Re: List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?
Alle 01:51, giovedì 27 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: I hope you get the point: friendly and positive mail-tone is essential for a mail-list cooperation. Do not assume that I do not want to understand your point. And excuse me if I am wrong, after all I (or others) could be helped to understand what you mean. Also excuse me if this is not the best way to help reaching a friendly atmosphere on this mail-list; I am trying as hard as I can but I may fail. I see, and totally agree. It's not easy to manage many emails with real-bugs reports or false-bugs. But an answer like read the manual is neither a friendly answer nor an answer at all. I prepared a score with lilypond and the celloist missed one note because of this problem, so I thought it could be a good idea to discuss this behaviour on the list. This is the reason my i went into a grumpy mood when you answered try to live with it, because it would end the discussion with no solution, or no real conclusion. I think your example on how weird accidental rules seem in some places is very good. Accidentals may seem odd even if it is the correct way these accidentals are placed. I do not think that the developers should change the accidental-rules. I don't understand what you mean, you say accidental rules seem weird in some places, but should remain as they are. Why? -The only rule to be adjusted is don't let the over-the-bar rule turn off the implicit ! obtained by alternations in the same bar -And to make it still better: forget the alteration after n bars ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No Bug nor Feature?
Alle 00:11, mercoledì 26 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Of course you didn't get the point and don't want to. I only said I think the program may lead to unwanted results. I'm not annoyed by Lilypond, i'm only annoyed by answers like read the manual or don't use lilypond when I warily report a bug. Bug reporting is a way to contribute to the project, too. Marco ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:26:33 +0200 Marco Gusy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alle 00:11, mercoledì 26 luglio 2006, Donald Axel ha scritto: Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Of course you didn't get the point and don't want to. I only said I think the program may lead to unwanted results. I'm not annoyed by Lilypond, i'm only annoyed by answers like read the manual or don't use lilypond when I warily report a bug. Bug reporting is a way to contribute to the project, too. I am sorry if I did not get the point. What I try to tell you is that working with list mail may be time consuming for developers and sentences like Anyway the problem is still more annoying, may better be stated as: Anyway it looks inappropriate to me that [...] I hope you get the point: friendly and positive mail-tone is essential for a mail-list cooperation. Do not assume that I do not want to understand your point. And excuse me if I am wrong, after all I (or others) could be helped to understand what you mean. Also excuse me if this is not the best way to help reaching a friendly atmosphere on this mail-list; I am trying as hard as I can but I may fail. I think your example on how weird accidental rules seem in some places is very good. Accidentals may seem odd even if it is the correct way these accidentals are placed. I do not think that the developers should change the accidental-rules. -- http://d-axel.dk/ -- Donald Axel, Consultant -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: No Bug nor Feature?
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:36:17 +0200 Marco Gusy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I already red it, and I think this behaviour is not correct. When playing you feel stronger the sharp in the same measure than the unsharp of the previous one. The previous one unsharp should not override the diesis in the same measure don't you think? Anyway the problem is still more annoying, this happens also if the first note is measures far away... Don't be annoyed, you can get your money back if you want;-) Music-notation is annoying anyway you look at it and demands a great effort on the behalf of the writer (even with pen and paper, which I used for 20 years or more.) Well, try to live with it, use ! or something like that to explicit specify accidentals. Good luck and happy writing, /Donald Axel -- http://d-axel.dk/ -- Donald Axel, Consultant -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
