Réf. : Re: changing time signature
You're right (as usual !). The issue is actually :
\version "2.0.1"
\score {
\notes {
\time 2/2
{
a'1
a1
a\breve*1/2
\time 3/4
a2.
a2.
\bar "|."
}
}
\paper {}
\header {}
}
without any \property Score.timing = ##f
Thanks a lot !
Mats Bengtsson
s3.kth.se> cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: changing time signature
06/09/2004 18:01
Jean-marc LEGRAND wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi list, ands thanks again for your support !
>
> My new problem is with time signature changes. Here's my .ly, with lily2.0.1 on XP :
>
> \version "2.0.1"
> \score {
> \notes {
> \time 2/2
> {
> a'1
> a1
> \once \property Score.timing = ##f
> a\breve
> \bar "||"
> \time 3/4
> a2.
> a2.
> \bar "|."
> }
> }
> \paper {}
> \header {}
> }
>
> The pb is that after the \breve and \bar "||", it seems that "automatic barnlining"
> is off. I have
> next 2 dotted half notes without barline between.
I'm not sure exactly how \once works in this context. I would
rather try to set and then reset the property explicitly:
\property Score.timing = ##f
a\breve
\bar "||"
\property Score.timing = ##t
\time 3/4
Another possibility is to fool LilyPond into thinking that the
a\breve only lasts for a bar by saying a\breve*1/2 The printout
will still be correct.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
My mistake (was: Cymbal instead of bass drum)
Hi, please accept my apology for posting a message about something that wasn't actually broken in Lilypond, which appears to be a Timidity problem instead. Anyway, that got me to install V 2.2.2 on my FreeBSD box tonight, so all's not lost. :-) It looks like there are many nice improvements in this version. Thanks to all who've created and worked on this software and to Patrick Atamaniuk for porting it to FreeBSD! Now to get the timidity problem straightened out... drums used to work fine with an older version of Timidity... I know that the drums in the midi file are ok, since I could hear them when using a sequencer on my windoze 2000 pro box. -- Copyright (C) 2004 R.D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: an All Rights Reservedunnatural belief that we're above Nature & her www.rddavis.org 410-744-4900other creatures, using dogma to justify such Uncle Fester for President! beliefs and to justify much human cruelty. ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
updates
Adobe InDesign CS - 100 Ahead Nero v6.3 Powerpack - 40 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition - 200 Windows 2000 Server - 50 Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional - 50 Quark Express 6.0 - 60 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100 Borland Delphi 7 Professional - 70 Adobe Illustrator 10 - 80 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180 and a lot more http://www.alloembest.info/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Get discount drugs without prescription
Discount generic drugs. save over 70% todays specials, Viagra, retails for $15, we sell for 3!!! Prozac, retails for $6, we sell for $1.50!! - Private Online ordering! - World wide shipping! - No Prescription required!! Check it out: http://4drugs123.com/?index No thanks: http://4drugs123.com/rm.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Large time signatures
Well, I could give "scores" of examples, but I'm not sure what pieces or editions you can conveniently consult. Anyway, here are a few from one pile of music on my shelves: Schoenberg: Klavierstück Op. 33a, Universal-Edition Nr. 9773 Schoenberg: Klavierstück Op. 33b, Belmont Music Publishers BEL 1003 Schoenberg: Sechs Stücke für Klavier zu vier Händen (1896). Belmont Music Publishers BEL-1019 Schoenberg: Fünf Klavierstücke Op. 23, Wilhelm Hansen Edition nr. 2326 Schoenberg: Suite Op. 29, Universal Edition UE 8685 Schoenberg: Sechs Stücke für Männerchor. Bote & Bock, Berlin (a different style to the above) The time signatures in the above publications are several times the size of the traditional "within-staff" type, and in piano music there is only one to a system rather than one per staff. In chamber and orchestral music there may be one or two time signatures per section (woodwind, brass...), and some staves may have TSs of the traditional size if they are not covered by one of the large ones. Can this style be emulated in Lilypond? /Kim Bastin On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:18:35 +0200, Mats wrote: >Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? > >/Mats > >Kim Bastin wrote: >> Is there any way to get Lilypond to do the large time signatures found >> in many 20th century scores? >> >> Kim Bastin >> >> >> >> ___ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Cymbal instead of bass drum
Hi, While trying a few things with 2.0.3 that worked with 1.8, I discovered that, in the midi output, bassdrum or bd results in a cymbal being played; the same thing for the acoustic bass drum. Has anyone else experienced this and found a workaround? ...besides upgrading to the latest stable version, that is, which I plan to do eventually. -- Copyright (C) 2004 R.D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: an All Rights Reservedunnatural belief that we're above Nature & her www.rddavis.org 410-744-4900other creatures, using dogma to justify such Uncle Fester for President! beliefs and to justify much human cruelty. ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found
Thanks for your help. I succeeded in installing ghostscript and was able to
build a sample LilyPond file.
Unfortunately, now I am experiencing another problem. I wish to update some
old LilyPond files that I prepared with version 1.6.8. (They cannot even be
built as they stand because they violate the syntax of the latest version.)
I tried running
$ convert-ly -e -f=1.6.8 `find . -name '*.ly' -print`
and got the following error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/convert-ly", line 2199, in ?
from_version = str_to_tuple (a)
File "/usr/bin/convert-ly", line 91, in str_to_tuple
return tuple (map (string.atoi, string.split (s,'.')))
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/string.py", line 220, in atoi
return _int(s, base)
ValueError: invalid literal for int(): =1
The same thing happened when I tried running convert-ly with a single
file. I was, however, able to run it with no files (using such options
s -s and -h), so it does at least do something.
Any suggestions? Does this look like a problem with convert-ly or a
defect in my .ly files? or perhaps another problem with installation?
Again, this is with Lilypond 2.2.5 for Windows.
Scott Horne
> -Original Message-
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6 septembre 2004 06:01
> To: P Scott Horne
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found
>
>
> Just rerun setup.exe once more and make sure that the
> package ghostscript is selected (it should be by default
> if you install LilyPond, but sometimes it seems to fail).
>
> /Mats
>
> P Scott Horne wrote:
> > I have just installed the latest version of LilyPond for
> Windows from your
> > Web site. When I tried to run the test ('test.ly'), I got an
> error message:
> > "ps2pdf not found". How can I obtain and install this missing utility?
> >
> > For your reference, I have attached a copy of the log file.
> >
> > Thank you in advance for your assistance.
> >
> > Scott Horne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
> --
> =
> Mats Bengtsson
> Signal Processing
> Signals, Sensors and Systems
> Royal Institute of Technology
> SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
> Sweden
> Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
> Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
> =
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: grace plus repeat ending bug?
On Monday 06 September 2004 16.35, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
> [ Mac OS X 10.3.5; Lilypond 2.3.13 via Fink]
>
> Hello, all!
>
> Just wondering if this is a bug, or if I'm doing something wrong...
>
> NOTE: The "unexpected thing" only happens when the global stuff and the
> notes are split into two blocks; when the volta definition is in the
> same block as the grace notes, it works as advertised.
I guess it's the same grace problem as usual. My lily cvs is broken right now;
so I can't try this, but it should work:
>
>
> \version "2.3.12"
> #(set-global-staff-size 19)
>
> theNotes =
> \context Voice \relative c'
> {
> c4 c c c
> \grace { e16[^( d] } 1)
> \grace { a16[^( b] } 1)
> }
>
> globalStuff =
> {
> \repeat "volta" 2 { s4*4 }
Change
> \alternative { { s4*4 } { s4*4 } }
to
\alternative { {\grace s8 s4*4 } {\grace s8 s4*4} }
currently the grace notes sometimes count as starting before the beginning of
the measure, that's why you have to do this.
Erik
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
couple of questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I'm fairly new to lilypond, but I've got a couple of small problems. I've attached my .ly files so it's easier to describe them. In bar 69, where there's a trill on an E, I would like to have the "arco" markup below, but then it gets written on top of the 'p' dynamic marking. I would also like the natural sign, which at the moment is above the other markings, to be beside the trill marking, to indicate to trill on an f natural. Is this possible? Then, on bar 72, I would like to a slur which starts on the e in 72 and encompasses both the d sharp and e grace notes (ending on the e), but I can't figure out how to do this. Help much appreciated Thanks a lot, Philip Nelson -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBPEWFxIxNqC2kQ1MRAvuwAKCLkODWze3nZJgboLD79Gwcr7UFSgCdEcrc x4Abma+eRwUkMEAhp8GYylc= =sFoW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: possible [lilypond] mail subject field ?
Dave Phillips writes: > obviously nothing was done about it. Also, hitting Reply-to for LP > mail addresses the response to the sender, not to the > list. Grrr... ;) Then that's what the sender wants. If the sender wants followups only to the list, she uses the header Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Out of Office AutoReply: Thanks!
I am currently out of the office and will return on Tuesday Sept. 7th. I will respond to your e-mail when I return. Thanks Roger This e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much. ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: possible [lilypond] mail subject field ?
Dave Phillips writes:
> all of which include list identifiers, all except LilyPond.
The LilyPond lists are run with mailman, which includes the standard
List-Id: LilyPond user discussion
This procmail recipy catches all lists, except for majordomo en LISTSERV:
# Mailing lists
:0
* ^(List-Id|X-(Mailing-)?List):.*<\/[^>]*
{
:0:
* MATCH ?? ^\/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| rcvstore +indoos/$MATCH
}
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: possible [lilypond] mail subject field ?
Dave Phillips wrote: > Not to complain too bitterly, but I'm subscribed to more than two > dozen mail-lists, all of which include list identifiers, all except > LilyPond. Could you *please* add it to your mail service ?? My LP mail > is scattered through literally hundreds of messages per day, it would > be so much nicer to be able to let Mozilla organize them according to > the identifier. I know this has been asked before, but obviously > nothing was done about it. Hello Dave, I agree that a [lilypond] designator would be nice. However, you should be able to get Mozilla or Thunderbird to filter messages. My filter says "if To or CC contains lilypond, move to local folder . . . " HTH, Daniel -- Daniel Ashton PGP key available http://Daniel.AshtonFam.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ChamberMusicWeekend.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 9445142 http://ZephyrBrass.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
possible [lilypond] mail subject field ?
Hi guys: Not to complain too bitterly, but I'm subscribed to more than two dozen mail-lists, all of which include list identifiers, all except LilyPond. Could you *please* add it to your mail service ?? My LP mail is scattered through literally hundreds of messages per day, it would be so much nicer to be able to let Mozilla organize them according to the identifier. I know this has been asked before, but obviously nothing was done about it. Also, hitting Reply-to for LP mail addresses the response to the sender, not to the list. Grrr... ;) If LP list traffic were thinner I'd have no complaint, but it is a very active list and generates a considerable volume of mail per day. Best regards, dp ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
programming error
with lilypond 2.3.13 on mac os 10.3.5 i'm getting the following message: programming error: Improbable offset for translation: setting to zero Continuing; crossing fingers is it something i should pay attention to? is it something i've typed wrong in my lilypond file? the pdf still get made and looks ok to me. -sean ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: changing time signature
Jean-marc LEGRAND wrote:
Hi list, ands thanks again for your support !
My new problem is with time signature changes. Here's my .ly, with lily2.0.1 on XP :
\version "2.0.1"
\score {
\notes {
\time 2/2
{
a'1
a1
\once \property Score.timing = ##f
a\breve
\bar "||"
\time 3/4
a2.
a2.
\bar "|."
}
}
\paper {}
\header {}
}
The pb is that after the \breve and \bar "||", it seems that "automatic barnlining" is
off. I have
next 2 dotted half notes without barline between.
I'm not sure exactly how \once works in this context. I would
rather try to set and then reset the property explicitly:
\property Score.timing = ##f
a\breve
\bar "||"
\property Score.timing = ##t
\time 3/4
Another possibility is to fool LilyPond into thinking that the
a\breve only lasts for a bar by saying a\breve*1/2 The printout
will still be correct.
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
changing time signature
Hi list, ands thanks again for your support !
My new problem is with time signature changes. Here's my .ly, with lily2.0.1 on XP :
\version "2.0.1"
\score {
\notes {
\time 2/2
{
a'1
a1
\once \property Score.timing = ##f
a\breve
\bar "||"
\time 3/4
a2.
a2.
\bar "|."
}
}
\paper {}
\header {}
}
The pb is that after the \breve and \bar "||", it seems that "automatic barnlining" is
off. I have
next 2 dotted half notes without barline between.
How is this ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
grace plus repeat ending bug?
[ Mac OS X 10.3.5; Lilypond 2.3.13 via Fink]
Hello, all!
Just wondering if this is a bug, or if I'm doing something wrong...
NOTE: The "unexpected thing" only happens when the global stuff and the
notes are split into two blocks; when the volta definition is in the
same block as the grace notes, it works as advertised.
Thanks!
Kieren.
\version "2.3.12"
#(set-global-staff-size 19)
theNotes =
\context Voice \relative c'
{
c4 c c c
\grace { e16[^( d] } 1)
\grace { a16[^( b] } 1)
}
globalStuff =
{
\repeat "volta" 2 { s4*4 }
\alternative { { s4*4 } { s4*4 } }
}
\score
{
<< \theNotes \globalStuff >>
\paper
{
papersize = letter
raggedright = ##f
raggedbottom = ##t
pagenumber = no
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: problems upgrading input files from lilypond 1.6.6
It seems that the situations where convert-ly fails on your input
files is
- Where you put the slur end on another line than the following note:
ef4.( )
f!8
If instead you had written
ef4.(
) f!8
convert-ly would correctly have produced
ef4.(
f!8 )
As you can see, slur endings as well as all other kind of
annotations are now put after the note they refer to.
- Where you use the old text markup commands, like
^#'(columns((music "scripts-trill"))) or
^#'(columns((music "accidentals--1")))
(by the way, I don't understand why you used columns here)
You can read more about the new markup commands at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Text-markup.html
The two examples above can be replaced by
^\markup{ \musicglyph scripts-trill }
and
^\markup{ \flat }
respectively.
See also
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html
for a quick overview of what has changed.
/Mats
Jacob Smullyan wrote:
Hi --
I did a bit of work with lilypond 1.6.6 14 months ago and have an
unfinished composition typeset in it that I'd like to go back to. But
I no longer have lilypond 1.6.6 installed, and it doesn't build on my
Gentoo Linux system (alas, C++ compiler problems); and lilypond 2.2.4,
even when I run "convert-ly -f 1.6.6 -e " on my .ly files, fails on
them with numerous syntax errors.
The syntax seems to have changed a great deal in a single year, which
is no doubt is great for the project's future, but is rough on
occasional users like me. There isn't much documentation on how to
upgrade input files, either (but I'm not complaining -- I appreciate
all the energy that is going into the project). The result is that
I'm a bit lost, and I'd be very grateful for any pointers on what
particular kinds of changes I should be looking for.
The input files in question (in their 1.6.6 version) are viewable
here:
http://cvs.smullyan.org/viewcvs.cgi/trio/
They are quite short.
Thanks much,
Jacob Smullyan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Making a children's piano music book with LilyPond
Antti Kaihola wrote: Hi all LilyPond users and developers, I have a small music publishing company which has recently published its first piano music book for children. The book has 65 elementary piano pieces composed by a young Finnish composer-pianist. The pieces were engraved using Sibelius. We are now working on another set of pieces with three different composers. We aim to publish the new book in December. There will be about 40-50 small pieces (1-2 pages each). I'm doing the new pieces with both Sibelius and LilyPond at the same time, because I want to evaluate LilyPond's abilities and maturity for print quality publishing. So far my experience from LilyPond has been mostly positive, and its way of thinking suits me very well. I assume it would help developers and users if I post examples of erroneus or incomplete output to the mailing list(s)? It would help to see tricks and workaround from other users, and hopefully some of the cases would lead to bugfixes or new features. Great! In the best case we would be able to use LilyPond's output for the printed book, but in any case I'd be happy to do my part to help LilyPond mature towards that goal. Which list should I post my examples to? Use bug-lilypond for errors, lilypond-user for questions and general examples and lilypond-devel for feature requests and issues specific to the development version. /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond error: ps2pdf not found
Just rerun setup.exe once more and make sure that the
package ghostscript is selected (it should be by default
if you install LilyPond, but sometimes it seems to fail).
/Mats
P Scott Horne wrote:
I have just installed the latest version of LilyPond for Windows from your
Web site. When I tried to run the test ('test.ly'), I got an error message:
"ps2pdf not found". How can I obtain and install this missing utility?
For your reference, I have attached a copy of the log file.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Scott Horne
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midi2ly output question
It seems that the note durations in your MIDI file are not exact,
as is the case for any MIDI file that sounds somewhat musical, for
example. You probably want to round the note durations to something
that looks reasonable on paper, so try something like
midi2ly --duration-quant=16
or
midi2ly --duration-quant=32
or
midi2ly --duration-quant=16 --allow-tuplet=8*2/3
depending on what kind of music you have.
/Mats
R. D. Davis wrote:
Greetings,
When using midi2ly for the first time, I noticed some things about the
syntax that I didn't understand. Here are a few lines, for example:
trackBchannelA = \notes\relative c {
% [SEQUENCE_TRACK_NAME] Track 1
s4*3403/960 ais4*883/960 s4*358/960 gis4*474/960 s4*133/960 dis4*348/960
What is the * for? Also, what are the numbers which are separated by
a '/'?
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Making a children's piano music book with LilyPond
Hi all LilyPond users and developers,
I have a small music publishing company which has recently published its
first piano music book for children. The book has 65 elementary piano
pieces composed by a young Finnish composer-pianist. The pieces were
engraved using Sibelius.
We are now working on another set of pieces with three different
composers. We aim to publish the new book in December. There will be
about 40-50 small pieces (1-2 pages each).
I'm doing the new pieces with both Sibelius and LilyPond at the same
time, because I want to evaluate LilyPond's abilities and maturity for
print quality publishing.
So far my experience from LilyPond has been mostly positive, and its way
of thinking suits me very well.
I assume it would help developers and users if I post examples of
erroneus or incomplete output to the mailing list(s)? It would help to
see tricks and workaround from other users, and hopefully some of the
cases would lead to bugfixes or new features.
In the best case we would be able to use LilyPond's output for the
printed book, but in any case I'd be happy to do my part to help
LilyPond mature towards that goal.
Which list should I post my examples to?
My first problem with the current CVS version is that it won't produce
landscape A4 output like LilyPond 2.2. The same problem was reported[1]
on the lilypond-user mailing list in August. As soon as the problem is
resolved or a workaround found, I'll be able to use the CVS version, but
until then I must stick to 2.2.
Here's my \paper section which works perfectly in 2.2:
papernormal = \paper {
pagenumber = no
linewidth = 256 \mm
indent = 0 \mm
orientation = "landscape"
#(paper-set-staff-size 8)
}
Regards,
Antti Kaihola
Turku, Finland
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-
08/msg00214.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Sustain pedal improvement idea
Is there any standard notation for this or do you only have the MIDI output in mind? /Mats R. D. Davis wrote: Giving Lilypond's sustain pedal more thought, I was thinking about how it's either up or down, while there's more variability with a piano's sustain pedal; e.g., when the amount of sustain depends upon how far one depresses the pedal. Are there any plans to add a numeric value, such allowing the user to specify a value between between 1 and 100 to indicate how far the pedal is depressed when it's down? -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Large time signatures
Could you be more specific about what you have in mind? /Mats Kim Bastin wrote: Is there any way to get Lilypond to do the large time signatures found in many 20th century scores? Kim Bastin ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how do I move a boxed-molecule?
When you tried to set the padding property, what layout object did you set it on? Since you want to move a rehearsal mark, you have to set the property on the RehearsalMark object. Also, since the rehearsal marks are typeset at the score level, you have to set the property within the Score context (assuming you use version 2.2 or newer): \override Score.RehearsalMark #'padding = #4 I'm surprised that you didn't find anything in the mailing list archives, when I search for "padding rehearsal mark", I get a number of hits, even though most show the syntax of version 2.0 or older. Also, I hope you have read the section on "Changing defaults" in the manual. /Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am adding some rehearsal marks, boxed-molecules, but in one place it is colliding with the number above a multi-measure rest. I have a multi-measure rest at the beginning of a staff, and I want the rehearsal mark at the beginning of the multi-measure rest. I tried to use\set #'padding = #n but just results in broken code. I couldn't find any answer in the archives or on google. Regards, chip ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: dvi problem with jedit 4.2final
It says this: [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: Got font path: file: Libero Mureddu Il giorno 05/set/04, alle 22:08, Bertalan Fodor ha scritto: That means the fonts should be there but somehow jdvi can't find it. Please help us investigate it, because we couldn't test anything on Mac OS X and that can be the problem.: 1. select Utilities>BeanShell>Evaluate BeanShell expression... 2. Type: lilytool.LilyToolPlugin.getDVIFontPath(); Press OK. 3. select Utilities>Troubleshooting>Activity log and send us the last line of it saying Got Font Path: Thanks, Bert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I did, I forgot to say it in the mail, and I got, from the console, the following message: dvips -V -u /dev/null -o /dev/null -D 600 /Volumes/Documenti/Users/libero/Music/MUSICA/Lilypond/sestetto.dvi This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2004.09.05:1805' -> /dev/null . [1] LilyPond ready. But nothing has happened. And the "activity log panel, in the "activities->troubleshooting" menu, says that jedit cant find the fonts. ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Libero Mureddu Vanha Viertotie, 21 As. 415 00350 Helsinki - Finlandia Tel. +358-9-5808415 Mob. +358-41-7702668 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Via Abbiati, 4 20148 Milano - Italia Tel. +39-02-4075953 Mob. +39-339-8757587 ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lily4jedit question
I don't use linux, but I think the problem may be that somehow .bashrc is not run from the shell that runs jEdit Console commands. Try running lilypond -verbose %buffer from the console (changing from System to LilyPond) to find out if some path is not set. Perhaps you could run lilypond-profile before starting jEdit or from the jEdit Console. Bert J. Scott Amort wrote: Thanks for the response, On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 21:59 +0200, Bertalan Fodor wrote: What OS do you use? linux (gentoo). Best, Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
