Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Please don't forget the `random cruft' http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00125.html either. ;- Applied (with a feeling of deja-vu) :). Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
Daniel Reed wrote: On 2004-09-17T20:12+0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? ) If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily, ) I'll apply it. Bug report: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00050.html Ralf's backported patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00051.html Success report: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00058.html I committed this. Thanks. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I'll make a stable release from branch-1-5 (1.5.10 according to Release Numbering on http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html) if I can apply Ralf's patch... Are you planning on doing this fairly soon? I have some time this weekend and could do it tomorrow. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
libtool release plans for the next few weeks
What is branch-1-5's current role? There have been patches checked in as of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release? If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? I would like to pick the version of libtool to ship with our upcoming Fedora Core 3 release. Should I track CVS branch-1-5 and use a version number like libtool-1.5.8.0.200409171404, can I rely on there being a 1.5.9 release in the next few weeks, or should I track CVS 1.9? If I take no action, we are currently set to ship 1.5.6 with a number of patches--most of which have been applied or reproduced in branch-1-5 since 1.5.8. Thanks, -- Daniel Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.redhat.com/djr/ Desktop and Cygwin ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
Hi Daniel! Daniel Reed wrote: What is branch-1-5's current role? 1.5 is winding down its status as stable branch. There have been patches checked in as of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release? There are no concrete plans to make another release from branch-1-5 at the moment. If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily, I'll apply it. I would like to pick the version of libtool to ship with our upcoming Fedora Core 3 release. Should I track CVS branch-1-5 and use a version number like libtool-1.5.8.0.200409171404, can I rely on there being a 1.5.9 release in the next few weeks, or should I track CVS 1.9? Please don't ship CVS revisions except as additional versions to a stable release version. 1.9 in particular has had a lot of code churn recently and will need at least one more alpha before we can release 2.0. If I take no action, we are currently set to ship 1.5.6 with a number of patches--most of which have been applied or reproduced in branch-1-5 since 1.5.8. I'll make a stable release from branch-1-5 (1.5.10 according to Release Numbering on http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html) if I can apply Ralf's patch... Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
On 2004-09-17T20:12+0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? ) If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily, ) I'll apply it. Bug report: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00050.html Ralf's backported patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00051.html Success report: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2004-09/msg00058.html ) I'll make a stable release from branch-1-5 (1.5.10 according to Release ) Numbering on http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html) if I can ) apply Ralf's patch... Great, thanks :) -- Daniel Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.redhat.com/djr/ Desktop and Cygwin ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Re: libtool release plans for the next few weeks
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:12:04PM CEST: Daniel Reed wrote: What is branch-1-5's current role? 1.5 is winding down its status as stable branch. There have been patches checked in as of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release? There are no concrete plans to make another release from branch-1-5 at the moment. If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5? If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily, I'll apply it. Please don't forget the `random cruft' http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00125.html either. ;- Regards, Ralf ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
