Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ask for help, on discrepancy about a enhancement request in bugzilla.

2012-09-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi,

Le 22/09/2012 01:51, MiguelAngel a écrit :
 Hi,

 I had reported the following bug about conditional formatting:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54774
 The developer wrote that he did not consider it a bug and he marked it
 as RESOLVED / NOTABUG.

I have added a comment with a proposal:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54940#c13

Markus answered that it is not possible.
Too expensive, perhaps, but not possible, I can't believe it. ;-)

I think this question may be the cause of a strong misunderstanding from
end-users.
So it is important to resolve the problem.

Best regards.
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ask for help, on discrepancy about a enhancement request in bugzilla.

2012-09-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi,

Le 22/09/2012 16:46, Markus Mohrhard a écrit :
 [...]
 In 3-7 this dialog will be once again a ref-input dialog which means
 weeks or months to implement the most simple stuff that is not yet
 supported by the dialog. 
Sorry I do not understand what you mean by ref-input dialog.
 Even if it would be easily possible I still
 think that it is never a good idea to manipulate anything when you are
 calling a modal dialog. Furthermore as I tried to explain in the bug
 report it is a good thing that the dialog shows the relative reference
 from the current position but I explained it already in the bug
 report.
And what happen if the end-user does not understand that and modifies
the formula in the edit subdialog ?

In your test document the current cell being C13, the edit subdialog
shows a formula which speak about D14. You will be lucky if the user
remember which was selected when he opened this menu.
When the end-user will see that he will understand that his CF has been
destroyed in some way and he will correct it in _this_ dialog.
When he will return in the menu Format  Conditional Formatting, he will
see something else again. In your test case the formula becomes
ISNUMBER(B#REF!) and is still working! Now the end user has destroyed
himself his data.

Best regards.
JBF

-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Ask for help, on discrepancy about a enhancement request in bugzilla.

2012-09-21 Thread MiguelAngel

Hi,

I had reported the following bug about conditional formatting:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54774
The developer wrote that he did not consider it a bug and he marked it 
as RESOLVED / NOTABUG.

I disagree, but okay, if is by design, I can not considered it as bug.

But as I can not understand the design, I reported an enhancement request:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
But the developer insist and he marked it as RESOLVED WONTFIX.

I reopen the request because is an enhancement request, and if the 
developer does not want to take it into consideration, nothing to said, 
but perhaps others can understand my point of view and may consider it 
in the future. What is near to impossible with a RESOLVED status.


Again the developer have marked it as RESOLVED WONTFIX.

I do not agree that someone can mark a enhancement request as RESOLVED 
WONTFIX, without the agreement of who reported it.


I ask for the reopening of the enhancement request #54940.

If I am in an error, please excuse me.
Regards.
Miguel Ángel.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/