[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 129599] Add Redaction action items into main menu in Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129599 --- Comment #5 from Commit Notification --- ayhanyalcinsoy committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/c060c80496429d59bb6f158c44957d853dccb06c tdf#129599:Add Redaction action items into main menu in Draw It will be available in 7.0.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 129599] Add Redaction action items into main menu in Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129599 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 129599] Add Redaction action items into main menu in Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129599 Ayhan Yalçınsoy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 129179] UI Print dialog page sizes list has redundant items
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129179 Gabor Kelemen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #5 from Gabor Kelemen --- Comparing this list to Word we see that this is actually the same - our local printer provides a very redundant list of supported paper sizes. I'm not sure the redundant items don't have some difference compared to each other (like A4 but with different paper tray or somesuch), so maybe we can mark this as NAB? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Will LO create a replacement for Outlook, Please!
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 Kevin Suo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 96192] Add Personal Information Manager (PIM) core module to LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96192 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@wolven.net --- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 130496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Summary|Will LO create a|Implement a PIM as a |replacement for Outlook,|replacement for Outlook |Please! | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote --- Clearly out of scope of LibreOffice. Discussed at various times back to StarOffice era. http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/MS-Outlook-td3746229.html#a3770801 http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Adding-the-browser-to-Libreoffice-td4017558.html *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96192 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 96192] Add Personal Information Manager (PIM) core module to LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96192 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alberto...@hotmail.com --- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 59075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 96192] Add Personal Information Manager (PIM) core module to LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96192 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s.kuc...@aisnovations.com --- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 112350 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130542] PAGE STYLE: Cannot change page style with double click in style list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130542 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval Ever confirmed|0 |1 Blocks||108576, 103427 Summary|cannot change page style|PAGE STYLE: Cannot change ||page style with double ||click in style list Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Dieter --- I confirm, that it is not possible to change page style with double click. I see two possibilities: a) It's the intended behaviour. But in this case, focus should go back to the used style to avoid confusion. That's a bug or enhancemen (I'm not sure) b) It's a bug. => NEW and cc: Design team for further input Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103427 [Bug 103427] [META] Styles and Formatting sidebar deck and floating window https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108576 [Bug 108576] [META] Writer page style bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 Randy changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Randy --- Kevin: I agree with you that this isn't a bug. Unfortunately, when you click on "File an Enhancement Request", this is where it sends you. If you post an Enhancement Request in the "Ask" section (as I did) they CLOSE it and tell you to post it here... and then when you do, someone tries to close it because it's not a "bug". Not cool. If you don't want people getting frustrated and being "rude" then it seems rather obvious that LO SHOULD have an area in the User Forums for Feature\Enhancement requests. Where users can up vote and\or down vote them. It would help LO see what their user think is important. As a software developer, I often recommend my clients to check out Libre Office. When they do, the first objection I hear is that it doesn't have an Outlook like module. LO does a great job of providing a replacement for everything else in the MS Office Suite, so why would they stop short with the Outlook part? As someone pointed out in one of the "bugs" you marked this as a duplicate of, Most businesses want a COMPLETE replacement if they are going to switch a software package. Integration, single line of support, and simply ease of use is important to them. I'm trying to help LO by letting you know what my clients have told me. They don't see LO as being a complete replacement for MS Office because of the lack of the Outlook module. Finally, when my customers ask for an enhancement to my software, I don't tell them that that is not a "bug" and send them somewhere else. Usually I view it as, if this important to them, it will probably be important to other potential customers... and I usually add the new functionality they are asking for. Apparently, an Outlook like module is something that LO users have asked for repeatedly... maybe LO should seriously consider it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote --- This is a valid enhancement request but is a duplicate of bug 96192 -- also a valid enhancement request for PIM substitute for Outlook as PIM and e-mail client. The correct resolution again here is WONTFIX Based on prior ESC/dev & UX-Advise discussions (including actions from the OOo era when the StarOffice email client & calendaring was removed). Enhancement was out of scope for OpenOffice.org and remains so for LibreOffice. BZ QA sidebar: while comments on an issue made in duplicates often expand or clarify things, QA closing as a duplicate keeps the relevant BZ linkage. Alternatively we may designate one issue as a META to link related requests. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96192 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 96192] Add Personal Information Manager (PIM) core module to LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96192 --- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote --- *** Bug 130496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Suo --- (In reply to Randy from comment #6) I think what you need alongside of LibreOffice is Thunderbird, which is an opensource email client and provide calendar, task, adressbook functionalities. Actually I think MSO's outlook function is also a separate part. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 130496] Implement a PIM as a replacement for Outlook
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130496 --- Comment #9 from Randy --- Outlook is one component of the MS Office Suite. No more "separate" than Word is separate from Excel or Power Point. While I understand there are other open source Outlook like products available, I and many businesses would prefer to have a Complete Integrated Suite from a single vendor. There are other open source word processors, spreadsheet programs, database programs, etc... But I'd rather have a complete suite from LO than a bunch of separate, incompatible programs. Maybe there's some reason LO doesn't want to compete with Thunderbird, I don't know. But I think LO would gain a lot more users if they included an Outlook like module in their suite. I'm really curious as to why LO doesn't want to do that? It can't be any harder than the other components they've done. It just doesn't make any sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise