Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
On 03.04.19 23:23, Valentin Villenave wrote: On 4/3/19, Knut Petersen wrote: An strace log that shows argv and env of execve gs would be helpfull ... Here’s a full strace log from that user, I’m not sure how to find that specific information: http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/file/t249946/lily_strace.txt Tell him to rerun with the some more strace switches: strace -v -f -ff -s 8192 -o LILYTRACE lilypond ... Knut ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
On 4/3/19, Knut Petersen wrote: > An strace log that shows argv and env of execve gs would be helpfull ... Here’s a full strace log from that user, I’m not sure how to find that specific information: http://lilypond-french-users.1298960.n2.nabble.com/file/t249946/lily_strace.txt Cheers, V. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
On 31.03.19 16:17, Valentin Villenave wrote: Greetings, someone on -user-fr has reported gs crashing on some scores (for example the first incipit example from NR 2.9.6), with the following error: gs: Interpreter revision (926) does not match gs_init.ps revision (921). Might be caused by environment variables (PATH / GS_LIB ...) An strace log that shows argv and env of execve gs would be helpfull ... Knut ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
On 4/2/19, Federico Bruni wrote: > As far as I can see from my installations, gs distributed in > lilypond.org recent installers is version 9.26. Nope: $ wget http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/linux-64/lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh $ sh lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh --tarball $ tar -tjvf lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.tar.bz2 | grep ghostscript … drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2019-03-20 17:09 ./usr/share/ghostscript/9.21/ … > Even if in the GUB spec I read 9.21: > https://github.com/gperciva/gub/blob/master/gub/specs/ghostscript.py#L22 Gah. That doesn’t look good. V. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
Il giorno dom 31 mar 2019 alle 17:22, Valentin Villenave ha scritto: On 3/31/19, Valentin Villenave wrote: I couldn’t reproduce (but then again I’m not running Ubuntu). I also find it odd that only some scores are reported to fail while other’s aren’t. OK, as I suspected *all* scores do indeed fail for this user. Further information just in case: LilyPond 2.19.83 has been decompressed to /usr/local, and there’s gs 9.26 installed in /usr/bin (as a dependency for the distro-provided LilyPond 2.18, I’d guess). So where "gs revision 9.21" comes from? As far as I can see from my installations, gs distributed in lilypond.org recent installers is version 9.26. Even if in the GUB spec I read 9.21: https://github.com/gperciva/gub/blob/master/gub/specs/ghostscript.py#L22 On Fedora 29, both system's and lilypond's gs are 9.26: $ gs --version 9.26 $ .local/lilypond/usr/bin/gs --version 9.26 ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: gs version error in latest GUB build
On 3/31/19, Valentin Villenave wrote: > I couldn’t reproduce (but then again I’m not running Ubuntu). I also > find it odd that only some scores are reported to fail while other’s > aren’t. OK, as I suspected *all* scores do indeed fail for this user. Further information just in case: LilyPond 2.19.83 has been decompressed to /usr/local, and there’s gs 9.26 installed in /usr/bin (as a dependency for the distro-provided LilyPond 2.18, I’d guess). Cheers, V. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
