Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-23 Thread Uli Heller

Bertalan Fodor schrieb:
I don't want to be too confident, but as far as I know, the editor with 
the most features is jEdit with its LilyPondTool plugin. :-) I don't 
what the definition of an IDE is, but the most complete one is 
LilyPondTool for sure.

I feel the automatic completion and document wizard a must for beginners.
However you get an indexed LilyPond documentation, syntax coloring 
out-of-the-box, code folding, brace matching, instant help on markup 
commands, some simple error checking  (like unclosed braces), and much 
more: hyphenation, midi player, tweaking wizard, repeats etc.


Convince yourself with http://web.interware.hu/fodber/lilytut

Bert


Hello Bert,

thank you for your message about jEdit! Your Link was very interesting
and illustrative. Wonderful the assistent to write some settings before
starting the source code. That feature is not in context, you are right.
But I don't need that feature realy. When I start to write a new piece I
load a usable template with the most needed entrys and edit their values
in the text.

I tried jEdit before I knew context. I was not pleased with that
program, it was to gaudy and the frame looked oversized for me. Now I am
no more shure, but I think it was a bit slowly too). The language of
jEdit is only in english (I like to work with my mother-language
germany) and I missed shortcuts like (A)lt - (D)atei - (ö)ffnen. (I
hope your e-mail-reader finds the oe-char). :-)

Can jEdit call lilypond, midi and other functions with a shortcut or
only with menü (like the demo-link showed)? I like to work with
shortcuts but a menü should be there alternative (to remember my
forgotten shortcuts and for recreation the brain). :-)

I don't want you all to leave your favorite editors. But I can say,
context is an editor that cooperates very well with lilypond, is quick
and easy to use.

Best wishes (to write good music) to you and all the others  :-)

Uli Heller






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-23 Thread Uli Heller

Nicolas Sceaux schrieb:

Oh please...
Emacs has menus.
Emacs has windows-like keyboard shortcuts if you like.
You can delete a character with backspace.
You can compile a LilyPond file, see the PDF score or play the midi
file with shortcuts (or via the menus) without leaving the source code.


Thank you for that information. I see, late versions of Emacs are
alright and I will try this historic editor when I work on a linux
machine. For windows, context has all I need.

Kind regards

Uli Heller





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-23 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Well, easy-to-use and many features are conflicting with each other 
:-) JEdit and LilyPondTool tends to be on the many features side. I 
can admit. Shortcuts are supported in a very general way.
However, if one needs autocompletion, because he cannot remember all the 
properties of a grob, or does not like browsing the doc all the time, or 
just hates typing, he may find jEdit the best :-)


Bert


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-22 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Uli Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 [...] Emacs has many own commands and very less commands who are
 windows-conform. All this specific commands you have to drill in your
 head, there is no graphical menü (when I am right).  [...]

 There you read that you cannot delete a written character with the
 backspace-key. An old typewriter could do that and every other
 editor around me does that. I don't want to miss this and such
 similarly features.

 Context has menus and you can take shortcuts as well. The commands are
 conform for windows-users (File open, close, cut and paste, delete and
 so on). Context is small and quick. I think context has all you need
 to handle with lilypond. IF you know Emacs it is alright when you use
 it. But can Emacs switch with one shortcut to the PDF- and with
 another shortcut to the midi-file without saving and leaving the
 source code (like context can)?

Oh please...
Emacs has menus.
Emacs has windows-like keyboard shortcuts if you like.
You can delete a character with backspace.
You can compile a LilyPond file, see the PDF score or play the midi
file with shortcuts (or via the menus) without leaving the source code.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Uli Heller writes:

 I found a wonderful editor to write and performe Lilypond in 
 Windows-Systems. He is called Context and can be found at:
http://www.context.cx/

That's great.

 I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
 editors emacs and vim.

Have you actually tried a recent version of Emacs lately?  What things
do you find complicated?

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien   | http://www.lilypond.org


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread martial

  I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
  editors emacs and vim.

I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported :-( 

http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread Uli Heller

Hello Jan,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb:
 Have you actually tried a recent version of Emacs lately?  What things
 do you find complicated?

No, I haven't tried any version of Emacs. But I read about it. Emacs may 
be a powerful editor of course, but when you start first with it, you 
have to study tutorials and read many other helps. Emacs has many own 
commands and very less commands who are windows-conform. All this 
specific commands you have to drill in your head, there is no graphical 
menü (when I am right). An introduction (in german language) I found at


http://www-pool.math.tu-berlin.de/doc/emacs/emacsintro.html

There you read that you cannot delete a written character with the 
backspace-key. An old typewriter could do that and every other editor 
around me does that. I don't want to miss this and such similarly features.


Context has menus and you can take shortcuts as well. The commands are 
conform for windows-users (File open, close, cut and paste, delete and 
so on). Context is small and quick. I think context has all you need to 
handle with lilypond. IF you know Emacs it is alright when you use it. 
But can Emacs switch with one shortcut to the PDF- and with another 
shortcut to the midi-file without saving and leaving the source code 
(like context can)?


I began to write a context-highlighter for lilypond source code. (You 
can choose 5 different colors for better reading special commands). It 
works well. But I am new in lilypond and only a few commands I have 
manually picked up to now. If somebody is interested, I can post the 
highlighter file here (as a text-file and as it is at the moment).




martial wrote:
 I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported

Hello martial,

Context supports UTF8, see it's homepage:
http://context.cx/content/view/18/41/

Yours sincerely

Uli



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread Brian Haddon
martial martial at cathemline.org writes:

 
   I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
   editors emacs and vim.
 
 I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported  
 
 http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0
 

Though (relatively) new to LilyPond, I have used ConTEXT for some time, and can
recommend it.  As mentioned in the first post, it makes a great IDE for LilyPond
on Windows.  You can compile your scripts, view the PDF's, play the MIDI's and
even summon LilyPond help files, all from within ConTEXT.  Syntax highlighting
is easy to set up (the hardest part is typing in all the keywords). :)

Unfortuneatly, UTF-8 is not supported.  (A new version of ConTEXT is pending,
but it not yet clear whether this new version will support UTF-8.)

I ran into problems with this lack of UTF-8 support when trying to insert the
copyright symbol into the copyright notice.  Of course, LilyPond needs UTF-8 to
encode non-ASCII characters.  I got around this by using a UTF-8-aware editor to
enter the copyright symbol, then saving my script in UTF-8 format.  ConTEXT will
load, edit and save these UTF-8 files just fine (they'll even appear as UTF-8 in
the status bar).





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread debian
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 06:27:38PM +, Brian Haddon wrote:
 martial martial at cathemline.org writes:
 
  
I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
editors emacs and vim.
  
  I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported  
  
  http://forum.context.cx/index.php?topic=678.0
  
 
 Though (relatively) new to LilyPond, I have used ConTEXT for some time, and 
 can
 recommend it.  As mentioned in the first post, it makes a great IDE for 
 LilyPond
 on Windows.  You can compile your scripts, view the PDF's, play the MIDI's and
 even summon LilyPond help files, all from within ConTEXT.  Syntax highlighting
 is easy to set up (the hardest part is typing in all the keywords). :)

my xemacs does all this already.  And _much_ more.

I too am _very_ new to lilypond.

Joe


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread Bertalan Fodor
I don't want to be too confident, but as far as I know, the editor with 
the most features is jEdit with its LilyPondTool plugin. :-) I don't 
what the definition of an IDE is, but the most complete one is 
LilyPondTool for sure.

I feel the automatic completion and document wizard a must for beginners.
However you get an indexed LilyPond documentation, syntax coloring 
out-of-the-box, code folding, brace matching, instant help on markup 
commands, some simple error checking  (like unclosed braces), and much 
more: hyphenation, midi player, tweaking wizard, repeats etc.


Convince yourself with http://web.interware.hu/fodber/lilytut

Bert


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-21 Thread martial
 I am blind  or utf-8 is not supported
 Context supports UTF8, see it's homepage:
 http://context.cx/content/view/18/41/
Thanks 
but I don't see where I can save the file in utf-8. 
Either not accent or not compiled when I convert in unicode !

It is not important for me, I use  now Crimson Edit for Lilypond; 
color syntaxique Lilypond..etc. 
Same Context but with accent compiled ! 

regards 





___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Context - A recommendable Windows-Editor for Lilypond

2006-01-20 Thread Uli Heller
Hello Lilypond-Friends,

I found a wonderful editor to write and performe Lilypond in 
Windows-Systems. He is called Context and can be found at:
   http://www.context.cx/

Context is a relative new programmers editor and freeware. The 
advantages are

1. You can use the known Windows-Shortcuts to work (not all 
   editors do that) 
2. You can write an own highlightersyntax-file to highlight the 
   Lilypond-commands 3. You can launch Lilypond from the editor 
   with function keys, means, you can make your PDF and start 
   the midi-file 
4. When launching you have a control window to see mistakes and 
   you can correct them pronto in the named line.

If you want to launch your program, go to Options, 
Environment and Execute Keys. Push ADD and write in the 
popup-entryfield the ending ly. Then mark a function key 
(like F9) and write in the entryfield Execute your lilypond 
path and a following %n. May be this is your entry:

   D:\music\lilypond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe %n 

Make a tick in Capture Console output to have a 
compilercontrol in your editorwindow. The percent-entry behind 
lilypond.exe calls your loaded programm. You don't need to save 
your last writings (but the filename must exist). 

With another function key you can call another program. Mark 
another function key and write in the Execute-Entryfield: 

   %F.pdf (calls your PDF-Reader and loads ) 
   %F.midi (calls your Midi-Player) 

That's all.

If you compile, you push F9. 

If you want to see your notes, you only push your defined 
function keys to see and hear your composing results. With 
ALT+TAB you are back in your editor and you can go on without 
leaving and new loading your ly-file.

I think Context is a wonderful alternative to the complicated 
editors emacs and vim.

And I think of course, lilypond is a wonderful program and has wonderful
creative developers!
Thanks and greetings from germany! 

Uli Heller






___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user