Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10
Can I second that, re mac ports? The only way Frescobaldi seems to work on Mac OS X is to use the mac ports versions of the dependencies. Downloading them all individually and building them - I just can't make that approach work. Try from mac ports: http://www.macports.org/ Andrew On 13/05/13 12:24 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: Struggling through with installing this on a Mac, how the heck does one get Poppler to work? Jeez, after installing nearly a GB of dependencies, everything seems to work but Popple ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10
Op Sun, 12 May 2013 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT) SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com schreef: Any thoughts on how (if at all possible) I could get icons in place of the menu text on Ubuntu/Linux? (i.e. Save, Open, etc) Uncheck Edit-Prefs-General-Use system icons? -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Centered Rests (= in the middle of the staff) in a multi-voice staff, without using note\rest
-Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes: there is \override Voice.Rest #'staff-position = #0 Thanks a LOT! this makes me save hours from now! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
On 2013-05-13 07:44, Sarah k Alawami wrote: Hello to the list. I notice that some of my grace notes are also causing the bar check errors Just a reminder: Grace notes are musical ornaments, printed in a smaller font, that take up no additional logical time in a measure. // Anders -- English isn't my first language. So any error or strangeness is due to the translation. Please correct my English so that I may become better. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
lo. I know this. but when I rewrite the measure to include what would have been equivalent, that is what I wanted them to play no bar check errors. at least not for the grace notes. Maybe it's operator error but as of now since I'm reaching the dead line I cannot change the score. On May 13, 2013, at 2:03 AM, and...@andis59.se wrote: On 2013-05-13 07:44, Sarah k Alawami wrote: Hello to the list. I notice that some of my grace notes are also causing the bar check errors Just a reminder: Grace notes are musical ornaments, printed in a smaller font, that take up no additional logical time in a measure. // Anders -- English isn't my first language. So any error or strangeness is due to the translation. Please correct my English so that I may become better. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fatal bug in strftime?
Phil, I've done this now. Thanks for the link - I'm new to Lilypond and didn't know the bug reporting protocol. Best regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com www.ptoye.com - Sunday, May 12, 2013, 4:22:55 PM, you wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Toye lilyp...@ptoye.com To: lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 2:38 PM Subject: Re: Fatal bug in strftime? The first step would be to report it as a bug: http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html -- Phil Holmes___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Rookie transpose / bookpart questions
Maybe this could help too?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=266
best
ole
Am 12.05.2013 um 23:55 schrieb Nathan:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
I'm creating some jazz charts that require a transposed lead
sheet for a Bb or Eb instrument. I haven't messed with \bookpart
much before. [...]
Try adding this to the score block:
\score {
% ...
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists Pitch_squash_engraver
}
}
}
When typesetting slash notation, I use this snippet:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=332. You don't have to worry about
transposition because the slashes are really rests. (Also, it doesn't add
weird notes to the MIDI output.)
Regards,
Nathan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Grace note displayed exactly on beat (and not before)
Thanks a lot! It works like a charm! Cheers, Ádám On 2013.05.13., at 6:36, Keith OHara wrote: Keith OHara k-ohara5a5a at oco.net writes: I could not quickly figure out how to apply all the 'graceSettings to the normal voice, but there is probably a way to do so and maybe we should make a short command \graceSettings for that. Some less-ugly version of graceSettings = \applyContext # (lambda (context) (map (lambda (x) (ly:context-pushpop-property context (cadr x) (caddr x) (cadddr x))) (ly:context-property context 'graceSettings )) and then we still need the bit with Flag #'stroke-style =#grace when we want the stroke through the grace notes This same method is useful when we want to let grace notes overlap earlier notes in another voice. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10
on 2013-05-12 at 21:49 Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Frescobaldi 2.0.10 is out, i'm glad to report that it compiled without problems and is running fine here on gentoo linux. thank you for developing frescobaldi, and congratulations for the new release. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
Hi Sarah, You sure have come a long way, but I think it is already a nice result. What I see: - line 17: the opening bracket is still before the \relative instead of after. That causes a problem that the musical expression seen by the \relative is only the next statement, that is the \key g \major. After that LilyPond will interpret the notes for the flute as absolute. But be carefull in changing it, because there are some octave jumps and by adding these up LilyPond can let the notes runaway. - line 68: the jump from g'' to b''' is impossible, it arrives here because it starts at \relative c'', goes to the d, to the g (all without quotes) and then the b' is interpreyed as b''. This is a typical example of LilyPond running away in the height because all the quotes add up. My guess is that the quote after the b is wrong and you want this b in the same range. Remove and check if this is what you want. This happens also at some other places, for example on line 70 where it goes to the next octave because the higher d is closer then the lower one. This is how \relative works: the last note specified was an a, the next is a d without quote or comma so it fetches the d closest by. But my guess is you don't want that high d but one octave lower. You'll get that one by specifying d, (the note followed by a comma). - line 26: the notes do not match up to 12/8, LilyPond complains on the barcheck. Reading the discussion on the \grace note, I'm wondering if you want a grace note here or that note is just part of the regular music the \grace command acts on the next expression, in this case the gis and it does NOT count it for the whole measure, so now you have 11/8. Either the \grace should be out or another /8 should be in somewhere. I cannot decide for you. - line 187: next barcheck problem: same problem with 1/8 missing (or a stray \grace) - several places: you specify different size of the repeats, for example in the flute part you a \repeat on line 20 spanning a significant piece of the music (it ends in line 43), but in the clarinet part you start a repeat on line 65 ending in the midlle of line 67. This piece is much smaller. LilyPond will insert several repeat marks and propagate these when possible to the other parts as well. It makes the result a little bit messy. Because it is a small piece and I think you only want the repeats to avoid typing too much notes, you can think of taking out the ones you don't need. Like line 67 already show the d4. and r4. twice, the repeat is too much. - line 125: the bassoon normally uses a bass-clef, insert it here after the global! - line 61: here you \transpose the clarinet music, but you do it wrong! It should be \transpose bes c' because that is how the clarinet is written. But in line 429 you do it again which cancels out the first action. Plus you also mention \transposition in line 427. My advise: remove the \transpose in line 61, also remove the \transposition in line 427 and leave 429. Because your piece is written in concert pitch g major, it should now for the clarinet part show a major. - line 176: same problem for the horn: remove it and also the \transpose in line 441. Good luck and have a good performance! Regards, Wim. On 13 May 2013, at 07:44 , Sarah k Alawami wrote: Hello to the list. I notice that some of my grace notes are also causing the bar check errors but most of them I think are happening at the end dog repeats where there's an incomplete measure as it was filling time so you can go back and repeat the anicrusis. Over all thats all I'm noting, that and the wrong octaves that I'm still not sure how to fix. sometimes I hate perfect pitch, like today. Attached is the .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Oboe advise needed - woodwind diagrams
Hi,
I am looking at some of the woodwind diagrams, redesigning the
clarinet part and if possible trying to judge on correctness of the
others.
In the Oboe diagram I see a left-hand key labeled F, but it is placed
a little bit strange on top of the others. Comparing with pictures on
the Internet doesn't help me that much. As I am not a hoboist, can
somebody who is take a look at this. I generated diagrams with (also
attached):
\version 2.16.0
% informational output to the default log-file:
#(print-keys 'oboe)
\score {
\relative c' {
\textLengthOn
c^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe - all keys
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'()
} }
s s
f^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe lh f-key
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'((cc .
())
(lh . (f))
(rh . (banana)))
} }
}
}
Also a right-hand banana key is shown. Is that correct? and if so,
is that the name of that key?
Any Obo-player who can guide me?
Regards,
Wim.
Oboe-f-question.ly
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Oboe advise needed - woodwind diagrams
I don't see an attached diagram? Many oboes do have a LH F, which is a
little knobbly one sort of on top of the others. If I could see it, I'll
take a look.
Since your email is continental, I assume you're looking for Conservatoire
key system. I can help with that.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at some of the woodwind diagrams, redesigning the clarinet
part and if possible trying to judge on correctness of the others.
In the Oboe diagram I see a left-hand key labeled F, but it is placed a
little bit strange on top of the others. Comparing with pictures on the
Internet doesn't help me that much. As I am not a hoboist, can somebody who
is take a look at this. I generated diagrams with (also attached):
\version 2.16.0
% informational output to the default log-file:
#(print-keys 'oboe)
\score {
\relative c' {
\textLengthOn
c^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe - all keys
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'()
} }
s s
f^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe lh f-key
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'((cc . ())
(lh . (f))
(rh .
(banana)))
} }
}
}
Also a right-hand banana key is shown. Is that correct? and if so, is
that the name of that key?
Any Obo-player who can guide me?
Regards,
Wim.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fatal bug in strftime?
Hi Peter,
When I try to use the %e format to get rid of leading zeros in the date,
lilypond crashes out.
As a workaround, you could just use %d and check for a leading zero,
replacing it with a space. Something like this:
\header {
title = title
composer = no-one
tagline = \markup {
Engraved
\simple #(let ((date (strftime %d/%m/%Y (localtime (current-time)
(if (string-prefix? 0 date)
(string-append (string-drop date 1))
date))
with \with-url #http://lilypond.org/;
\line { LilyPond \simple #(lilypond-version) (http://lilypond.org/) }
}
}
{ c d e f }
Modifications would have to be made if you want the day in other than the
leading position.
Anyway, hope this helps.
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
Thanks. I was going off of the templet on the site. The whole song with out repeats is 23 measures long, with repeats it's double that I think. I'm not performing this Here is a recording of the harpsichord part I was to orchestrate.. It jumps all over the place and I'm not aloud to change the line of the melody. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1672188/lessons%20in%20harpsichord%20orchestra%20assignment%20in%20g%20major.mp3 Take care. On May 13, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote: Hi Sarah, You sure have come a long way, but I think it is already a nice result. What I see: - line 17: the opening bracket is still before the \relative instead of after. That causes a problem that the musical expression seen by the \relative is only the next statement, that is the \key g \major. After that LilyPond will interpret the notes for the flute as absolute. But be carefull in changing it, because there are some octave jumps and by adding these up LilyPond can let the notes runaway. - line 68: the jump from g'' to b''' is impossible, it arrives here because it starts at \relative c'', goes to the d, to the g (all without quotes) and then the b' is interpreyed as b''. This is a typical example of LilyPond running away in the height because all the quotes add up. My guess is that the quote after the b is wrong and you want this b in the same range. Remove and check if this is what you want. This happens also at some other places, for example on line 70 where it goes to the next octave because the higher d is closer then the lower one. This is how \relative works: the last note specified was an a, the next is a d without quote or comma so it fetches the d closest by. But my guess is you don't want that high d but one octave lower. You'll get that one by specifying d, (the note followed by a comma). - line 26: the notes do not match up to 12/8, LilyPond complains on the barcheck. Reading the discussion on the \grace note, I'm wondering if you want a grace note here or that note is just part of the regular music the \grace command acts on the next expression, in this case the gis and it does NOT count it for the whole measure, so now you have 11/8. Either the \grace should be out or another /8 should be in somewhere. I cannot decide for you. - line 187: next barcheck problem: same problem with 1/8 missing (or a stray \grace) - several places: you specify different size of the repeats, for example in the flute part you a \repeat on line 20 spanning a significant piece of the music (it ends in line 43), but in the clarinet part you start a repeat on line 65 ending in the midlle of line 67. This piece is much smaller. LilyPond will insert several repeat marks and propagate these when possible to the other parts as well. It makes the result a little bit messy. Because it is a small piece and I think you only want the repeats to avoid typing too much notes, you can think of taking out the ones you don't need. Like line 67 already show the d4. and r4. twice, the repeat is too much. - line 125: the bassoon normally uses a bass-clef, insert it here after the global! - line 61: here you \transpose the clarinet music, but you do it wrong! It should be \transpose bes c' because that is how the clarinet is written. But in line 429 you do it again which cancels out the first action. Plus you also mention \transposition in line 427. My advise: remove the \transpose in line 61, also remove the \transposition in line 427 and leave 429. Because your piece is written in concert pitch g major, it should now for the clarinet part show a major. - line 176: same problem for the horn: remove it and also the \transpose in line 441. Good luck and have a good performance! Regards, Wim. On 13 May 2013, at 07:44 , Sarah k Alawami wrote: Hello to the list. I notice that some of my grace notes are also causing the bar check errors but most of them I think are happening at the end dog repeats where there's an incomplete measure as it was filling time so you can go back and repeat the anicrusis. Over all thats all I'm noting, that and the wrong octaves that I'm still not sure how to fix. sometimes I hate perfect pitch, like today. Attached is the .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Oboe advise needed - woodwind diagrams
I didn't attached a diagram, just the .ly file to generate it. Now the result is attached in .png, so you should see that. It shows you two layout, first one is with all keys, the second one with the "F" and "banana" key pressed.Actually my question is world-wide because it is LilyPond-wide. These diagrams are produced by LilyPond, I'm in the process of re-designing the Clarinet diagrams, making them complete, removing some of the problems. And in that process I also generated all the others and wondered at this. Regards,Wim. On 13 May 2013, at 15:34 , Frauke Jurgensen wrote:I don't see an attached diagram? Many oboes do have a LH F, which is a little knobbly one sort of on top of the others. If I could see it, I'll take a look.Since your email is continental, I assume you're looking for Conservatoire key system. I can help with that. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote: Hi, I am looking at some of the woodwind diagrams, redesigning the clarinet part and if possible trying to judge on correctness of the others. In the Oboe diagram I see a left-hand key labeled F, but it is placed a little bit strange on top of the others. Comparing with pictures on the Internet doesn't help me that much. As I am not a hoboist, can somebody who is take a look at this. I generated diagrams with (also attached): \version "2.16.0" % informational output to the default log-file: #(print-keys 'oboe) \score {\relative c' { \textLengthOn c^\markup {\center-column { "Oboe - all keys" \woodwind-diagram #'oboe #'() } } s s f^\markup {\center-column { "Oboe lh f-key" \woodwind-diagram #'oboe #'((cc . ()) (lh . (f)) (rh . (banana))) } } } } Also a right-hand "banana" key is shown. Is that correct? and if so, is that the name of that key? Any Obo-player who can guide me? Regards, Wim. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Rookie transpose / bookpart questions
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 02:55:32PM -0700, Nathan wrote: When typesetting slash notation, I use this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=332. You don't have to worry about transposition because the slashes are really rests. (Also, it doesn't add weird notes to the MIDI output.) Regards, Nathan Thank you, Nathan. I had forgotten about this technique, as I used to use it in my early days with LP. I stopped using it because it is difficult to notate more complex stroke rhythms, e.g.: \improvisationOn b16 b b b r b r b b b r8 b16 b r8 b16 b b b r b r b b b r4. \improvisationOff MIDI output isn't a consideration for me (at this time), but point taken. You're right though, for basic quarter-note strokes that don't get transposed, it does solve the problem. Thanks also for the 'comp' function, that's a convenient way to incorporate stroke marks into a staff. Jim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Oboe advise needed - woodwind diagrams
Right, well, the LH F is correct, though its placement looks a little
weird. Regarding the universality, the problem is that there are several
key systems in general use. North America and the Continent tend to use the
conservatoire system, and the UK uses the thumbplate system. Some
manufacturers build hybrid oboes that accomodate both systems. That diagram
looks a bit like a thumbplate to me, though it does appear to have one (but
not both) of the right hand first-finger octave keys, which I think the
thumbplate doesn't generally have (I play conservatoire, so don't know the
thumbplate configuration very well). I'll try to find some diagrams that
show both, for comparison.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote:
I didn't attached a diagram, just the .ly file to generate it. Now the
result is attached in .png, so you should see that. It shows you two
layout, first one is with all keys, the second one with the F and
banana key pressed.
Actually my question is world-wide because it is LilyPond-wide. These
diagrams are produced by LilyPond, I'm in the process of re-designing the
Clarinet diagrams, making them complete, removing some of the problems. And
in that process I also generated all the others and wondered at this.
Regards,
Wim.
On 13 May 2013, at 15:34 , Frauke Jurgensen wrote:
I don't see an attached diagram? Many oboes do have a LH F, which is a
little knobbly one sort of on top of the others. If I could see it, I'll
take a look.
Since your email is continental, I assume you're looking for Conservatoire
key system. I can help with that.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at some of the woodwind diagrams, redesigning the clarinet
part and if possible trying to judge on correctness of the others.
In the Oboe diagram I see a left-hand key labeled F, but it is placed a
little bit strange on top of the others. Comparing with pictures on the
Internet doesn't help me that much. As I am not a hoboist, can somebody who
is take a look at this. I generated diagrams with (also attached):
\version 2.16.0
% informational output to the default log-file:
#(print-keys 'oboe)
\score {
\relative c' {
\textLengthOn
c^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe - all keys
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'()
} }
s s
f^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe lh f-key
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'((cc . ())
(lh .
(f))
(rh .
(banana)))
} }
}
}
Also a right-hand banana key is shown. Is that correct? and if so, is
that the name of that key?
Any Obo-player who can guide me?
Regards,
Wim.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Oboe-f-question.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Oboe advise needed - woodwind diagrams
Hi Frauke,
If it is relevant, I can add multiple diagrams, just as I now do for
the clarinet and bass-clarinet.
Regards,
Wim.
On 13 May 2013, at 16:29 , Frauke Jurgensen wrote:
Right, well, the LH F is correct, though its placement looks a
little weird. Regarding the universality, the problem is that there
are several key systems in general use. North America and the
Continent tend to use the conservatoire system, and the UK uses the
thumbplate system. Some manufacturers build hybrid oboes that
accomodate both systems. That diagram looks a bit like a thumbplate
to me, though it does appear to have one (but not both) of the right
hand first-finger octave keys, which I think the thumbplate doesn't
generally have (I play conservatoire, so don't know the thumbplate
configuration very well). I'll try to find some diagrams that show
both, for comparison.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl
wrote:
I didn't attached a diagram, just the .ly file to generate it. Now
the result is attached in .png, so you should see that. It shows you
two layout, first one is with all keys, the second one with the F
and banana key pressed.
Actually my question is world-wide because it is LilyPond-wide.
These diagrams are produced by LilyPond, I'm in the process of re-
designing the Clarinet diagrams, making them complete, removing some
of the problems. And in that process I also generated all the others
and wondered at this.
Regards,
Wim.
Oboe-f-question.png
On 13 May 2013, at 15:34 , Frauke Jurgensen wrote:
I don't see an attached diagram? Many oboes do have a LH F, which
is a little knobbly one sort of on top of the others. If I could
see it, I'll take a look.
Since your email is continental, I assume you're looking for
Conservatoire key system. I can help with that.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl
wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at some of the woodwind diagrams, redesigning the
clarinet part and if possible trying to judge on correctness of the
others.
In the Oboe diagram I see a left-hand key labeled F, but it is
placed a little bit strange on top of the others. Comparing with
pictures on the Internet doesn't help me that much. As I am not a
hoboist, can somebody who is take a look at this. I generated
diagrams with (also attached):
\version 2.16.0
% informational output to the default log-file:
#(print-keys 'oboe)
\score {
\relative c' {
\textLengthOn
c^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe - all keys
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'()
} }
s s
f^\markup {
\center-column {
Oboe lh f-key
\woodwind-diagram #'oboe
#'((cc . ())
(lh . (f))
(rh . (banana)))
} }
}
}
Also a right-hand banana key is shown. Is that correct? and if
so, is that the name of that key?
Any Obo-player who can guide me?
Regards,
Wim.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
OK, it makes sense to get the keys right for the individual parts. I for myself play bass-clarinet, I would flip when I got a concert pitch part to play, I'm used to read the transposed version. But please read my remarks on \transpose of earlier today. If they want parts remember you already put the music in seperate variables. That makes it easier to grab that for a part. But I would only start doing that if they ask for it! Regards, Wim. On 13 May 2013, at 16:31 , Sarah k Alawami wrote: Im seeing if I can get an extension to at most this friday. so I can turn in a clean looking score and parts, if they want parts. lol! I'm writing everything in concert pitch not written pitch, but I still want the keys to be right for the parts. did the templet do it right? I was up all might trying to fix all of these errors and whilst that was fun I lost sleep. lol! so sorry if this makes no sense. Heha Oh btw thanks for the texshop program. It rocks. On May 13, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl wrote: ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10
I tried that setting but I couldn't see a difference either way. Perhaps it's something else that's wrong? Would you like me to make you a quick video showing the situation? If that would help you determine if this is a bug or just my bad luck, let me know. :) I'd be happy to help. As of now, on Ubuntu 13.04, no icons appear but only text (Save As, etc). Ben Wilbert Berendsen-6 wrote Op Sun, 12 May 2013 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT) SoundsFromSound lt; soundsfromsound@ gt; schreef: Any thoughts on how (if at all possible) I could get icons in place of the menu text on Ubuntu/Linux? (i.e. Save, Open, etc) Uncheck Edit-Prefs-General-Use system icons? -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user - composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-Frescobaldi-2-0-10-tp145815p145872.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: odd bar check errors
On 13 May 2013, at 17:06 , Sarah k Alawami wrote:
Ok. so do I have to put the right keys in at least not everything in
g major after the transpose line? I did read the manual but me being
a singer and I can only transpost by ear it kind of makes thing
sharder. I used to be able to do this but 5 years out of practice is
not fun. *fronws*
If you use \transpose then LilyPond will do it for you. Just use \key
g \major in the notes piece (in concert-pitch) and when you are at the
point of transposing put the brackets of \transpose around the whole
instrument piece. Then both the notes AND the key are transposed in
one go. You don't have to specify the key again.
Ok so for the clarinet part instead of g major since it reads a
half step lower then what I hear it would have to be f major or 1
flat correct?
No, if the piece is in g major (concert pitch), it will have to be
written in a major for the clarinet, written one full step higher. If
you use a clarinet in B-flat of course! For example your very first
note for the clarinet part is a d in concert-pitch, it should become
an e for the clarinet. Same for the regular trumpet, that is also an
instrument in B-flat.
and the horn in f it would have to be c major if I calculated my
keys and directions right.
Assuming you have a horn in F, you do \transpose f c' { . } and
the key for the horn part should transpose into d major.
Regards,
Wim.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
frescobaldi: no icons in toolbars (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10)
Op 13-05-13 18:30, SoundsFromSound schreef: I tried that setting but I couldn't see a difference either way. Perhaps it's something else that's wrong? Would you like me to make you a quick video showing the situation? If that would help you determine if this is a bug or just my bad luck, let me know. :) I'd be happy to help. As of now, on Ubuntu 13.04, no icons appear but only text (Save As, etc). Isn't it some global ubuntu setting? I can't reproduce -- Wilbert Berendsen http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: frescobaldi: no icons in toolbars (was Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10)
Hmm...odd. I did a simple restart and everything is working correctly. The icons are now appearing, and it seems that your suggestion about unchecking the system icons preference was all that was needed. Thank you for your help! Ben Wilbert Berendsen-4 wrote Op 13-05-13 18:30, SoundsFromSound schreef: I tried that setting but I couldn't see a difference either way. Perhaps it's something else that's wrong? Would you like me to make you a quick video showing the situation? If that would help you determine if this is a bug or just my bad luck, let me know. :) I'd be happy to help. As of now, on Ubuntu 13.04, no icons appear but only text (Save As, etc). Isn't it some global ubuntu setting? I can't reproduce -- Wilbert Berendsen http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user - composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-Frescobaldi-2-0-10-tp145815p145876.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.10
On 14/05/13 02:30, SoundsFromSound wrote: I tried that setting but I couldn't see a difference either way. Perhaps it's something else that's wrong? Would you like me to make you a quick video showing the situation? If that would help you determine if this is a bug or just my bad luck, let me know. :) I'd be happy to help. As of now, on Ubuntu 13.04, no icons appear but only text (Save As, etc). I see the icons in the toolbar with Frescobaldi on Ubuntu 13.04. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Can somebody help me with a lilypond layout?
Hello I use FOMUS to output data from AC Toolbox (algorithmic composition software) to a Lilypond file and a pdf. However, as my data is quite dense, some systems are colliding making it impossible to distinguish the independent notes. I am not working with Lilypond enough to solve this hence I would like to ask if somebody could have a look at my file and try to disentangle the staves. I would be very grateful. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
oddly corrupt midi - need help
My moderately small complete source file is here: http://pastie.org/7904566 I have two problems: a corrupt midi file, and a note head collision that I cannot seem to fix. Two things to note about the source: I am including articulate.ly, and this is set up to produce cross-voice arpeggios, not uncommon with classic guitar. The basic file structure comes from a guitarist who's been a member of this list in the past (I've basically been gone for two years), and has made major additions to the Lilypond documentation for classic guitar. I'm speaking especially of the code from structure =... on, which which frankly has always been a muddle to me. *1. corrupt midi file* - After upgrading Lilypond (at least one version), the midi file now get weird at m. 4. It SHOULD repeat, but in fact BOTH repeats AND plows on right through the repeat and plays the next line at the same time. Not exactly what I had in mind! I have no idea what's wrong, much less how to fix it. Any help on this would be much appreciated. *2. note head collision that I cannot seem to fix**-* In m. 12, at beat 2, there is an intractable (for me) note head collision. I've studied the documentation, and tried a number of things, and absolutely NONE of them have had any effect. Right now, there is in the code (l. 97) an attempt to move the top voice ahead of the bottom voice, which is split, at this point. Any ideas how to fix this issue? Thank for any help offered! Tom -- ~~ Tom Cloyd, MS MA Cedar City / St. George, Utah, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332 t...@tomcloyd.com (email) TomCloyd.com (website) Sleightmind.com (mental health issues weblog) ~~ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with re stemUp open notehead
I think I might have noticed this before, but in the example below, all the
re noteheads that are stem up that should be open (half note, dotted half
note) are filled. Whole notes are not affected.
\version 2.16.2
notation = { \aikenHeads \time 3/4
\key c \major
d2. d' d'' d'''
d'2 d'4
\stemUp \time 2/4
d2 d' d'' d'''
}
\score {
{ \notation
\transpose c d { \notation }
}
}
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Can somebody help me with a lilypond layout?
Greetings Samuel You wrote:- Hello I use FOMUS to output data from AC Toolbox (algorithmic composition software) to a Lilypond file and a pdf. However, as my data is quite dense, some systems are colliding making it impossible to distinguish the independent notes. I am not working with Lilypond enough to solve this hence I would like to ask if somebody could have a look at my file and try to disentangle the staves. I would be very grateful. I could look at the file for you, but with no guarantee of a successful outcome! :) Attach your file... Regards Bill ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with re stemUp open notehead
Greetings Carl,
You wrote:-
I think I might have noticed this before, but in the example below, all
the re noteheads that are stem up that should be open (half note,
dotted half note) are filled. Whole notes are not affected.
\version 2.16.2
notation = {\aikenHeads \time 3/4
\key c \major
d2. d' d'' d'''
d'2 d'4
\stemUp \time 2/4
d2 d' d'' d'''
}
\score {
{ \notation
\transpose c d { \notation }
}
}
It seems to be a display artefact... zooming in on the relevant notes
shows open heads partially obscured by leger lines (which are slightly
fatter than staff lines) or staff lines (less obviously)
I tested the following using Frescobaldi 2.0.10 on Ubuntu 13.04
I hope this is helpful?!:)
Regards
Bill
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with re stemUp open notehead
I can't reproduce that problem either in 2.16.2 or 2.17.14. Arch Linux. I do see that the notes on lines are quite tight, with not much air, but they are not solid. Andrew On 14/05/13 12:25 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: I think I might have noticed this before, but in the example below, all the re noteheads that are stem up that should be open (half note, dotted half note) are filled. Whole notes are not affected. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with re stemUp open notehead
This is what measures 2 and 3 of my output looks like. The problem goes away if I manually specify thin noteheads instead of the standard aiken heads. I am using 2.16.2 on Mac OS X 10.8.3. The earlier timestamp (larger file) image is zoomed in from Preview. The later timestamp is from Adobe Acrobat 9.5.4. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.comwrote: I can't reproduce that problem either in 2.16.2 or 2.17.14. Arch Linux. I do see that the notes on lines are quite tight, with not much air, but they are not solid. Andrew On 14/05/13 12:25 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: I think I might have noticed this before, but in the example below, all the re noteheads that are stem up that should be open (half note, dotted half note) are filled. Whole notes are not affected. __**_ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/**listinfo/lilypond-userhttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user attachment: Screen Shot 2013-05-13 at 11.05.46 PM.pngattachment: Screen Shot 2013-05-13 at 11.08.04 PM.png___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
getting error already have slur in my compilation
Hello there. I've never seen this before. I got "already have slur" I checked and all looks well but this is an odd one.Here is the .ly file. I got rid of all the bar checks except for a few that looked correct. did I miss something? again? final score.ly Description: Binary data I hope one day I can know enough to help out as well. but for now I'm taking baby steps lol!Take care all and be blessed. Sarah Alawami.msn and aim: marri...@gmail.comskype: marrie1 (let me know where you know me from)twitter: http://twitter.com/marrie1podcast/blog: http://tffppodcast.compodcast twitter: http://twitter.com/tffppodcastyoutube channel: http://youtube.com/marrie125 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: getting error already have slur in my compilation
Hmm. I thought I closed the slur with ) that was the first thing I checked. Yeah they are 2 note slurs. r8 b8(\p\ cis) d4. r8 fis,8( ais) cis4. 2 2 note slurs in the measure. I even tried the 3 note slurs with the rest in the middle and it still errors out. Suggestions? I want to have this played like this. lol! On May 13, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Sarah, The reason you get this is you have opened a slur with ( but not closed it before opening a new slur with ( again. You need to close the first bracket. Deleting the first unpaired bracket makes the warning go away, so this seems to be the problem, Do you want nested slurs, or is this just a simple mistake? Andrew On 14 May 2013 13:46, Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com wrote: Hello there. I've never seen this before. I got already have slur I checked and all looks well but this is an odd one. Here is the .ly file. I got rid of all the bar checks except for a few that looked correct. did I miss something? again? I hope one day I can know enough to help out as well. but for now I'm taking baby steps lol! Take care all and be blessed. Sarah Alawami. msn and aim: marri...@gmail.com skype: marrie1 (let me know where you know me from) twitter: http://twitter.com/marrie1 podcast/blog: http://tffppodcast.com podcast twitter: http://twitter.com/tffppodcast youtube channel: http://youtube.com/marrie125 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with re stemUp open notehead
If I generate the PDF's on Arch Linux, but view in Preview in Mac OS X 10.8.3 or with Adobe Acrobat on the Mac the problem is not visible. That narrows the issue down to lilypond on Mac, not the display programs. Raise a bug report? Andrew On 14/05/13 1:13 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: This is what measures 2 and 3 of my output looks like. The problem goes away if I manually specify thin noteheads instead of the standard aiken heads. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lyrics spacing issues
Reposting a previous question with code example. Note that depending on how
the alignment is defined, about a notehead of space is added to one side of
the lyrics or the other.
Thanks,
Carl
\version 2.16.2
\score {
\new Staff = top { \new Voice = tester { c' e' g' c'' } }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto tester \lyricmode {This is a test }
\new Staff = bottom { \clef bass c' g e c }
\header { piece = default behavior }
}
\score {
\new Staff = top { \new Voice = tester { c' e' g' c'' } }
\new Staff = bottom { \clef bass c' g e c }
\new Lyrics \with {alignAboveContext=bottom} \lyricsto tester
\lyricmode {This is a test }
\header { piece = aligned above bottom staff }
}
\score {
\new Staff = top { \new Voice = tester { c' e' g' c'' } }
\new Staff = bottom { \clef bass c' g e c }
\new Lyrics \with {alignBelowContext=top} \lyricsto tester \lyricmode
{This is a test }
\header { piece = aligned below top staff }
}
testing.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
