Re: Lyrics placement
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 05:31, Guy Stalnaker wrote: > And THEN I find this: > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=781 > > LOL > > I've already redone the code to swap the voices, but I'll investigate this > snippet to see if I can learn how it works. > > Guy > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Hmmm… the LSR page says: > The solution is to create one or more named lyrics context(s) with > > \new Lyrics = "lyr1" > \new Lyrics = "lyr2" > … > > *before* they are filled with the lyrics text. > > It is noteable that the definition of the contexts *must * use \new … > while later references *must * use \context … > …then the snippet never has any \new Lyrics. I can’t work this snippet out at all. Vaughan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
And THEN I find this: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=781 LOL I've already redone the code to swap the voices, but I'll investigate this snippet to see if I can learn how it works. Guy ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
Thank you both. I'm afraid I don't know enough about LP context to ferret out if that is the issue. I was hoping that my reading of the LP Learning Manual had the proper way to do this instantiation of temporary lyrics in the temporary polyphonic context, but nope. Phil's suggestion is what I've done. Guy Guy Stalnaker jimmyg...@gmail.com On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 9:08 AM Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Kieren MacMillan" > To: "Guy Stalnaker" > Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" > Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2018 2:51 PM > Subject: Re: Lyrics placement > > > > Hi Guy, > > > > Does your definition of ChoirStaff accept Lyrics? > > That’s usually the reason I see for "jumping" contexts… > > > > Hope that helps! > > Kieren. > > > > > > Kieren MacMillan, composer > > > Alternatively, it might be that the temporary voice has disappeared prior > to > the lyrics being placed. Guy - you might try making the upper voice the > temporary one and assigning the lyrics to the permanent voice. > > -- > Phil Holmes > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
- Original Message - From: "Kieren MacMillan" To: "Guy Stalnaker" Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2018 2:51 PM Subject: Re: Lyrics placement Hi Guy, Does your definition of ChoirStaff accept Lyrics? That’s usually the reason I see for "jumping" contexts… Hope that helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer Alternatively, it might be that the temporary voice has disappeared prior to the lyrics being placed. Guy - you might try making the upper voice the temporary one and assigning the lyrics to the permanent voice. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
Hi Guy, Does your definition of ChoirStaff accept Lyrics? That’s usually the reason I see for "jumping" contexts… Hope that helps! Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lyrics placement
All,
Every so often LP does something so unexpected I have no idea how to
trouble-shoot it. I have a score with this structure (simplified - this
structure is a Frescobaldi standard SATB with piano reduction Wizard
output):
%Voices
/soprano
/also
/tenor
/bass %Temp lyrics (see below) here
%keyboard
/pRHTop
/pRHBottom
/pLHTop
/pRHBottom
%staves
sopranoStaff = {
\new Staff { /sopraon }
}
altoStaff = {
\new Staff { /alto }
}
tenorStaff = {
\new Staff { /tenor }
}
bassStaff = {
\new Staff { /bass }
}
pianoReduction = \new PianoStaff <<
{
<<
\new Voice = "1" \rightHandTop }
\new Voice = "2" \rightHandBottom }
>>
}
\new Staff {
\clef bass
<<
\new Voice = "1" \leftHandTop }
\new Voice = "2" \leftHandBottom }
>>
}
>>
%score
\score {
\new ChoirStaff <<
\sopranoStaff
\altoStaff
\tenorStaff
\bassStaff
\pianoReduction
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
I have a temp polyphonic voice with temp lyrics in the VOICE bass part for
the last four measures of the work:
<< { \voiceOne
fs8\!\p fs fs fs |
g2 ~ |
g4 g |
fs2 \fermata
}
{ <<
\new Voice = "bassTemp" {
\voiceTwo
b,8\p b, b, b, |
as,4 as, |
b,8 g d cs |
b,2 \fermata
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "bassTemp" { O mag -- num mys -- ter -- i --
um mys -- ter -- i -- um }
>>
}
>> \oneVoice
Engraving produces no errors, but LP puts the the lyrics for "bassTemp"
below the piano reduction staff and not below the voice staff where this
code is. I use "\new Voice = "bassTemp"" nowhere else in the code.
[image: image.png]
Any ideas on how I can code this so avoid such an error in lyric placement
is appreciated.
Guy Stalnaker
jimmyg...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics placement change from 2.18 to 2.19 ?
On 10/09/2015 06:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > ... thanks, that's a very useful code snippet, and it solves my immediate problem. - Johannes. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics placement change from 2.18 to 2.19 ?
Johannes Waldmann <johannes_waldm...@web.de> writes:
> Hi.
>
> The following snippet is interpreted
> differently by 2.18.* and 2.19.* :
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff { \key a \minor \relative c'' {
> a1 \new Voice { c2 d2 } e1
> }}
> \addlyrics { foo bar }
>>>
> }
>
> notes are displayed identically,
> but lyrics placement is changed:
>
> with 2.18.2, foo -> a1, bar -> e1,
> with 2.19.27, foo -> a1, bar -> c2.
>
> This breaks a bunch of my scores (so I don't like it).
> Is this a bug? Or a bug-fix?
If you put \addlyrics to a staff, how can you expect one voice in the
staff to be relevant for the lyrics and another not? LilyPond did not
do anything sensible here. Try
\score {
\new Staff { \key a \minor
\relative c'' {
a1 \new Voice { c2 d2 } e1
}
\addlyrics { foo bar }
}
}
> What is the relevant section of documentation?
What is the relevant section of documentation that would have promised
your version to work?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lyrics placement change from 2.18 to 2.19 ?
Hi.
The following snippet is interpreted
differently by 2.18.* and 2.19.* :
\score {
<<
\new Staff { \key a \minor \relative c'' {
a1 \new Voice { c2 d2 } e1
}}
\addlyrics { foo bar }
>>
}
notes are displayed identically,
but lyrics placement is changed:
with 2.18.2, foo -> a1, bar -> e1,
with 2.19.27, foo -> a1, bar -> c2.
This breaks a bunch of my scores (so I don't like it).
Is this a bug? Or a bug-fix?
What is the relevant section of documentation?
Thanks - J.W.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lyrics placement change from 2.18 to 2.19 ?
Hello Johannes, and welcome to the list.
On 09.10.2015 00:02, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Hi.
The following snippet is interpreted
differently by 2.18.* and 2.19.* :
\score {
<<
\new Staff { \key a \minor \relative c'' {
a1 \new Voice { c2 d2 } e1
}}
\addlyrics { foo bar }
}
notes are displayed identically,
but lyrics placement is changed:
with 2.18.2, foo -> a1, bar -> e1,
with 2.19.27, foo -> a1, bar -> c2.
This breaks a bunch of my scores (so I don't like it).
Is this a bug? Or a bug-fix?
Most likely so. I suspect the fix for issue 2010
<http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/2010/> or something in
that context.
What is the relevant section of documentation?
It’s relevant that \addlyrics has never been working reliably with any
but the _most_ simple situations. So you were on shifting ground anyway.
And if you start creating new contexts within the music expression to
which \addlyrics is applied, it’s most certainly better to use \lyricsto
and named contexts.
If you have further, more specific questions, feel free to post code
examples and ask again.
Yours, Simon
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
Guy Stalnaker wrote Monday, October 29, 2012 2:37 AM Hello everyone -- my first question to this list. Hi, welcome! I have looked over the Learning Guide and the Notation Reference for help in telling Lilypond to put S1 lyrics above the staff. Yet I'm stymied by differences in terminology. The Learning Guide uses /addlyrics in its examples (as does my file) while the Notation Reference uses /new lyrics /lyricsto. When the Notatation Reference shows examples on how to modify lyric placement, it shows two different examples that I cannot map to my use of /addlyrics. I know it's a context thing, but I cannot grok what's supposed to happen. \addlyrics is useful for simple situations but it does not have the flexibility available when the lyrics context is specified explicitly. In particular \addlyrics cannot be used if the vertical placement of the lyrics needs to be changed, as the lyrics context needs to be explicitly exposed to do this. The method to use is outlined in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#placing-lyrics-vertically [snip score] This works perfectly with lyrics for sopranoVoiceOne and places them below the staff aligned with the notes. How to I get the lyrics above the staf if I use /addlyrics? I've tried futzing with modifying /addlyrics to /new lyrics, etc. but that creates errors on compiling. \new Lyrics is definitely required (with a capital L) as the examples show. Try this again, and come back to the list with more specifics of the compilation errors, if they persist. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics placement
Thanks Trevor -- I had to completely rework how the score was described
and, and you said, jettison /addlyrics. The template will be different
now, but the lyrics are indeed above the staff where I want them to be.
The issue was with using in a nested way to get SopranoOne and
SopranoTwo music on the same stave with lyrics for one above and lyrics
for the other below:
\context Staff = soprano
\context Voice = sopranoVoiceOne {
\sopranoVoiceOne
} % Voice
\lyricsto sopranoVoiceOne
\new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = soprano } \lyricmode {
\verseSopranoVoiceOne
} % Lyrics
%SopOne
\context Voice = sopranoVoiceTwo {
\sopranoVoiceTwo
} % Voice
\lyricsto sopranoVoiceTwo \new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\verseSopranoVoiceTwo
} % Lyrics 1
% SopTwo
That bit works.
Guy
On 10/29/2012 03:27 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Guy Stalnaker wrote Monday, October 29, 2012 2:37 AM
Hello everyone -- my first question to this list.
Hi, welcome!
I have looked over the Learning Guide and the Notation Reference for
help in telling Lilypond to put S1 lyrics above the staff. Yet I'm
stymied by differences in terminology. The Learning Guide uses
/addlyrics in its examples (as does my file) while the Notation
Reference uses /new lyrics /lyricsto. When the Notatation Reference
shows examples on how to modify lyric placement, it shows two different
examples that I cannot map to my use of /addlyrics. I know it's a
context thing, but I cannot grok what's supposed to happen.
\addlyrics is useful for simple situations but it does not have the
flexibility available when the lyrics context is specified explicitly.
In particular \addlyrics cannot be used if the vertical placement
of the lyrics needs to be changed, as the lyrics context needs
to be explicitly exposed to do this.
The method to use is outlined in
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#placing-lyrics-vertically
[snip score]
This works perfectly with lyrics for sopranoVoiceOne and places them
below the staff aligned with the notes. How to I get the lyrics above
the staf if I use /addlyrics? I've tried futzing with modifying
/addlyrics to /new lyrics, etc. but that creates errors on compiling.
\new Lyrics is definitely required (with a capital L) as the examples show.
Try this again, and come back to the list with more specifics of the
compilation errors, if they persist.
Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
There is only love, and then oblivion. Love is all we have
to set against hatred. (paraphrased) Ian McEwan
Guy Stalnaker
jimmyg...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lyrics placement
Hello everyone -- my first question to this list.
I am new to Lilypond and have been working with it over the past week or
so. I think I have notation well in hand and lyrics. I'm using
Frescobaldi for entering data and running Lilypond against the .ly file.
I have all the music coded for a new SSATBB choral piece. I want the
lyrics for the SopranoOne part to be above the staff with the lyrics for
SopranoTwo below. Naturally, Lilypond puts the lyrics below the staff
per the default.
I have looked over the Learning Guide and the Notation Reference for
help in telling Lilypond to put S1 lyrics above the staff. Yet I'm
stymied by differences in terminology. The Learning Guide uses
/addlyrics in its examples (as does my file) while the Notation
Reference uses /new lyrics /lyricsto. When the Notatation Reference
shows examples on how to modify lyric placement, it shows two different
examples that I cannot map to my use of /addlyrics. I know it's a
context thing, but I cannot grok what's supposed to happen. I'm building
the score with variables thus:
quote
sopranoVoicePart = \new Staff \with {
instrumentName = Soprano
midiInstrument = choir aahs
}
{ \sopranoVoiceOne }
\addlyrics { \verseSopranoVoiceOne }
{ \sopranoVoiceTwo }
\addlyrics { \verseSopranoVoiceTwo }
altoVoicePart = \new Staff \with {
instrumentName = Alto
midiInstrument = choir aahs
} { \altoVoice }
\addlyrics { \verseAltoVoice }
tenorVoicePart = \new Staff \with {
instrumentName = Tenor
midiInstrument = choir aahs
} { \clef treble_8 \tenorVoice }
\addlyrics { \verseTenorVoice }
bassVoicePart = \new Staff \with {
instrumentName = Bass
midiInstrument = choir aahs
} { \clef bass \bassVoice }
\addlyrics { \verseBassVoice }
\score {
\sopranoVoicePart
\altoVoicePart
\tenorVoicePart
\bassVoicePart
\layout { }
\midi { }
/quote
This works perfectly with lyrics for sopranoVoiceOne and places them
below the staff aligned with the notes. How to I get the lyrics above
the staf if I use /addlyrics? I've tried futzing with modifying
/addlyrics to /new lyrics, etc. but that creates errors on compiling.
Any help is appreciated.
Guy
--
There is only love, and then oblivion. Love is all we have
to set against hatred. (paraphrased) Ian McEwan
Guy Stalnaker, I^2@DOIT, 1210 West Dayton Street, Room 3209 CSS, Madison
WI 53719-1220, jstal...@wisc.edu, work 608.263.8035, cell 608.235.4718,
fax 608.265.6681, page page-...@watchdog.doit.wisc.edu
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
- Original Message - From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net; LilyPond User Group lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:38 PM Subject: Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music? Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better? No, it's not a bug. The problem is not with the lyrics but with MensuralStaff, which is not accepted by StaffGroup, so they both get pushed to the bottom. Thanks, Trevor. The answer begs the question that it would appear deliberate that this works wrongly, but it still seems to work wrongly by default. It would seem that a StaffGroup _should_ accept a MensuralStaff by default? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better? No, it's not a bug. The problem is not with the lyrics but with MensuralStaff, which is not accepted by StaffGroup, so they both get pushed to the bottom. Thanks, Trevor. The answer begs the question that it would appear deliberate that this works wrongly, but it still seems to work wrongly by default. It would seem that a StaffGroup _should_ accept a MensuralStaff by default? That depends on whether the system start brace provided by StaffGroup is used in mensural music. I know nothing about ancient music so I've no idea whether this is the case or not. Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes: Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better? No, it's not a bug. The problem is not with the lyrics but with MensuralStaff, which is not accepted by StaffGroup, so they both get pushed to the bottom. Thanks, Trevor. The answer begs the question that it would appear deliberate that this works wrongly, but it still seems to work wrongly by default. It would seem that a StaffGroup _should_ accept a MensuralStaff by default? That depends on whether the system start brace provided by StaffGroup is used in mensural music. I am not sure about that. Unless the current behavior is _advantageous_ in some situations, there is little point in retaining it. I know nothing about ancient music so I've no idea whether this is the case or not. It is not uncommon for music to mix and match styles. Granted, this is more the case for Gregorian chant where the notation is not just visually distinct (which is mostly the case for mensural) but rather quite different. But for things like incipits and similar, the combination is not unthinkable either. So we should focus on the question is there a conceivable reason where the current behavior is actually desirable for more than `user educational' reasons?. If the answer is no, it seems like we have nothing to gain from keeping it. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
- Original Message - From: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net; LilyPond User Group lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:50 AM Subject: Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music? Phil Holmes wrote Friday, September 28, 2012 9:40 AM Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better? No, it's not a bug. The problem is not with the lyrics but with MensuralStaff, which is not accepted by StaffGroup, so they both get pushed to the bottom. Thanks, Trevor. The answer begs the question that it would appear deliberate that this works wrongly, but it still seems to work wrongly by default. It would seem that a StaffGroup _should_ accept a MensuralStaff by default? That depends on whether the system start brace provided by StaffGroup is used in mensural music. I know nothing about ancient music so I've no idea whether this is the case or not. Well - strictly, staff groups aren't used at all in music from this period - each part was copied out separately (rather like orchestral music). However, if you're recreating music of this style, you'd want the option to have them all together for checking purposes, if nothing else (like a conductor's score). Whilst I eventually found that you don't need the staff group, it does seem a natural way to do this, and it took me a while to find out a workaround to get lyrics working. My analysis would be similar to David's - unless there's a clear reason for not allowing a MensuralStaff in a StaffGroup (and I can't think of one) it reduces the scope for wasted time if it's added. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a
StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I
can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this
must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better?
\new StaffGroup {
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = melody \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto melody \lyricmode { Lyrics can contain markup }
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = lower \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto lower \lyricmode { Some lower words here }
}
{
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = melody \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto melody \lyricmode { Lyrics can contain markup }
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = lower \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto lower \lyricmode { Some lower words here }
}
\new StaffGroup {
\new Staff
{
\new Voice = melody \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto melody \lyricmode { Lyrics can contain markup }
\new Staff
{
\new Voice = lower \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto lower \lyricmode { Some lower words here }
}
--
Phil Holmes
attachment: LyricTest2.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Phil Holmes wrote
The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a
StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and
I
can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_
this
must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better?
as a workaround you can put the Lyrics inside the MensuralStaff:
\new StaffGroup {
\new MensuralStaff
\new MensuralVoice = melody \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto melody \lyricmode { Lyrics can contain markup }
\new MensuralStaff
\new MensuralVoice = lower \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto lower \lyricmode { Some lower words here }
}
alignBelowContext doesn't seem to work.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bug-in-lyrics-placement-in-mensural-music-tp133721p133723.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in lyrics placement in mensural music?
Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:02 PM
The code below produces the image attached. As can be seen, using a
StaffGroup with mensural staves places the lyrics above the top stave, and I
can't find an over-ride that gets them in the proper place. I _think_ this
must be a bug, but wondering if anyone knows better?
No, it's not a bug. The problem is not with the lyrics but with
MensuralStaff, which is not accepted by StaffGroup, so they
both get pushed to the bottom.
Try:
\new StaffGroup \with { \accepts MensuralStaff } {
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = melody \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto melody \lyricmode { Lyrics can contain markup }
\new MensuralStaff
{
\new MensuralVoice = lower \relative c'' { c4 c c c }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto lower \lyricmode { Some lower words here }
}
Trevor
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with lyrics placement (can't show lyrics below bass-staff)
Hi,
I have a score with soprano, alto and bass music + lyrics. I try to get all
lyrics below the staffs, but for some reason the lyrics are all shown between
the staffs. I use Lilypond 2.0.3
My score section is given below.
Furthermore I would like to know if there is a way the avoid double rests
(e.g. the soprano and alto part have common rests which are shown above
eachother).
Also the stanza numbers do not show (music starts with 4 bars rests). Is there
a way to get the stanza numbers at the beginning of the bar?
Many thanks for your attention and help!
Mike Bosschaert
\score { \notes
\context StaffGroup
\property Score.automaticMelismata = ##t
\context Staff = sop { \clef violin s1 }
\context LyricsVoice = sopa { s1 }
\context LyricsVoice = sopb { s1 }
\context Staff = men { \clef bass s2 }
\context LyricsVoice = mena { s2 }
\context LyricsVoice = menb { s2 }
\addlyrics
\context Staff = sop \context Voice = VA { \sopMusic }
\lyrics \context Lyrics
\context LyricsVoice = sopa {
\property LyricsVoice . stanza = 1
\sopWordsA
}
\context LyricsVoice = sopb {
\property LyricsVoice . stanza = 2
\sopWordsB
}
\addlyrics
\context Staff = sop \context Voice = VB { \altMusic }
\lyrics \context Lyrics
\addlyrics
\context Staff = men \context Voice = VC { \bassMusic}
\lyrics \context Lyrics
\context LyricsVoice = mena {
\property LyricsVoice . stanza = 1
\bassWordsA
}
\context LyricsVoice = menb {
\property LyricsVoice . stanza = 2
\bassWordsB
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lyrics Placement
Please disregard my previous question. As I though, I figured it out after I sent the e-mail. I hate it when that happens. -Beldon -- Try to be the best of whatever you are, even if what you are is no good. ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
