Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:28:31 + From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:55:23 +0700 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I still think that Dan needs to add the word "with" in order to > > avoid further confusion. > >Ask him to remove the dead FAQ link too, please >http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html Heh... Dan... RUThere?? ;-) _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:55:56 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy Care to expand on this for us newbies, Pres > I would like to know what happened to the Win98 protected mode floppy > drivers that eliminated the "compatibility mode" > > I haven't seen them recently > > Thanks > > Pres Waterman, W2PW > c/o 112 Motors, LLC > Long Island Ford, Kia and Used Dealer > > GO BILLS! > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > > ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:27:23 -0500 From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy > > The Amherst site shows floppy drivers originating at the UK Toshiba site for > both the L100 and L110. I have no experience with either of these, I'm using > W95, but they are here: http://www.mininotebook.co.uk/libfiles.htm I would like to know what happened to the Win98 protected mode floppy drivers that eliminated the "compatibility mode" I haven't seen them recently Thanks Pres Waterman, W2PW c/o 112 Motors, LLC Long Island Ford, Kia and Used Dealer GO BILLS! ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:15:40 -0500 From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > > You have to look online.. Or you can check a local battery shop. One > other place is look at www.radioshack.com Nope. Because they become bombs when mistreated, you can't buy cells Thanks Pres Waterman, W2PW c/o 112 Motors, LLC Long Island Ford, Kia and Used Dealer GO BILLS! ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:14:16 -0500 From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries ]> > Where would you get new cells from? They usually don't sell li-ion > to consumers. > I have a few bad packs. One, a lo-cap for the L100, has one of its three cells slightly rversed ( baad ) so guess what I will do with the other 2!?!? Use them to repair ANOTHER pack! Thanks Pres Waterman, W2PW c/o 112 Motors, LLC Long Island Ford, Kia and Used Dealer GO BILLS! ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:11:28 -0500 From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and > have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was > possible to recondition the battery (of course, with nicad, the > most obvious deterioration of performance was due to memory > effects). Is it possible to recondition the Libretto's Lithium ion > battery? YES! But LiOn batteries can be dangerous. Maha Energy makes a unit called the 777Plus ( about $70 ) that will condition and charge Nickel and Lithium technology batteries. I twisted apart the Libretto pack and cut small holes in the ends of the packs to insert wires to connect the Maha. I took a hi-cap pack, considered shot by its prior owner, and restored it to 2500 mAH! Thanks Pres Waterman, W2PW c/o 112 Motors, LLC Long Island Ford, Kia and Used Dealer GO BILLS! ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:03:04 EST From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy Douglas, >That is one of the ones which I have tried unsucessfully The Amherst site shows floppy drivers originating at the UK Toshiba site for both the L100 and L110. I have no experience with either of these, I'm using W95, but they are here: http://www.mininotebook.co.uk/libfiles.htm Lee ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:53:04 +0800 From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT At 12:37 PM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 + >From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT > >Hmmm sorry for this long message > >Does anyone know of a good LCD-industry access or LCD discussion board. It has been >a while since I took physical electronics, and I can't fine enough information to >satiate my curiosity. If you're interested in pouring through periodicals then magazines like IEEE Spectrum and the like are worth looking through at your local university library ... or if you've already got access just look it up in their online index. >I was shopping around for a 17" LCD with TV inputs, and I came across the two Samsung >Models 170MP and 171MP. There are a few feature differences listed, but a question >arose since the 170MP was listed as TFT-LCD and the 171MP was listed as A-Si LCD. I >need to ask, "Is this not the same technolgy? Does A-Si LCD = TFT-LCD, or not?" Hehe they're talking about different things. A-Si talks about Amorphous Silicon, a process where silicon is deposited in thin layers onto a substrate by the use of a gas plasma (amongst other things). The alternative is crystalline or polycristalline silicon, neither of which in traditional forms is suitable for this purpose. TFT simply means the display contains thin film transistors to do the switching - each pixel element (of which there are 3 per pixel) is controlled by its own transistor(s). Now the only mass technology (apart from Toshiba's LTPS) that can do TFTs is gas plasma deposition which creates amorphous silicon! I think the REAL question would not be if A-Si == TFT-LCD but rather if a panel ADVERTISED as A-Si == one ADVERTISED as TFT-LCD. AFAIK (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) ALL LCD panels made of A-Si except for Toshiba's LTPS but only SOME are TFT. If a panel uses A-Si as its selling point then chances are thats because it ain't a TFT so marketing can't slap a TFT badge on it. Of coures, it still boils down to how it looks ... a decent passive screen might still beat a poor TFT. See further down for more though ... >I remember the old days when people spoke of Active matrix (transistor on every >pixel) vs Passive Matrix (transistors on edges, so dual-scan was added at some time >to improve response). The Toshiba spec seems to indicate that this LTPS technology >is another way of having transistors in the LCD. >*ponder* TFT == Active Matrix ... I'm not really familiar with this LTPS stuff but if what I hear is correct, its their (polycrystalline) silicon-on-polymer and silicon-on-glass technology (yes there can be 2 'poly's there) ... its currently used in their Portege range AFAIK. Certainly if something USED LTPS then it'd make a song-and-dance about it (for one thing its another acronym for the marketing bods) so if it DOESN'T put 'LTPS' in lights you can be pretty sure it doesn't have it. >The brightness level and view angle are greater for the 171MP, but it seems so too is >the power requirement, which would indicate that perhaps the same LCD components are >the same (LCD's block light when aligned right?), but the light producing elements >draw greater current... or am I completely off track? Its possible yes ... one sure way of finding out if a panel is a TFT or not though is to load up a test pattern consisting of a black screen with a white box in the middle that covers about 1/3 of the screen (or inverse). There should be no 'shadow' cross on the background on a TFT. If you confine the box to one half of the screen, on a dual-scan the 'shadow' should only affect that half of the screen. Another test is to run an animation or game and see how bad the ghosting is. On a good TFT (note, not necessarily a NEW one, my old Tecra 500CDT from 1995 has a damn good screen with almost no ghosting) the ghosting should be barely noticeable (perhaps as much as one would expect on a TV), on a passive screen the ghosting should be quite noticeable. >Well the cost of the 171MP is greater (runs about $1300), so I am probably going to >pick up the 170MP (a local store has it for $700-800.00 vs the $1000.00 I see on the >internet). Does anyone have one of these? Not me ... thats curious though ... perhaps the 171 IS a TFT but for some reason the marketing spin doctors decided that since everyone was advertising TFT they'd do something different *shrug* ... just run those tests I just mentioned and it'll tell them apart. >Since everything ends up going back to Toshiba, further reading found these: > >TOSHIBA INTRODUCES WORLD'S SMALLEST LOW-TEMPERATURE POLY-SILICON TFT LCD WITH XGA >RESOLUTION >http://www.toshiba.com/taec/press/to-055.shtml > >LCD Frequently Asked Questions >http://www.toshiba.com/taec/main/faq/lcd_faq.html > >It
RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:43:45 +0800 From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries At 02:22 PM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:17:36 -0600 >From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > >You have to look online.. Or you can check a local battery shop. One >other place is look at www.radioshack.com Another place to look is in the quaterly (or however often) 'clearance specials' from your local wholesaler. Often in fact you can pick up very similar packs (I picked up a pack for a really old Portege 300 which is virtually identical to the one for the Libretto) for a fraction of the price ($7USD in this case). With these, you could probably even just cut the back off the dead Libby pack and epoxy it onto the back of the new pack (and solder the appropriate connections). (I don't say just replace the cells because the P300 pack is the size of the Libby extended battery, unless you've got an extended battery thats dead the cells won't fit!). - Raymond --- /~\ | | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?"| | ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" | | /__/ +---| | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | HTTP://www.raybot.net| | ICQ: 31756092 | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | \~/ ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] Virus update
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:15:37 +0800 From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update At 09:34 AM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:29:14 -0600 >From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update > >Hmm mine showed nimda worm..might have been more then one virii.. Have >to run a scan Mine also says nimda, NAV can't find anything else in my mail area though *shrug* - Raymond --- /~\ | | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?"| | ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" | | /__/ +---| | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | HTTP://www.raybot.net| | ICQ: 31756092 | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | \~/ ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Libretto replacement-ish review
Date: 11 Jan 2002 10:02:00 +0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nik Ahmad Fahmi) Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto replacement-ish review > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:40:13 -0800 (PST) > From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto replacement-ish review > That's the LOOX in Japan, or the P-series for $1499 in the USA (but USA > model has 800Mhz processor and built-in CD-R/DVD-ROM drive and more > goodies). I am having in front of me a Fujitsu Lifebook P-1030 subnotebook. From David's description of Loox, I think this is a different model. The specs are as described here : http://www.fujitsu-pc-asia.com/products/ lb_p1030_main.html. It is slightly longer than the 110CT (8.9" wide TFT display) but lighter than the 110CT (880g). It definitely make a good replacement for my ageing 110CT but it's lacking an IrDA port which I need occassionally for use with my Nokia 7110. > = > adorable toshiba libretto > The latest news and information for the Toshiba Libretto owner. > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:33:36 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy That is one of the ones which I have tried unsucessfully - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:27 PM Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:24:43 -0600 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy > > There is a windows driver on the toshiba web site. It is either under > the 100CT listing or the 110CT listing. ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:24:43 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy There is a windows driver on the toshiba web site. It is either under the 100CT listing or the 110CT listing. On 13 Jan 2002, at 16:12, Douglas Asmussen wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:07:27 -0800 > From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: CT 110 Floppy > > Hi All, have just formatted and installed windows 98 SE on my 110, I have been >having a heck of a time getting the floppy to work, basically it doesn't except from >a Win98 startup disk. Am I wrong in assuming that it is a windows driver issue, due >to the fact that it works fine from the start up disk. I have tried a couple of win98 floppy disk drivers off the web with no luck, one actually worked but reported the floppy as a drive d:\, which I did not like. I have searched thru the archives with no answers that seem to work being found. Hopefully someone on the group has gone thru this and would be willing to help. Sure I can use the floppy from a DOS start up but would rather have access from windows. TIA > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
[LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:07:27 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CT 110 Floppy Hi All, have just formatted and installed windows 98 SE on my 110, I have been having a heck of a time getting the floppy to work, basically it doesn't except from a Win98 startup disk. Am I wrong in assuming that it is a windows driver issue, due to the fact that it works fine from the start up disk. I have tried a couple of win98 floppy disk drivers off the web with no luck, one actually worked but reported the floppy as a drive d:\, which I did not like. I have searched thru the archives with no answers that seem to work being found. Hopefully someone on the group has gone thru this and would be willing to help. Sure I can use the floppy from a DOS start up but would rather have access from windows. TIA ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:17:36 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries You have to look online.. Or you can check a local battery shop. One other place is look at www.radioshack.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:03 PM To: Libretto Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries Where would you get new cells from? They usually don't sell li-ion to consumers. On 13 Jan 2002, at 13:53, phillip ramirez wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:47:21 -0600 > From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > > Just went over this on the tp600 list ;-) yes it is possible as long > as it does not have a smart chip on the battery itself. The TP's have > a chip that after so many cycles it blows the chip from what others > have said. But you can get new cells and try.. I would use a silver > based epoxy instead of soldering on the LI-Ion battery > > -Original Message- > From: Clarence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:33 PM > To: Libretto > Subject: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > > > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:21:56 -0500 > From: "Clarence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: reconditioning batteries > > So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and > have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was > possible to recondition the battery (of course, with nicad, the > most obvious deterioration of performance was due to memory > effects). Is it possible to recondition the Libretto's Lithium ion > battery? > > -Clarence Harper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get your own evilemail.com address at http://www.evilemail.com > > > > > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's > subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's > subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries Where would you get new cells from? They usually don't sell li-ion to consumers. On 13 Jan 2002, at 13:53, phillip ramirez wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:47:21 -0600 > From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > > Just went over this on the tp600 list ;-) yes it is possible as long as > it does not have a smart chip on the battery itself. The TP's have a > chip that after so many cycles it blows the chip from what others have > said. But you can get new cells and try.. I would use a silver based > epoxy instead of soldering on the LI-Ion battery > > -Original Message- > From: Clarence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:33 PM > To: Libretto > Subject: [LIB] reconditioning batteries > > > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:21:56 -0500 > From: "Clarence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: reconditioning batteries > > So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and > have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was > possible to recondition the battery (of course, with nicad, the > most obvious deterioration of performance was due to memory > effects). Is it possible to recondition the Libretto's Lithium ion > battery? > > -Clarence Harper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get your own evilemail.com address at http://www.evilemail.com > > > > > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's > subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > > > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:47:21 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries Just went over this on the tp600 list ;-) yes it is possible as long as it does not have a smart chip on the battery itself. The TP's have a chip that after so many cycles it blows the chip from what others have said. But you can get new cells and try.. I would use a silver based epoxy instead of soldering on the LI-Ion battery -Original Message- From: Clarence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:33 PM To: Libretto Subject: [LIB] reconditioning batteries Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:21:56 -0500 From: "Clarence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: reconditioning batteries So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was possible to recondition the battery (of course, with nicad, the most obvious deterioration of performance was due to memory effects). Is it possible to recondition the Libretto's Lithium ion battery? -Clarence Harper Get your own evilemail.com address at http://www.evilemail.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:26:30 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus On 13 Jan 2002, at 10:12, Adrian Ho wrote: > Yeah. They shed /zero/ useful info. I could claim to be you on a > nasty-gram, and no one (perhaps not even the list owner) could prove it > wasn't you. Nasty. 8-) Yes nasty ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
[LIB] reconditioning batteries
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:21:56 -0500 From: "Clarence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: reconditioning batteries So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was possible to recondition the battery (of course, with nicad, the most obvious deterioration of performance was due to memory effects). Is it possible to recondition the Libretto's Lithium ion battery? -Clarence Harper Get your own evilemail.com address at http://www.evilemail.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:09:15 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT On 13 Jan 2002, at 12:37, Eugene Hsu wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 + > From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT > > Hmmm sorry for this long message > Since everything ends up going back to Toshiba, further reading found these: > > TOSHIBA INTRODUCES WORLD'S SMALLEST LOW-TEMPERATURE POLY-SILICON TFT LCD > WITH XGA RESOLUTION > http://www.toshiba.com/taec/press/to-055.shtml > > LCD Frequently Asked Questions > http://www.toshiba.com/taec/main/faq/lcd_faq.html > > It seems that Toshiba in 1999 had the 1024x768 LTPS-TFT displays in a 6.3 > inch format, and at the time it was claiming that the technology was better > than amorpheous silicon. I do wish that my 70CT had greater resolution, so > I wonder whether we could replace our screens with the LTM06C310 or its > modern equivalent. *further pondering* > Interesting. Might work. I would love a higher resolution too. 6.3 isn't too big if the rest of the display is the same size. John ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
[LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 + From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT Hmmm sorry for this long message Does anyone know of a good LCD-industry access or LCD discussion board. It has been a while since I took physical electronics, and I can't fine enough information to satiate my curiosity. I was shopping around for a 17" LCD with TV inputs, and I came across the two Samsung Models 170MP and 171MP. There are a few feature differences listed, but a question arose since the 170MP was listed as TFT-LCD and the 171MP was listed as A-Si LCD. I need to ask, "Is this not the same technolgy? Does A-Si LCD = TFT-LCD, or not?" I remember the old days when people spoke of Active matrix (transistor on every pixel) vs Passive Matrix (transistors on edges, so dual-scan was added at some time to improve response). The Toshiba spec seems to indicate that this LTPS technology is another way of having transistors in the LCD. *ponder* The brightness level and view angle are greater for the 171MP, but it seems so too is the power requirement, which would indicate that perhaps the same LCD components are the same (LCD's block light when aligned right?), but the light producing elements draw greater current... or am I completely off track? Well the cost of the 171MP is greater (runs about $1300), so I am probably going to pick up the 170MP (a local store has it for $700-800.00 vs the $1000.00 I see on the internet). Does anyone have one of these? Since everything ends up going back to Toshiba, further reading found these: TOSHIBA INTRODUCES WORLD'S SMALLEST LOW-TEMPERATURE POLY-SILICON TFT LCD WITH XGA RESOLUTION http://www.toshiba.com/taec/press/to-055.shtml LCD Frequently Asked Questions http://www.toshiba.com/taec/main/faq/lcd_faq.html It seems that Toshiba in 1999 had the 1024x768 LTPS-TFT displays in a 6.3 inch format, and at the time it was claiming that the technology was better than amorpheous silicon. I do wish that my 70CT had greater resolution, so I wonder whether we could replace our screens with the LTM06C310 or its modern equivalent. *further pondering* Eugene _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 02:05:12 +0800 From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:39:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Did anyone look at the headers? Yeah. They shed /zero/ useful info. I could claim to be you on a nasty-gram, and no one (perhaps not even the list owner) could prove it wasn't you. Nasty. 8-) - Adrian ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:00:32 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus You know I was thinking this would be the case but was unsure. Like I said its been about 2 years since even trying to track myself when using remailers hehe -Original Message- From: Adrian Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:39 AM To: Libretto Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 01:30:55 +0800 From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:19:19AM -0800, phillip ramirez wrote: > But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7 ip address All Libretto list mail passes through that address, and all Libretto list mail "originates" from psmtp.basiclink.com. This is because the Libretto "list manager" is actually a remailer that strips off almost all headers from the real incoming messages and sends out spanking new ones in their place. The only person who can track this down is the basiclink.com owner, assuming there are sufficient logs to do so. - Adrian ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:30:36 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus All someone would need to do is obtain the list of names, put [LIB] in the subject use the mailing list as a return address and everyone would think it is from the list. Did anyone look at the headers? On 13 Jan 2002, at 4:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:33:23 +0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus > > > Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from some head > moron whatever but mine contained an unwelcome guest which set off my virus > software. No damage done luckily just a heads up to the rest. > > Looks like we all got it. > > How does such a thing persuade The List to accept and re-send it, ie when > it's apparently not from someone who is subscribed from the list? > > > > > ** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives > http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ > ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ** > ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 01:30:55 +0800 From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:19:19AM -0800, phillip ramirez wrote: > But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7 ip address All Libretto list mail passes through that address, and all Libretto list mail "originates" from psmtp.basiclink.com. This is because the Libretto "list manager" is actually a remailer that strips off almost all headers from the real incoming messages and sends out spanking new ones in their place. The only person who can track this down is the basiclink.com owner, assuming there are sufficient logs to do so. - Adrian ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] Virus update
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:29:14 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update Hmm mine showed nimda worm..might have been more then one virii.. Have to run a scan -Original Message- From: Douglas Asmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:28 AM To: Libretto Subject: [LIB] Virus update Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:23:39 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Virus update Yup that is the name that I noticed on the mail before I deleted it from the VS quarantine, according to the VS files it was the JS.Exception.Exploit one. HTH ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
[LIB] Virus update
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:23:39 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Virus update Yup that is the name that I noticed on the mail before I deleted it from the VS quarantine, according to the VS files it was the JS.Exception.Exploit one. HTH ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:16:40 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus If nav nabbed it it is already deleted or pulled over to its quarentine area.. It was from its been too long since I have tried to decode headers.. But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7 ip address 65.174.101.7 (EHLO bl7.basiclink.com) (65.174.101.7) by mta464.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2002 22:20:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from psmtp.basiclink.com ([65.174.102.137]) by bl7.basiclink.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id com; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:21:42 -0800 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:22:59 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Libretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Libretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LIB] óp¨< Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
RE: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:08:39 -0600 From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus Avg got it for me -Original Message- From: Douglas Asmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:33 AM To: Libretto Subject: [LIB] Virus Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:25:32 -0800 From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Virus Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from some head moron whatever but mine contained an unwelcome guest which set off my virus software. No damage done luckily just a heads up to the rest. Douglas ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest ** _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:21:11 +0800 From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus At 04:39 AM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:33:23 +0700 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus > >> Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from some head >moron whatever but mine contained an unwelcome guest which set off my virus >software. No damage done luckily just a heads up to the rest. > >Looks like we all got it. > >How does such a thing persuade The List to accept and re-send it, ie when >it's apparently not from someone who is subscribed from the list? Actually I'm having trouble figuring out which email it was that had it ... NAV flagged a virus in my email inbox but I checked and I can't find the email! I wasn't even sure it was from the list until someone else mentioned it. Perhaps NAV deleted it before I could see it? ... *shrug* Bear in mind IIRC you don't need to be subscribed to send messages ... besides how do you know they're not subscribed? - Raymond --- /~\ | | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?"| | ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" | | /__/ +---| | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | HTTP://www.raybot.net| | ICQ: 31756092 | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | \~/ ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:33:23 +0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus > Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from some head moron whatever but mine contained an unwelcome guest which set off my virus software. No damage done luckily just a heads up to the rest. Looks like we all got it. How does such a thing persuade The List to accept and re-send it, ie when it's apparently not from someone who is subscribed from the list? ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:55:23 +0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest > I still think that Dan needs to add the word "with" in order to > avoid further confusion. Ask him to remove the dead FAQ link too, please http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html ** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE--- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST-- Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **
