal build with the fix about slow loading replacement table has still the issue I'm describing here... maybe, if we are lucky, that fix could somehow have influence even on the freeze I'm describing. I indeed suspect that the freeze is caused by first access to the autocorrect database... if it was so slow to load the GUI replacemente table, maybe there is something that makes slow even the internal access to it. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:22:47 +0100, Tommy wrote: the 2nd longer freeze related to autocorrect is present in LibO 3.4.5 and earlier versions and 3.5.0 as well ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:50:32 +0100, Tommy wrote: again, using a "virgin" portable LibreOffice 3.5 ( http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1338 ) has no start-typing-freeze in my user experience. let me partially retract this statement... after more accurate test I found that even a "virgin" 3.5.0 has a slight freeze when start typing... just 2-3 seconds.. try typing "test" and hitting space... you will see that the cursor freezes after "tes" then writes the last letter and the space... with any word you use, there's always this 2-3 seconds freeze after the 3rd letter... this short freeze is not present in LibO 3.4.5 and earlier version so I think it's an issue of the 3.5.0 release it seems that huge autocorrect databases create a second freeze try this: enter the autocorr subfolder in your user profile (in Windows is under: User\LibreOffice 3\user\autocorr) and put the attached acor_.dat file (backup yours first) which has 64000 entries inside it. start LibO and open a blank writer file. digit "test" and hit space... you will see a first 2-3 second freeze after "tes" the the cursor moves to "test" and another longer freeze (6 seconds maybe) happens before you see the "space" so there are 2 freeze moments, the first one is shorter and unrelated to autocorrection, while the second is longer and depends on autocorrection these tests were done on LibO 3.5.0 Windows Vista 64bit SP1 IntelCore2 Duo CPI P8400@2.26 GhZ, 4GB RAM the 2nd longer freeze related to autocorrect is present in LibO 3.4.5 and earlier versions ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:38:37 +0100, julien2412 wrote: You're absolutely right ! :-) I opened a bug (see https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46765). I attached the lsof diff and some detailed info about my config and the options I use in autogen.lastrun Julien. hi julien. did u read my 14:50 post? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:56:53 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:37 -0800, julien2412 wrote: On 3.5 updated some days ago, here's the difference between the moment I open Calc (so before freeze) and after the moment the freeze stops (once I typed something) : Great - so, loading / bootstrapping the python stuff is also something of a problem it seems: urgh ! or perhaps ( as Tommy suggests ) autocorrect is implicated too. snip maybe there are 2 causes for that freeze. if it may help you, I can tell that the freeze I experience has always been part of old OOo/LibO releases and it's not a new thing for me in OOo 3.5.0 again, using a "virgin" portable LibreOffice 3.5 ( http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1338 ) has no start-typing-freeze in my user experience. the performace issue happens only when using a profile with my huge autocorrect database ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:14:06 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 02/28/2012 07:25 AM, Tommy wrote: however I still confirm that the freeze has something to do with autocorrection... if you download this portable versione of LibO 3.5.0 http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1338 which comes out with a "virgin" user preset, you won't notice any delay or freeze when starting modules... please, have your try!!! on the other hand if I use the same package with my user preset which is stuffed with a lot of autocorrect entries (I have 65000 in the acor_.dat and other 62000 in the acor_it-IT.dat files) the freeze happens at each start after digiting the first word. But that's exactly the thing discussed in the recent "[PATCH] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables" mail thread then, right? Stephan no, that thread was about loading time of the replacement table of autocorrect (Ctrl+H) shich has been fixed this is about a freeze that happens at the start of each module I suspect it can be a side effect of large autocorrect databases. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:37:39 +0100, julien2412 wrote: On 3.5 updated some days ago, here's the difference between the moment I open Calc (so before freeze) and after the moment the freeze stops (once I typed something) : http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3782371/lsof_diff.txt lsof_diff.txt Julien. -- ok, that's the debug thing Micheal Meeks asked before. however I still confirm that the freeze has something to do with autocorrection... if you download this portable versione of LibO 3.5.0 http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1338 which comes out with a "virgin" user preset, you won't notice any delay or freeze when starting modules... please, have your try!!! on the other hand if I use the same package with my user preset which is stuffed with a lot of autocorrect entries (I have 65000 in the acor_.dat and other 62000 in the acor_it-IT.dat files) the freeze happens at each start after digiting the first word. again, no Language Tool extension in installed. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:39:10 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 12:45 +0100, Tommy wrote: i write a word then hit space... the cursor seems frozen for 5 to 9 seconds (depending how fast is the machine i'm working with) and then moves to the space and let you write other words. That -really- still sounds like the Java slowdown to me. That is when I'd expect languagetool to get it's clogs on. if I use a virgin setup of OOo/LibO without my user profile I do not see that freeze Sure - but then the LangaugeTool extension would be registered in your user profile too ;-) Can you check in the extension manager that it is removed from the system rather than just disabled or whatever. I have no LT extension installed and never I had that there's no trace of it in the extension manager You can of course double check by looking at the: lsof -p `pidof soffice.bin` to see if Java is loaded before and/or after you type that word. ATB, Michael. sorry but it looks arabic to me ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [REVIEWED 3-5-1] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:40:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:47 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Looks safe to me, +1 And of course I love it ;-) so ... I cherry-picked it - thanks Szabolcs :-) Thanks, Michael. great!!! just one more question: will it be in 3.5.1 or 3.5.2? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [REVIEW 3-5-1] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:47:43 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:57 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: I cherry picked it to libreoffice-3-5 branch. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=3a90b7fea7de8860dfdb92925df39dac3d0ed4fc 2 more signoffs needed for libreoffice-3-5-1. Looks safe to me, +1 C. one more needed!!! I crave for this bug to be fixed!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:49:09 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 17:21 +0100, Tommy wrote: do u have many autocorrect entries as well? ... as I said before in my experience OOo/LibO performances gets worse when you have a lot of autocorrect items. Dezsi has a patch to fix the horrible slow-down when selecting large autocorrect lists, from minutes to seconds ;-) but he didn't post it last week. Are there other instances / operations where big auto-correct lists cause horrible slow-downs that you know of ? and/or is there a tracker / bug about this ? Thanks ! Michael. I've seen dezsi patch right now and I asked to cherry pick to 3.5.1 or .2 As I told before, the big list of autocorrect has effects on the loading time of the replacement table (that dezsi just fixed) and also on the starting of each module when you first write something... i write a word then hit space... the cursor seems frozen for 5 to 9 seconds (depending how fast is the machine i'm working with) and then moves to the space and let you write other words. if I use a virgin setup of OOo/LibO without my user profile I do not see that freeze ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:10 +0100, Dézsi Szabolcs wrote: great!!! I love you!!! the huge acor_ file you used is mine!!! I'm the one who opened this issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=101726 Yes, I used that file, hope it's not a problem :) I know that i could generate an xml file with random entries (with a script), but finding your .dat file was easier. :) you did the right thing!!! great catch!!! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PUSHED] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:50 +0100, Andras Timar wrote: 2012/2/24 Dézsi Szabolcs : I tested it with the attached acor_it-IT.dat file. Autocorrection worked, and it loaded all entries. Load time before patch: ? minutes (didn't wait) Load time after patch: 1.5-2 seconds (and i have an old comp.) Pushed to master, thanks. Andras since it's a considerable performance improvement for LibO vs. OOo and avoids users wih lots of autocorrect entries to see their PC frozen for 15-10 minutes (that's what it takes to show up in OOo), is there any chance that this push could be cherry picked in LibO 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 ? thanks. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH] Reduced loadtime of autocorrect tables
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:52:20 +0100, Dézsi Szabolcs wrote: Hello! There was an issue with acor_* files containing lots of entries (takes forever to load in Autocorrection options). With a small modification in cui/source/tabpages/autocdlg.cxx the issue seems to be gone. Thanks Michael Meeks! I tested it with the attached acor_it-IT.dat file. Autocorrection worked, and it loaded all entries. Load time before patch: ? minutes (didn't wait) Load time after patch: 1.5-2 seconds (and i have an old comp.) Szabolcs great!!! I love you!!! the huge acor_ file you used is mine!!! I'm the one who opened this issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=101726 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:33:13 +0100, julien2412 wrote: Tommy, I compile LO sources from master. As I said, I removed LO profiles so I don't think I've got a lot of autocorrect items. (I've got also a directory for LO sources from 3.5 and have the same thing). OK. please test and try the portable LibO 3.5.0 from here: http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1338 and tell me if you experience the same freeze at each module start. bye, Tommy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:22:44 +0100, julien2412 wrote: Yes I had language-tool enabled in autogen.lastrun. So I removed it then did : - ./autogen.sh - make dev-install - removed LO profile But I saw no difference :-( Either what I did is not sufficient to take this change into account (perhaps I should run "make clean && make") or the cause is something else as Tommy (see in this same thread) suggests. Julien. -- do u have many autocorrect entries as well? as I said before in my experience OOo/LibO performances gets worse when you have a lot of autocorrect items. try with a fresh installation of LibO or download the portable versione from here: http://www.winpenpack.com/main/download.php?view.1323 do you still see that freeze at first start? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Trying to understand why LO seems freezed for some seconds when a module is started
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:54:03 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: cut etc. of course, perhaps we still have some vestige of Java in that path in the default install, if so we need to find / fix it :-) but I suspect you just have LanguageTool installed. HTH, Michael. I'm experienxing the same freeze julien described on module start since OOo/LibO 3.3/3.4 and see the same on LibO 3.5 I have no language tool extension installed but I have a lot of autocorrect entries (65000 in acor_.dat and other 65000 in acor_it-IT.dat) so I suspect the freeze is related to first access to huge database of autocorrect entries. in the past I tried with a "virgin" OOo/LibO installation which have only few preinstalled autocorrect and I did not experience any freeze ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: No page and Columns boundaries in 3.5
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:16:56 +0100, Fernand Vanrie wrote: On the user lists the first complaints about "no" page and column boundaries for LO Writer 3.5 are comming in. For some documents the "new corner layout" can be helpfull but without visible page and column boundaries it becomes very difficult to "place" images and other objects in a mulptiple column layout. Please make a simple option in "Appearance" to make the boundaries back to the user's choise. Greetz Fernand I think the issue is this one: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Patch for Easy Hack 45033
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:27:26 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote: I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please help. Thanks, Italo Italo, are you turning into a "code-geek" after years and years of PR activity ? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
