Re: Getting rid of space above lyrics...I'm completely stumped.
John S.L. wrote Here's the log % Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.16.2 [ForumAug8.ly]... Processing `c:/users/johnla~1/appdata/local/temp/frescobaldi-pgntlt/tmpxiwiz4/ForumAug8.ly' Parsing... c:/users/johnla~1/appdata/local/temp/frescobaldi-pgntlt/tmpxiwiz4/ForumAug8.ly:40:16: error: Grob name should be alphanumeric \override LyricText.font-size = #-1 the culprit is in line 40 column 16 where in upgraded versions (2.17.4 and up) we can use \override LyricText.font-size instead of \override LyricText #'font-size sorry I overlooked that - but it also brings out the importance to reduce sample code to a minimum Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Getting-rid-of-space-above-lyrics-I-m-completely-stumped-tp149021p149134.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: text to the *right* of staves?
Adam Spiers-5 wrote
How can I put text *after* a staff? I.e. directly to the right of the
final barline? I've searched high and low but can't find anything
close ...
here's one simple way:
\markup \fill-line {
\score {
\new Voice \repeat unfold 4 \relative {a' b c d}
\layout{
line-width=#166
ragged-right = ##f
}
}
text at the right
}
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/text-to-the-right-of-staves-tp149126p149138.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
[lots of discussion about LilyPond vs other notation software] Hi people, it seems that i've missed an important discussion. After reading it (and reading comments on the Steinberg blog), i decided to add my comment in the form of a blog post: http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/honestly-is-lilypond-good-enough/ I'd be interested in hearing your opinions in the comments! best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Hello Janek, Very interesting post, thanks! Typo: algorythmic JM Le 14 août 2013 à 10:54:17, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com a écrit : [lots of discussion about LilyPond vs other notation software] Hi people, it seems that i've missed an important discussion. After reading it (and reading comments on the Steinberg blog), i decided to add my comment in the form of a blog post: http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/honestly-is-lilypond-good-enough/ I'd be interested in hearing your opinions in the comments! best, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
An absolutely marvellous typo in our particular context. :-) Andrew Jacques Menu 14 August 2013 7:25 PM Typo:algorythmic ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Lol, indeed! Thanks for letting me know, Jacques! Corrected. Janek 2013/8/14 Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com An absolutely marvellous typo in our particular context. :-) Andrew Jacques Menu jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch 14 August 2013 7:25 PM Typo: algorythmic ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user compose-unknown-contact.jpg___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: can someone convert a tux guitar to lilypond to PDF for me
2013/8/14 Christopher Reed christopher.ree...@gmail.com hey I tried but I lost the drum section could someone email me and I'll send you the .Tg file Done, Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Different figures on one bass (y-offset question)
Hello,
I join a pict. With lines separators would be best.
Actually, I did it manually with lines of figures full of
\markup { }2.
\markup { }2.
\markup { }2.
but thats not very smart... Then if the 7 4 2 has no glyph { }
directly under it, it lowers itself in the figures of the lower line
(look pic: false)
Thanks in advance,
Frank
2013/8/13, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message -
From: Francois Planiol alicuota...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:45 PM
Subject: Different figures on one bass (y-offset question)
Hello,
I am working at material for harmony-lectures and need different
figures one the same bass (showing different chords-possibilities).
I need some Y-spacing between the figures lines to make clear for the
students, this doesnt belong together. This depends of course of the
line-numbers of the more complex figure.
And I didnt found a way to do that.
Is this possible?
Thanks in advance,
Frank
Could you provide an image of what you're trying to do, please?
--
Phil Holmes
attachment: multiFiguresBass.jpgattachment: false.jpg___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Text in front of Staves
Hi Harm, Hi Kale,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
\relative c' {
Two small remarks :
1) because of its tessitura, \relative is not needed for the guitar
2) better use \clef G_8
Here's Harm's code with modern fingerings and an alternative for the no
left hand finger in the exercise no.4
\version 2.17.23
%\version 2.16.2
%%% Right hand fingerings %%
rhp = -\rightHandFinger #1
rhi = -\rightHandFinger #2
rhm = -\rightHandFinger #3
rha = -\rightHandFinger #4
rhx = -\rightHandFinger #5
Aletrnate No Left hand fingering %
lnf =
#(let ((finger (make-music 'FingeringEvent)))
(set! (ly:music-property finger 'tweaks)
(acons 'text #{\markup\stencil #(make-circle-stencil 0.45 0.2 #f)#}
(ly:music-property finger 'tweaks)))
finger)
%%% score
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
\context {
\Voice
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup.default-staff-staff-spacing =
#'((basic-distance . 15)
(minimum-distance . 10)
(padding . 1))
}
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBar #'stencil = ##f
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #0
}
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 3 }
\new Voice
\clef G_8
{
\voiceOne
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
%mes. 1
c8 e'-0\rhm c'-1\rhi e e'\rhm c'\rhi
g e'\rhm c'\rhi c e'\rhm c'\rhi |
%mes. 2
b, f'-1\rhm d'-4\rhi d f'\rhm d'\rhi
g f'\rhm d'\rhi b, f'\rhm d'\rhi |
}
}
% mes. 3
g-0 c'-1 e'-01 |
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
{
\voiceTwo
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(down)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
c-3\rhp4 e-2\rhp g-0\rhp c\rhp
b,-2\rhp d-0\rhp g-0\rhp b,\rhp
% mes. 3
c-3 e-2 1 |
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 4 }
\new Voice
\clef G_8
{
\voiceOne
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e-2\rhi g\lnf\rhm e g\rhi c'-1\rhm
g c'\rhi e'\lnf\rhm c c'\rhi e'\rhm
b, d\lnf\rhi g\lnf\rhm d g\rhi d'-4\rhm
g d'\rhi f'-1\rhm b, d'\rhi f'\rhm
}
}
g\lnf c'-1 e'\lnf1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
{
\voiceTwo
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(down)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
c-3\rhp4 e\rhp g\rhp c\rhp
b,-2\rhp d\rhp g\rhp b,\rhp
c-3 e-21
}
Cheers,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Text in front of Staves
Hi Thomas,
Thanks; it works like a charm* until I need a page break; right now its
just crowding everything on one page. I put it a \pageBreak and nothing
happened, so I'm guessing that lilypond won't break simultaneous music
over a page (makes sense). Any overrides for this?
*works like a charm except for your \override VerticalAxisGroup command,
which I'm not super familiar with (looks right to me). Won't compile
with it, will compile without it.
wasn't planning on bringing back 19th century guitar fingering notation,
but now that you mention it... =)
Thanks again,
Kale
On 08/13/2013 07:56 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/8/14 k...@kalegood.com mailto:k...@kalegood.com
I see that lilypond supports a cool-looking No. glyph, which is
great. I'd like to get in in front of each stave in order to
number a series of exercises. See attached png for an example.
I'm working on making a version of Giuliani's 120 right hand
studies for clasical guitar.
Hi,
I've typesetted the first two exercises of your png, though without
fingerings.
This should give you a starting-point.
Btw, I hope you are _not_ going to rebuild these fossil
right-hand-fingering-symbols. ;)
\version 2.17.24
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
\context {
\Voice
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup.default-staff-staff-spacing =
#'((basic-distance . 12)
(minimum-distance . 7)
(padding . 1))
}
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBar #'stencil = ##f
}
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 3 }
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\voiceOne
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e' c e, e'c g e' c c, e' c
b, f'' d d, f' d g, f' d b, f'' d
}
}
e, g c e1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
c4 e g c,
b d g b,
c1
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 4 }
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\voiceOne
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e g e g c g c e c, c' e
b, d g d g d' g, d' f b,, d' f
}
}
e, g c e1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
c4 e g c,
b d g b,
c1
}
HTH,
Harm
--
Kale Good: Guitar Instructor
phillyguitarlessons.com http://phillyguitarlessons.com
k...@kalegood.com mailto:k...@kalegood.com
phone: (215)260-5383
* 4705 Baltimore Ave, Phila, PA 19143 -mailing lessons
* 1867 Frankford Ave. Phila, PA 19125 -lessons
Google+ https://plus.google.com/b/105422331794047992190/
Facebook http://facebook.com/KaleGoodGuitarStudio
Read my article The Seven Secrets to Six String Success
http://www.guitarnoise.com/lesson/seven-secrets-to-six-string-success/ at
GuitarNoise.com http://guitarnoise.com
Leading the Journey from No-Skills-Guitarist to Talented Musician!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Text in front of Staves
forgot to mention, i'm running 2.16.2
On 08/13/2013 07:56 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2013/8/14 k...@kalegood.com mailto:k...@kalegood.com
I see that lilypond supports a cool-looking No. glyph, which is
great. I'd like to get in in front of each stave in order to
number a series of exercises. See attached png for an example.
I'm working on making a version of Giuliani's 120 right hand
studies for clasical guitar.
Hi,
I've typesetted the first two exercises of your png, though without
fingerings.
This should give you a starting-point.
Btw, I hope you are _not_ going to rebuild these fossil
right-hand-fingering-symbols. ;)
\version 2.17.24
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
\context {
\Voice
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup.default-staff-staff-spacing =
#'((basic-distance . 12)
(minimum-distance . 7)
(padding . 1))
}
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBar #'stencil = ##f
}
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 3 }
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\voiceOne
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e' c e, e'c g e' c c, e' c
b, f'' d d, f' d g, f' d b, f'' d
}
}
e, g c e1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
c4 e g c,
b d g b,
c1
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 4 }
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\voiceOne
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e g e g c g c e c, c' e
b, d g d g d' g, d' f b,, d' f
}
}
e, g c e1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
c4 e g c,
b d g b,
c1
}
HTH,
Harm
--
Kale Good: Guitar Instructor
phillyguitarlessons.com http://phillyguitarlessons.com
k...@kalegood.com mailto:k...@kalegood.com
phone: (215)260-5383
* 4705 Baltimore Ave, Phila, PA 19143 -mailing lessons
* 1867 Frankford Ave. Phila, PA 19125 -lessons
Google+ https://plus.google.com/b/105422331794047992190/
Facebook http://facebook.com/KaleGoodGuitarStudio
Read my article The Seven Secrets to Six String Success
http://www.guitarnoise.com/lesson/seven-secrets-to-six-string-success/ at
GuitarNoise.com http://guitarnoise.com
Leading the Journey from No-Skills-Guitarist to Talented Musician!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: text to the *right* of staves?
Adam Spiers-5 wrote
How can I put text *after* a staff?
I.e. directly to the right of the final barline?
And here is another way:
\version 2.16.2
{
\repeat unfold 44 R1
\bar |.
% after final barline:
\stopStaff
\once \override TextScript #'Y-offset = #-0.5
s1^text at the right
}
The -0.5 value centres it vertically; feel free to change this.
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Text in front of Staves
Well that's the simple solution to defining right hand fingers that I
was looking for. Thanks.
Your example, like Thomas's, throws an error for me with the \override
VerticalAxisGroup using 2.16.2 Also throws an error for tuplet command,
but both work once I take these out. Also, there's the issue of page
breaks; right now the 20 exercise I have done are all crammed on one page.
Here is my code for the 2 we're looking at. Please pardon me if my
minimum example isn't as minimum as possible; this is by far the biggest
lily project I've undertaken.
\version 2.16.2
recurring themes %
staffset = {
\new Voice
\clef G_8
\key c
\major
\time 4/4
\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
\mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
\bar |:
}
cchord = {
\relative c' {
\bar :|
c, e g c e1
\bar |.
}
}
rh = #rightHandFinger
strokesdown =
{
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(down)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
}
strokesup = {
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
}
%%% bass lines %%%
basslineOne = {
\strokesdown {
c,4\rh #1 e g c, | b d g b,
}
}
studies =
%%%
%Number 3
%%%
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 3. }
\staffset
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\voiceOne
\scaleDurations #'(2 . 3) {
\strokesup
c,8 e'\rh #3 c\rh #2 e, e' c g e' c c, e' c
b, f'' d d, f' d g, f' d b, f'' d
}
\cchord
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
\basslineOne
}
%%%
%Number 4
%%%
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 4. }
\staffset
\relative c' {
\bar .|:
\voiceOne
\scaleDurations #'(2 . 3) {
\strokesup
c,8 e\rh #2 g\rh #3 e g c g c e c, c' e
b, d g d g d' g, d' f b,, d' f
}
\cchord
}
\new Voice
\relative c' {
\voiceTwo
\basslineOne
}
\score {
\studies
\midi {
}
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
\context {
\Voice
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
}
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBar #'stencil = ##f
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #0
}
}
}
\paper {
}
Best,
Kale
On 08/14/2013 09:44 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
Hi Harm, Hi Kale,
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com
\relative c' {
Two small remarks :
1) because of its tessitura, \relative is not needed for the guitar
2) better use \clef G_8
Here's Harm's code with modern fingerings and an alternative for the
no left hand finger in the exercise no.4
\version 2.17.23
%\version 2.16.2
%%% Right hand fingerings %%
rhp = -\rightHandFinger #1
rhi = -\rightHandFinger #2
rhm = -\rightHandFinger #3
rha = -\rightHandFinger #4
rhx = -\rightHandFinger #5
Aletrnate No Left hand fingering %
lnf =
#(let ((finger (make-music 'FingeringEvent)))
(set! (ly:music-property finger 'tweaks)
(acons 'text #{\markup\stencil #(make-circle-stencil 0.45 0.2 #f)#}
(ly:music-property finger 'tweaks)))
finger)
%%% score
\layout {
ragged-right = ##f
\context {
\Voice
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
\override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\override VerticalAxisGroup.default-staff-staff-spacing =
#'((basic-distance . 15)
(minimum-distance . 10)
(padding . 1))
}
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBar #'stencil = ##f
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #0
}
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 3 }
\new Voice
\clef G_8
{
\voiceOne
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
%mes. 1
c8 e'-0\rhm c'-1\rhi e e'\rhm c'\rhi
g e'\rhm c'\rhi c e'\rhm c'\rhi |
%mes. 2
b, f'-1\rhm d'-4\rhi d f'\rhm d'\rhi
g f'\rhm d'\rhi b, f'\rhm d'\rhi |
}
}
% mes. 3
g-0 c'-1 e'-01 |
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
{
\voiceTwo
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(down)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
c-3\rhp4 e-2\rhp g-0\rhp c\rhp
b,-2\rhp d-0\rhp g-0\rhp b,\rhp
% mes. 3
c-3 e-2 1 |
}
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = N° 4 }
\new Voice
\clef G_8
{
\voiceOne
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations = #'(up)
\override StrokeFinger #'add-stem-support = ##t
\bar .|:
\repeat volta 2 {
\tupletSpan 4
\times 2/3 {
c8 e-2\rhi g\lnf\rhm e g\rhi c'-1\rhm
g c'\rhi e'\lnf\rhm c c'\rhi e'\rhm
b, d\lnf\rhi g\lnf\rhm d g\rhi d'-4\rhm
g d'\rhi f'-1\rhm b, d'\rhi f'\rhm
}
}
g\lnf c'-1 e'\lnf1
\bar |.
}
\new Voice
{
\voiceTwo
\set
Re: change the key signature
2013/7/28 Givaldo de Cidra givaldodeci...@gmail.com
\set Staff.keySignature '= # (((1. 0.), SHARP) ((1. 3.), natural))
I want the key signature have a natural sign of caution.
Is it possible?
Hi,
I'm a bit ashamed not having found a better method.
It's Fischer-Technik/Tinkertoy at it's worst.
Anyway, here it is:
\version 2.16.2
#(define NEARNULL 1/10)
#(define OTHERNEARNULL -1/10)
very-kludgy-method-to-get-parenthesized-accidentals-in-key-signature =
\override Staff.KeySignature #'before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((glyph-name-alist (ly:grob-property grob 'glyph-name-alist))
(lst (list (cons NEARNULL accidentals.leftparen)
(cons OTHERNEARNULL accidentals.rightparen
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'glyph-name-alist
(append lst glyph-name-alist
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\very-kludgy-method-to-get-parenthesized-accidentals-in-key-signature
}
}
\new Staff {
\set Staff.keySignature =
#`(((1 . 0) . ,SHARP)
((1 . 3) . ,NEARNULL)
((1 . 3) . ,NATURAL)
((1 . 3) . ,OTHERNEARNULL)
((1 . -1) . ,NEARNULL)
((1 . -1) . ,FLAT)
((1 . -1) . ,OTHERNEARNULL)
)
a'
}
Cheers,
Harm
attachment: atest-22.preview.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: change the key signature
Hi Thomas Morley
This code fully solved the problem...
Thanks very much.
Givaldo de Cidra
2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
2013/7/28 Givaldo de Cidra givaldodeci...@gmail.com
\set Staff.keySignature '= # (((1. 0.), SHARP) ((1. 3.), natural))
I want the key signature have a natural sign of caution.
Is it possible?
Hi,
I'm a bit ashamed not having found a better method.
It's Fischer-Technik/Tinkertoy at it's worst.
Anyway, here it is:
\version 2.16.2
#(define NEARNULL 1/10)
#(define OTHERNEARNULL -1/10)
very-kludgy-method-to-get-parenthesized-accidentals-in-key-signature =
\override Staff.KeySignature #'before-line-breaking =
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((glyph-name-alist (ly:grob-property grob 'glyph-name-alist))
(lst (list (cons NEARNULL accidentals.leftparen)
(cons OTHERNEARNULL accidentals.rightparen
(ly:grob-set-property! grob 'glyph-name-alist
(append lst glyph-name-alist
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\very-kludgy-method-to-get-parenthesized-accidentals-in-key-signature
}
}
\new Staff {
\set Staff.keySignature =
#`(((1 . 0) . ,SHARP)
((1 . 3) . ,NEARNULL)
((1 . 3) . ,NATURAL)
((1 . 3) . ,OTHERNEARNULL)
((1 . -1) . ,NEARNULL)
((1 . -1) . ,FLAT)
((1 . -1) . ,OTHERNEARNULL)
)
a'
}
Cheers,
Harm
--
Abraços,
Givaldo de Cidra
Ser e Pensar Sempre no Objetivo é o Caminho para Alcançar o Sucesso
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tempo mark more than once
Thomas,
Thanks. Works a treat.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Tuesday, August 13, 2013, 4:47:42 PM, you wrote:
2013/8/13 Peter Toye lilyp...@ptoye.com:
I want to put a tempo marking (e,g, Allegro) into a song above both the
piano part and the vocal part. (I'm one of those people who believes in
making life easier for the pianist). And I can't see how to do it.
With the code as it is the \tempo indication is ignored.
If I move the \tempo above the \new Staff or outside the I get a
new staff with n o lines, and still no tempo indication.
How do I do it, please? I can't see it in the snippets.
Regards,
Peter Toye
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
how about:
\version 2.16.2
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\remove Metronome_mark_engraver
}
\context {
\Staff
\consists Metronome_mark_engraver
}
}
\new Staff { \tempo 4=80 c1 }
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff { \tempo 4=80 c1 }
\new Staff { \clef bass c1 }
HTH,
Harm___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Create different pdf layers
Hello, 2013/8/1 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org I have brought this up before without success. But as my interest reappeared I'll try it again with a slightly more specific question. there is an existing issue based on your request: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2542 Do you believe, it is a good Idea to discus your Ideas on bug-list? Marek, one of the very few bug squad members ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
2013/8/14 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com: Hi, Harm and David N. (and some other people) write lots of very advanced (and very helpful!) Scheme functions. These funcitons are improved over time, and there is a problem related to that: it's easy to get lost in all the email threads about them, and it's not always obvious where the most recent version is. I think that such functions should be tracked by version control, and i see two approaches: - include them in official LilyPond source as soon as they are created. Upside: there's bigger chance that they will be updated when there are some changes. Downside: one has to write documentation and go through official patch submitting channels. - use another repository. What about OpenLilyLib? http://www.openlilylib.org/ At any rate, we better do something about it - at current state, all these funcitons can easily become lost or forgotten, and that would be a grave loss. Thoughts? Janek Hi Janek, well, if I think one of my functions, definitions etc is worth a patch, I do so, but ofcourse there's the risk I'm distracted by other tasks and forget about it or I've no time or ... The idea of version-control for such functions might be nice. But because I'm still not very familiar with git I'm feeling kind of ambivalent. Otoh, it might be an idea to do so for the LSR. Though, a lot of my functions, definitions etc are too special-cased, written to fit some users needs or they are workarounds not worth a patch. The right place for them would be the LSR, _if_ the LSR would be able to compile them and not use a LilyPond-version far too old for many of my ideas. There were some insinuations on the list the last months (or was it a year already?) to upgrade the LSR and yes, one should do so. But I hesitate to volunteer again for this task. I initiated the last ugrade and did perhaps the major work, supported by several developers and the great David Nalesnik. Though there was only one, I repeat _one_, other user who tried to help: Philippe Hezaine @Philippe Thanks a lot for trying to help. And let me say: You didn't waste my time! So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still pissed off. After my experience from doing it once, let me say: _Every_ user can start the LSR-upgrade. The relevant CG-chapter is in far better state than it was the last time. Ok, there will be snippets which need some (perhaps advanced) scheme-knowledge and there may be some which need advice from an experinced developer. Some tasks will need to be done by people, who have the permission (from the LSR-maintainer) to do so. But let me repeat: _Every_ user can start the LSR-upgrade. Volunteers? Be sure that I'd grant support. Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: maintaining advanced power-user Scheme functions
Hi Janek, Hi Harm, 2013/8/14 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com So I was annoyed by the lack of help/interest of others and I'm still pissed off. Sorry for that, I think I totaly missed this discussion. Volunteers? Be sure that I'd grant support. Sure ! Maybe give me some links where I can find how to do it. Cheers, Pierre ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once.
dynamic-positioning.ly http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n149192/dynamic-positioning.ly The following problem occurs with both 2.16.2 (stable) and 2.17.23 (unstable). My goal is to produce an orchestral score which both - uses *\partcombine* (e.g. to combine wind and brass instruments on shared staves) - has dynamics separately defined and attached to spacers, so that they can be duplicated in several staves Here are my observations: - If the dynamic is attached directly to the note, it is positioned correctly. - If it is attached to a spacer, it is positioned too far to the left, /unless/ the whole construction is explicitly wrapped in *\new Voice*. This 'solves' the problem in simple cases. - However, when the music consists of *\partcombine*d material, (which mine does) the dynamics are positioned wrongly, /even/ if I wrap the whole construction in a *\new Voice*. The incorrect positioning may seem small, but it causes great problems in a real-life score, cutting into barlines and looking very odd especially at the beginnings of bars. So my question is, how can I get the dynamics to align themselves 'correctly', i.e. as they would be if they were directly attached to the notes. Putting the dynamics in a Dynamics context is not really an option, since that will make them align themselves on one line, and I want the dynamics and hairpins to be snugly under the notes each time. Any ideas? I am aware that existing 'issues' exist to do with dynamic positioning, but many of them claim to be 'fixed' - yet they apparently are not. I have attached a .ly file containing a series of minimal examples to illustrate the observations I have made above. Thanks everyone, Dominic -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-spacers-and-partcombine-used-at-once-tp149192.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once.
Dominic dominicirving at gmail.com writes:
My goal is to produce an orchestral score which both
- uses *\partcombine*
- has dynamics separately defined
To make this go smoothly, you will probably need to keep in mind how
\partcombine works. \partcombine takes two music expressions and routes
each note into one of four Voices (depending on whether the players are
in unison, making chords, or soloI or soloII) and the system is a bit
fragile. If you manage the voices in the expressions that go into
\partcombine, that can confuse the system.
If you include the dynamics in the music for each player as it goes into
\partcombine, it will merge the dynamics and keep them attached to the
voice that is printing the notes so they are aligned to the notes.
dd = {s4\p\ s s s\f s1 \bar |.}
aa =
\dd
{e4 f g a b\mf c' d' e'}
bb =
\dd
{c4 d e f }
\new Staff { \transpose c c' \partcombine \aa \bb }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Dominic dominicirv...@gmail.com wrote: So my question is, how can I get the dynamics to align themselves 'correctly', i.e. as they would be if they were directly attached to the notes. Putting the dynamics in a Dynamics context is not really an option, since that will make them align themselves on one line, and I want the dynamics and hairpins to be snugly under the notes each time. Any ideas? I am aware that existing 'issues' exist to do with dynamic positioning, but many of them claim to be 'fixed' - yet they apparently are not. What if you use rests or real notes instead of spacers and then hide the notes and turn off the appropriate engravers so that the notes themselves neither print nor impact the spacing of the score, but the dynamics are attached to notes? Haven't tried this, but I use this technique with partcombine to attach lyrics. Cheers, Carl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once.
Thanks Keith - this works brilliantly. Occasionally the part combiner will
duplicate dynamics even though they are identical, so once in a while I have to
force a 'partcombineChords' or 'partcombineUnisono' as necessary, but this is a
small price to pay. Thanks again.
On 15 Aug 2013, at 06:11, Keith OHara [via Lilypond]
ml-node+s1069038n149196...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Dominic dominicirving at gmail.com writes:
My goal is to produce an orchestral score which both
- uses *\partcombine*
- has dynamics separately defined
To make this go smoothly, you will probably need to keep in mind how
\partcombine works. \partcombine takes two music expressions and routes
each note into one of four Voices (depending on whether the players are
in unison, making chords, or soloI or soloII) and the system is a bit
fragile. If you manage the voices in the expressions that go into
\partcombine, that can confuse the system.
If you include the dynamics in the music for each player as it goes into
\partcombine, it will merge the dynamics and keep them attached to the
voice that is printing the notes so they are aligned to the notes.
dd = {s4\p\ s s s\f s1 \bar |.}
aa =
\dd
{e4 f g a b\mf c' d' e'}
bb =
\dd
{c4 d e f }
\new Staff { \transpose c c' \partcombine \aa \bb }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-spacers-and-partcombine-used-at-once-tp149192p149196.html
To unsubscribe from Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once., click
here.
NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-spacers-and-partcombine-used-at-once-tp149192p149198.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Dynamics, spacers, and partcombine used at once.
Hi Carl, I tried that and it does indeed work (at least in my small test example), but it does seem like it destroys the semantic integrity of the code to have notes and rests that are not really functioning as notes or rests. Nevertheless, I'll keep it in mind as a solution to consider in the future for one-off examples. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dynamics-spacers-and-partcombine-used-at-once-tp149192p149200.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
