Re: repeats in parallel mode?

2010-07-11 Thread William Bajzek

On Jul 11, 2010, at 2:15 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:

 The problem appears to lie with the repeats.  If you use the version I have 
 below, the music works as you would expect.  I'm not quite sure what you're 
 trying to do with the repeats - repeat the first bar twice and the second bar 
 twice?

I want it to emit two measures, each surrounded with repeats. 


- William Bajzek
williambaj...@gmail.com





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 92, Issue 28

2010-07-11 Thread William Bajzek
Thanks; I guess that's not exactly ideal but it is good enough for me. 

On Jul 11, 2010, at 5:00 AM, paulxii wrote:

 
 The only thing which seems to work for me, after experimenting for a while,
 is to add the repeats manually like this:
 
 \version 2.12.3 
 
 \parallelMusic #'(voiceA voiceB) { 
   \key c \major 
   \time 4/4 
 
c4 c c c  | \bar :|: %voiceA measure 1 
c,4 c c c | \bar :|: %voiceB measure 1 
 
g4 g g g  | \bar :|: %voiceA measure 2 
g,4 g g g | \bar :|: %voiceB measure 2 
 
 } 

- William Bajzek
williambaj...@gmail.com





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


repeats in parallel mode?

2010-07-10 Thread William Bajzek
I just read about the \parallelMusic function and was trying it out. First of 
all, I'd like to say that I think it's great because it is a very convenient 
way to lay out multi-voice music. The problem I've run into can be seen in the 
following; I expect it to emit two measures but it emits four instead. 
Hopefully my intent is clear enough; what's the right way to do this?


\version 2.12.3

\parallelMusic #'(voiceA voiceB) {
   \key c \major
   \time 4/4

\repeat volta 2 {
c4 c c c  | %voiceA measure 1
c,4 c c c | %voiceB measure 1
}

\repeat volta 2 {
g4 g g g  | %voiceA measure 2
g,4 g g g | %voiceB measure 2
}

}

\score {
\new StaffGroup 
  \new Staff  \relative c'' \voiceA \\ \relative c'' \voiceB

\layout { } %emits four measures
}


Thanks,
- William Bajzek
williambaj...@gmail.com





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: arpeggioBracket spanning multiple voices on a single staff?

2010-05-20 Thread William Bajzek
On May 19, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:

 William Bajzek wrote:
 My expectation and hope is that it would show the arpeggio
 bracket instead of the zigzag one, but it doesn't. Can
 this be done?
 
 Yes.
 - Mark
 
 * * * * * * * * * *
 
 arpeggioBracketStaff = {


Thanks! That does work nicely. I'll make the problem harder now, though; I 
usually use an input structure like the following, to facilitate keeping the 
stems for each voice going the right direction, and I wouldn't *always* want 
the arpeggioBracket, as the regular arpeggio often comes up in guitar music, 
too. With your suggestion, it looks like I am limited to the one type. Is there 
a way to do it without restructuring my files?

upper = \relative c' {
\voiceOne
e' g4\arpeggio d f d f2
}

lower = \relative c' {
\voiceTwo
d, f2\arpeggio g b2
}

\score {
   \new Staff = guitar traditional 

\clef treble_8

 \context Voice = upper \upper
 \context Voice = lower \lower
 
\layout { }
}


- William Bajzek
please note my new email address: williambaj...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: arpeggioBracket spanning multiple voices on a single staff?

2010-05-20 Thread William Bajzek

On May 20, 2010, at 2:50 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:

 Just change the arpeggio appearance back using \arpeggioNormal. This is 
 clearly explained in the documentation at 
 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/lines#Arpeggio.
 
 Nick


Not really, because if I do what the documentation says, I get the zigzag. I've 
come up with a solution based on Mark's advice. I guess the last question, as a 
relative newbie to this stuff... Can I make it so I don't need a \arpeggio to 
follow \barreBracket?


barreBracket = {
 \once \revert Staff.Arpeggio #'X-extent
 \once \override Staff.Arpeggio #'stencil =
   #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-bracket
 \arpeggioBracket
}

upper = \relative c'' {
\voiceOne
\barreBracket a \arpeggio b c 
\arpeggioNormala c e4 \arpeggio
\barreBracket a \arpeggio b c 
\arpeggioNormala c e4 \arpeggio

}

lower = \relative c'' {
\voiceTwo
\arpeggioBracket e,2. \arpeggio 
\arpeggioNormala,4 \arpeggio
\arpeggioBracket e'2. \arpeggio 
\arpeggioNormala,4 \arpeggio

}

\score {
\new Staff \with {
  \consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
{
 \set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t  
 
\context Voice = upper \upper
\context Voice = lower \lower
 
}
}


- William Bajzek
please note my new email address: williambaj...@gmail.com

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


arpeggioBracket spanning multiple voices on a single staff?

2010-05-19 Thread William Bajzek
Hi all, a quick question (I hope). I would like to place a bracket on a guitar 
music staff, indicating a partial barre, as is frequently found in Frank 
Koonce's editions. \arpeggioBracket more or less does it, but only within a 
single voice. The following is a modified snippet from the documentation. My 
expectation and hope is that it would show the arpeggio bracket instead of the 
zigzag one, but it doesn't. Can this be done? 

\new Staff \with {
  \consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
\relative c' {
  \set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
  
{ \arpeggioBracket e' g4\arpeggio d f d f2 } \\
{ \arpeggioBracket d, f2\arpeggio g b2 }
  
}


Here is an example of what I would like: 
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/597433/barre.gif



- William Bajzek
please note my new email address: williambaj...@gmail.com


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Lute tablature and j

2010-04-20 Thread William Bajzek
Hello. I'm new to the list, but I've been using Lilypond for about a year now. 

Recently I've been wanting to produce some lute tablature, and just noticed the 
example in the documentation on doing letter tablature. I tried it out and 
found a problem that I'm not sure how to get around; the style of lute 
tablature I am interested in writing (a la Luys de Narvaez) skips the letter j 
as a fret indicator. Can anyone recommend a way to accomplish that in Lilypond?

Apologies if this has been covered. I couldn't find it in the archives.

- William Bajzek
please note my new email address: williambaj...@gmail.com



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Lute tablature and j

2010-04-20 Thread William Bajzek
That seems like the right place to look. Thanks!

On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
 
 
 Hi William,
 
 do you know about the tablature mailing list?
 http://lists.lilynet.net/tablatures/ 
 
 I don't know anything about lute tablature, anyway...
 maybe this thread can be interesting for you:
 http://n2.nabble.com/Baroque-lute-tablature-td4008032.html#a4008032 
 
 HTH,
 Federico
 
 

- William Bajzek
please note my new email address: williambaj...@gmail.com

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user