Re: position whole measure rest
Op woensdag 9 januari 2008, schreef Wilbert Berendsen:
Hello, I know that I can position a rest vertically using e.g. d'1\rest .
But how can I alter the vertical position of a whole-measure rest (R1)? I
want it to move outside the staff, so it should also get a ledger line.
\relative c'
{ e2 e4 a } \\
{ R1 }
The R1 is drawn too close to the notes.
Two people replied with
\once \override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7
it works! Thanks!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
-- Mahatma Gandi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: position whole measure rest
this also occurs if you \include individual parts into a short-score
in this scenario either the note-name-rest or the staff-position-
tweak would not work as it would give an incorrect rest placement in
the part concerned
any clues?
cheers
d
On 9 Jan 2008, at 12:41, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Op woensdag 9 januari 2008, schreef Wilbert Berendsen:
Hello, I know that I can position a rest vertically using e.g. d'1
\rest .
But how can I alter the vertical position of a whole-measure rest
(R1)? I
want it to move outside the staff, so it should also get a ledger
line.
\relative c'
{ e2 e4 a } \\
{ R1 }
The R1 is drawn too close to the notes.
Two people replied with
\once \override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7
it works! Thanks!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
-- Mahatma Gandi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: position whole measure rest
Damian Legassick wrote:
this also occurs if you \include individual parts into a short-score
in this scenario either the note-name-rest or the staff-position-tweak
would not work as it would give an incorrect rest placement in the
part concerned
How do you include the individual parts into the short score?
From your question, I guess that you use the ... \\ ... feature.
In that case, the solution is exactly the same:
replace
\partI \\ \partII
by
\partI \\ {\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7 \partII }
(you may want a similar setting in the upper part as well).
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweaking confusion
Reilly wrote:
Borrowing heavily from the LSR and the archive, I created a Tempo Mark
I could use in my scores. The trick was to make an initial tempo mark
(Allegro con moto with a metronome mark) print left justified with the
time signature. I succeeded with the following code:
tempoOne = {
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol =
#'time-signature
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
\mark \markup{ \bold Allegro con moto { \smaller { \note
#4 #1 = 112 } } }
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'transparent = ##t
\tempo 4 = 112
}
There was one problem, however. Although I specified self-alignment
left justified, the tempo mark was NOT left justified. I was able to
tweak it into a left justified position by adding:
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'X-offset = #7
Strange! When I try your definition above, it certainly gives left
alignment.
So far, so good.
However, the tempo mark was too high above the staff. So I tried to
move it lower with the following code:
Better: try to figure out why it is too high! If you try to comment out
the line
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'transparent = ##t
you will notice that it's the (invisible) normal metronome mark that pushes
your markup upwards. This is a general feature of setting
#'transparent = ##t
on some object, namely that it is just made transparent but that the
layout is still
done as if the object was printed. To completely remove the object so
that it doesn't
affect the spacing of other things, you should instead do
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'stencil = ##f
So, I did some more research and discovered the following code:
(a)\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols =
#' ( time-signature )
which is ever so slightly different from my code line
(b)\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol =
#'time-signature
(Note especially the 's' on the end of symbols.) Why two slightly
different code? Is one more correct than the other? Or are they
different code?
This is something that has changed from version 2.10 to version 2.11.
The property break-align-symbol is for version 2.10 whereas
break-align-symbols
is for version 2.11. In general, if you pick up a solution from LSR or
the mailing
list archives or whatever, please always try to figure out what LilyPond
version
it was written for and then use the convert-ly utility to automatically
upgrade
the code to your current LilyPond version. This would automatically have
handled this specific incompatibility, for example.
Code (a) actually worked great and left justified the tempo mark
without using the X-offset =#7.
But, I still cannot lower the tempo mark.
Although I was able to left justify the tempo mark with code (a), in
the manual I read that I should use the following code:
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature
#'break-align-anchor-alignment = #LEFT
I thought this simple (ahem, ahem) tweak, would be a good
illustration of precisely how baffled I am by Lilypond code. I really
don't know what I am doing and batter my music into the right form by
dint of research and lots of trial and error. I don't want to do it
this way.
In one of the model snippets for a tempo mark, the author included the
following line of code:
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t
Again, that's outdated if you use version 2.11. Ufortunately, this is
one aspect
that convert-ly does not take care of, since so few users have used this
specific
property.
3. Why can I left justify with Score.RehearsalMark
#'break-align-symbol while the manual suggests that I use
Staff.TimeSignature #'break-align-anchor-alignment?
If you have set the alignment of the markup to be left aligned, the
break-align-anchor-alignment is used to specify if the left edge of the
markup
should be aligned with the left edge, center or right edge of the time
signature
(which is why this property is set on the TimeSignature object).
If you carefully read the manual again, you'll notice that this is
exactly what it says.
If you have any proposal on how to reformulate the instructions to make
this point
even clearer, please see Small Additions at
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/documentation-adding
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: position whole measure rest
thanks mats
the problem i was thinking of is when you've done all the parts in
their own files with their own formatting.
to compile the score (with different formatting) i would have
somewhere in score.ly (e.g.) \include fluteOne.ly and within
fluteOne.ly i would have \fluteOneMusic.
the question is how to get the rests in \fluteOneMusic to be
'correct' in fluteOne.ly and 'offset' in score.ly if in the score i
wish to have \fluteOne and fluteTwo sharing the same staff.
an additional problem is that the value for MultiMeasureRest #'staff-
position will most likely not stay fixed throughout
d
On 9 Jan 2008, at 13:00, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Damian Legassick wrote:
this also occurs if you \include individual parts into a short-score
in this scenario either the note-name-rest or the staff-position-
tweak would not work as it would give an incorrect rest placement
in the part concerned
How do you include the individual parts into the short score?
From your question, I guess that you use the ... \\ ... feature.
In that case, the solution is exactly the same:
replace
\partI \\ \partII
by
\partI \\ {\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7
\partII }
(you may want a similar setting in the upper part as well).
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweaking confusion
Hi,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This is something that has changed from version 2.10 to version 2.11.
The property break-align-symbol is for version 2.10 whereas
break-align-symbols is for version 2.11.
I've been wondering the purpose of the list symbols for break-align-symbols.
It seems that I'm not able to create a tempo mark tweak which would align
things on a key-signature and if that's missing to a time-signature. If I
give #'(time-signature key-signature) the mark is always aligned to a
time-signature. If I turn them around the mark is aligned to a key-signature
when it exits. If not, it is aligned to the bar line on the left. The
program reference says: If the grob selected by the first symbol in the
list is invisible due to break-visibility, we will align to the next grob
(and so on). When does this invisibility occur?
Anyways, I created a scheme / tweak / whatnot that accepts a second
parameter – a list of symbols. Now I can align them as I please. :-)
-Risto
SNIP %%
\version 2.11.35
tempoMarkAlign = #(define-music-function (parser location markp align)
(string? list?)
#{
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #left
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'extra-spacing-width = #'(+inf.0 .
-inf.0)
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = $align
\mark \markup { \bold \smaller \smaller $markp }
#})
{
\key d \major
\tempoMarkAlign #Senza denti #'(key-signature)
d'2 d' |
}
% END %
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tweaking-confusion-tp14703901p14712400.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: position whole measure rest
Damian Legassick wrote:
thanks mats
the problem i was thinking of is when you've done all the parts in
their own files with their own formatting.
to compile the score (with different formatting) i would have
somewhere in score.ly (e.g.) \include fluteOne.ly and within
fluteOne.ly i would have \fluteOneMusic.
the question is how to get the rests in \fluteOneMusic to be 'correct'
in fluteOne.ly and 'offset' in score.ly if in the score i wish to have
\fluteOne and fluteTwo sharing the same staff.
That's exactly the question I tried to answer below, just replace \partI by
\fluteOne and \partII by \fluteTwo, i.e.
\new Staff
{\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#+7 \fluteOne } \\
{\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7 \fluteTwo }
(By the way, the default settings for this property in the upper and
lower voices
is +4 and -4).
an additional problem is that the value for MultiMeasureRest
#'staff-position will most likely not stay fixed throughout
Yes, that's another issue. Preferably, the collision detection
algorithms in LilyPond
should handle this problem automatically, as it attempts to do for
normal rests,
however as far as I know there's no collision detection implemented for
full measure
rests yet. One possible solution is to use the \tag command, see
Different editions
from the same source in the manual.
/Mats
d
On 9 Jan 2008, at 13:00, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Damian Legassick wrote:
this also occurs if you \include individual parts into a short-score
in this scenario either the note-name-rest or the
staff-position-tweak would not work as it would give an incorrect
rest placement in the part concerned
How do you include the individual parts into the short score?
From your question, I guess that you use the ... \\ ... feature.
In that case, the solution is exactly the same:
replace
\partI \\ \partII
by
\partI \\ {\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7
\partII }
(you may want a similar setting in the upper part as well).
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Alignment bug. Was: Tweaking confusion
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Dear Mats and all,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Perhaps you forgot to do the setting at the Score level?
Nope. If I try your example in c major then the first A is thrown to the
left.
This seems like a bug and I cannot see it in the bug tracker. The
following example
illustrates the bug. Since there is no key signature when you are in C
major, the
first mark A should be aligned on the time signature, which it isn't.
\version 2.11.36
\relative c''{
\key c \major
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #' (
key-signature time-signature )
\mark A e1 | \time 2/2 \mark B | e |\break
\key d \major
\mark C e1 | \time 2/2 \mark D | e |
}
\layout{ragged-right = ##t }
Thanks for pointing this out!
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweaking confusion
Dear Mats and all,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Perhaps you forgot to do the setting at the Score level?
Nope. If I try your example in c major then the first A is thrown to the
left.
Was there a bug related to this issue. Has it been fixed?
-Risto
SNIP
\version 2.11.36
\relative c''{
\key c \major
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #' (
key-signature time-signature )
\mark A a g fis e | \time 2/2 \mark A | d e fis g |
}
\layout{ragged-right = ##t }
% END %
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tweaking-confusion-tp14703901p14713228.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweaking confusion
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Hi,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This is something that has changed from version 2.10 to version 2.11.
The property break-align-symbol is for version 2.10 whereas
break-align-symbols is for version 2.11.
I've been wondering the purpose of the list symbols for break-align-symbols.
It seems that I'm not able to create a tempo mark tweak which would align
things on a key-signature and if that's missing to a time-signature.
You mean like
\version 2.11.36
\relative c''{
\key d \major
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #' (
key-signature time-signature )
\mark A a g fis e | \time 2/2 \mark A | d e fis g |
}
\layout{ragged-right = ##t }
Perhaps you forgot to do the setting at the Score level?
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: You can support software freedom in 2008!
Does this kind of FSF spam really belong to the lilypond-user mailing list (and to the lilypond-devel list, where it appeared too)? Yes. I don't think so. Indeed, I consider sending campaigns to mailing lists without the mailinglist address at least in the to: or cc: headers as offensive spam. Ooh, you already knew the answer. Glad you spammed the lot of us with your opinion though. Immanuel -- Get a free email account with anti spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/2 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Alignment bug. Was: Tweaking confusion
2008/1/9, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This seems like a bug and I cannot see it in the bug tracker. You can now :) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=553 Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Leaving: I can't help
Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Graham, Okay, the guilt and peer pressure has finally overwhelmed my better judgement! ;-) Ooo-kay; me too. Between work, two small kids and a choir I can't promise to deliver by any set deadline, but I can probably re-read and revise some text and examples. I don't know how to play any instrument, but I do sing and I've typeset around 100 choral pieces so far. I'm not a native english speaker, but I've never let that stop me. Oh, and I personally find the existing Lilypond documentation very good, at least compared to other documentation out there. Send me (or point me to), one at a time, the section(s) you want me to review/rewrite. I'll do what I can, and when I'm done a section, point me to the next. That sounds like it could work for me, too. Cheers, -- Arvid ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Leaving: I can't help
On 09 Jan 2008 17:02:33 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arvid Gr__tting) wrote: Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Send me (or point me to), one at a time, the section(s) you want me to review/rewrite. I'll do what I can, and when I'm done a section, point me to the next. That sounds like it could work for me, too. Great, have a look at NR 1.1 Pitches, then. No .texinfo required; just read the docs (HTML or PDF is fine) and send emails with comments. The more specific the better. (I want everybody to start off with Pitches; after that, we'll branch out more) Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: position whole measure rest
\tag, yes
thanks mats
d
On 9 Jan 2008, at 14:22, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Damian Legassick wrote:
thanks mats
the problem i was thinking of is when you've done all the parts in
their own files with their own formatting.
to compile the score (with different formatting) i would have
somewhere in score.ly (e.g.) \include fluteOne.ly and within
fluteOne.ly i would have \fluteOneMusic.
the question is how to get the rests in \fluteOneMusic to be
'correct' in fluteOne.ly and 'offset' in score.ly if in the score
i wish to have \fluteOne and fluteTwo sharing the same staff.
That's exactly the question I tried to answer below, just replace
\partI by
\fluteOne and \partII by \fluteTwo, i.e.
\new Staff
{\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#+7 \fluteOne } \\
{\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7 \fluteTwo }
(By the way, the default settings for this property in the upper
and lower voices
is +4 and -4).
an additional problem is that the value for MultiMeasureRest
#'staff-position will most likely not stay fixed throughout
Yes, that's another issue. Preferably, the collision detection
algorithms in LilyPond
should handle this problem automatically, as it attempts to do for
normal rests,
however as far as I know there's no collision detection implemented
for full measure
rests yet. One possible solution is to use the \tag command, see
Different editions
from the same source in the manual.
/Mats
d
On 9 Jan 2008, at 13:00, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Damian Legassick wrote:
this also occurs if you \include individual parts into a short-
score
in this scenario either the note-name-rest or the staff-position-
tweak would not work as it would give an incorrect rest
placement in the part concerned
How do you include the individual parts into the short score?
From your question, I guess that you use the ... \\ ...
feature.
In that case, the solution is exactly the same:
replace
\partI \\ \partII
by
\partI \\ {\override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position =#-7
\partII }
(you may want a similar setting in the upper part as well).
/Mats
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
double repeat voltas
hello:
I have a repeat, then a first and second ending repeat which looks like this:
|: [music a ] :||: [music b] | [ 1st ending ] :| [ 2nd ending :||
Eventually it will be a part of a piece structured this way:
| {music A section } | {music B section consisting of |: [music a ]
:||: [music b] | [ 1st ending ] :| [ 2nd ending :|| {music A section
} ||
Each one of these sections have \partial measures. I thought it would
be exactly like one of the examples in the documentation, however I
have the following problems:
on rendering I get unknown type Volta see documentation (of course
that's where i copied the code from!)
As well there is an extra barline inside the second ending.
Before i post some code which may be problematic (perhaps), I want to
rule out some sort of generic mistake I may have made.
Cheers,
David
P.S. The new documentation which is appearing with each new
development version is VERY helpful! Thanks to everyone who is helping
with this. I'd really be lost or even more lost than I feel now
without its vastly improved state.
--
David Fedoruk
B.Mus. UBC,1986
Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003
http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com
Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough
for music Sergei Rachmaninov
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: double repeat voltas
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:12:15 -0800 David Fedoruk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on rendering I get unknown type Volta see documentation (of course that's where i copied the code from!) IIRC volta is not capitalized. Or maybe it is, and you didn't. In either case, check it. - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Latest Lilypond versions on Ubuntu?
Hi! Where can I find information about how to install the latest Lilypond versions on my Ubuntu machine? No problem with the .deb versions I've found, but they're a bit dated... Regards / Jonas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Latest Lilypond versions on Ubuntu?
Cambiata wrote: No problem with the .deb versions I've found, but they're a bit dated... I have been through this during the last couple of weeks! To be fair, LilyPond wasn't a problem, but jEdit and LilyPondTool caused several headaches. For LilyPond, uninstall the repository .deb(s) (lilypond/emacs files/documentation) and then use the installer script from lilypond.org/web/install/. Install as root sudo sh ./lilypond-2.11.37-1.linux-x86.sh, which will put it in /usr/local/lilypond/ and a link in /usr/local/bin. For CLI use, that's all. If you want to use jEdit and LilyPondTool, jedit-4.3-pre11 is the latest version that works with Linux (then with some limitations). -- Nick. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Latest-Lilypond-versions-on-Ubuntu--tp14719807p14720344.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: volunteering and other questions
Le 9 janv. 08 à 00:37, Valentin Villenave a écrit : 2008/1/7, Tim Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 4. What is a .ily file? It is basically, as far as I can understand, a programmer's use: you can't give the same extension to a file that is meant to be compiled as is, than to another file that is only meant to be included in another. (actually, you perfectly can, but it's just inelegant I guess) So Nicolas has this very elegant solution, that is to name all his files something.ily, then include them all in a master file, and only give the .ly extension to the master file that has to be compiled. I assume the i in ily stands fot inclusion or whatever. It seems that there is no widespread convention or consensus regarding extension of LilyPond files that are not compilable, but should be included in other files. See for instance this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2003-09/msg00025.html I chosed to use .ily for my scores because of the analogy with .texi/.itexi, .tely/.itely, etc. And I seem to recall that .ily has been used for some files in the LilyPond distribution. [...searching...] Actually that's still the case: ./input/manual/engraver-example.ily ./input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn3-allegro.ily ./input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn3-defs.ily ./input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn3-romanze.ily ./input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn3-rondo.ily ./input/regression/allfontstyle.ily nicolas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: working with two different lilypond versions
Thanks but I found another way to still use portage, I emerge the first version, on slot one, and then move the files from /usr/bin to another directory like /usr/bin/lilypond-x.y.z/ ;emerge the second version on another slot move files to another directory and then just use symblolic links to choose the version I want to use. thanks even though Regards Matth -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/working-with-two-different-lilypond-versions-tp14638744p14720467.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Latest Lilypond versions on Ubuntu?
Jonas Nyström wrote: Hi! Where can I find information about how to install the latest Lilypond versions on my Ubuntu machine? No problem with the .deb versions I've found, but they're a bit dated... This has changed recently. 2.10.33 is available for Debian sid by apt-get. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Parallel music
Hi,
I've small problem:
I write Score for piano and I use parallelMusic. I've two voices in
right hand. In second bar Voice two (RightB) divides to two voices
again. But... lilypond joins voice RightA with upper part of voice
RightB. In this position is generated one stem only. I need three
separate voices in this position:
1. a'4.
2. g'4
3. a8 h
Can somebody help me?
Zbynek
\version 2.10.33
\include deutsch.ly
music = {
\time 3/4
\parallelMusic #'(RightA RightB Left) {
d''4.( e''8 d''4) |
d' fis' a'4 d' fis' a' d' g' |
d, d4 c, c h,, h, |
c''8( h') a'4.( g'8) |
e' g'4 g' \\ {a8 h} c' d' fis'4 |
c, c4 d, d d,, d, |
}
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\music
\new Staff
\key g \major
\RightA \\
\RightB
\new Staff {
\key g \major
\clef bass
\Left
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Latest Lilypond versions on Ubuntu?
On 09/01/2008, Jonas Nyström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Where can I find information about how to install the latest Lilypond versions on my Ubuntu machine? I use Lilypond on Ubuntu and I just user the installer from lilypond.org. Get the latest from here: http://lilypond.org/web/install/ and then in a console, $ chmod +x lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x86.sh $ sudo ./lilypond-2.10.33-1.linux-x86.sh If you already have another version installed, it will give you instructions for uninstalling it first. No problem with the .deb versions I've found, but they're a bit dated... Dated, but not as dated as I thought. I have just checked and apparently, version 2.10.25 is available for Feisty - only 8 minor versions old! Last time I checked (Edgy, 2 versions older than Feisty) it was still 2.6, which I wouldn't have considered touching even when Edgy was released. My guess is that a Lilypond fan has recently joined the Ubuntu development team. Regards, Joe ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Parallel music
Have a look at the 2.11 development branch Learning Manual
at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-le
arning/index , in particular Section 3.2 Voices contain
music. You will find the answer there. Although this
documentation is for release 2.11 it applies equally well to
release 2.10 in this respect.
(Actually, it seems the images are broken in this document
at the moment. Try instead
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond-l
earning/index.html , which is a slightly later version of
the same manual.)
Trevor D
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zbyněk Burget
Sent: 09 January 2008 22:16
To: Lilypond
Subject: Parallel music
Hi,
I've small problem:
I write Score for piano and I use parallelMusic.
I've two voices in
right hand. In second bar Voice two (RightB)
divides to two voices
again. But... lilypond joins voice RightA with
upper part of voice
RightB. In this position is generated one stem
only. I need three
separate voices in this position:
1. a'4.
2. g'4
3. a8 h
Can somebody help me?
Zbynek
\version 2.10.33
\include deutsch.ly
music = {
\time 3/4
\parallelMusic #'(RightA RightB Left) {
d''4.( e''8 d''4) |
d' fis' a'4 d' fis' a' d' g' |
d, d4 c, c h,, h, |
c''8( h') a'4.( g'8) |
e' g'4 g' \\ {a8 h} c' d' fis'4 |
c, c4 d, d d,, d, |
}
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\music
\new Staff
\key g \major
\RightA \\
\RightB
\new Staff {
\key g \major
\clef bass
\Left
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
collision, is there a workaround?
Dear all,
in the third bar on the first beat is a collision in the upper voice
(between the rest and the bis).
Is this is known issue? Does this have to do with the usage of
\partcombine? Is there a workaround?
thanks for help
best
ole
%
\version 2.11.36
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
testfile = \new Staff {
\set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
\time 6/4
\clef G_8
\partcombine
\relative c' {
R1.|
r2
\times 2/3 { r8 gis'4( } cis,4) r2 |
\times 2/3 { r8 bis'4( } gis4~ gis fis ~ fis) r4 |
}
\relative c' {
R1.| r2 r2 r4 b~( | b~ \times 2/3 { b8 cis4~ } cis4 cis e!) r |
} }
\score {
\testfile
}
%
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: double repeat voltas
You are right -- it is not capitalized, there are two instances, one is capitalized and one isn't. This takes care of the error message but not the problem with the added bar line inside the last repeat. David IIRC volta is not capitalized. Or maybe it is, and you didn't. In either case, check it. - Graham -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 http://recordjackethistorian.wordpress.com Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
guitar fingering 'a' \RH doesn't seem to work
I have tried to use note-digit e'16-a that won't work log gives me unexpected notename pitch. Tried from the manual e'16-\rightHandFinger #4 and that did nothing no 'a' version 2.10.25 Yours- Jay Jay Hamilton www.soundand.com 206-328-7694 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitar fingering 'a' \RH doesn't seem to work
2008/1/9, Jay Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have tried to use note-digit e'16-a that won't work log gives me unexpected notename pitch. Tried from the manual e'16-\rightHandFinger #4 enclose the note in : e'-\rightHandFinger #a16 and that did nothing no 'a' version 2.10.25 Yours- Jay Jay Hamilton www.soundand.com 206-328-7694 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Daniel Tonda C. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
