Re: libcmis compile failure
Hi, On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:15:03PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev timofeev@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost, but internal libcmis? A wish to build with as much system libraries as possible maybe. :) We require quite recent libcmis = 0.4.0. I understand the point of building with all system libs from a distro point of view -- but when you're hacking, if you want to reduce from scratch build time with that, I guess using ccache is a better option, the current JSON problem is an example of that. Also there is: AC_MSG_ERROR([--with-system-libcmis conflicts with --enable-dbgutil]) Sure, that's true for every C++ lib, like cppunit, etc. Miklos signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
libcmis compile failure
Hi, currently some tinderboxes are red. It seems libcmis encounters a bug in boost=1.49: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6785 read_json does not compile on GCC 4.7.0 with std=c++11. Quoting the report: It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98. So, should we add this flag for libcmis? Regards, Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: libcmis compile failure
On 04.09.2013 19:50, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:16:16PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev timofeev@gmail.com wrote: Quoting the report: It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98. So, should we add this flag for libcmis? Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost, but internal libcmis? A wish to build with as much system libraries as possible maybe. :) We require quite recent libcmis = 0.4.0. Also there is: AC_MSG_ERROR([--with-system-libcmis conflicts with --enable-dbgutil]) Regards, Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: libcmis compile failure
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:16:16PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev timofeev@gmail.com wrote: Quoting the report: It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98. So, should we add this flag for libcmis? Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost, but internal libcmis? Wouldn't it make more sense to tweak the tinderbox to not mix system and internal libraries? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: libcmis compile failure
Hi, On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 05:50:05PM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 06:16:16PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev timofeev@gmail.com wrote: Quoting the report: It compiles successfully on 4.7.0 with -std=c++98. So, should we add this flag for libcmis? Hmm, but we bundle boost 1.54. What's the point of using system boost, but internal libcmis? Wouldn't it make more sense to tweak the tinderbox to not mix system and internal libraries? In general, using system libs might incur high amounts of redtape for LibreOffice: - using the external lib might incur bugs/regressions that are not encountered with the internal version and requires extra testing or bugfixing - the external lib must be packaged in a recent enough version - even a packaged version might need additional review and process to be usable by LibreOffice, e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess as such, having the option to fall back on a internal copy is highly desirable. Best, Bjoern ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
