midi swing patch version
Hi,
I wanted to test the swing patch, do I need version 2.16 for that? 2.14
doesnt seems to work
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/attachmentText?id=687aid=6870029001name=swingtest.lytoken=ndOkZOHxPedrruWZArMs5tLny80%3A1389347237994
Starting lilypond 2.14.2 [swingtest.ly]...
Processing `/tmp/frescobaldi-QwYW62/tmpsXyeEd/swingtest.ly'
Parsing...
/tmp/frescobaldi-QwYW62/tmpsXyeEd/swingtest.ly:16:19 0: error: syntax
error, unexpected DIGIT
\tripletFeel
8 { c'8 c' c' c'
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: midi swing patch version
yep, works with 2.16, thx On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I wanted to test the swing patch, do I need version 2.16 for that? 2.14 doesnt seems to work https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/attachmentText?id=687aid=6870029001name=swingtest.lytoken=ndOkZOHxPedrruWZArMs5tLny80%3A1389347237994 Starting lilypond 2.14.2 [swingtest.ly]... Processing `/tmp/frescobaldi-QwYW62/tmpsXyeEd/swingtest.ly' I would expect the \version 2.16.0 line (which you apparently changed without changing anything else in the file) to be a pretty good hint. The current stable version is 2.18, and 2.14 is quite a bit stale. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
chordnames midi instrument
Hi, Can I change the midi instrument for the Chordnames, guitar instead of piano? Now i've chordsPart = \new ChordNames \chordNames Regards, \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
tempo changes (midi)
Is it possible to change tempo for a certain part of the score and make
that also audible in the midi file?
In the template there is:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 100 4)
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tempo changes (midi)
Ok thx. You just have to put it in the score of one instrument, or do you
need to put it in all the parts of the instruments playing at the same time?
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
Have you tried \tempo?
\score {
{
\tempo 4 = 120
c''4 c'' c'' c''
\tempo 4 = 40
c''4 c'' c'' c''
}
\layout {}
\midi {}
}
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: rosea grammostola
To: lilypond-user
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 11:44 AM
Subject: tempo changes (midi)
Is it possible to change tempo for a certain part of the score and make
that also audible in the midi file?
In the template there is:
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 100 4)
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond to musicxml
Hi, How do I convert lilypond to musicxml? Regards ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond to musicxml
On 11/20/2011 03:38 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, rosea grammostola wrote: Hi, How do I convert lilypond to musicxml? http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665 Big pita that there is no such functionality yet. Open source is (almost) always walking behind and hard to get a decent workflow with music related stuff... Anyway before I get too negative, count me in for 20 USD. Regards, \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond for FL Studio ...
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Johnny Ferguson hyperfle...@gmail.comwrote: On 07/21/2010 05:24 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: They can still make money with GPL. Yes, they are not going to do that. rant I think it's far too easy to make a statement like They can still make money with GPL especially in light of the fact that there ISN'T a GPL equivalent to FL. I think you're right when you state this. The best example is Ardour, they can make a living, but it's not easy. There is LMMS btw. IL has been making FL since I was in high school (time ago). In all that time, no one has managed to make a non-crappy GPL DAW. I suspect it has something to do with the fact that most of the programmers are not artists. The only good audio app I know of that's native for linux is Renoise (and it's not GPL). This is not true. You have Ardour and qtractor for instance. If you know how to work with JACK there are things possible for sure. I know people who where using FL Studio and Ableton Live and use now Ardour, Qtractor and Renoise instead on Linux. I just have a hard time dealing with GPL fanaticism, some attitude that seems to believe that anything created under a morally superior guideline must also be a better product or tool (essentially a non-sequitur). While it holds true for most GPL software, tools for audio and graphics are complete rubbish. I do not agree. Ardour, JACK, Qtractor for instance are good tools. The problem is that most people are not able to configure their system properly or refuse to learn how to work with JACK properly. \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond for FL Studio ...
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Johnny Ferguson hyperfle...@gmail.comwrote: On 07/22/2010 05:19 AM, rosea grammostola wrote: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Johnny Ferguson hyperfle...@gmail.com mailto:hyperfle...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/21/2010 05:24 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: They can still make money with GPL. Yes, they are not going to do that. rant I think it's far too easy to make a statement like They can still make money with GPL especially in light of the fact that there ISN'T a GPL equivalent to FL. I think you're right when you state this. The best example is Ardour, they can make a living, but it's not easy. There is LMMS btw. Ardour is not a proper DAW in the modern sense. It doesn't let me (for example) drag a softsynth onto a track and start programming it with midi data. As a multitrack recorder, It works fine. I wouldn't call it a DAW though (at least not in the modern sense of the word). Ardour 2 doesn't have MIDI editing functionality. Ardour 3 has, a beta release should be out soon. Also, I'll just pretend you didn't say LMMS. Not that I'm ungrateful for their trying, but it's just not FL in any way, shape, or form. Developers need to stop creating low quality clones, and begin their projects with notions of what makes the programs they want to emulate so great in the first place. Again, both being an artist and being a programmer are heavy specializations. I'm not surprised that you don't find many hybrids posessing both skills who want to commit their efforts for little compensation. I didn't say I like LMMS, I don't like it, cause it lacks proper JACK support for instance. I prefer Qtractor and Renoise in that scope. I do know how to use JACK, but it's a bit of a pain to manage configurations. In a program like FL, configuration is saved as part of the project file, as far as I've seen with JACK, the usefulness of multiple programs being linked together is negated by the fact that the configuration has to be managed separately. And one may argue that the same thing is true of FL using rewire, but because FL does almost everything you could need, I find the argument irrelevant. This is in stark contrast with the small, simple, modular philosophy I find in linux audio software. While better in the long run, it has some shortcomings in the present. That is: instead of loading one program and opening a single project file, I have to load up JACK, load up all the programs involved in the project, load all the project files for each program, then finally load the JACK configuration for everything else that's open. If I'm wrong on this point, please let me know. I hope I'm wrong, but if I am, then I think JACK could use some better documentation. If I'm right, then JACK needs some kind of complementary application that has some notion of project workspace. Within such a space various programs would be opened in a given manner and then linked when ready. The closest I came to that was writing a bash script that would open up QSynth, call sleep for a few seconds, then load up jack and connect everything up to my midi keyboard. I don't want to write a bash script every time I start a new project. While I appreciate that functionality, I don't think that's what will make people prefer a system like JACK. You're right, all though the JACK and modular infrastructure gives you very many creative and technical possibilities, the main drawback is session management. You can make your bash scripts and there are some other scripting tools made for that, but it is not ideal (for everybody)... BUT there are developments here: check www.ladish.org for instance. There is also Jacksession now, integrated in JACK: http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/Dev/JackSession http://svn.fuzzle.org/jsweeper/trunk/ That's a fair argument. I'd actually never heard of QTractor, and I'll be checking it out in the next few days. Looks similar to sonar, and from screenshots I think I see some kind of JACK integration which looks intriguing. I don't like the idea that the faults of JACK are that people aren't willing to learn some kind of specialized rocket science though. JACK on a conceptual level is quite simple, but if it requires more than a day of study to use effectively, it's probably too complicated. I'd argue that it is JACK that needs to learn to work with musicians, not the other way around. Granted, it's fun for fooling around with, but as it lacks a sense of project awareness (as far as I've seen), I've never used it for anything serious (except perhaps sample making via ZynAddSubFX and JACK-Rack) I see this from a different perspective. The commercial apps do everything to get and keep customers as much as possible. That means also, make it easy! Maybe FL Studio and all those 'make-a-hit-in-one-day-apps' focus more on commercial goals... Ardour doesn't compromise
Re: Lilypond for FL Studio ...
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: If you think its worth to invest a bit in audio engineering when working with a DAW, Ardour and JACK might not be the tool for you... Typo: I mean of course, if you're from the type 'I-want-to-make-a-hit-in-one-day' Ardour and JACK might be not the tools for you... That doesn't mean you can't make quality recordings with Ardour or that the tools isn't good. It's not by accident that a pro company like Harrison Consoles use Ardour in their products... \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond for FL Studio ...
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.netwrote: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jean-Marie Cannie j...@image-line.com wrote: We are the developers of FL Studio (formerly known as Fruityloops) and we are looking to print music sheets direct from our software. Greetings, whilst I'm certain we all appreciate this tribute to LilyPond's quality and reliability, you have to know that GNU LilyPond is free software (GPLv3 licensed), and as such it cannot be embedded in (nor link to) non-free software. It would be possible to use Lilypond in FL Studio, when Lilypond was released with a LGPL license right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGPL Is it now (with GPL) possible to have a Lilypond export function in FL Studio? \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond for FL Studio ...
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.comwrote: Or if Stutio FLX changes its license to GNU/GPL. 2010/7/21 rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jean-Marie Cannie j...@image-line.com wrote: We are the developers of FL Studio (formerly known as Fruityloops) and we are looking to print music sheets direct from our software. Greetings, whilst I'm certain we all appreciate this tribute to LilyPond's quality and reliability, you have to know that GNU LilyPond is free software (GPLv3 licensed), and as such it cannot be embedded in (nor link to) non-free software. It would be possible to use Lilypond in FL Studio, when Lilypond was released with a LGPL license right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGPL Is it now (with GPL) possible to have a Lilypond export function in FL Studio? \r On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com wrote: Or if Stutio FLX changes its license to GNU/GPL. Hmm right... Some kind of win-win situation would be not so bad... maybe. They use lilypond and optimize the MIDI functionality and pop-music scores and give those code changes back to Lilypond (this is also needed with a LGPL license?). Firefox and OpenOffice and JACK seems to use the LGPL license. \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
how to get a jazz swing
Hi, I made a piece for double bass. How do I get a swing rhythm in the midi output? Thanks in advance, \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to get a jazz swing
Valentin Villenave wrote: On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:04 PM, rosea grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: I made a piece for double bass. How do I get a swing rhythm in the midi output? Unfortunately you don't (yet): http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=687 Cheers, Valentin (PS. Now, there may be some Scheme magic to be found but I'm less than optimistic about it.) Thanks, mmh that's a pita.. Swing is used pretty often in midi of course. I hope there will be more hope soon. Now I maybe can fix something with qtractor from svn http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/184 \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: how to get a jazz swing
Ed Ardzinski wrote:
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
I made a piece for double bass. How do I get a swing rhythm in the
midi
output?
I'verelied on writing a separate part for the midi output that uses
6/8, 9/8 etc...instead of 2/4, 3/4...have to add lots of \times 2/3
{} code.
It's brutal, yes, but if you already have the parts written for the
PDF output it should not take long to make the special version.
mmh I do try it now with openoctave midi, a fork of Rosegarden:
www.openoctave.org
It has a swing option.
\r
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Fwd: [LAU] Linux Audio Conference 2010]
---BeginMessage--- Dear Linux Audio developer, user, composer, musician, philosopher and anyone else interested, you are invited to the... Linux Audio Conference 2010 The conference about Open Source Software for music and audio May 1-4 2010 Hogeschool voor de Kunsten Utrecht (HKU) Utrecht, The Netherlands Registration is open, and so is the call for abstracts and papers. More information can be found on the website: http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2010 For previous editions, look here: http://lac.linuxaudio.org For concerts, music and workshops a submission system and protocol will be available soon. In the meantime, ideas and announcements can be sent by e-mail (lac -at- linuxaudio -dot- org ) or written on the wiki: http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/lac2010 We hope to see you all in Utrecht ! Kind regards on behalf of the LAC team, Marc Groenewegen, lecturer music software design @ HKU ___ Linux-audio-user mailing list linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user ---End Message--- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: The new Drummer's Gigsaw: first edition.
Philippe Hezaine wrote: Philippe Hezaine a écrit : Hi all, Here is the new Puzzle du Batteur-The Drummer's Gigsaw. Published under GPLv3 or later Licence, at this time it's only available for Linux. Forget the old versions and first of all read the README. Feedbacks, suggestions, criticisms are welcome, of course. Download the tar.bz2 archive here: http://philippe.hezaine.free.fr/spip.php?article46 Cheers. Sorry. I've found several mistakes in the PATH. Here is a corrected version: http://philippe.hezaine.free.fr/spip.php?article46 Hopefully it works. Tell me if it doesn't. Cheers. Did you made some progress getting a better midi output? \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[OT] Re: another route from MIDI to lilypond (from NtEd developer) [OT]
Sorry a bit OT but I get Err http://pini.free.fr testing Release.gpg Could not resolve 'pini.free.fr' Err http://pini.free.fr testing/main Translation-en_US Could not resolve 'pini.free.fr' \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [OT] Re: another route from MIDI to lilypond (from NtEd developer) [OT]
Joerg Anders wrote: On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, rosea grammostola wrote: Sorry a bit OT but I get Err http://pini.free.fr testing Release.gpg Could not resolve 'pini.free.fr' Err http://pini.free.fr testing/main Translation-en_US Could not resolve 'pini.free.fr' what gives: nslookup pini.free.fr It works now. Does NtEd have Jack support? \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: The new Drummer's Gigsaw: first edition.
Philippe Hezaine wrote: rosea grammostola a écrit : Philippe Hezaine wrote: Philippe Hezaine a écrit : Hi all, Here is the new Puzzle du Batteur-The Drummer's Gigsaw. Published under GPLv3 or later Licence, at this time it's only available for Linux. Forget the old versions and first of all read the README. Feedbacks, suggestions, criticisms are welcome, of course. Download the tar.bz2 archive here: http://philippe.hezaine.free.fr/spip.php?article46 Cheers. Sorry. I've found several mistakes in the PATH. Here is a corrected version: http://philippe.hezaine.free.fr/spip.php?article46 Hopefully it works. Tell me if it doesn't. Cheers. Did you made some progress getting a better midi output? \r Hi, The Gigsaw's midi output from a lilypond file gives you a midi file with velocities values. You haven't this option from a default lilypond file which only implements volume values per channel. But the Gigsaw uses a special way to get this result. Lilypond's midi output is especially buggy to do a sort about Param. It doesn't forget them but sometimes they are not in the right order for a clean midi file. Hence some unsolvable issues when I used Mididings. You can check what i say with midicomp. For this reason Gigsaw's midi files are stamped +veloc. Have you succeed to install and run the new Drummer's Gigsaw? There are around 250 downloads on my site and nobody gives me a feedback. I'm a bit disappointed. P.S. A second edition is coming soon with an easier install. All the stuff will be done by a bash script. Ouf! Mmh yeah, for composition stuff it would be nice if the midi output of lilypond could be improved. About your project. I like the fact that you do something with Lilypond, but I don't know the goal of the project very well and so I don't know if it's interesting for me personaly. \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Frescobaldi and rumor are in Debian now
Hi, Frescobaldi (Debian testing) and Rumor (unstable) are in Debian now! \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: debian and lilypond 2.12
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Johannes Schöpfer j...@schoepfer.infowrote: hi, we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the moment as it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have gone dead. perhaps someone else can do a non-maintainer upload? i'm not sure about the ettiquette or debian policy on this exactly but maybe its time to start looking in to that - i dont want to hassle thomas in cc if he is busy but i belive he is on this list - any suggestions? Kubuntu has 2.12.1 packages, so they might be a good starting point... Could someone fix Lilypond in Debian. There are also some people busy with packaging Frescobaldi for Debian, but it isn't possible to upload it without having Lilypond fixed and updated to the recent stable version. Hi, I've build a package for Debian Lenny: http://schoepfer.info/lilypond/lilypond_2.12.2-1_i386.deb It is not testet very well, any suggestions to improve the package are welcome:) This package is not splitted like the official lilypond packages in Debian/Ubuntu, everything coming from make all is inside. I think splitting makes sense if there is a debian-package-repository to get everything with aptitude, but i will split it if someone needs that. Thanks but this didn t solve the Debian lilypond problem... It needs an active maintainer... \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: debian and lilypond 2.12
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 16:56:39 schrieb Rob Canning: hi, we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the moment as it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have gone dead. perhaps someone else can do a non-maintainer upload? i'm not sure about the ettiquette or debian policy on this exactly but maybe its time to start looking in to that - i dont want to hassle thomas in cc if he is busy but i belive he is on this list - any suggestions? Kubuntu has 2.12.1 packages, so they might be a good starting point... Could someone fix Lilypond in Debian. There are also some people busy with packaging Frescobaldi for Debian, but it isn't possible to upload it without having Lilypond fixed and updated to the recent stable version. Thanks in advance, \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Frescobaldi] [ANN] Frescobaldi 0.7.9
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Wilbert Berendsen i...@frescobaldi.orgwrote: Hi all, Frescobaldi 0.7.9 has been released. This release contains some bugfixes and small improvements. Changes: * Spurious crashes (since 0.7.8) seem to have been eliminated. * Alt-Up and Alt-Down now jump to the first line of a blank space instead of just the next or previous blank line. * LilyPond symbols throughout the program now use the default window text color. * Octave marks are removed from the (first) pitch of a chord when using the repeat last expression function. * Predefined guitar frets have been added to the Chord Names and Lead Sheet part type in the Score Wizard Get it at http://lilykde.googlecode.com/files/frescobaldi-0.7.9.tar.gz thanks! nice job! \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 0.7.8 released
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Chris Snyder csny...@adoromusicpub.comwrote: Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Frescobaldi 0.7.8 has been released. [...] For Ubuntu users: Frescobaldi 0.7.8 has been posted to the Frescobaldi PPA: https://launchpad.net/~frescobaldi/+archive/ppahttps://launchpad.net/%7Efrescobaldi/+archive/ppa The build of the Intrepid packages has completed. The Jaunty builds will have to wait until some package conflicts in the Jaunty repositories are resolved. If you added my PPA (csnyder) in the past, please switch over to the Frescobaldi PPA. No Hardy package? \r ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: tablature.ly, second attempt
Great job!
Really appreciate it!
\r
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Hello tablature users,
after sending my first version of a tablature.ly-file, I got a lot of
positive resonse,
and a lot more of corrections/improvements. Thank you all!
Now, there is a (hopefully) better file which includes the following
features/changes:
1) the palmmute/deadnote stuff is the same, only the code has been
simplified, thanks to Neil's proposals
2) the \tabNumbersOnly settings are now the default, so when tablature.lyis
included, the stems etc. are gone
(as proposed by Grammostola Rosea)
3) the modern tab clef is now available as any other clef by typing \clef
moderntab
To implement (3), there is another function necessary, which will be in
future releases of lilypond, but
for now, you have to insert the following lines into scm/parser-clef.scm:
;; a function to add new clefs at runtime
(define-public (add-new-clef clef-name clef-glyph clef-position octavation
c0-position)
Append the entries for a clef symbol to supported-clefs and
c0-pitch-alist
(set! supported-clefs
(acons clef-name (list clef-glyph clef-position octavation)
supported-clefs))
(set! c0-pitch-alist
(acons clef-glyph c0-position c0-pitch-alist)))
Otherwise the new clef definition won't work.
Thanks again to Carl and Neil for their help!
There is one problem now with the settings in tablature.ly: I simply made
ties transparent, but
then, the fret number appears as it were a note to be played. Hopefully
somewhere in the future,
I will find a possibility to let the fret number disappear, but as David
Stocerk pointed out,
some cases had to be distinguished (the following is a quote from a former
posting from David):
(quote...)
It should be noted that a publishing standard is when there is a Note Staff
+ Tab Staff, tied notes (that is, the notes that are 'held') in the Tab
Staff are indicated by parenthesizing the tab number(s). There are several
conventions that are related to tied notes in a Notes+Tab situation:
* Tab numbers that are 'tied to' are sometimes parenthesized,
sometimes hidden.
* In the case that 'tied to' notes are hidden, a parenthesized tab
number is usually forced if the 'tied to' note is at the beginning
of a line (i.e., the note is tied over a system break).
* Likewise, parenthesized tab numbers are forced when a 'tied to'
note begins a 2nd ending or Coda section.
* A parenthesized chord in the Tab Staff are indicated with a single
pair of parentheses surrounding all of the notes in the chord (as
opposed to as single pair of parentheses around each individual
note in the chord).
(...quote)
So this seems to be a difficult task, but somehow to manage.
Marc
tablature.ly
source file of the GNU LilyPond music typesetter
(c) 2009 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
% some publications use the triangled note head
% for palm mute, so here we go:
palmMuteOn = { \set shapeNoteStyles = #(make-vector 7 do) }
palmMuteOff = { \unset shapeNoteStyles }
% for single notes (or groups of notes within { ...} :
palmMute = #(define-music-function (parser location notes) (ly:music?)
#{
\palmMuteOn $notes \palmMuteOff
#})
% x-tab-format uses a x instead of the fret number:
#(define (x-tab-format str context event)
(make-whiteout-markup
(make-vcenter-markup
(markup #:musicglyph noteheads.s2cross
% dead notes are marked with a cross-shape note head,
% both in normal notation and in tablature:
deadNotesOn = {
\override NoteHead #'style = #'cross
\set tablatureFormat = #x-tab-format
}
deadNotesOff = {
\unset tablatureFormat
\revert NoteHead #'style
}
% for single notes or groups of notes within {...}:
deadNotes = #(define-music-function (parser location notes) (ly:music?)
#{
\deadNotesOn $notes \deadNotesOff
#})
% definitions for the moderntab clef:
% the moderntab clef will be added to the list of known clefs,
% so it can be used as any other clef:
%
% \clef moderntab
%
#(add-new-clef moderntab markup.moderntab 0 0 0)
% this function decides which clef to take
#(define (clef::print-modern-tab-if-set grob)
(let* ((glyph (ly:grob-property grob 'glyph)))
;; which clef is wanted?
(if (string=? glyph markup.moderntab)
;; if it is moderntab, we'll draw it
(let* ((staff-symbol (ly:grob-object grob 'staff-symbol))
(line-count (ly:grob-property staff-symbol
'line-count))
(staff-space (ly:grob-property staff-symbol
'staff-space 1)))
(grob-interpret-markup grob (make-customTabClef-markup
line-count staff-space)))
;; otherwise, we simply use the default printing routine
(ly:clef::print grob
% define sans serif-style tab-Clefs as a markup:
Re: Ubuntu 8.04 and Lilypond
Internet connection? aptitude search lilypond sudo aptitude install lilypond check also some gui's to, lilypondtool, denemo, rosegarden, maybe useful Success! On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ronald van Eunen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, I have installed Lilypond on a Windows Xp based computer. Just for trying, music notation used to be my only reason for keeping Windows. But now that I've found Lilypond, I want to install it on my Ubuntu laptop. It seems to install (via apt-get), but no results so far. What do I need to know? I still consider myself an Ubuntu/Linux newbie. Please help me enjoy Lilypond and get rid of Microsoft!! Thx, Ronald ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
