Re: path to lilypond executable
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:29:33 +0100 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 12.03.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Mattes: Hmm, are you looking for the path to the current lilypond executable or the current lilypond input file? For the first '(car (command-line))' might be all you need. Yes, this is what I'm looking for, thank you. Please be aware that on vanilla *ix systems this only works if the program is executed via a PATH search. E.g., if lilypond is in /usr/bin: cd /tmp lilypond -- /usr/bin/lilypond cd /usr/bin ./lilypond -- ./lilypond -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
On 2015-03-12 08:29, Urs Liska wrote: Could anybody please tell me what \version 2.18.2 #(display (car (command-line))) displays on Windows (i.e. how the string is formatted)? Using Frescobaldi C:\lilypond-2-18-2-1\usr\bin\lilypond-windows.exe // Anders -- English isn't my first language. So any error or strangeness is due to the translation. Please correct my English so that I may become better. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Spacing Cheat Sheet
Hi Joram,
Yes, of course, I can say now after your replay and explanation. Why
didn't I see this myself? For what you point out, of course I have seen
this with hierarchy and different kinds of staff grouping a lot of times
when reading the documentation. But I did not realize the consequences
of my reading. Your are a good teacher, and also a wee of mind reader,
which probably is one important making of being a successful teacher.
What you pointed out is exactly my case: no StaffGroup but ChoirStaff
and PianoStaff. So of course I my efforts to move the staves had no
effect by just copying from your sheet. Now I can say of course, but I
did not realize this. Your explanation has opened my eyes, and I have
come a few steps further towards the true understanding. Thank you!
Kaj
On 2015-03-12 01:31, Noeck wrote:
Dear Kaj,
you are brave to really dig through all this! That's a good thing. I
think I can help you here, too:
It is correct (and it works like expected) if you do
\override StaffGroup.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = 30
like I wrote. But only (!) if your grouping context is a StaffGroup. In
case you have a PianoStaff or a ChoirStaff or anything else, you need to
override the property of that context. I.e.
\override PianoStaff.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = 30
and the like.
There is a context hierarchy in LilyPond: A lower level context (e.g.
Voice) can be inside a staff, which can be inside a staff group, which
can be inside a score. Of course more complex nesting is possible.
The important thing for you is: The inner contexts inherit (take the
overrides) from the outer contexts. In your case, if you override the
StaffGrouper of the Score, that overrides the spacing for any
StaffGrouper in the Score. If you override the spacing for the
StaffGroup (and similar), only this kind of group is affected and if you
do so in the \with statement, only this particular context is affected.
Here is an example showing some possible overrides:
\version 2.18.2
\layout {
% no effect because there is no StaffGroup
% only PianoStaff and ChoirStaff
\override StaffGroup.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = 60
% this works for the piano staff (upper group)
\override PianoStaff.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = 15
% this works for all groups but the PianoStaff has more specific
% settings which are used instead
\override Score.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = -2
\override Score.StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.basic-distance = 0
}
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff { a }
\new Staff { b }
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff { c }
\new Staff { d }
\new PianoStaff \with {
% this override only affects this second piano staff
% overriding the Score and PianoStaff overrides from
% the layout block above
\override StaffGrouper.staff-staff-spacing.padding = 4
}
\new Staff { e }
\new Staff { f }
Don't hesitate to ask again if things are still unclear.
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Time signature style with note in the denominator
Hi Gilberto,
Try :
\version 2.19.15
#(define-public (format-time-sig-note grob)
(let* ((frac (ly:grob-property grob 'fraction))
(num (if (pair? frac) (car frac) 4))
(den (if (pair? frac) (cdr frac) 4))
(m
(markup #:override '(baseline-skip . 0.5)
#:center-column (#:number (number-string num)
#:override '(style . default)
;; her comes the flag:
#:override '(flag-style .
modern-straight-flag)
#:note (number-string den)
DOWN
(grob-interpret-markup grob m)))
%%%
\relative c' {
\override Staff.Flag.stencil = #modern-straight-flag
\override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #format-time-sig-note
\time 3/8
\autoBeamOff
c8 c8 c8
}
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-03-11 13:52 GMT+01:00 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
Hello LilyPonders,
Could someone please give me a hand? I want to use the following snippet
(from: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=642), but I'd like that the
notes
in the denominator to use the straight-modern-flag similarly to the notes
of
the score:
\version 2.19.15
#(define-public (format-time-sig-note grob)
(let* ((frac (ly:grob-property grob 'fraction))
(num (if (pair? frac) (car frac) 4))
(den (if (pair? frac) (cdr frac) 4))
(m (markup #:override '(baseline-skip . 0.5)
#:center-column (#:number (number-string num)
#:override '(style .
default)
#:note (number-string den)
DOWN
(grob-interpret-markup grob m)))
%%%
\relative c' {
\override Staff.Flag.stencil = #modern-straight-flag
\override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #format-time-sig-note
\time 3/8
\autoBeamOff
c8 c8 c8
}
This code above produces:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n172947/03.png
Any help is very much appreciated.
Best,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Time-signature-style-with-note-in-the-denominator-tp172947.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 um 08:58 schrieb and...@andis59.se: On 2015-03-12 08:29, Urs Liska wrote: Could anybody please tell me what \version 2.18.2 #(display (car (command-line))) displays on Windows (i.e. how the string is formatted)? Using Frescobaldi C:\lilypond-2-18-2-1\usr\bin\lilypond-windows.exe Thanks. Fortunately the respected result :-) Urs // Anders -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 um 09:11 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:29:33 +0100 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 12.03.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Mattes: Hmm, are you looking for the path to the current lilypond executable or the current lilypond input file? For the first '(car (command-line))' might be all you need. Yes, this is what I'm looking for, thank you. Please be aware that on vanilla *ix systems this only works if the program is executed via a PATH search. E.g., if lilypond is in /usr/bin: cd /tmp lilypond -- /usr/bin/lilypond cd /usr/bin ./lilypond -- ./lilypond OK, this means if the result points to in the current dir then I should prepend it with the current dir (which is easily possible with the tools I already have). But I couldn't verify this actually. I have a binary release (on Debian), installed through the install script. The executable is in ~/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond (where the lilypond path is actually a symlink). I get = /home/uliska/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond with each of the following: cd ~ lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/bin lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin lilypond test-script.ly I'm happy that the result points to the actual lily executable and not to the wrapper script in ~/bin. I don't have a package installation, so I don't know if that would return different reults. Could someone please try this out for me? Thank you Urs -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Hi Urs, I get = /home/uliska/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond with each of the following: cd ~ lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/bin lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin lilypond test-script.ly The difference was whether you use path search or not: lilypond (execute it wherever it is found) or ./lilypond (execute this file here) so this should make a difference: cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin ./lilypond test-script.ly Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Op Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:11:33 +0100 Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl schreef: Please be aware that on vanilla *ix systems this only works if the program is executed via a PATH search. E.g., if lilypond is in /usr/bin: cd /tmp lilypond -- /usr/bin/lilypond cd /usr/bin ./lilypond -- ./lilypond If I run simply lilypond, (car (command-line)) also just yields 'lilypond'. (while lilypond resides in /usr/local/bin on my system) You could read PATH of course and decude where lilypond is found. But you could always ask LilyPond for its datadir, it always returns the absolute path to the ly, svg, ps, scm etc files. #(display (ly:get-option 'datadir)) -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 11:40, schrieb Wilbert Berendsen: But you could always ask LilyPond for its datadir, it always returns the absolute path to the ly, svg, ps, scm etc files. #(display (ly:get-option 'datadir)) Thank you very much, this is even closer to what I really want, namely the fonts dir, which is inside that :-) Best Urs -- Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 15:38, schrieb Noeck: I assume python has a function abspath or similar. os.path.abspath Yes, but I'm looking for a Scheme solution (which I now have). -- Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
convert-ly adding linefeeds / carriage return
Wilbert, Thanks for your help. I should have tried that before posting. It turns out that the problem is with Frescobaldi. Running convert-ly from the command-line works fine, no carriage return and/or linefeed added. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:15 +0100 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: Am 12.03.2015 11:40, schrieb Wilbert Berendsen: But you could always ask LilyPond for its datadir, it always returns the absolute path to the ly, svg, ps, scm etc files. #(display (ly:get-option 'datadir)) Thank you very much, this is even closer to what I really want, namely the fonts dir, which is inside that :-) This is a reminder to all of us that it is usually best to ask what you are looking for :) . -- Joahn ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:38:20 +0100 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote: OK, this means if the result points to in the current dir then I should prepend it with the current dir (which is easily possible with the tools I already have). To be more precise: when the result is not an absolute path name (i.e., does not start with a / ) then it must be resolved from the perspective of the current directory. I assume python has a function abspath or similar. I get = /home/uliska/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond with each of the following: cd ~ lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/bin lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin lilypond test-script.ly You probably do not have . in your PATH, or it does not precede /home/uliska/lilypond/usr/bin/. Try e.g. env PATH=.:$PATH lilypond test-script.ly -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
I assume python has a function abspath or similar. os.path.abspath ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
2015-03-12 22:08 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com: 2015-03-12 20:35 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com: Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig It's caused by \markLengthOn in your global-variable: The spacing-wish of RehearsalMark and Dynamic conflict. I did some more investigation and filed a bug-report. It's not the Dynamic/RehearsalMark conflict, but \markLengthOn itself. http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/markLengthOn-fails-if-MetronomeMark-RehearsalMark-direction-is-DOWN-td173039.html Cheers, Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
How many of those issues are the sort that affect users every second Tuesday after a a blue moon versus critical bugs? I don't understand what you are trying to ask. Please have a look at https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list to see how we are collecting reports. Note that we discourage Joe User from generating issues; instead, we have bugmeisters who take care of properly generating entries. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
However, one extremely important feature is sorely missing from Savannah's bug tracker: the ability to directly display images, [...] Are there plans to implement image support? Realistically, no. Hmm. Perhaps it's time to open an issue in FusionForge (at least I assume that the Savane installation on Savannah will eventuall move to FusionForge). I noticed google provides some tools to export the issues as a file. Perhaps there could be a way to take their output, and import it into savannah (generating the proper structures and items in the database). I'm guessing this will not be trivial, but if there's interest in working on that, I'll can assist from the Savannah side. Thanks in advance for the offer. IMHO, since we are forced to migrate to another site, we have to immediately start with evaluating our options. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Postsctipt arrows
Greetings list,
I want to make many different types of arrows using PostScript. The following
function from the Adobe Blue Book works very nicely for what I need. It’s quite
general.
The question is, how do I incorporate something of this level of complexity
this into a form where it can be invoked with \postscript in a \markup block?
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
/arrowdict 14 dict def arrowdict begin
/mtrx matrix def end
/arrow
{ arrowdict begin
/headlength exch def /halfheadthickness exch 2 div def /halfthickness exch 2
div def
/tipy exch def /tipx exch def
/taily exch def /tailx exch def
/dx tipx tailx sub def
/dy tipy taily sub def
/arrowlength dx dx mul dy dy mul add
sqrt def
/angle dy dx atan def
/base arrowlength headlength sub def
/savematrix mtrx currentmatrix def
tailx taily translate angle rotate
0 halfthickness neg moveto
base halfthickness neg lineto base halfheadthickness neg lineto arrowlength 0
lineto
base halfheadthickness lineto base halfthickness lineto
0 halfthickness lineto
closepath
savematrix setmatrix end
} def
An example of use in raw PostScript:
newpath
318 340 72 340 10 30 72 arrow
fill
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
Patches are always welcomed, but I do not know if anyone is interested in hacking on the current php code to add such a feature. Right, I'm not exactly interested, but if that single feature makes the difference between lilypond moving to savannah or somewhere, I'd at least try to look at it. I would be glad if we could use Savannah since I don't like github's workflow very much. BTW, while github is able to display images, you can't have any non-image attachments, which is very annoying. Of course it would be great if someone from lilypond was willing. It seems that FusionForge (the successor of Savane) is written in PHP, which is unfortunately a programming language I don't know at all... Does google do anything to filter out virus-y images? Since they are so commonly used as a carrier for bad things. I'm not sure how to even begin on that problem. And spammers signing up for savannah is a known and continuing problem. My suggestion is to use netpbm programs to filter everything, e.g. jpegtopnm input.jpg | pnmtojpeg output.jpg pngtopnm input.png | pnmtopng output.png (with some sensible command line options). This should ensure that the images are not malformed. I gather lilypond wants a web interface, not a mail interface, though? Yes, I think so. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: convert-ly adding linefeeds / carriage return
Op Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:19:35 -0400 stephan.patter...@videotron.ca stephan.patter...@videotron.ca schreef: Thanks for your help. I should have tried that before posting. It turns out that the problem is with Frescobaldi. Running convert-ly from the command-line works fine, no carriage return and/or linefeed added. thanks, added as https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/649 -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Copying metronome marks to multiple \StaffGroup's
Hi Xavier, Actually it should be done easily by adding Metronome_mark_engraver to the StaffGroup. I find it about the same amount of work — but far more flexible — to add a new context. Unfortunately there is a bug in LilyPond and it does not work. https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2199 And that, too. ;) Cheers, Kieren. ___ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: http://www.kierenmacmillan.info email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
We may be at cross purposes if you're creating score-oriented music. I generally create lead sheets. But no matter. I can understand your question, but will you eventually be generating single parts from your score? Would you not then WANT to have the D.C. included in every part? \global helps you there, compared to having to manually insert the D.C. markup into each instrument part when you go to produce individual parts. If Harm's solution works for you, that's what I would use. However, I would still recommend putting all rehearsal marks (including the D.C.) into the global music variable, so that both your full score and your individual parts will have identical rehearsal marks. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:37:13PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Jim, When I put in the Da Capo as a text markup in the global section, it ends up appearing on every staff, rather than just the bottom one, whereas when it is in as a rehearsal mark it only appears once like it should. How do you overcome this? See attached file. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:25 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for your quick response. I'll look into your solution now. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:23 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote: Hi, Craig. Just for a different perspective, I always put form-related marks like D.C., D.S., Segnos, Codas, Fines, etc. in the global section. Since they (almost always) need to be in the same location for all parts, it makes the most sense to me to put them there once, and then use the \global variable in each part to make sure that all parts are consistent. That said, I'm attaching a diff to your original file that shows how I would do what you're trying to accomplish. I, too, have seen that \marks will sometimes distort the musical spacing, but except for lots of fiddling with X-extents and offsets, I don't know how to do anything about it. My approach uses TextScript markup objects instead of RehearsalMark objects. I hope it will give you some ideas about alternative solutions to your problem. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig *Craig Dabelstein* e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
Hi Jim, When I put in the Da Capo as a text markup in the global section, it ends up appearing on every staff, rather than just the bottom one, whereas when it is in as a rehearsal mark it only appears once like it should. How do you overcome this? See attached file. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:25 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for your quick response. I'll look into your solution now. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:23 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote: Hi, Craig. Just for a different perspective, I always put form-related marks like D.C., D.S., Segnos, Codas, Fines, etc. in the global section. Since they (almost always) need to be in the same location for all parts, it makes the most sense to me to put them there once, and then use the \global variable in each part to make sure that all parts are consistent. That said, I'm attaching a diff to your original file that shows how I would do what you're trying to accomplish. I, too, have seen that \marks will sometimes distort the musical spacing, but except for lots of fiddling with X-extents and offsets, I don't know how to do anything about it. My approach uses TextScript markup objects instead of RehearsalMark objects. I hope it will give you some ideas about alternative solutions to your problem. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig *Craig Dabelstein* e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Da Capo test file.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
2015-03-12 20:35 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com:
Hi Lilyponders,
Has anyone run into this before.
When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above
the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN
command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra
space. Please see the attached file.
This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've
overlooked.
Craig
It's caused by \markLengthOn in your global-variable: The spacing-wish of
RehearsalMark and Dynamic conflict.
How about:
daCapo = {
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility =
#begin-of-line-invisible
\markLengthOff
\tweak direction #DOWN
\mark
\markup {
%% maybe add:
\fontsize #-2
\italic Da Capo
}
\markLengthOn
}
HTH,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Tweak Down causes extra space
Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig *Craig Dabelstein* e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en Da Capo test file.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
Il giorno gio 12 mar 2015 alle 21:08, Abel Cheung abelche...@gmail.com ha scritto: Time to start think about migrating issue tracker to somewhere else, especially when Lilypond has a huge project issues list, and storage is a dire requirement. It would take some time to make sure new issue tracker works properly afterwards. http://google-opensource.blogspot.de/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html The deadline is actually closer, 24th of August: March 12, 2015 - New project creation disabled. August 24, 2015 - The site goes read-only. You can still checkout/view project source, issues, and wikis. January 25, 2016 - The project hosting service is closed. You will be able to download a tarball of project source, issues, and wikis. These tarballs will be available throughout the rest of 2016. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
Hi, Craig.
Just for a different perspective, I always put form-related marks
like D.C., D.S., Segnos, Codas, Fines, etc. in the global section.
Since they (almost always) need to be in the same location for all
parts, it makes the most sense to me to put them there once, and
then use the \global variable in each part to make sure that all
parts are consistent.
That said, I'm attaching a diff to your original file that shows
how I would do what you're trying to accomplish. I, too, have
seen that \marks will sometimes distort the musical spacing, but
except for lots of fiddling with X-extents and offsets, I don't
know how to do anything about it.
My approach uses TextScript markup objects instead of RehearsalMark
objects. I hope it will give you some ideas about alternative
solutions to your problem.
Jim
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote:
Hi Lilyponders,
Has anyone run into this before.
When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above
the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN
command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra
space. Please see the attached file.
This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've
overlooked.
Craig
*Craig Dabelstein*
e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com
http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--- testfile.ly.orig2015-03-12 13:06:16.0 -0700
+++ testfile.ly 2015-03-12 13:17:01.0 -0700
@@ -1,17 +1,7 @@
\version 2.18.2
\language english
-daCapo = {
- \once
- \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
- \once
- \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #begin-of-line-invisible
- %\tweak direction #DOWN
- \mark
- \markup {
-\italic Da Capo
- }
-}
+daCapo = \markup { \italic Da Capo }
global = {
\markLengthOn
@@ -29,7 +19,8 @@
\mark TRIO (ad lib.)
\key g \major
\repeat volta 2 {
-s2*8
+s2*7
+s4 s4_\daCapo
}
}
@@ -64,7 +55,6 @@
c8 c d4 |
b8 c a d |
g,8\ff b16 a g8 r |
-\daCapo
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.18
Il 12/03/15 01.06, MarcM ha scritto: i just updated from MacPort but it installed 2.17.2 instead of 2.18. Il 12/03/15 01.42, safvet ha scritto: Likewise updated yesterday and received 2.17.2. There's nothing wrong with this: MacPorts still provides 2.17.2. I usually manage to have Frescobaldi updated in a couple of days, but it is important to note that I cannot commit directly to MacPorts repository, so any change I submit needs to be reviewed and applied by a developer with commit rights, who in most cases is a volunteer, working on MacPorts in the spare time. This time, due to unexpected circumstances (problems with the patch I submitted, problems with the SVN repository, personal problems of the developer who took charge of my patch), some important changes to the portfile for python-poppler-qt4 (a dependency of Frescobaldi) required longer than usual to be reviewed (they've been accepted only yesterday). Today I'm going to upload the 2.18 update: I hope it will be accepted in the usual short time. Also, for the developers, it appears that the pre-build .dmg version of Frescobaldi opens correctly with the full set of windows, but the version built from MacPorts will launch and show the splash, but one has to click the dock icon again to get the full window set. Although this is a known issue (see https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/428), I didn't know that the pre-built application is not affected. Thanks for reporting. Unfortunately I'm not able to reproduce it consistently on my machine, but this new piece of information could indeed help a lot. Best wishes. Davide ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
Hi Jim, Thanks for your quick response. I'll look into your solution now. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:23 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote: Hi, Craig. Just for a different perspective, I always put form-related marks like D.C., D.S., Segnos, Codas, Fines, etc. in the global section. Since they (almost always) need to be in the same location for all parts, it makes the most sense to me to put them there once, and then use the \global variable in each part to make sure that all parts are consistent. That said, I'm attaching a diff to your original file that shows how I would do what you're trying to accomplish. I, too, have seen that \marks will sometimes distort the musical spacing, but except for lots of fiddling with X-extents and offsets, I don't know how to do anything about it. My approach uses TextScript markup objects instead of RehearsalMark objects. I hope it will give you some ideas about alternative solutions to your problem. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig *Craig Dabelstein* e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Scheme functions with #:
Large thanks! I would never have found this. Now I also see that #: terms are guile keyword syntax. Andrew On 13 March 2015 at 10:52:49, David Nalesnik (david.nales...@gmail.com) wrote: Try here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/markup-construction-in-scheme --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Pedal line staff sepation
Thanks Trevor, this is great. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
So that's what's behind the export to github button that appeared on google code today. The end of an era... Looks like google can export all issue data to a JSON file, so that's encouraging: http://code.google.com/p/support-tools/wiki/IssueExporterTool Just thinking out loud in terms of images, I wonder if GNU MediaGoblin might help? http://mediagoblin.org/ Maybe just some way to automate posting images to a MediaGoblin instance with links to them appearing in the bug/issue tracker? (Barring more elaborate integration efforts...) It looks like MediaGoblin is written in python, and they probably have some way of dealing with the virus and spam problems. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Google-Code-will-be-no-more-at-2016-01-25-tp173015p173036.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Graphical operators in markup
Andrew Bernard wrote I am trying to use postscript in markup blocks. I see snippets using such things as \translate and \scale, which I need, along with all the other plane transformation operators. Where is the documentation for these operators? I have looked everywhere to no avail. Using 2.19.16. You'll find \scale here, among some other related things: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/graphic -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Graphical-operators-in-markup-tp173031p173037.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
Issues: Savannah supports web-based 'trackers' (for bugs, supports, tasks, etc.), for example: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=lwip and also using a DebBugs server, for example: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=emacs However, one extremely important feature is sorely missing from Savannah's bug tracker: the ability to directly display images, which is of extreme importance for an application like lilypond, where subtle details in the rendering results together with its real-world templates are discussed. Are there plans to implement image support? We can try to work with project administrators on importing existing issues, but that will require some effort. Right now, lilypond has more than 4000 issues... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
Thanks to you both. I have it sorted now. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 07:39 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote: We may be at cross purposes if you're creating score-oriented music. I generally create lead sheets. But no matter. I can understand your question, but will you eventually be generating single parts from your score? Would you not then WANT to have the D.C. included in every part? \global helps you there, compared to having to manually insert the D.C. markup into each instrument part when you go to produce individual parts. If Harm's solution works for you, that's what I would use. However, I would still recommend putting all rehearsal marks (including the D.C.) into the global music variable, so that both your full score and your individual parts will have identical rehearsal marks. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:37:13PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Jim, When I put in the Da Capo as a text markup in the global section, it ends up appearing on every staff, rather than just the bottom one, whereas when it is in as a rehearsal mark it only appears once like it should. How do you overcome this? See attached file. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:25 Craig Dabelstein craig.dabelst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, Thanks for your quick response. I'll look into your solution now. Craig On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 06:23 Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote: Hi, Craig. Just for a different perspective, I always put form-related marks like D.C., D.S., Segnos, Codas, Fines, etc. in the global section. Since they (almost always) need to be in the same location for all parts, it makes the most sense to me to put them there once, and then use the \global variable in each part to make sure that all parts are consistent. That said, I'm attaching a diff to your original file that shows how I would do what you're trying to accomplish. I, too, have seen that \marks will sometimes distort the musical spacing, but except for lots of fiddling with X-extents and offsets, I don't know how to do anything about it. My approach uses TextScript markup objects instead of RehearsalMark objects. I hope it will give you some ideas about alternative solutions to your problem. Jim On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +, Craig Dabelstein wrote: Hi Lilyponders, Has anyone run into this before. When including a Da Capo markup at the end of a file, if it sits above the staff it is fine, but when I uncomment the \tweak direction #DOWN command it moves the marking below the staff but adds a heap of extra space. Please see the attached file. This has been driving me crazy. I'm sure there is a simple fix that I've overlooked. Craig *Craig Dabelstein* e:craig.dabelst...@gmail.com http://www.facebook.com/craig.dabelstein http://au.linkedin.com/pub/craig-dabelstein/b2/5b8/389/en ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Copying metronome marks to multiple \StaffGroup's
On 11 March 2015 at 19:40, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi, Search for “ScoreMarks” or “MarkLine” in the archives and snippets. There are lots of discussions about this. Hi, Actually it should be done easily by adding Metronome_mark_engraver to the StaffGroup. Unfortunately there is a bug in LilyPond and it does not work. https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2199 Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 um 10:59 schrieb Noeck: Hi Urs, I get = /home/uliska/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond with each of the following: cd ~ lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/bin lilypond test-script.ly cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin lilypond test-script.ly The difference was whether you use path search or not: lilypond (execute it wherever it is found) or ./lilypond (execute this file here) so this should make a difference: cd ~/lilypond/usr/bin ./lilypond test-script.ly Ah, now I see. Yes, it does make a difference: GNU LilyPond 2.19.16 warning: not relocating, no 2.19.16/ or current/ found under /shared/software/lilyponds/2.19.16/usr/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path which is due to the load script that doesn't set the paths when the executable is done directly. when I run this from ~/bin (i.e. locally calling the wrapper script) everything's fine again because the wrapper script sets the actual path to the executable. So it seems I don't have to consider this as an issue. Thanks for the feedback Urs Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: convert-ly adding linefeeds / carriage return
Op Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:16:21 -0400 stephan.patter...@videotron.ca stephan.patter...@videotron.ca schreef: I have just upgraded to the latest Lilypond, version 2.19.16. I'm using Frescobaldi 2.18 on Windows 8.1. Running convert-ly on any of my Lilypond scores, I find that carriage returns and/or linefeeds get added to each line. Please try this also outside of Frescobaldi. Then we can see if it is a Frescobaldi bug (i.e. it reads the output back in an incorrect way) or a convert-ly bug. -- Wilbert Berendsen (http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
How many of those issues are the sort that affect users every second Tuesday after a a blue moon versus critical bugs? Shane On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote: Issues: Savannah supports web-based 'trackers' (for bugs, supports, tasks, etc.), for example: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=lwip and also using a DebBugs server, for example: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=emacs However, one extremely important feature is sorely missing from Savannah's bug tracker: the ability to directly display images, which is of extreme importance for an application like lilypond, where subtle details in the rendering results together with its real-world templates are discussed. Are there plans to implement image support? We can try to work with project administrators on importing existing issues, but that will require some effort. Right now, lilypond has more than 4000 issues... Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Scheme functions with #:
Hi Andrew, On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com wrote: In some Scheme code I find functions prefaced with #:, such as #:roman, #:translate, and so on. What is this syntax? How does one find where such items are defined? Maybe I am no longer any good at finding things, but I have looked everywhere. Try here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/markup-construction-in-scheme --David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:Tweak Down causes extra space
How is this
\version 2.18.2
\language english
daCapo = {
%\once
%\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #0
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #begin-of-line-invisible
\tweak direction #DOWN
\mark
\markup {
\hspace #-11
\italic Da Capo
}
}
global = {
\markLengthOn
\time 2/4
\key d \major
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
\mark \default
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
\mark TRIO (ad lib.)
\key g \major
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
}
piccoloNotes = \transpose c c'' {
\relative c' {
\transposition c''
\clef treble
a8(\f fs) a( fs) |
d'8(\sf a) a4 |
d8( cs) b-. a-. |
g8 fs e4 |
a8( fs) a( fs) |
d'8(\sf a) a4 |
d8( cs) b-. a-. |
gs8 b a4 |
e8( a) a4\sf |
fs8( a) a4\sf |
g8-. a-. b-. cs-. |
d8( a) fs4 |
e8( a) a4\sf |
fs8( a) a4\sf |
\grace { a16 } g8-. fs-. g-. e-. |
d8-. d'-. d-. r |
r4 r8 b\p |
c8 c d4 |
b8 b d4 |
a8\ff a16 b a8 d, |
r4 r8 b'\p |
c8 c d4 |
b8 c a d |
g,8\ff b16 a g8 r |
\daCapo
}
}
\score {
\new Staff = Piccolo
\global
\piccoloNotes
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Tweak Down causes extra space
Thanks Stephen.
I'll try it out and compare.
Craig
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 at 09:06 Stephen MacNeil classicalja...@gmail.com
wrote:
How is this
\version 2.18.2
\language english
daCapo = {
%\once
%\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #0
\once
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility = #begin-of-line-invisible
\tweak direction #DOWN
\mark
\markup {
\hspace #-11
\italic Da Capo
}
}
global = {
\markLengthOn
\time 2/4
\key d \major
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
\mark \default
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
\mark TRIO (ad lib.)
\key g \major
\repeat volta 2 {
s2*8
}
}
piccoloNotes = \transpose c c'' {
\relative c' {
\transposition c''
\clef treble
a8(\f fs) a( fs) |
d'8(\sf a) a4 |
d8( cs) b-. a-. |
g8 fs e4 |
a8( fs) a( fs) |
d'8(\sf a) a4 |
d8( cs) b-. a-. |
gs8 b a4 |
e8( a) a4\sf |
fs8( a) a4\sf |
g8-. a-. b-. cs-. |
d8( a) fs4 |
e8( a) a4\sf |
fs8( a) a4\sf |
\grace { a16 } g8-. fs-. g-. e-. |
d8-. d'-. d-. r |
r4 r8 b\p |
c8 c d4 |
b8 b d4 |
a8\ff a16 b a8 d, |
r4 r8 b'\p |
c8 c d4 |
b8 c a d |
g,8\ff b16 a g8 r |
\daCapo
}
}
\score {
\new Staff = Piccolo
\global
\piccoloNotes
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [savannah-help-public] Google Code will be no more at 2016-01-25
Patches are always welcomed, but I do not know if anyone is interested in hacking on the current php code to add such a feature. Right, I'm not exactly interested, but if that single feature makes the difference between lilypond moving to savannah or somewhere, I'd at least try to look at it. Of course it would be great if someone from lilypond was willing. Does google do anything to filter out virus-y images? Since they are so commonly used as a carrier for bad things. I'm not sure how to even begin on that problem. And spammers signing up for savannah is a known and continuing problem. Another possibility is to work on DebBugs, adding a feature to show (some) attachments inline. Presumably that could be done now with each individual's mail reader. I gather lilypond wants a web interface, not a mail interface, though? karl ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Graphical operators in markup
I am trying to use postscript in markup blocks. I see snippets using such things as \translate and \scale, which I need, along with all the other plane transformation operators. Where is the documentation for these operators? I have looked everywhere to no avail. Using 2.19.16. While we are here, I am looking for a function to draw postscript arrows. If anybody has such, I would be most appreciative. I think it would be good to have a very general and flexible arrow library in lilypond. Thanks! Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Scheme functions with #:
In some Scheme code I find functions prefaced with #:, such as #:roman, #:translate, and so on. What is this syntax? How does one find where such items are defined? Maybe I am no longer any good at finding things, but I have looked everywhere. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in articulate.ly
From: Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de Subject: Re: Bug in articulate.ly Another example is that you could indicate tempo rubato and then specify as interpretation one of the many possible actual tempo(s) that would be used for rendering the MIDI. If I may chime in with my opinion on this: there may be some point in translating articulations into midi, but tempo rubato is in itself meant to be subjective and thus marks the point where a human performer cannot and must not be replaced by a machine. Thus I find the sketched approach more than a little absurd, if you permit the remark. Permit me to suggest that you lower your standards. The practical reality is that, even in a human performance, a passage marked rubato will actually take a specific, measurable amount of time. If one's purpose is to render MIDI that approximates such a performance, you can choose, as an editor/interpreter, to instruct the MIDI output to consume that amount of time. I agree that adding randomness into this definition probably does not achieve much. But it is absolutely useful to tweak MIDI output. There is a great deal of useful difference between some control and none, even if the results are far from passing a Turing test. It?s neither possible, nor rewarding, nor even desirable to substitute real music making by electronic simulation, (at least for most kinds of music, and certainly every music which can be reasonably typeset with lilypond belongs in this category). Well, in the 21st century, computers have pretty much become instruments in their own right. Which is to say, lilypond can be a way to control such an instrument. It is probably the case the vast majority of the music people hear in film tv scores with orchestral instruments is played on virtual instruments. Composers end up actually writing more for those instruments (playing to their strengths, avoiding their weaknesses) than with actual acoustic instruments and performers in mind. So, I think that lilypond being able to control virtual instruments is a pretty practical goal. Yours, David Elaine Alt 415 . 341 .4954 *Confusion is highly underrated* ela...@flaminghakama.com self-immolation.info skype: flaming_hakama Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: path to lilypond executable
Am 12.03.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Mattes: Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 21:29 CET, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org schrieb: Sorry, but I don't seem to be able to find the right search terms ... How would I retrieve the path to the currently executed LilyPond from Scheme? Hmm, are you looking for the path to the current lilypond executable or the current lilypond input file? For the first '(car (command-line))' might be all you need. HTH Ralf Mattes Yes, this is what I'm looking for, thank you. Could anybody please tell me what \version 2.18.2 #(display (car (command-line))) displays on Windows (i.e. how the string is formatted)? Thanks Urs TIA Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
