Re: min size svg, how to
> 1-crop > I am trying to produce 'min sized' svg images, but I fail. As an > example: > ... > which I compile using this command: > lilypond -dcrop --svg test-2.ly I am sorry for the 'noise', I actually missed that lilypond creates a test-2-cropped.svg, so everything is fine wrt 1- > 2-[crop/staff] margins? Now that it works perfectly, is it possible to adjust I(to add) top, left, bottom, right (staff) margins? Thanks, David pgpwD5dJWuyLJ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
min size svg, how to
Hello
1- crop
I am trying to produce 'min sized' svg images, but I fail. As an
example:
\version "2.22"
\paper{
indent=0\mm
oddFooterMarkup=##f
oddHeaderMarkup=##f
bookTitleMarkup = ##f
scoreTitleMarkup = ##f
page-breaking = #ly:one-line-breaking
}
\layout {
}
\relative {
g'4 f e f
g2 c,
\bar "|."
}
which I compile using this command:
lilypond -dcrop --svg test-2.ly
I obtain the attached image (screenshot of eog test-2.svg ...], where
one can see it has been horizontally cropped, but not vertically, how
can I achieve a crop in both direction?
2- [crop/staff] margins?
If I succeed to crop in both direction, is there a way, using variables
further adjust top, left, bottom, right (staff) margins?
Thanks,
David
pgpxgWEsk4EeH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Replace sub-string
Hello, > On 2020-05-22 8:38 pm, Freeman Gilmore wrote: > > Is there a procedure, to replace 'all' occurrences of a sub-string > > within a string. with a string? > > If so please give an example. > regexp-substitute/global [1] should do the job. > [1]: > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/Regexp-Functions.html#Regexp-Functions > > (regexp-substitute/global #f >"(c|sh|w)ould of" >"I would of done that if I could of." >'pre 1 "ould have" 'post) > ... Fwiw, I wrote a none regex version, inspired by a similar code I found in guix, it is here [1], feel free to snarf it ... Guile 3.0 also has a version, in (ice-9 string-fun), a complete diff implementation [2] ... David [1] Grip - string-replace-all http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/grip.git/tree/grip/string.scm [2] Guile 3.0 - string-replace-substring http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/module/ice-9/string-fun.scm?h=master pgp23oQY86n3V.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hello THomas, > ... > Now `core-guile-condition´ feels like a case for `match´, but I > couldn't make it work. > Is this a bad use case and alist searching is always preferable? I would do this: (define (is-spanner? grob) (match grob ((g-key . g-vals) (let ((meta (assq-ref g-vals 'meta))) (and meta (eq? (assq-ref meta 'class) 'Spanner) g-key) Which you could generalize: (define (lp-grob-is-a? grob class) (match grob ((g-key . g-vals) (let ((meta (assq-ref g-vals 'meta))) (and meta (eq? (assq-ref meta 'class) class) g-key) Then filtering becomes: (define grobs '((Name-1 . ((foo . x) (bar . y) (buzz . z) (meta . ((name . Name-1) (class . Spanner) (ifaces . (i1 i2 i3)) (Name-2 . ((foo . m) (bar . n) (buzz . o) (meta . ((name . Name-2) (class . Not-a-Spanner) (ifaces . (i4 i5 i6)) (Name-3 . ((foo . m) (bar . n) (buzz . o) (meta . ((name . Name-3) (class . Spanner) (ifaces . (i7 i8 i9 scheme@(guile-user)> (filter-map (lambda (grob) (lp-grob-is-a? grob 'Spanner)) grobs) $6 = (Name-1 Name-3) > As a side note. > I'd like to download the "Guile Reference Manual" as one big-page > .html, but couldn't find any for 2.9.1. > Not yet done? No, but you could locally build it, using the glib gendoc.sh script, let me know if you need help with this, I can cook sometig for you ... David. pgpDLtncfEjE5.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hi Thomas, > ... > Thanks again! You're welcome. I used 'funny' (weird) procedure and variable names, but if the procedure is to be exposed to your users, and with the objective of making it simple to use, read and maintain, as you described later in your answer, you could write it as - using (ice-9 match): (define (lp-map proc lp-list) "Apply PROC to each element of LP-LIST. An LP-LIST must be a list of lists of items - (cons '(a b c) (cons '(d e f) (cons '(g h i) '( - or a list of lists of items plus a pair of list of items - (cons '(a b c) (cons '(d e f) '(g h i))). Each sublist item must statisfy (not (pair? item)). The result(s) of the procedure applications are saved and returned in a list." (let loop ((lp-list lp-list) (result '())) (match lp-list ((elt . rest) (if (pair? elt) (loop rest (cons (proc elt) result)) (reverse! (cons (proc lp-list) result (() (reverse! result) This version also matches the built-in map argument order. If you need an lp-map that accepts more then an lp-list, let me know: "lp-map proc lp-list1 lp-list2 ..." Now, it is worth pointing that if the above code is ok, it is not very robust: it strongly depends on well formed LP-LIST, and will fail otherwise, as (not very well) described in the procedure comment, consider this example: (define bad-lp-list (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) '((x) y z scheme@(guile-user)> (lp-map car bad-lp-list) $2 = (a 1 x y) > I think you're wrong. > It's not in the guile-1.8-docs, but below worked: Oh, great. > ... > Among keeping things simple is the attempt to use very little > additional guile-modules. I am all in favor of simplicity (who would not?), though I don't agree that not using additional Guile modules does (always) help to achieve that goal. > Whether 'pattern matching' will be useful to hide complexity to make > life easier for our users or whether it adds an abstraction layer, > which would make it even harder for users to write their own > guile-code, I can't judge currently. Ok, I believe it does help a lot, maybe even more scheme beginners actually, and so do our maintainers, here is an extract of the (latest) manual, section "6.6.8 Pairs": ... Since a very common operation in Scheme programs is to access the car of a car of a pair, or the car of the cdr of a pair, etc., the procedures called caar, cadr and so on are also predefined. However, using these procedures is often detrimental to readability, and error-prone. Thus, accessing the contents of a list is usually better achieved using pattern matching techniques (see Pattern Matching). ... But of course do as you wish, there is nothing 'wrong' writing good scheme code using 'old' destructuring techniques, but it will, always imo, be more difficult to read and maintain. David. pgpWdxXCqa_hL.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hi Thomas, > ... > Thanks pointing me to this possibility, in my use-case I then could do: > (define (p) (cons '(1 2 3) '(4 5 6))) > (define l1 '(a b c)) > (define l2 '(x y z)) > (cons* l1 l2 (car (p)) (cdr (p)) '()) > => > ((a b c) (x y z) (1 2 3) (4 5 6)) Yes, if you can (you mentioned the code was not yours and couldn't be changed ...) that would be a lot cleaner, imo, and will let you use 'built-in' scheme, guile and srfi-1 procedures that work on lists, as mentioned in my first answer. > > (define (blue-walk blue proc) > > (let loop ((blue blue) > > (result '())) > > (match blue > > ((a . rest) > >(if (pair? a) > >(loop rest > > (cons (proc a) result)) > >(reverse! (cons (proc (cons a rest)) > >result > > (() > >(reverse! result) In the above code, I am performing an extra and therefore useless cons, here is a correction (not a bug, but one should _always_ avoid consing whenever possible): (define (blue-walk blue proc) (let loop ((blue blue) (result '())) (match blue ((a . rest) (if (pair? a) (loop rest (cons (proc a) result)) -> (reverse! (cons (proc blue) result (() (reverse! result) > My guile-knowledge is mostly limited to what LilyPond needs. > As far as I can tell (ice-9 match) isn't used in our source. > So I need to study your `blue-walk´ from scratch. In this particular case, match is 'convenient', but not really indispensable - and I see now it's not in guile-1.8. Here is a version that does not need match (though you might not even need it if you can (cons* a b c ... '()) as you mentioned here above): (define (fox-walk fox proc) (let loop ((fox fox) (result '())) (if (null? fox) (reverse! result) (let ((a (car fox))) (if (pair? a) (loop (cdr fox) (cons (proc a) result)) (reverse! (cons (proc fox) result))) Now, if/when you (lily devs I mean, not just you of course) plan to use 2.0, 2.2 or 3.0 (2.9.1 is it is ...) [*], it is highly recommended to use match 'everywhere' you'd use car, cdr, cadr ... but not only, look at the "7.7 Pattern Matching" section of a recent manual for more ... the code is/becomes a lot more readable, and match is not only extremely powerful, but also extremely fast (no figures, but it's being said there is no penalty compared to using 'older' destructuring techniques ... (referred to, among guilers, 'the car cdr hell' :)) David. [*] I know why the change hasn't been made, I don't expect any answer here, just mentioning that if/when ... (saying this so you save your energy and to avoid to start yet another conversation on this already deeply discussed mater among you ...) pgp_tUmxGgAZD.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hi again, Replying twice to myself in a row, how is that :) A little tired I guess ... > > Note that the above will only work if the last 'blue item' has 3 elements, > > you'd > > need to adapt for other use case (which also 'speak' in favor of the cleaner > > approach. > Actually, I didn't like what I wrote, here is a slightly better code: And here is a corrected version: the code in the mail I'm answering now would not return proper (expected) results for any other operator then car ... this one will let you really walk :) (use-modules (ice-9 match)) (define blue (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) '(x y z (define fox (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) (cons '(x y z) '() (define (blue-walk blue proc) (let loop ((blue blue) (result '())) (match blue ((a . rest) (if (pair? a) (loop rest (cons (proc a) result)) (reverse! (cons (proc (cons a rest)) result (() (reverse! result) scheme@(guile-user)> (load "blue.scm") ;;; note: source file /usr/alto/projects/guile/blue.scm ;;; ... scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk blue car) $2 = (a 1 x) scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk fox car) $3 = (a 1 x) scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk blue cdr) $4 = ((b c) (2 3) (y z)) scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk fox cdr) $5 = ((b c) (2 3) (y z)) Cheers, David pgpj47BxMMxuy.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hi again, > Note that the above will only work if the last 'blue item' has 3 elements, > you'd > need to adapt for other use case (which also 'speak' in favor of the cleaner > approach. Actually, I didn't like what I wrote, here is a slightly better code: (use-modules (ice-9 match)) (define (blue-walk blue proc) (let loop ((blue blue) (result '())) (match blue ((a . rest) (if (pair? a) (loop rest (cons (proc a) result)) (reverse! (cons a result (() (reverse! result) It solves the above note (it avoids to have to know how many elements the last pair has), and also let you process both 'your' structure and the 'cleaner' one: (define blue (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) '(x y z (define fox (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) (cons '(x y z) '() scheme@(guile-user)> (load "blue.scm") ;;; note: source file /usr/alto/projects/guile/blue.scm ;;; newer than ... scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk fox car) $2 = (a 1 x) scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk blue car) $3 = (a 1 x) Cheers, David pgpq3Krn_OVTN.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scheme-question about accumulating lists of lists
Hi Thomas, > Failing example: > (map > car > (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) '(x y z > One way to make it work is to convert the initial pair (cons '(1 2 3) > '(x y z)) to a list of lists, i.e (cons '(1 2 3) (list '(x y z))) > The question is: is it the only and/or best way? It sounds a lot cleaner to me, because, in the end, it is as if: (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) (cons '(x y z) '( which is 'consistent all the way down, so to speak, and will let you use build-in scheme ops like map, fold, ... If you want to keep the original structure though, I'd use (ice-9 match) and recurse: (use-modules (ice-9 match)) (define blue (cons '(a b c) (cons '(1 2 3) '(x y z (define (blue-walk blue proc) (let loop ((blue blue) (result '())) (match blue ((x y z) (reverse! (cons x result))) ((a . rest) (loop rest (cons (proc a) result)) scheme@(guile-user)> (load "blue.scm") ;;; compiling /usr/alto/projects/guile/blue.scm ;;; compiled /home/david/.cache/guile/ccache/2.2-LE-8-3.A/usr/alto/projects/guile/blue.scm.go scheme@(guile-user)> (blue-walk blue car) $8 = (a 1 x) Note that the above will only work if the last 'blue item' has 3 elements, you'd need to adapt for other use case (which also 'speak' in favor of the cleaner approach. David pgpE8DMTMeHFF.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond
Hello, > I never tried to compile lilypond with a guile version higher than > 2.0.13, so I can't say anything about it. I (really) recommend you to do so: guile 2.2 is due to be released in a month or two, at the very most. 2.1.5 beta is the latest [1], 2.1.6 will be released in a few days (and I think it fixes a(some) utf8 related bug(s). At this point in time Thomas, if I was in your position, I would not spend time to get things done for 2.0, I would skip 2.0 and work on 2.2 instead, it is too late, and imo totally useless, 2.2 is an order of magnitude better then 2.0, for numerous reasons (read the NEWS since its first release...). Not only that, but when 2.2 is released, support to 2.0 will be kept to the very strict minimum... Don't loose your time here, it is my advice, maybe a bit more then 2c this time... Cheers, David [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2016-12/msg5.html pgp4JwddiA_Br.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Which Linux distro for Lilypond
Hello, > ... > I already had the vague thought how much work it might be to explore > other scheme-dialects, adjust whole lilypond to use them and drop > guile entirely. > ... For info, someone claimed on irc (#guile, freenode) that he/she is closed to compile/use lilypond using guile-2.1: https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guile/2017-01-05 [12:44:11] for the first time in several years, I can use lilypond (on Guile 2.1) to compile my infinite hands sheet notes! On this same guile log, further below, you may follow a conversation between the user and wingo (1 of the 3 guile maintainers) on what he/she considers 'the last problem to solve' ... Cheers, David pgpHWIBqn80is.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bach - Brahms Chaconne ... for left hand
Mark, > http://www.free-scores.com/download-sheet-music.php?pdf=1288 Thank you, And to Gilles and SoundsFromSound as well David. pgpmBYLJJH6RB.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Bach - Brahms Chaconne ... for left hand
Hello, Does anyone know if a lilypond free score exists for this piece: Bach - Brahms Chaconne (Violin Partita - V) No. 2 in D minor, BWV 1004: arranged for piano left hand I couldn't find it, but I'm not [by far] the best when it comes to searching for something on the web... Many thanks, David pgpoVwd1RNcIe.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Solution to 7 over sqr(71) time against integer polyrhythms
> We'll wait while you whip that right out and show that png file to us. > Remember, it is a poor carpenter who blames his tools. So you finally admit it: you are a poor carpenter pgpORFobQUwMQ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
Hello David, > > I was talking about the source code of these web sites, > The "source code of these web sites" is also written in Texinfo. Nope, Guile, Guix and the other examples I gave all have their web-site source code written in scheme. > That's because Guile does not have its web site written in Texinfo. > LilyPond does. Guile's web-pages were not using sxml before the rewrite either, and it is in the perspective of a redesign/rewrite that I suggested to consider scheme/sxml, and in that respect, it does not matter actual pages are written in texinfo. But I understand you and most people who answered my suggestion believe it is not a good approach for Lilypond web pages, especially in regards of the translation in multiple languages. David ps: for info, guile has a 'Texinfo Processing' module and manual entry pgpxkohFtwLjV.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
Hello Urs, > ... > >> Still needs to be tied into the translation process and means another > >> technology the translators need to master. > > > >Translators would edit the strings , then run 'make www' > > ... > So that explains something. > You think LilyPond's website and docs are maintained as HTML files? Not at > all! Nope, I never said the doc was written and maintained in 'html' :). You can follow the doc link on Guile's web-site, for example, which, as Guix, Guile-Gnome..., also has its doc written in texinfo: Guile -> Learn -> Reference Manuals -> Guile-2.0 and choose what ever format you prefer, for example https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html I was talking about the source code of these web sites, and why, imo, this approach is a good candidate for a new lily web site. There would be no 'interference' with the lily doc and its translations. Guile's doc hasn't change, not even a single modif, because of it's new web-site :) David pgpE5PnmWb5qr.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
> > Don't be! You'll get use to it a lot faster then you think! It > > actually reads almost as if it was English [and *nod* a lot easier > > then the corresponding html page], here is a simplified example. The > > schema is the same for all pages: > > > > import > > utils > > shared > > > > define the page > > > > `(html (@ (lang "en")) > > ,(html-page-header "About");; defined in shared > > (body > > ,(html-page-description) ;; dito > > ,(html-page-links);; dito > > > > ,(html-page-footer))) ;; dito > > > > The page content can be as simple as > > > > (div (@ (id "content-box")) > >(article > > (h1 "About the Project") > > (p "Lylipond is ..."))) > Still needs to be tied into the translation process and means another > technology the translators need to master. Translators would edit the strings , then run 'make www' [or what ever target is made], and because of this approach, they would have a lot less work and less 'bugs', since header, navbar and footer text are 'shared' by all pages. But yes, they would have to know at least a bit about this representation, is this not also true wrt html? If so, then their knowledge is transferable with almost no effort, and the above argument that an sxml tree is easier to read, imo at least, also makes it easier to translate. If a translator can read and translate Alfie he/she surely can do so on the sxml representation (parrot (@ (type "African Grey")) (name "Alfie")) Do they edit html pages now [or use a web 'design' gui tool]? If they do [edit html pages directly], I would consider this approach the best candidate, no need to be a top notch schemer to implement it, it is real fun to play with actually, and as I said, some work to build the first time, a lot less work and bugs to maintain it later on... My 2c pgprhzY8npspL.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
> > ... or rather strings in a scheme file? Here's a scary example: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/www/about.scm > > > This approach, at least this example, is totally missing CSS/JavaScript > integration that makes (and, unfortunately, often breaks) modern web sites. > What would be the benefits? This is a total lack of knowledge and therefore misunderstanding on your side, both of the links I pointed, guix and guile web sites extensively use css [did you really look at the source code?] javascript however, unless libre as in what is stated and described by the fsf and gnu projects should never be used anyway Cheers, David pgpJrnvcWS8QI.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
Hi Federico, > Il giorno mer 24 ago 2016 alle 0:00, David Pirotte <da...@altosw.be> ha > scritto: > > The first thing, imo, would be to have these pages rewritten in > > scheme, Guile scheme > > I mean of course :), with the portion of the code that holds the > > content being > > expressed using sxml, see below for examples. > ... or rather strings in a scheme file? Here's a scary example: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/www/about.scm From someone how can fluently read lily source code, scary? :) All lilypond users know a bit of scheme right? :) Don't be! You'll get use to it a lot faster then you think! It actually reads almost as if it was English [and *nod* a lot easier then the corresponding html page], here is a simplified example. The schema is the same for all pages: import utils shared define the page `(html (@ (lang "en")) ,(html-page-header "About");; defined in shared (body ,(html-page-description) ;; dito ,(html-page-links);; dito ,(html-page-footer))) ;; dito The page content can be as simple as (div (@ (id "content-box")) (article (h1 "About the Project") (p "Lylipond is ..."))) The complexity of the content of a page is not due to sxml, but the the complexity of page itself, to the complexity of its design and how much css tweaks you're using. The hard work is in the design, the translation to guile scheme is relatively easy: one of the lily maintainers should ask Luis if he'd be interested: and he is a schemer to, he did the design for Guile's web-pages _and_ wrote the source code as well ... David pgp6n7DfN6fXl.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Potential improvements to the homepage?
Hello, > >>> Would a CMS like WordPress be a good candidate for a complete rewrite? I would not do that. The first thing, imo, would be to have these pages rewritten in scheme, Guile scheme I mean of course :), with the portion of the code that holds the content being expressed using sxml, see below for examples. It is a real winner, drastically reduce bugs/quirks and the maintenance time. Once done, all you need to do is either add news entries and run make, upload. Two beautiful examples, imo: GNU Guix https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/ Source code: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website GNU Guile https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ Source code: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile/guile-web.git The author of these two is Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ on his page there is a texinfo css you may want to look at as well Maybe Luis would be happy to participate to the design, I really don't know but it would not cost anything to ask him ... Another example, cool too but not as beautiful (because I wrote them :) and couldn't count on the help of a designer and css expert, so nice but a bit 'old fashioned' as well): GNU Foliot http://www.gnu.org/software/foliot/ I did not upload the source codeyet, but it is gpl as well. Cheers, David. pgpoHu03zIQbC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Please how to use the Scheme debugger?
Mark, (use-modules (ice-9 readline)) readline is not provided in this Guile installation The Guile Reference Manual version 2.0.11 says: 4.4.2 Readline To make it easier for you to repeat and vary previously entered expressions, or to edit the expression that you’re typing in, Guile can use the GNU Readline library. Which means you need to install the GNU Readline library if you want to use it: apt-get install readline-common libreadline6 libreadline6-dev This said, if you really want to hack in guile, you'll do yourself a favor in investing a little of your time to study and use emacs and geiser instead: http://www.emacswiki.org/ http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/Scheme For Scheme, a new Emacs mode is available: Geiser. It supports Guile and Racket (previously known as PLT Scheme). On Debian or Ubuntu, it can be installed with sudo apt-get install geiser. http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/ Cheers, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem: incompatible Lilypond and Guile
Mark, Then I downloaded Guile 2.0.11 from the gnu.org website and tried to build it. Configure failed (also off topic). This step is tells you that there is a dependency problem, and that guile 2.0.11, which is _very_ _very_ stable :), won't compile, don't even try :) If you can't find out by yourself what the problem is [check your config.log, especially for the libgc [conservative garbage collector for C and C++ ], gcc and automake], then send an email to guile-u...@gnu.org, and if you wish join us on irc #guile at freenode... So why does the gnu.org website http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ say that Guile 2.0.11 is stable? Because it is the latest stable version of guile :) Cheers, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: MusicXML
Doing it in scheme does seem to offer some nice advantages. I looked into it and found that there's SXML, a scheme version of XML: for info [in guile 2]: http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/SXML.html#SXML what is the priority of lilypond being built upon guile-2, if there still is, and if, how far is lilypond from effectively being built upon guile-2 ? (david pirotte) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: fyi - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFreeCultureShowcase
Hi, If you think it serves well lilypond, you may use mine too [it's a small piece], which by the way is already used in the lilypond manual [2.3 Unfretted string instruments] [someone in this list did ask to ear it, now one interpretation is available - on this page too]: http://www.altosw.be/dp/ Cheers, David ;; -- Le Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:23:15 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke-l...@xs4all.nl a écrit : Hi, Read about Ubuntu's free culture showcase this morning on Ivanka Majic's blog. Title of the post: Art in the open. First sentence: Are you a musician? Dove right into the wiki and was saddened by the fact that it did not mention LilyPond. Tweeted @ivanka and she added it! So now I'm looking for someone to take this up and send in a composition in LilyPond to -- save me from embarrassment for taking this up -- I mean, -- to win eternal fame :-) Greetings, Jan PS: do we have/want a special place in the new website for original/new compositions made with/in LilyPond? PPS: wouldn't it be nice if we had so many great composers in our userbase that we could stage a composition contest with a major release? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: an output question
evince [gnome document viewer] will do that for you as well, i am using it a lot and i am quite happy, it's been improved a lot recently [i am using version 2.20.2] http://www.gnome.org/projects/evince David ;; -- Le Wed, 21 May 2008 09:55:35 +0200, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : At least on Linux machines, there are several useful tools to do these things in Postscript files, for example psnup and pstops. Also, if you use the CUPS printer driver, there's an option to lpr to get 2-up printing of any document. /Mats James E. Bailey wrote: I was just wondering if it's possible to get lilypond to print 2-up. So I get two A4 sheets on one A3 sheet? I know I can do it in acrobat, but I like to use acrobat as infrequently as possible, and I've actually never used ghostscript directly. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: A440 Notation System
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:55:44 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Erik Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 21 January 2005 10.54, John Boyle wrote: Hello, Lilypond users. I'd be very grateful to hear your comments on the A440 System which you can access on www.a440system.com FYI, there are some issues with that website, when viewing with Mozilla Firefox: - Mostly, you can not open links in new windows. - Under Results, it omplains about a missing plugin for the MP3 file, which is not possible to find. - If you press the links under How does it work, nothing happens. With Konqueror the page doesn't seem to work at all; there are no links from Had the same with Opera. very poorly designed indeed. links can be accessed, but result is unreadable changes at the very bottom and very narrow (quasy invisible) 'last line' of the main screen (or is it bad superimposed images ..., difficult to say): using galeon david ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Font problem, Xdvi, quite urgent.
Amelie Zapf wrote:
Amelie,
if you are using a distribution that includes tetex, then
the following suggestion might help you:
1. get the latest xdvi-22.48
ftp://ftp.math.berkeley.edu/pub/Software/TeX/
2. ./configure --with-tetex (or --with-tetex=PATHLIST) (and other
options you would want of course (but not --enable-ps..., this
will be properly be set by this option))
3. make, make install
4. find and edit the file 'texmf.cnf', mine is in /etc/texmf/
add the following lines:
% drp/01.10.13 as recommanded by xdvi-22.48 install
PKFONTS.XDvi= .:$TEXMF/%s:$VARTEXFONTS/pk/{%m,modeless}//
VFFONTS.XDvi= .:$TEXMF/%s
PSHEADERS.XDvi = .:$TEXMF/%q{dvips,fonts/type1}//
PSFIGURES.XDvi = .:$TEXMF/%q{dvips,tex}//
be carefull, these lines has to come BEFORE any occurence of the same
variables (that would not have the extension (i.e. PKFONTS, VFFONTS ...))
this should solve your problems with respect to TeX and Latex, at least it did
for me, but there are still the other things to do which are well described in
INSTALL.txt with respect to tetex (and SuSE, the distribution I use)
hope it helps
david
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
LilyPond 1.4.8: ly2dvi error
Hi,
i've installed, as recommanded, both
guile-1.4 in $HOME/usr/guile-1.4
LilyPond 1.4.8 PATH=$HOME/usr/guile-1.4/bin:$PATH ./configure
i still can not compile simple lily file, such as the following
one (below error message)
i tried to modify the GUILE_LOAD_PATH (because conflicting with guile-1.7
i guess) as is:
export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=~/usr/guile-1.4/share:~/usr/guile-1.4/lib
but it didn't help
;; -- error output
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 70 $ export
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=~/usr/guile-1.4/share:~/usr/guile-1.4/lib
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 71 $
/usr/alto/staff/david/usr/guile-1.4/share:/usr/alto/staff/david/usr/guile-1.4/lib
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 72 $ ly2dvi bars-1.ly
Running LilyPond...
GNU LilyPond 1.4.8lilypond: error while loading shared libraries: lilypond: undefined
symbol: scm_make_gsubr
error: lilypond: command exited with value 32512
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 781, in ?
run_lilypond (files, outbase, dep_prefix)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 389, in run_lilypond
system ('lilypond %s %s ' % (opts, fs))
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 313, in system
error (msg)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 207, in error
raise _ (Exiting ... )
Exiting ...
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 73 $
;; -- bars-1.ly content
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = SA { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\context Lyrics = LB \lyrics { _1 _ _ _ }
\context Staff = SB { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\paper {
\translator {
\StaffContext
% override the type of bar we see at staff context
whichBar = #empty %generates harmless warnings.
}
\translator {
\LyricsVoiceContext
\consists #Bar_engraver
% BarLine gets confused about size if there's no staff
BarLine \override #'bar-size = #4.0
}
}
}
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond 1.4.8: ly2dvi error
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: ... Well, scm_make_gsubr should be in guile-1.4. Did you adjust your library load path to look for guile 1.4 first? (Hint: see what ldd lilypond says.) ahhhrch! yes, thanks. so, for other users who would want to run several guile versions, it is important to change both (below) in the shell where lilypond is called: GUILE_LOAD_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH --- for example, in my case: export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=~/usr/guile-1.4/share export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=~/usr/guile-1.4/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH which leads to: david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 104 $ ldd /usr/local/bin/lilypond libguile.so.9 = /usr/alto/staff/david/usr/guile-1.4/lib/libguile.so.9 (0x40017000) libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 = /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 (0x40095000) libm.so.6 = /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400de000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400fd000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4021a000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) \consists #Bar_engraver Also, did you added an extra # sign? LilyPond wants a string here, not a SCM object. ok, thought it wanted a scheme object ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
page numbering
anyone know how to ask page numbering to be centered in the footer? thanks david ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: not too bad for a beginner ... but i need help
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
If you want the same layout as given by \f, you should use
((dynamic) e)m ((dynamic) ff), ((dynamic) ppp)
and so on.
yes, but the reason i wanted to define some is because i find that the
default font-size for all dynamics is too big (matter of taste i guess)
I guess you still want the same font, though?
so, i can i globally ask to reduce dynamic font size?
Of course:
\score{
...
\paper{
...
\translator{
\ScoreContext
DynamicText \override #'font-relative-size = #-1
}
}
}
;; --
well, i tried, but it does the work only for those inserted following the
'normal syntax':\p \ppp ...
but in my case, i have
...
#(define ppp '((dynamic) ppp))
#(define p '((dynamic) p))
...
#(define 2ped '(italic 2 Péd.))
#(define 2ped2 `(lines ,ppp ,2ped))
...
b_#`,2ped2
in which case it does not 'listen' to the translator requests to reduce dynamic
font
;; --
also, if instead i try:
...
b_\ppp_#`,2ped
then it does not compute correctly position of elements
;; --
in lylipond 1.5.15, it was better positionning \decr, here it clashes with other
indications: can't it be automatic? do i have to 'manually' ask for \decr to be lower?
(and how)
thanks
david
\include paper16.ly
% shiftI = \property Voice.NoteColumn \override #'horizontal-shift = #0
% shiftII = \property Voice.NoteColumn \override #'horizontal-shift = #1
% shiftIII = \property Voice.NoteColumn \override #'horizontal-shift = #2
% shiftIV = \property Voice.NoteColumn \override #'horizontal-shift = #3
% shiftV = \property Voice.NoteColumn \override #'horizontal-shift = #4
#(define note '(columns
((font-relative-size . -1) (music noteheads-2
((font-relative-size . -3) (kern . -0.1) flags-stem)
#(define eight-note `(columns ,note ((kern . -0.1)
(music ((raise . 10.0) flags-u3)
#(define dotted-eight-note
`(columns ,eight-note (music dots-dot)))
#(define text-flat '((font-relative-size . -2) (music accidentals--1)))
#(define title-instr `(pour Piano et 2 Cl. en Si ,text-flat))
#(define f '((bold italic) f))
#(define f3corde `(lines ,f \treCorde))
% #(define ppp '((dynamic) ppp))
% #(define p '((dynamic) p))
#(define ppp '((bold italic) ppp))
#(define p '((bold italic) p))
#(define 2ped-legend (*) UC + Péd. droite)
#(define 2ped '(italic 2 Péd.))
#(define 2ped1 `(lines ,ppp ,2ped (*)))
#(define 2ped2 `(lines ,ppp ,2ped))
#(define pup '(italic ---/))
#(define uc '(italic UC))
% #(define uc '\unaCorda)
#(define puc `(lines ,p ,uc))
#(define init `((lines lent: sans réelle pulsation,
(columns simplement ,note $\\leq$ 42
% #(define init `((lines lent: sans réelle pulsation,
% (columns simplement ,note ou = à 42
\header {
title = Prélogique
subtitle = à Leila Bouzalgha
composer = David PIROTTE
opus = Opus 1
piece = ~
poet = ~
% instrument = `,title-instr
instrument = pour Piano et 2 Cl. en Si \fetachar\fetaflat
meter = ~
arranger = ~
% tagline =
footer = prélogique
}
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = Cl1 {
\property Staff.instrument = #`(lines Cl. 1 (columns (Si ,text-flat )))
% \property Score.timing = ##f
% \property Staff.TimeSignature \override #'style = #'()
\time 12/4
\clef violin
{r2. r2. r2 r1
r2. r2. r2 r1
}
}
\context Staff = Cl2 {
\property Staff.instrument = #`(lines Cl. 2 (columns (Si ,text-flat )))
% \property Score.timing = ##f
% \property Staff.TimeSignature \override #'style = #'()
\time 12/4
\clef violin
{r2. r2. r2 r1
r2. r2. r2 r1
}
}
\context PianoStaff \notes
\context Staff = up
\property Staff.instrument = Piano
% \property PianoStaff.instrument = Piano
% \property Score.timing = ##f
% \property Staff.TimeSignature \override #'style = #'()
\time 12/4
\clef violin
{r2.^#`,init r2. fis'2_#`,ppp ~ fis'1^\fermata
r2. r2. r2 r1
}
\context Staff = mid
% \property Score.timing = ##f
% \property Staff.TimeSignature \override #'style = #'()
\time 12/4
\clef bass
{ % s1 \break
r2. r2. r2 r1
r2. r2. r2 r1
}
\context Staff = down
\time 12/4
% \property Score.timing = ##f
% \property Staff.TimeSignature \override #'style = #'()
\clef bass
\property Staff.clefOctavation = #-15
\property Staff.OctavateEight \set #'text = #15
\property Staff.centralCPosition = #13
% \property Staff.pedalSustainStrings = #'(- -P P)
\relative c,
{\stemDown
a?2. b_#`,2ped2 c ais \decr a?2. \rced b_#`,pup c ais a?2_#`,puc r1
a?2. b_#`,2ped2 c ais \decr a?2. \rced b_#`,pup c ais \stemUp a?2_#`,f ~
a1^\fermata
lilypond-1.5.15
Hello,
just for information, i installed lilypond-1.5.15, but it does not
compile my prelogique.ly (mentionned and sent in a previous mail)
and does not compile the example that i copy-paste from
http://lilypond.org/wiki/?LilyPondHacks
guile 1.7.0
(latest cvs version (Changelog modification date: 2001-09-30))
;; -- error message
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 52 $ ly2dvi bars-1.ly
Running LilyPond...
GNU LilyPond 1.5.15
Now processing: `/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly'
Parsing...
/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly:12:20: error: parse error, expecting
`SCM_T' or `SCM_IDENTIFIER':
whichBar = empty
; %generates harmless warnings.
/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly:2:6: warning: Braces don't match:
\score
{
error: lilypond: command exited with value 256
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 787, in ?
run_lilypond (files, outbase, dep_prefix)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 392, in run_lilypond
system ('lilypond %s %s ' % (opts, fs))
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 316, in system
error (msg)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 214, in error
raise _ (Exiting ... )
Exiting ...
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 53 $
;; -- bars-1.ly
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = SA { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\context Lyrics = LB \lyrics { _1 _ _ _ }
\context Staff = SB { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\paper {
\translator {
\StaffContext
% override the type of bar we see at staff context
whichBar = empty; %generates harmless warnings.
}
\translator {
\LyricsVoiceContext
\consists Bar_engraver;
% BarLine gets confused about size if there's no staff
BarLine \override #'bar-size = #4.0
}
}
}
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-1.5.15
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
try removing the semi-colons.
yes, i thought about it, here is 'another' error output:
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 54 $ ly2dvi bars-1.ly
Running LilyPond...
GNU LilyPond 1.5.15
Now processing: `/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly'
Parsing...
/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly:12:20: error: parse error, expecting
`SCM_T' or `SCM_IDENTIFIER':
whichBar = empty
%generates harmless warnings.
/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/tests/bars-1.ly:2:6: warning: Braces don't match:
\score
{
error: lilypond: command exited with value 256
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 787, in ?
run_lilypond (files, outbase, dep_prefix)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 392, in run_lilypond
system ('lilypond %s %s ' % (opts, fs))
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 316, in system
error (msg)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 214, in error
raise _ (Exiting ... )
Exiting ...
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/tests 55 $
;; -- bars-1.ly content
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = SA { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\context Lyrics = LB \lyrics { _1 _ _ _ }
\context Staff = SB { c1 c1 c1 c1 }
\paper {
\translator {
\StaffContext
% override the type of bar we see at staff context
whichBar = empty %generates harmless warnings.
}
\translator {
\LyricsVoiceContext
\consists Bar_engraver
% BarLine gets confused about size if there's no staff
BarLine \override #'bar-size = #4.0
}
}
}
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
latest guile cvs gives me problems
hello,
i just downloaded the latest guile cvs for guile-core and since can not use
lilypond anymore, here is the ly2dvi output
david
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/prelogique 19 $ ly2dvi prelogique.ly
Running LilyPond...
GNU LilyPond 1.5.14.jcn1
Now processing: `/usr/alto/projects/lilypond/prelogique/prelogique.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...[3]
Preprocessing elements...
Calculating column positions...
paper output to `prelogique.tex'...
writing header field `title' to `prelogique.title'...
writing header field `subtitle' to `prelogique.subtitle'...
writing header field `footer' to `prelogique.footer'...
writing header field `composer' to `prelogique.composer'...
writing header field `arranger' to `prelogique.arranger'...
writing header field `instrument' to `prelogique.instrument'...
writing header field `opus' to `prelogique.opus'...
writing header field `piece' to `prelogique.piece'...
writing header field `meter' to `prelogique.meter'...
writing header field `poet' to `prelogique.poet'...
ERROR: In procedure gh_scm2int:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: 4.0
error: lilypond: command exited with value 512
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 787, in ?
run_lilypond (files, outbase, dep_prefix)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 392, in run_lilypond
system ('lilypond %s %s ' % (opts, fs))
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 316, in system
error (msg)
File /usr/local/bin/ly2dvi, line 214, in error
raise _ (Exiting ... )
Exiting ...
david@faust:~/alto/projects/lilypond/prelogique 20 $
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-1.5.14 compilation problem
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: try this patch I tried, but the content of the patch seems to have a little problem, could you send me an attached patch file ? Thanks David ;; -- patch output david@faust:~/ftp/lilypond-1.5.14 29 $ patch -E -p1 lilypond-1.5.14.jcn1.diff patching file CHANGES patching file Documentation/footer.html.in patching file VERSION patching file lily/include/lily-guile.hh patching file lily/scm-hash.cc Hunk #1 succeeded at 14 with fuzz 1. Hunk #3 succeeded at 142 with fuzz 1. patching file lily/translator.cc patching file stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line Hunk #2 FAILED at 226. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py.rej david@faust:~/ftp/lilypond-1.5.14 30 $ ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-1.4.8 compilation problem
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: David Pirotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hello, lilypond-1.4.8 compilation problem SuSE 7.2 Linux 2.4.4 checking for guile-config... guile-config checking Guile version... 1.7.0 Lots of things have changed in GUILE since 1.4. Han-Wen chose to backport a subset of guile-1.5 compatibility stuff to 1.4.8. Doing everything is quite some work, so it's not very likely that lilypond 1.4 will be made compatible with the latest guile snapshots. I'd advise you to install guile-1.4. too bad: this is not possible because I need most up-to-date guile version for other things i do i'll compile install 1.5.14, it may help you to have a 'tester' (once i know a bit more about lilypond off course) thanks david ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: make web-doc
Mats Bengtsson wrote: http://www.s3.kth.se/~matsb/lilypond/lilypond.ps.gz (using Type1 fonts throughout the document!) great! thanks ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
clusters: note spacing problem and other things
Hello
;; --
I am new user of lilypond. I am a composer, a young composer, and I hope that I
will be able to write my music with lilypond. But modern music is quite
demanding and so much more difficult to typeset then ancient music.
Is there any other composers of classical contemporary music
on this list?
I hope that lilypond developpers are also willing to make it a modern typesetter
alternative to commercial software (which are not good enough anyway). It would
be so nice!
So, please and in advance, pardon my requests: it will not be to point out
things that lilypond can not do, but just things I need to be able to do, hoping
that these requests will help others (or that people on the list can help me of
course). As a lilypond beginner, I obviously probably will ask stupid
question(s) to ...
;; --
ly2dvi (GNU LilyPond) 1.5.13
So, here is a couple of little problems I encountered, very small example to
start with
1. the following compiles ok
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = Cl {
\property Staff.instrument = Cl Sib
\time 8/4
\clef violin
{r2. r2.}
}
\context Staff = staffB {
\time 8/4
\clef bass
\relative a,
{a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is a2. b2. c2. a2is}
}
\paper {}
}
but does not produce the expected display results: even the r2. and
the a2. does not produce the result expected, (the dot is in the note,
and not after the note)
or is it my xdvi? (it seems i have xdvik, should i get another xdvi?
;; --
2. the following does not compiles
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = Cl {
\property Staff.instrument = Cl Sib
\time 8/4
\clef violin
{r2. r2.}
}
\context Staff = staffB {
\time 8/4
\clef bass
\relative a,
{a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is. a2. b2. c2. a2is.}
% a2is. instead of a2is
}
\paper {}
}
clusters in general are not 'displayed' properly, note spacing problems. a strange
thing is that if I do not have
{a2. a2. b2. c2. a2is. ...}
but
{a2. b2. c2. a2is. ...}
then the cluster is really badly 'computed'
is there a special feature for clusters?
;; --
3. i wanted to call staff using numbers to, but is seems not possible:
\score {
\notes
\context Staff = Cl1 {
...
\context Staff = Cl2 {
...
does not compile: is it the expected behavior? can't we use numbers
in staff names
;; --
4. i would like to define a piano always with 3 staff, with clef as is:
\violin
\bass
\bass -15
how can i define a clef twice octava bassa ? (the \bass clef with the number
15 sligthly below and right)
;; --
thanks a lot for help and understanding
david
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
make web-doc
Hello,
i could compile install lilypond-1.5.13 and it seems to work fine
however, i am a new user and need the doc to build, which does not
- can anyone help me with this problem?
or
- is there a lilywebdocsite.tar.gz somewhere I could download?
thanks,
david
david@faust:~/ftp/lilypond-1.5.13 59 $ make web-doc
make --no-builtin-rules out=www -C Documentation WWW
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/alto/staff/david/ftp/lilypond-1.5.13/Documentation'
/usr/bin/python .././stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py --index=../../ --name LilyPond
--version 1.5.13
--header=../Documentation/header.html.in --footer ../Documentation/footer.html.in
./out-www/index.html out-www/index.html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File .././stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py, line 253, in ?
do_file (f)
File .././stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py, line 237, in do_file
m = re.match ('.*?!-- (@[a-zA-Z0-9_-]*@)=(.*?) --', s, re.DOTALL)
File /usr/lib/python2.0/sre.py, line 44, in match
return _compile(pattern, flags).match(string)
RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded
make[1]: *** [footify] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/alto/staff/david/ftp/lilypond-1.5.13/Documentation'
make: *** [web-doc] Error 2
david@faust:~/ftp/lilypond-1.5.13 60 $
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
