Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration] We're done! Please visit the new site to reset your password!
On 27.01.2015 08:12, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: +1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords Here's the current list of keywords: ALL: What should go? bisected (255) The bug has been successfully connected to a code commit that introduced the bug (such as with git bisect). useful, keep bisect_pending (0) The bug seems likely to benefit from bisecting, (such as easy to reproduce, etc.), but the bisect has not yet been performed. See also the bisected keyword. this sounds similar to BibisectRequest - which one to keep? cleanup0407 (2) April 2007 bug cleanup. DELETE have-backtrace (232) bugs that have a useful backtrace useful, keep i18n (26) Xorg Internationalisation issues (i18n) sounds potentially useful, we don't have a component with similar scope (but if we keep it the description needs to remove Xorg and it should be merged with l10 as they seem very similar) janitor (9) Cleanup bugs, usually trivial. sounds like EasyHack? DELETE l10n (51) Xorg/X11 Localisation issues see i18n above licence (2) Files with licence problems (e.g. mixing incompatible licences, missing/non-permissive copyrights, et al) not sure if we want this, best to get BoD's opinion on that... love (8) Marking a bug with this keyword means that you're willing to help someone fix the bug, or that it should be fixable by a beginner without any help. This should ONLY be set by a maintainer or people familiar with the code base, and ONLY when it looks like a project suitable for a new developer looking for a task. covered by EasyHack - DELETE movetoxkc (0) Bugs that should be moved to xkeyboard-config, if still applicable. DELETE NEEDINFO (51) The bug does not have enough information in order to solve the problem. Please read the comments and add the relevant information required to aid in solving the problem. this is a status, so doesn't need to be a keyword too? notourbug (2) It's not really our bug, but we might work around it anyway. RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - DELETE? patch (21) Bugs with a valid patch. the patch attachment should have the patch flag set which can be queried so why do we need this? regression (3392) Xorg bug regressions (issues previously fixed but somehow broken again) keep the all-time favorite, remove Xorg from description though security (6) Security-sensitive bugs sure, let's keep them in the public bug tracker :D want-backtrace (13) Bugs whose triage could be greatly accelerated with the addition of a backtrace from the crash. hmm sounds like it could be useful... x12 (0) Bugs that require a protocol version bump. DELETE and add some [keywords] that are nore useful. We have a number of tags that we put in the Whiteboard right now https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard (also see advanced page) Many of those could become keywords. ALL: Proposals on which ones? confirmedRegression never served any purpose and should be summarily DELETED possibleRegression could be a keyword, unless it's considered too transient a state... is that a criterion? hmmm... why not just add it... confirmed:VERSION:OS noRepro:VERSION:OS needsSOFTWARE needsHARDWARE target:X.Y summary:comment# are not fixed so cannot be keyword bibisected should be keyword odf and odf_validation should be keywords a11y sounds useful as a keyword perf sounds useful as a keyword interoperability could be a keyword too, although perhaps a better name is required that indicates this is about Microsoft Office and its formats in particular (MSOinterop? MSO? MSinterop? MSOffice?). there are *lots* of easy-hack related ones... not sure about those? perhaps better leave them in the whiteboard since we may often add additional ones etc. and the keyword list may become cluttered? ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Informations and help for a bug report
Marina, Thank you for taking the time to help us improve LibreOffice. A bug report would be good, please. Please add me lo_bugs@iseries-guru-com to the CC. I can confirm the bug, and I hope to do a bibisect. More comments in-line. Terry. On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 17:10 +0100, Marina Latini wrote: Hi all, I'm writing here because I need to report a bug but I have some problem to write the correct report. This looks wonderful. I have a business xlsx file with complex formulas. In particular there are: * matrix with nested indirect references * formulas that refer to a query from Excel. My old LibreOffice complains This file contains links to other files. Should they be updated? When I click No it displays the file, but pegs the CPU for the few minutes that I waited for it. I presume that you have the linked-to file(s). Do you get the same result when you do and do not update the links? I can't open the document with a LibreOffice version bigger then 3.6.7.2. All the 4.X versions hang during opening while LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 opens the file with some errors. I can provide the xlsx file and 3 screenshots of the document opened with Office365 and LibreOffice 3.6.7.2. I tested the files on my Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 and on Windows Server 2012 R2 I don't know what LibreOffice version set in the report but I'm sure that 3.6.7.2 opens the file. Set the earliest version which you have observed to fail to open the file. Anybody who finds an earlier failing version will adjust the LibreOffice version to the earlier version. file to test: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4rmc162mgjisd4a/01% 20CLEAN.xlsx?dl=0 Screenshot from Office365: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ws8rr3mj6juouuo/01Clean_Office365.png?dl=0 Screenshot from LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 (query): https://www.dropbox.com/s/00xnspejrrk1nfd/01CleanLibO-query3672.png?dl=0 Screenshot from LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 (matrix with indirect): https://www.dropbox.com/s/h5qtxf6ji9u71n2/01CleanLibO-indirect3672.png?dl=0 Best, Marina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] And then there were two...
Bugzilla Products Table (bug counts): Impress Remote - 1 LibreOffice - 33642 :-) -- I've stubbed-in the basics for the Impress Remote product. Before we jump in and move-over all of the bugs, let's get our ducks in a row and our fields set up properly. 1) Are we missing any version #'s? (Should those all be 'X.y.z alpha' or 'X.y.z final' ? Looks like that's the naming convention so far, right Cloph?) 2) What Components should this product have? Here's a start: - Documentation - General - Localization - UI 3) What's the difference between the Android and iOS ports? NOTE: Both Android and iOS have been added to the 'OS' field (this is a global field for all products). Please set this field when migrating-over bug reports. 4) FirefoxOS? There's some code in there... have we ever built it? https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=impress_remote.git;a=history;f=firefoxos/sdremote;hb=HEAD 5) How about the Pebble remote? Should this have its own component? (Gülşah: you're the expert here :-) Thanks! --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration] We're done! Please visit the new site to reset your password!
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote: if i go to Saved Searches there are a whole bunch of XOrg and GPU driver related ones imported from FDO; somebody with sufficient privileges needs to clean up there. HIya, I cleaned up some of the obvious queries. Are there any more that should be removed? Thanks, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adopt-a-Component
Hi all, I just had a quick idea for getting people more involved with bug triage and testing: Adopt-a-Component https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Components#Components The idea is simple: If you put your name in the table to 'Adopt a component', you're signaling that you really want to help triage bugs in that area. Perhaps you have a particular skill with that program or category, or you're just gung-ho about getting those particular bugs fixed. Of course, a person is always free to triage whatever bugs he likes, but I think that getting people to sign up for a role can be a positive mechanism to help contributors feel that they have a specific focus to their work, and to take pride when their component(s) meet our targets for first response (1 week) and full triage (2 weeks). Anyhow, stop listening to me blather, and go sign up for your favorite components! Best, --R P.S. Feel free to invite a friend to sign up to Adopt a particular Component, too. Maybe you can have a little friendly competition between components? :-) -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Help me make a 'welcome box' for people redirected from FDO
Hi all, Bugzilla post-migration is going well. If you've been poking around the bug tracker lately, you've probably seen a few little fixes and improvements here and there. Those will continue to trickle-in over the next few weeks. Tollef (our awesome contact/sysadmin) at FDO has modified redirect bug urls for us. So if you go here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58920 You get redirected here: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58920redirected_from=fdo I'd like to put a little infobox (welcome box) up on the screen whenever someone gets forwarded to us from FDO. I'm thinking it could look like a post-it, or maybe just a box that slides out from the right-hand side of the screen. We can add a greeting, and provide some help for people who might still be unfamiliar with the migration. Example: Welcome to the new TDF Bugzilla! You've been redirected from Freedesktop to bugs.documentfoundation.org, as we've just migrated all the LibreOffice bugs to our own bugtracker! If you already had an account in Bugzilla, click [here] to activate your migrated user account. If you never had an account, click [here] to set one up! Questions? Somethings? Try the * Migration FAQ * QA IRC Channel * etc.. I'd love it if someone could mock-up some HTML for this post-it note! Thanks, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] And then there were two...
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Gülşah Köse gulsah.1...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-01-27 10:54 GMT+02:00 Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com: 2) What Components should this product have? - Installation - Connection - Pebble - Android - iOS - FirefoxOS I was under the impression that there was some shared code between Android and iOS, but it sounds like each app is separate, so (theoretically) they could be separate products. At least for now, I've made up Components for each one: 'Android app', 'iOS app', etc. Hopefully those names will help clue-in users that there is a difference between each product. Now that leaves an open question about how we should handle version numbers. (I guess we can use the same #s for each app; there just won't be correlation between the apps as to what a particular number means in terms of functionality) Best, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Hijack bulk bug updates to remind about Bugzilla Migration
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:24:44 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: Quick reminder: The next time we (read: probably Joel) do some bulk updates of bug reports, we shoudl leverage that opportunity to insert a small reminder about the migration of Bugzilla, password reset, etc. Linking to this would probably be good: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/TDF_Bugzilla_Proposal/Migration_Userguide#After_the_Migration Thanks, --R nice idea. it would be useful to do that. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration] We're done! Please visit the new site to reset your password!
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:12:34 +0100, Robinson Tryon bishop.robin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: +1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords Here's the current list of keywords: ALL: What should go? these are the one that I'd remove. cleanup0407 (2) April 2007 bug cleanup. i18n (26) Xorg Internationalisation issues (i18n) l10n (51) Xorg/X11 Localisation issues licence (2) Files with licence problems (e.g. mixing incompatible licences, missing/non-permissive copyrights, et al) movetoxkc (0) Bugs that should be moved to xkeyboard-config, if still applicable. NEEDINFO (51) The bug does not have enough information in order to solve the problem. Please read the comments and add the relevant information required to aid in solving the problem. notourbug (2) It's not really our bug, but we might work around it anyway. patch (21) Bugs with a valid patch. security (6) Security-sensitive bugs x12 (0) Bugs that require a protocol version bump. I include the NEEDINFO and notourbug keywords that are basically useless duplicates of the NEEDINFO and NOTOURBUG status. and add some [keywords] that are nore useful. We have a number of tags that we put in the Whiteboard right now https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard (also see advanced page) Many of those could become keywords. ALL: Proposals on which ones? I think that all the bibisect related tags could be tunred into keywords. morevoer I'd like to have specific attachment default extension types, like .odt, .ods, .doc, .docx, .xls and .xlsx which are commonly attached by users and commonly mislabeled. Are you talking about the mimetype problems on FDO? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Attachments#MIME_Type_Problems AFAIK, those are fixed Best, --R I was talking about the select MIME type dropdown menu which actually offers only PNG, JPEG, PDF and a few others. anyway if you say that the automatic detection now works fine, this is probably not necessary anymore Tommaso ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Informations and help for a bug report
Hi all, I'm writing here because I need to report a bug but I have some problem to write the correct report. I have a business xlsx file with complex formulas. In particular there are: * matrix with nested indirect references * formulas that refer to a query from Excel. I can't open the document with a LibreOffice version bigger then 3.6.7.2. All the 4.X versions hang during opening while LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 opens the file with some errors. I can provide the xlsx file and 3 screenshots of the document opened with Office365 and LibreOffice 3.6.7.2. I tested the files on my Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 and on Windows Server 2012 R2 I don't know what LibreOffice version set in the report but I'm sure that 3.6.7.2 opens the file. file to test: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4rmc162mgjisd4a/01%20CLEAN.xlsx?dl=0 Screenshot from Office365: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ws8rr3mj6juouuo/01Clean_Office365.png?dl=0 Screenshot from LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 (query): https://www.dropbox.com/s/00xnspejrrk1nfd/01CleanLibO-query3672.png?dl=0 Screenshot from LibreOffice 3.6.7.2 (matrix with indirect): https://www.dropbox.com/s/h5qtxf6ji9u71n2/01CleanLibO-indirect3672.png?dl=0 Best, Marina -- Marina Latini mar...@studiostorti.com Studio Storti Srl Viale Leonardo da Vinci, 18 36100 - Vicenza (VI) http://www.studiostorti.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Windows dev please evaluate my ProposedEasyHack
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:00:19PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: * Pending Action Items: + please file an Easy-Hack this week: just a bug with whiteboard: (All) EasyHack DifficultyBeginner SkillCpp TopicCleanup + thanks to: + Stephan, Michael, Lionel, Ashdod + http://bit.ly/1DTbesP An easy way to do that would be to evaluate https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56904 which is Windows-specific, so I don't really have a clue how to do it and what it entails, but I expect it is rather easy if one already knows one's way around msi (Windows Installer) files and how we generate them. Is it easy enough for EasyHack? Can you outline to the lucky winner that will pick it up how to do it? Thanks in advance! -- Lionel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Windows dev please evaluate my ProposedEasyHack
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:00:19PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: * Pending Action Items: + please file an Easy-Hack this week: just a bug with whiteboard: (All) EasyHack DifficultyBeginner SkillCpp TopicCleanup + thanks to: + Stephan, Michael, Lionel, Ashdod + http://bit.ly/1DTbesP An easy way to do that would be to evaluate https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56904 which is Windows-specific, so I don't really have a clue how to do it and what it entails, but I expect it is rather easy if one already knows one's way around msi (Windows Installer) files and how we generate them. Is it easy enough for EasyHack? Can you outline to the lucky winner that will pick it up how to do it? IMHO hacking MSI is not easy by any means. It's probably easy only for an installer expert. I'd add the AccessDatabaseEngine.exe to a CustomAction and call this CustomAction in the install sequence. It may work. But why add a 25MB 3rd party package to LibreOffice, which will benefit a tiny fraction of users? We don't even bundle Java, which has a wider audience. I think it's enough to add a paragraph to help, with the link to this MS download page. Best regards, Andras ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
