[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta2 test builds available
Hi *, for the upcoming new version 4.2.0, the builds for beta2 are now available on pre-releases. besides the usual builds, there are also 64bit builds for Mac available for testing. It is the second of two betas (and thus a LibreOfficeDev build) and can be installed alongside the stable version. See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.2#4.2.0_release for the complete schedule. Grab the builds from here here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ The builds include the full set of languages - while translation is not complete, this build contains a first update of translations for 4.2. If you've a bit of time, please give them a try report any severe bugs not yet in bugzilla here, so we can incorporate them into the release notes. Please note that it takes approximately 24 hours to populate the mirrors, so that's about the time we have to collect feedback. The list of fixed bugs relative to 4.2.0 beta1 is here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-4-2-release-4.2.0.0.beta2.log So playing with the areas touched there also greatly appreciated - and validation that those bugs are really fixed. Thanks a lot for your help, Christian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
Hi, Robinson Tryon wrote on 2013-12-04 09:49: Hmm...looks like you weren't in cc here -- here's my email :-) yep. :-) Somehow the QA list is configured to do reply-to mangling, it seems, plus overwriting the reply to all. It's hard to know how big a problem this is because the filesize limit on bugzilla is absolute, and there's no integrated documentation telling people to upload large files elsewhere...so some number of people undoubtedly give up. Looking at ownCloud, at the sheer number of directories, it seems it happens more often, so maybe raising the average limit helps - didn't look in detail, though. IIRC, Rainer set up the wiki page to host files that wouldn't fit in Bugzilla. I can't recall if the logs indicated that anyone else used the wiki for this purpose, if documentation was made available, etc. I assume things have - totally understandable - grown that way. Looking now at the SQL issues we are experiencing, databases growing beyond any sane limit and so on, it's clear to me that we need to invest more time in finding proper tools. :-) For the wiki, I knew it was used that way, when I now read ownCloud, I felt the need to jump in... My strong proposal is therefore to raise the attachment limit in our own BugZilla instance when it's ready. By that, files are in the same tool, tied to the same user accounts, and therefore also in the same backup. Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback plan, even if it's File too big to upload? Please see if you can shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails, please email us at bugzilla-attachment-assista...@bugs.libreoffice.org. There will always be corner cases, and it might be worth our time to keep an eye on them. I don't know if this can be hacked into BugZilla, but setting up an e-mail alias as shared IMAP (or forwarder, though I prefer the IMAP approach) is no big deal. We are ready on our side to make the migration: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal Cloph passed along word from Tollef that he hopes to get the first half done til the weekend, but also mentioned that [Tollef] is extremely busy and the migration is still in the planning phase. Cool, glad we're making progress. Otherwise, everyone is busy before Christmas. :-) I'd suggest that we add the File too big to upload? message to FDO right now, were it not for the fact that such a request would take more time away from Tollef. Indeed... So...I don't have a great answer. I guess I'd say punt and hope that we get some traction on migration this month. Given that all proposals I had seem to have drawbacks, my take is: Let's raise the attachment size limit in our bugzilla instance then, and add the note to the mail address. If that does not work either, we can look for another tool. Sounds good? Florian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] 4.1.4rc1 on BZ
Hi, Could somebody add 4.1.4 rc1 to BZ? thanks in advance Cheers Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
Hi, On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:40:13AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback plan, even if it's File too big to upload? Please see if you can shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails, please email us at bugzilla-attachment-assista...@bugs.libreoffice.org. There will always be corner cases, and it might be worth our time to keep an eye on them. Most people have free webbased email these days and those have a limit on the attachment size often too (around 8-10MB). just saying. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:27 AM, bjoern bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:40:13AM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: Sounds great to me. I would suggest we have some kind of fallback plan, even if it's File too big to upload? Please see if you can shrink it in size or compress it before upload. If all else fails, please email us at bugzilla-attachment-assista...@bugs.libreoffice.org. There will always be corner cases, and it might be worth our time to keep an eye on them. Most people have free webbased email these days and those have a limit on the attachment size often too (around 8-10MB). My thinking was that the email address would be for upload assistance, not for direct delivery of the attachments to us -- we could tweak the wording to make that clearer :-) Cheers, --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ownCloud for Bugzilla - IMHO a no go
Hi, Robinson Tryon wrote on 2013-12-05 10:24: Tweaking the attachment dialog (and in particular the error message when one tries to upload a file bigger than the set limit) should be straightforward once we have our bugzilla code living in a git repo...which probably will happen around the same time bugzilla is migrated to TDF infra. wonderful! :-) but setting up an e-mail alias as shared IMAP (or forwarder, though I prefer the IMAP approach) is no big deal. Cool. We can talk particulars in the future... Ok. Given that all proposals I had seem to have drawbacks, my take is: Let's raise the attachment size limit in our bugzilla instance then, and add the note to the mail address. If that does not work either, we can look for another tool. Sounds good? +1 from my side. I'll make a note of this on the Migration page. I am _really_ happy we're on the same page here! :) Florian ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: FreedomSponsors, LibreOffice and Bugzilla
Hi all, I'm fowarding a mail from FreedomSponsors asking about an add on our bugzilla system that links to FreedomSponsors site which is a crouwndfounding plateform. That means that some bugs could be crowdfounded for their fix (and it seems it already happened for a LibreOffice bug). I let you discuss if you're interested or not and will inform Tony of our decision. Thanks ! Cheers Sophie Original Message Subject:FreedomSponsors, LibreOffice and Bugzilla Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 19:33:22 -0200 From: Tony França tonylamp...@gmail.com To: i...@documentfoundation.org Hi, my name is Tony, I'm the founder of freedomsponsors.org http://freedomsponsors.org - a crowdfunding website for Free/Open Source Software projects. In case you never heard of it yet, here's a brief explanation: FreedomSponsors is a crowdfunding platform for Free and Open Source projects. Specifically, open source project's _issues_. It lets anyone place money bounties for open issues that they are interested, for which payment is required only after the issue is resolved. If the sponsors are happy with the solution, they pay it directly to the developer. We believe our site can help the Free Software cause and bring more people closer to the developers' communities. That's the short story. The long story is here [1] http://freedomsponsors.org/faq. LibreOffice is driving a decent traction on FreedomSponsors [2] http://freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/?page=1project_id=149s=project_name=LibreOffice/[3] http://blog.freedomsponsors.org/wine-support-for-libreoffice/, and I think that's pretty awesome. We have developed a plugin for Bugzilla [4] https://github.com/freedomsponsors/freedomsponsors-bugzilla-plugin, that when installed, will add a nice, discrete Sponsor this link on Bugzilla's bug pages, just below the Importance bit. Just to illustrate, here's an example of a similar plugin on Jenkins JIRA - [5] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13000. I'm hoping that LibreOffice will consider adopting it. Do you think that's a good idea? If you need anything from FreedomSponsors, just let me know. :-) Cheers! Tony [1] - http://freedomsponsors.org/faq [2] - http://freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/?page=1project_id=149s=project_name=LibreOffice [3] - http://blog.freedomsponsors.org/wine-support-for-libreoffice/ [4] - https://github.com/freedomsponsors/freedomsponsors-bugzilla-plugin [5] - https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13000 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Impress crashes, when you use the wizard and select the effect
Hello @ll, after I reported the slowing down of my system, when I choose different effects in Impress a couple of days ago (see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2013-December/005955.html), I discovered, that with LO 4.2.0.0beta2 it get even worse ... :( Steps to reproduce: 1. Start LO 2. Go to File – Wizards – Presentation... 3. Choose From template in the first window (you may need to install a template pack, if you have none available there ... ;) ) 4. Click Next 5. Choose Screen 6. Click Next 7. Select the effect Venetian Blinds 3D Vertical Impress crashes ... :( Discovered with: LO: Version: 4.2.0.0.beta2 Build ID: 1a27be92e320f97c20d581a69ef1c8b99ea9885d (parallel installed with Germanophone lang- as well as helppack, though it does not depent on any language, as the crash happens also, when I switch the UI language to en-US ... :( ) OS: Debian Testing AMD64 Java: java version 1.7.0_21 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.3.9) (7u21-2.3.9-5) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.7-b01, mixed mode) If you need any further informatin, feel free to ask :) Can anyone confirm this? Thanks for testing Thomas. -- Nobody can be as agreeable as an uninvited guest. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
Michael Meeks-5 wrote * Symbols for Windows releases (Markus) + Kendy's tinderbox is now providing the symbols (Kendy) + http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/symbols/ + We need it for release builds (Markus) [...] + provide it but not for every RC Hi! Thanks a lot. I think it is very important to provide symbols for every official beta, RC and stable releases. This will allow to contribute backtraces for those who are willing to help, but are unable to set up building environment. Please put want-backtrace keyword whenever a trace is needed. Also updating links at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg would be welcomed. Michael Meeks-5 wrote + help Robinson wrt. getting MS Office (Michael) 60-day trial of Office 2013 Professional Plus is available for free download at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/jj192782.aspx. Using Windows 8.1 Enterprise 90-day trial free download from http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/hh699156 you can set up Windows+Office VM (or easily replaceable dual-boot system when installed as VHD) for testing or backtracing. Free... for real. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4086714p4086726.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta2 test builds available
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net wrote: Hi, Norbert, as you can read from bug report, I am running it on 10.9, the system that majority or at least a big number of LO users on OS X will want to run it on. and as I said below.. I _did_ download the beta2 build to a 10.9 and I did test it there before uploading.. it worked fine Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Impress crashes, when you use the wizard and select the effect
Hi Thomas Thomas Hackert wrote 7. Select the effect Venetian Blinds 3D Vertical Impress crashes ... :( There is no Venetian Blinds 3D Vertical effect under Windows XP, only Venetian Blinds Vertical but no crash occurs. BTW why is the effect list sorted in an almost random order? Wouldn't it be nicer to have it alphabetically sorted? Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Impress-crashes-when-you-use-the-wizard-and-select-the-effect-tp4086724p4086789.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * lo 1st rank. YES! ... * lobz No, too long. Lobster, anyone? From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the alreay short enough commit summary line. Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. --R, thinking that LObster might not be the worst idea for our mascot :-) ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com wrote: * lo 1st rank. YES! ... * lobz No, too long. Lobster, anyone? From my view of a developer who has to type and squeeze these into the alreay short enough commit summary line. Hi all -- thank you for voting! For those of you who haven't yet voted...do it! We'll close the voting process at the next QA call. Here's a quick summary of how the votes have been cast so far: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/LibreOffice_Bugzilla_Proposal#We.27re_now_voting.21.21.21 The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. but by a wide margin the only 4-char abbreviation in the list has taken an early lead. Sure, but if you were to ask that question on the dev-ml rather than here.. I'd bet you you'd get many more vote for lo# true. I'd always like to have more devs listening-in on what we talk about on the QA list... ;-) Norbert PS: btw I don't see the appeal to want to stick characters in there to re-inforce the idea that it is a bugzilla number... the # in it is sufficient enough to make that clear so the b/bz stuff is not only a waste of space.. but also completely redundant. it is like climbing up or descending down... Fair, fair. One other thing: The abbreviation has a secondary purpose: to be used as shorthand for the bugtracker. Using our two highest-profile options: Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit messages), Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err insert abbreviation here, etc.. sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Annual report on activities
Hi all, This is the time to prepare our annual report about the so various activities we have achieved during this year. Florian will then translate and adapt it to serve as the official report for the Berlin authorities. I've prepared a pad here: http://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/annualreport So please, fill in the activities you've lead during the year, do not give to many details (it's a report :) but draw the main lines of what your project has achieved. Thank you very much in advance for your participation, it's an important task for our project. Aside the official report, we can use it also to present our project to the various publics we meet. If you have question, please follow up on the projects list. Kind regards Sophie ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LO Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO = Joel, go take a look at regressions on LOBZ How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... ... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) true, the bots are kind of annoying in that regard :-) --R ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libo-marketing-priv] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.0 beta2 test builds available
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@documentfoundation.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net wrote: Hi, Norbert, as you can read from bug report, I am running it on 10.9, the system that majority or at least a big number of LO users on OS X will want to run it on. and as I said below.. I _did_ download the beta2 build to a 10.9 and I did test it there before uploading.. it worked fine Norbert I have received the same error message that Martin reports. I'm using OS X 10.9. I'll add this to the bug report. So I downloaded it from the tdf website and I too get the issue.. I will re-upload the correct version and see how it goes --Jean ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration: Abbreviation to replace fdo#12345
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance technically speaking, the bot could recognize lo# as well as lobz#, but I am strongly of the opinion that we should have just one abbreviation! :-) Agreed.. no argument there :-) I think I'll start using 'salt mines' as a euphemism from now on... :-D , I thought you'd like it :-) Norbert ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
