Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?

[James Lowe]

Federico,

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:16:48 +0200, Federico Bruni  wrote:

> 
> 
> Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 14:01, Federico Bruni 
>  ha scritto:
> > 
> > 
> > Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 3:10, Karlin High 
> >  ha scritto:
> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen  
> >> wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >> 
> >>>  somehow this patch needs to be coordinated with Federico,
> >>>  rather than using the standard LilyPond patch sequence.
> >> 
> >> That's what I gathered, too. I assumed Federico follows this list. 
> >> The
> >> discussion had
> >> stopped with the question of how to instruct new developers to get 
> >> the fonts,
> >> and I debated whether to continue it here,
> >> or on the Sourceforge or Rietveld issues.
> >> 
> > 
> > Hi Karlin
> > 
> > In my opinion these fonts should be provided by linux distros.
> > I've just read that a new package urw-base35-fonts will replace the 
> > obsolete urw-fonts in Fedora 27 (which should be released in 
> > November):
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/urw-base35-fonts-20170801-1.fc27
> > 
> > Upstream repository is:
> > https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts
> > 
> 
> I'm testing a new container based on Fedora 27, where urw-base35-fonts 
> is installed.
> However, I'm still getting the configure error because it seems that 
> lilypond need the .otf files and this package contains only *.t1 and 
> *.afm files:
> 
> # ls /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
> C059-BdIta.afm   NimbusRoman-Regular.afm 
> P052-Roman.afm
> C059-BdIta.t1NimbusRoman-Regular.t1  
> P052-Roman.t1
> C059-Bold.afmNimbusSans-Bold.afm 
> StandardSymbolsPS.afm
> C059-Bold.t1 NimbusSans-Bold.t1  
> StandardSymbolsPS.t1
> C059-Italic.afm  NimbusSans-BoldItalic.afm   
> URWBookman-Demi.afm
> C059-Italic.t1   NimbusSans-BoldItalic.t1
> URWBookman-Demi.t1
> C059-Roman.afm   NimbusSans-Italic.afm   
> URWBookman-DemiItalic.afm
> C059-Roman.t1NimbusSans-Italic.t1
> URWBookman-DemiItalic.t1
> D05L.afm NimbusSans-Regular.afm  
> URWBookman-Light.afm
> D05L.t1  NimbusSans-Regular.t1   
> URWBookman-Light.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afmNimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.afm  
> URWBookman-LightItalic.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.t1   
> URWBookman-LightItalic.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm  NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.afm   
> URWGothic-Book.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1   NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.t1
> URWGothic-Book.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Italic.afm  NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.afm
> URWGothic-BookOblique.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Italic.t1   NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.t1 
> URWGothic-BookOblique.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Regular.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.afm
> URWGothic-Demi.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Regular.t1  NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.t1 
> URWGothic-Demi.t1
> NimbusRoman-Bold.afm P052-Bold.afm   
> URWGothic-DemiOblique.afm
> NimbusRoman-Bold.t1  P052-Bold.t1
> URWGothic-DemiOblique.t1
> NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.afm   P052-BoldItalic.afm 
> Z003-MediumItalic.afm
> NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.t1P052-BoldItalic.t1  
> Z003-MediumItalic.t1
> NimbusRoman-Italic.afm   P052-Italic.afm fonts.dir
> NimbusRoman-Italic.t1P052-Italic.t1
> 
> What would you recommend to do? (question open to all the fonts guru in 
> this list...)
> 
> There's an open issue to document this in the CG:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4998/
> 

I have not been able to find anyway other than manually copying the OTF files 
from their git repo.

There was a discussion started here

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00019.html

Oh but I see you already replied to this in

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00022.html

So if this is just for LilyDev then I'd just install them manually like you 
would for other dependencies by copying the files manually.

James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?

[Federico Bruni]

Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 14:01, Federico Bruni 
 ha scritto:



Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 3:10, Karlin High 
 ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen  
wrote:

[...]



 somehow this patch needs to be coordinated with Federico,
 rather than using the standard LilyPond patch sequence.


That's what I gathered, too. I assumed Federico follows this list. 
The

discussion had
stopped with the question of how to instruct new developers to get 
the fonts,

and I debated whether to continue it here,
or on the Sourceforge or Rietveld issues.



Hi Karlin

In my opinion these fonts should be provided by linux distros.
I've just read that a new package urw-base35-fonts will replace the 
obsolete urw-fonts in Fedora 27 (which should be released in 
November):

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/urw-base35-fonts-20170801-1.fc27

Upstream repository is:
https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts



I'm testing a new container based on Fedora 27, where urw-base35-fonts 
is installed.
However, I'm still getting the configure error because it seems that 
lilypond need the .otf files and this package contains only *.t1 and 
*.afm files:


# ls /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
C059-BdIta.afm   NimbusRoman-Regular.afm 
P052-Roman.afm
C059-BdIta.t1NimbusRoman-Regular.t1  
P052-Roman.t1
C059-Bold.afmNimbusSans-Bold.afm 
StandardSymbolsPS.afm
C059-Bold.t1 NimbusSans-Bold.t1  
StandardSymbolsPS.t1
C059-Italic.afm  NimbusSans-BoldItalic.afm   
URWBookman-Demi.afm
C059-Italic.t1   NimbusSans-BoldItalic.t1
URWBookman-Demi.t1
C059-Roman.afm   NimbusSans-Italic.afm   
URWBookman-DemiItalic.afm
C059-Roman.t1NimbusSans-Italic.t1
URWBookman-DemiItalic.t1
D05L.afm NimbusSans-Regular.afm  
URWBookman-Light.afm
D05L.t1  NimbusSans-Regular.t1   
URWBookman-Light.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afmNimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.afm  
URWBookman-LightItalic.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.t1   
URWBookman-LightItalic.t1
NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm  NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.afm   
URWGothic-Book.afm
NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1   NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.t1
URWGothic-Book.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Italic.afm  NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.afm
URWGothic-BookOblique.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Italic.t1   NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.t1 
URWGothic-BookOblique.t1
NimbusMonoPS-Regular.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.afm
URWGothic-Demi.afm
NimbusMonoPS-Regular.t1  NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.t1 
URWGothic-Demi.t1
NimbusRoman-Bold.afm P052-Bold.afm   
URWGothic-DemiOblique.afm
NimbusRoman-Bold.t1  P052-Bold.t1
URWGothic-DemiOblique.t1
NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.afm   P052-BoldItalic.afm 
Z003-MediumItalic.afm
NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.t1P052-BoldItalic.t1  
Z003-MediumItalic.t1

NimbusRoman-Italic.afm   P052-Italic.afm fonts.dir
NimbusRoman-Italic.t1P052-Italic.t1

What would you recommend to do? (question open to all the fonts guru in 
this list...)


There's an open issue to document this in the CG:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4998/

Thanks
Federico




___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel