Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Stopping the rubbish

2013-10-22 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Sveinn í Felli wrote:
 Þann þri 22.okt 2013 13:11, skrifaði dollyp:
 Can anyone stop the blizzard of rubbish being posted here and also coming
 through into my mail box. 44 alone today.

Switched list to moderation for non-members temporarily until this is
under control. That should deal with it for the moment. FYI.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Impress side pane layout selection

2013-10-07 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi guys,

was playing with master  Impress today, just *lovely* how the sidebar
turned out there, kudos to all involved!

Was wondering though, the 'Layout selection' menu is only visible if
no object is selected - if you select one, it gets replaced by other
stuff in the 'Properties' pane. Thoughts on how to better present that
appreciated, it appears hard to discover for users?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Hide and show slides from custom dialog

2013-07-02 Thread Thorsten Behrens
[dropping the dev list, this is no code talk currently]

Guillermo Molleda Jimena wrote:
 It would be better to put an option to print a certain custom slide
 show because could also have been chosen the slides in a different
 order.
 
Yup, that's what I would suggest - therefore wondering about the new
buttons on the custom show dialog. ;)

 The idea is to distribute to students a PDF (or printing paper) with
 selected slides for that course.
 
Indeed. But then you'd need to extend the pdf export dialog,
presumably?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Hide and show slides from custom dialog

2013-07-01 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Guillermo Molleda Jimena wrote:
 Objective: to print a custom in PDF, hiding the rest of slides and
 presenting only those chosen.
 Can anyone help?

Hi Guillermo,

so you mean, beyond selecting certain slides, within that custom
selection, have some 'don't export this to pdf' meta-customization?

 I think it's something important for teachers with different
 students, the same base but different levels slide.
 
Wouldn't that work with the custom slide shows itself, i.e. have
several different ones, for the various student levels, and then
export just the slides in the selected custom show? Can you elaborate
a bit more (preferably on the ux-advise list) how the interaction
would look like?

 But I don't know how do it.
 
Beyond the question of the use case, and how to best do it (for which
I Cc the ux-advise list), the dialog and code to stick slide subset
selections into is:

 - impress pdf/export page render code: SdXImpressDocument::render()
   in sd/source/ui/unoidl/unomodel.cxx
 - pdf export dialog implementation: filter/source/pdf/impdialog.cxx

HTH,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Impress : general feed back

2013-05-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michel RENON wrote:
 Can it be implemented easily ?
 
Disabling stuff, changing focus etc. is generally easy stuff, that
could be done as EasyHacks, or as a group effort e.g. on the upcoming
HackFest in Hamburg. Would you want to file a number of bugs for those
(provided it is not yet reported), and poke us with the IDs?

Thanks a lot for looking closely indeed,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Mass changes to Impress animations - related to fdo#41572

2013-05-08 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Mirek Mazel wrote:
 On your original proposal [1], I'm thinking this kind of
 functionality might be best suited to styles (kind of like CSS
 animations). Do you think it would be possible to make animations a
 part of presentation styles?
 
Yup, that would be my thinking - at least technically, it's how I
would tie that to master pages (which work from how they apply styles
plus background objects to individual slides).

 As for Michel's proposal, I would love to see the animation pane
 redesigned, really, but I think that discussion is more appropriate
 for the design mailing list. Could we move that discussion there?
 
Please. It appears still rather in flux.

 Also, Janit, Thorsten, would you be willing to work on that
 redesign?  If so, it'd be incredibly useful if you could clarify the
 scope of the redesign a bit. Or perhaps we could generate a bunch of
 mockups and create the scope based on them (see which things can be
 done, which can't).
 
It is unlikely I'll personally be able to commit to larger amounts of
time there unfortunately, though would happily help mentoring such an
endeavour.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Mass changes to Impress animations - related to fdo#41572

2013-03-28 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michel Renon wrote:
 No, I was referring to the edition of a slide, when an animation is
 already defined on the lines of text : if you change the content of
 the text, the animation is not updated.

Right - this is a bug.

 With all your first answers, I started to brainstorm some ideas.
 I'll begin to mockup them in few days. I'll create a new page on the
 wiki.

Awesome, looking forward!

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Mass changes to Impress animations - related to fdo#41572

2013-03-22 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michel Renon wrote:
 In order to work on that problem, I would like to have some
 technical advise about what can be implemented or not.

Hi Michel,

as a matter of fact (though a bit tongue-in-cheek) - this is software,
so anything goes. The question rather is how much effort is it. ;)

 (just to avoid wasting time by designing things that can't be
 implemented)

Hmm. So in the past there were a few designs that did not get
implemented immediately - but sat there looking really good, and
eventually inspired someone to hack them up. But I see your
point.

 Well this mail is mostly for Thorsten as you're the official mentor
 of Impress/Draw.
 
I'm not - but I happily answer still. :)

 - Is it possible to implement some visual changes on objects in slides ?
 ex : add some small widget beside (or inside?) an object to indicate
 a status or to show a popup to activate some changes. Or have a
 special border.
 These widgets/borders would be shown via a menu command, or via a
 mouse hover, only while designing the slide.
 
Yes, that is possible - there's a concept called SmartTag in Impress,
that is e.g. used to implement this four-way icon at the presentation
placeholder objects ('insert table/chart/picture/movie'), or for
editing motion path animations. So the base technology for that is
there.

 - Is it possible to implement some visual changes on every single
 line/ some lines of a textfield ? It's a detailed version  of the
 previous point : can a line in a textfield have some widget ? or be
 drawn with some special border ?
 
In general yes, though slightly more involved.

 - today, the 'animation objects' are linked to object in slides, but
 is the reverse also true ?
 ie if user modify a slide object, can the animation object be
 updated automatically ?
 
Not sure I get the idea - are you referring to changes e.g. to master
pages, that then translate to all slides using it (that is one aspect
of the original question / task Janit was looking into)?

 The answers may have 4 values :
 -1- it can be implemented immediately, no changes required in VCL

This one. ~All the work needed is in sd.

 And two open questions :
 
 - In this whole subject, what objects are linked to ODF format ?
 (ie : what can be changed without changing the file format)
 
From the above - nothing should affect the file format.

 - what are the technical limitations related to animations in Impress ?
 
Going back to my initial comment - the sky is the limit. Without
concrete questions though, hard to answer specifically. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Mass changes to Impress animations - related to fdo#41572

2013-03-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi guys,

Janit was volunteering to look into

 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41572

and is struggling a bit how to best achieve that. The bug report there
muddles a few things up it seems, it is also not entirely clear what
should happen if one assigns a new master page to an existing slide.

Another idea Janit was pondering is to not use the master page
concept, but rather provide bulk-assignment options in the custom
animation pane (comparable to the slide transitions - selected slides
in the slide sorter get the effect). Though clearly that needs some
fleshing-out.

Would someone here want to work with him to come up with a nice
workflow for this very useful feature?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Advice required on auto text resize (Impress)

2012-10-08 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi there,

several partial answers to points from various people. Disclaimer:
I'm the original author of this feature, so at least I can tell you
the reasons for why the feature behaves as-is today. ;)

Muthu Subramanian wrote:
 Currently the text font size box in the toolbar displays the
 originally set font size even when the font size is reduced because
 of 'Auto fit'
 One of our users requested the behavior where the text font size is
 changed when the autofit size changes the text size.
 
For me the most important reason for the _status quo_ is the fact
that indeed the text stays formatted with the font size as stated in
the drop-down.

When you resize the text box, the text grows larger - but *only* up
until the font size as you see it in the UI. When you copy  paste
the text, again it will bear the font size as shown in the
drop-down. So it is at least useful information (bear with me a
little bit, on whether it is necessary information as well).

Muthu Subramanian wrote:
 Just to brainstorm a little more: How would it be if autofit was an option 
 rather than a property? E.g. Users click on autofit - it fits the 
 text accordingly, but when users add more text or remove text it 
 just behalves normally?

Of course, autofit can also be implemented on-request, i.e. a text
overflows the box, user clicks auto-fit, Impress calculates
necessary font size shrink  applies hard formatting.

That is a bit lacking, at least for power users, since:

 * reading the document on another machine that does not have the
   font used might end up with wrapped lines or overflow again
 * the text now bears hard formatting, and will no longer adapt to
   style changes in general, and applying different master pages in
   particular. this currently works very nicely, when in crunch mode
   in front of a presentation, having to apply the new Corporate
   slide template - if your text has auto-fit on, you get nicely
   fitting content (albeit at potentially different sizes)
 * we'd at least have to internally be able to round-trip that stuff
   for PowerPoint, i.e. the code for treating this as a property will
   have to stay, anyway.

Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
 I think this autofit feature is very disturbing if you are not aware of
 it.

Granted - so how to best display that? PowerPoint has a little icon
next to the textboxes that have this enabled.

 From my point of view it should be removed because if what you are
 writing does not fit in the available room, you should write less words
 or add room (split the text on another slide), but not write smaller
 when what you are writing is intended to be viewed on a projection screen.

I'm afraid but trying to educate users by taking away options might
end you up simply being replaced by another, more feature-full
offering these days 

Before getting deeper into the rather broad question of which
features are useful or not, for this thread, I think it would be most
helpful to improve the existing feature towards better usability. :)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgp4mn0sMesaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Repo / place for original artwork files (was: Re: [PUSHED] Make new About dialogue a little nicer)

2012-08-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Alexander Wilms wrote:
 just an idea: Could we use the old artwork repository that's not used 
 anymore? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/artwork/
 
Nah, let's not do that. We can't kill the old content there, and
playing games with unrelated branches is not so very clean. If you'd
like a repo on fdo, let's create a new one.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpBWGunc1qs5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Review-3-6?] New artwork for 3.6

2012-07-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Stefan Knorr wrote:
 Currently, about.svg is unused. I was asked, however, to re-enable it,
 as a matter of treating new contributors contributions better. I will
 not come to doing this today (i. e. before RC1 is tagged).
 If about.svg were used, it would be the same across all version of
 LibreOffice (at least the official TDF one and the community version).
 
Ok, cool - so we can remove it from the tdf-branding configure
magic.

 BTW, I've attached attached a patch for a new Finder background for the
 Mac installer. It'd be great if you could see if it fits or if there is
 weird alignment etc.
 
Looks good here, will push to master  -3-6 in a minute.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpy0sxmIYTu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Review-3-6?] New artwork for 3.6

2012-07-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
 Stefan Knorr wrote:
  Also, feel free to fetch the tar.bz2 archives from the previous mail,
  they're now good to go.
  
 Thanks, using them - though it seems they miss the about.svg
 (background image) - then again, that seems unused from the code by
 now?
 
 Can that go, and the configure check too?
 
 Meanwhile I'm using icon-themes/galaxy/brand/shell/about.svg for the
 'branded' version too.
 
Hi Astron,

rc1 builds are approaching - should we simply stick the plain
about.svg into the tarballs  go with that?

I somehow lost the plot on this one - or can we remove references to
that image from the code?

Thanks a lot,

-- Thorsten


pgp9UrWjvCpJo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Where do the official splash screens etc. lie?

2012-06-28 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Stefan Knorr wrote:
 Since we will want to replace them in the near future, can you tell me
 where they are?
 
http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/tdf-branding.tgz

 Another question: since Asa Dotzler from Mozilla criticised LibO for
 using TDF logos in the installer (which really doesn't make much sense
 from a branding perspective) ... I think it might be a good idea to
 replace these images too – where are these and how large do they have to
 be?
 
Well, which ones are you talking about? Windows installer? Those are
mostly here: instsetoo_native/res

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpRFaRjWJZs6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Repo / place for original artwork files (was: Re: [PUSHED] Make new About dialogue a little nicer)

2012-06-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Petr Mladek wrote:
 I prefer the new version as well, so pushed into master. It will be in
 the 3-6 branch.
 
Hi guys,

great stuff, nice fresh look! :)

Somewhat tangential to that, I'd like to trigger a decision-making
process on where to store original artwork files (svg I presume, for
the most).

With the above patch, and some icon theme reworks, we now have svg
graphics in git, that is, version-controlled. At the same time,
we've historically kept them archived in the wiki
(version-controlled as well via mediawiki revisions):

 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Visual_Elements

I have no personal preference, other than the fact that it would be
nice to standardize on one default, authoritative place.

And even more tangential: please remember, for all artwork bearing
The Document Foundation, that we typically need two versions of
that - one official, with the TDF tagline, for use from
'TDF-approved' artifacts, and one without, for default,
community-provided items. I can do easy things like simply removing
the tagline myself, it just sometimes looks better to then slightly
adjust the remaining graphics for size, aspect ratio etc. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpszf2owBjGD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Keep-ratio behaviour

2011-10-31 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote:
   Anyhow - just to split the mails up so we can reach a clear conclusion
 quicker. I love your idea to re-use keep ratio (it is worth checking
 if this is serialized in the file format for objects too I guess, or if
 this is some UI artifact).
 
It's not - it's global application state (i.e. the dialog show it
off when last time you had deselect it, and vice versa).

Shouldn't be too hard to have it default to keep, if the image
aspect ratio matches the image's preferred size aspect ratio (most,
but not all, images contain that info).

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpoK7H8QuAl8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] Re-sizing handles ...

2011-10-31 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote:
  There are four modes: small, large, small/3D, large/3D. Writer's
  scanner tool uses small square black handles, but I am not sure if
  these are graphics.
  Additionally, in Draw/Impress, there are at least another four handles
  (corner, side vertical, side horizontal, center) for rotating and a
  further two (node, direction of node) for manipulating vector lines,
  all are also available in four modes (small, small/3D, large,
  large/3D).
 
   So - Thorsten - is there really any good reason for all these handle
 modes ?
 
At some point in time, one platform wanted larger handles, while the
other kept smaller ones. The rest, as they say, is history.

  It would be great if all of the four modes could be unified (with
  handles nominally the same size as the current large handles [8*8])
  with all of the related options removed.
 
   I'd -love- to add an easy hack for that, it shouldn't be that hard. I
 just wonder if there is indeed any legitimate reason at all for all that
 complexity.
 
Much of that could go, if you ask me. Whether it makes sense to have
different handles for Draw, Impress  Writer is best left to UX
advise, I'd say.

 If not, I'll knock together an easy hack with code pointers for this.
 
Go for it! :)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpfiPLXvUBWG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] writer: link frames ...

2011-10-27 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Olivier Hallot wrote:
 I have one more suggestion: the same link mechanism as in writer for
 frames in Draw.
 
 Is it an easy hack as well?
 
Nope.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgp2cDGzPgyOx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] 256x256 application icons ...

2011-10-07 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Meeks wrote:
 Do we have
 easy-to-grok collect, split svgs of each of the icons ? 

Yep - svg with labels  groups for easy png generation is here:

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOffice_Initial_Icons-pre_final.svg

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


pgpVCvYhVgbA4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise