Re: Cannot install lilypond on a shared Hostmonster server
On Sun 05 Jun 2016 at 20:59:17 (+), Mike wrote: > > This sort of error is usually a good sign that you're trying to run a > > locally installed LP with the Linux Distribution versions of, eg, > > GhostScript or Python; not a good idea. > > > > Your full output of the installation process (in the other subthread) > > is useful, difficult to understand, and so it'll take a bit of looking at > > in due course. > > Thanks. To be honest though, this seems to point to the opposite, i.e. > that the "local" LP GhostScript is unhappy, while the one I invoke directly > from the command line (presumably the one provided with the distro) can > transform PS into PDF without any problems. When you type the gs command at the commandline, you will get the distribution's version of gs. It will run with a self-consistent set of libraries and files, and should process your PS file into a PDF file successfully. When you run LP, it will ask gs to convert the file. However, which version of gs runs, LP's or the system's? Will it be happy running with LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home1/myusername/lilypond/usr/lib"? Do I know if LP's symlinks are set up correctly? Not really. Do you yet know which distribution is running? What version of tar do you have? $ tar --version The only difference I can see at present between the symlinks that work (fonts) and those that don't (libs) is that the latter point to files in the same directory. tar is/has been quite buggy in the area of symlinks. In all cases, the symlinks precede the targets in your tar archive. I can't help wondering what goes on between the usr/lib directory, the symlink and the target file during the interval while the directory is being populated. Cheers, David. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Single slur with two endings (well, kind of) for repeats
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n191475...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/16 21:02, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Wed 08 Jun 2016 at 20:33:51 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> >> Suppose something like
> >>
> >> \repeat volta 2 {
> >>c4 c4(
> >> }
> >> \alternative {
> >> {c4) r}
> >> {c2) } %%% this
> >> }
> >>
> >> the second end slur is not typeset.
> >> is there any elegant way to draw it, or i should try to make an
> >> invisible note somewhere?
> >
> > The Notation Manual shows how to do this in 5.5.4 Modifying shapes
> > Modifying ties and slurs
> > where it comes right at the end, just before 5.5.5. It uses empty
> > chords <> rather than hidden notes.
>
> Thank you!!
FWIW, I've used \repeatTie in situations like this as well:
\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c4 (
}
\alternative {
{ c4 ) r }
{ c2 \repeatTie }
}
Naturally, you can adjust its shape with the \shape command if desired, but
this usually gives a pretty good starting shape.
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Single-slur-with-two-endings-well-kind-of-for-repeats-tp191473p191479.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Single slur with two endings (well, kind of) for repeats
On 08/06/16 21:02, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 08 Jun 2016 at 20:33:51 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
Suppose something like
\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c4(
}
\alternative {
{c4) r}
{c2) } %%% this
}
the second end slur is not typeset.
is there any elegant way to draw it, or i should try to make an
invisible note somewhere?
The Notation Manual shows how to do this in 5.5.4 Modifying shapes
Modifying ties and slurs
where it comes right at the end, just before 5.5.5. It uses empty
chords <> rather than hidden notes.
Thank you!!
alberto
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Single slur with two endings (well, kind of) for repeats
On Wed 08 Jun 2016 at 20:33:51 (+0100), Alberto Simões wrote:
> Suppose something like
>
> \repeat volta 2 {
>c4 c4(
> }
> \alternative {
> {c4) r}
> {c2) } %%% this
> }
>
> the second end slur is not typeset.
> is there any elegant way to draw it, or i should try to make an
> invisible note somewhere?
The Notation Manual shows how to do this in 5.5.4 Modifying shapes
Modifying ties and slurs
where it comes right at the end, just before 5.5.5. It uses empty
chords <> rather than hidden notes.
Cheers,
David.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Single slur with two endings (well, kind of) for repeats
Hi
Suppose something like
\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c4(
}
\alternative {
{c4) r}
{c2) } %%% this
}
the second end slur is not typeset.
is there any elegant way to draw it, or i should try to make an
invisible note somewhere?
Thanks
Alberto
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hide SystemStartSquare if Staff is removed?
Kyle, On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Kyle wrote: > I'm working on an orchestral score wherein the string parts > play some extended passages divisi, and it makes sense to > divide the staves during those passages. > When they are playing in unison, I'd like to hide the second staff. > However, when the second staff is hidden, > the SystemStartSquare is still visible. > Simply adding > \override StaffGroup.SystemStartSquare.transparent > to the relevant systems does not work. > It seems as though once transparency is set to ##t, it won't switch back > later. > Any help is greatly appreciated. > How about: \override StaffGroup.SystemStartSquare.collapse-height = #5 HTH, Abraham P.S. Devs, Both SystemStartBrace and SystemStartBracket have this property set by default, but SystemStartSquare does not. Is this intended? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Hide SystemStartSquare if Staff is removed?
Kyle writes:
> I'm working on an orchestral score wherein the string parts
> play some extended passages divisi, and it makes sense to
> divide the staves during those passages.
> When they are playing in unison, I'd like to hide the second staff.
> However, when the second staff is hidden,
> the SystemStartSquare is still visible.
> Simply adding
> \override StaffGroup.SystemStartSquare.transparent
> to the relevant systems does not work.
> It seems as though once transparency is set to ##t, it won't switch back
> later.
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html>
\version "2.19.42"
\new StaffGroup
<<
\new Staff { \repeat unfold 36 r1 }
\new Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves { \repeat unfold 35 r1 c1 }
>>
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hide SystemStartSquare if Staff is removed?
I'm working on an orchestral score wherein the string parts play some extended passages divisi, and it makes sense to divide the staves during those passages. When they are playing in unison, I'd like to hide the second staff. However, when the second staff is hidden, the SystemStartSquare is still visible. Simply adding \override StaffGroup.SystemStartSquare.transparent to the relevant systems does not work. It seems as though once transparency is set to ##t, it won't switch back later. Any help is greatly appreciated. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Ties across different voices?
On 06/07/2016 09:15 PM, Joshua Nichols wrote:
I've run into the need to do this, and I can't quite figure out how to
make it happen. Please see the attached image.
Basically, for those who can't load it, I want to create a tie from a
"chord" into a "new voice." It's fairly common in classical literature,
but I am wondering if this is possible even, or yet.
Ties into chords from chords/notes that only share part of the chord
notes already do exactly what you appear to need. No trickery (hidden
notes to cross voices etc) is necessary here:
\new Staff <<
{
d''1~ |
d''1~ |
2 |
} \\ {
d'1~ |
d'1~ |
d'1 |
}
>>
If you prefer, you can avoid the '\\' syntax by using
<<
{
\voiceOne
% notes for upper voice
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo
% notes for lower voice
}
>>
Rutger
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
