Agreed. Its annoying, but right now I think we are probably stuck with
it.
Cheers, Tim
On Dec 20, 9:06 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/12/09 2:18 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
I don't think it's worth a lot of effort. If it's been tried and
doesn't work nicely, I'm fine with sticking with the current structure.
At some point, though, you have to decide who's boss, you or the build
system ;)
(I love taking jabs at Maven, sorry)
So do I, no worries. Ironically, Maven is still getting away with all these!
- IRC
alex
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
indraj...@gmail.com mailto:indraj...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex,
Yes, it's possible to have artifactId ≠ directoryName for Maven
projects. But last time I did this Maven chose to be very cruel with me
(site generation, relative path resolutions etc. broke).
Also see the point and convergence to decision here:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/msg/73a5652a55076384
In this case, I would usually type out cd liftcore blindly and the
right thing would happen automatically thanks to shopt -s cdspell in
my .bashrc config. But I digress.
However, I won't mind re-opening this discussion on 'lift-' prefix if
you want me to.
Cheers, Indrajit
On 21/12/09 1:29 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
While we're discussing lift-core in a separate thread, I wanted
to bring
up a minor annoyance
All module directories in the repository start with lift-,
boisv...@smudge:~/git/liftweb$ tree -L 2 | grep lift
|-- lift-archetypes
| |-- lift-archetype-basic
| |-- lift-archetype-blank
| |-- lift-archetype-jpa-basic
| |-- lift-archetype-jpa-blank
| |-- lift-archetype-jpa-blank-single
|-- lift-base
| |-- lift-actor
| |-- lift-common
| |-- lift-json
| |-- lift-util
| |-- lift-webkit
|-- lift-core
|-- lift-examples
| |-- hellolift
|-- lift-misc
| |-- lift-installer
|-- lift-modules
| |-- lift-amqp
| |-- lift-facebook
| |-- lift-jta
| |-- lift-machine
| |-- lift-oauth
| |-- lift-openid
| |-- lift-osgi
| |-- lift-paypal
| |-- lift-testkit
| |-- lift-textile
| |-- lift-widgets
| |-- lift-wizard
| |-- lift-xmpp
|-- lift-persistence
| |-- lift-jpa
| |-- lift-mapper
| |-- lift-record
This naming isn't very practical when navigating the directory
structure
since it meddles with completion.
e.g. cd TAB (beep!) lift- TAB (beep!) c TAB (finally completes
core)
Does Maven support simpler names? Could we have something like this?
|-- base
| |-- actor
| |-- common
| |-- json
| |-- util
| |-- webkit
|-- modules
| |-- amqp
| |-- ...
| |-- ...
(I'm not suggesting change the names of the modules; just the
names of
the directories)
alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
mailto:liftweb@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
mailto:liftweb@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
