OooLilyPond
Has anyone used OooLilyPond recently? Today I tried it again and was getting an error that didn't happen to me when I last used it (quite some time ago). The macro fails if I select "png" output in the the OooLilyPond config dialog. If I switch to "eps" it works again. I am using Libre Office 4.3.5.2, LilyPond 2.19.15, OooLilyPond 0.4.0 -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond
Hi folks I upgraded to LibreOffice 4.3 recently and now I'm having problems in getting OOoLilypond to actually insert a snippet although the generation works fine. FWIW I'm using Lilypond 2.19.33. Is anyone still using OOoLilypond? If so have they come across the problem, and do they have a workaround. Sorry if this is off-subject (OOoLP and not LP itself), but for me it's always been one of the killer features of lilypond that I can plug snippets directly into a text document. It would be a shame if it's no longer available. Thanks for any pointers ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OooLilyPond
2015-02-12 0:40 GMT+01:00 Martin Tarenskeen : > > Has anyone used OooLilyPond recently? > Today I tried it again and was getting an error that didn't happen to me > when I last used it (quite some time ago). > > The macro fails if I select "png" output in the the OooLilyPond config > dialog. If I switch to "eps" it works again. > > I am using Libre Office 4.3.5.2, LilyPond 2.19.15, OooLilyPond 0.4.0 Jus tested with LibreOffice 4.3.3.2, LilyPond 2.19.16 and OooLilyPond 0.4.0 , works well with png output. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi Roman, I also use OOoLilyPond often and had to check immediately when I read your mail. I am using LibreOffice 5.0.2.2 and OOoLilypond 4.0.0 and it still works for me. What is actually happening when you insert a new snippet? Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On 05/01/2016 21:52, Noeck wrote: Hi Roman, I also use OOoLilyPond often and had to check immediately when I read your mail. I am using LibreOffice 5.0.2.2 and OOoLilypond 4.0.0 and it still works for me. What is actually happening when you insert a new snippet? Cheers, Joram Hello Joram When I hit the lilypond button the console popped up as usual to run Lilypond, finished correctly and disappeared. The OOoLP dialogue stayed open. When I looked at the LP output, everything had compiled fine. There were no errors. Debugging the macro, I found in the OOoLilypond/Make routine that after compilation it was looking for OOoLilyPond.eps in the temp directory. In reality I had OOoLilyPond-1.eps, OOoLilyPond-2.eps and OOoLilyPond-3.eps ... but no OOoLilyPond.eps, so the routine just exited. I commented this out since the only file I'm interested in is OOoLilyPond.png which was there, and was included next. Debugging further kept throwing out errors in LibreBasic ... so I gave up. Current state is that its now inserting the image ... but holding the image source open (even if I delete the image from the document). This means that the next run of OOoLP fails because it can't delete the source from the previous run. I'm managing to make it work by unlocking the file, but optimal it's not. Santé, Roman ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OooLilyPond problem
Hi, It has been some time ago since I used the OooLilyPond extension for Openoffice.org-writer. It worked nicely then. I just upgraded to Fedora 14 and decided to use it again. But now it is not working anymore. I'm getting a screen with error messages beyond my understanding as soon as I click the "Oly" button on the menubar. I'm using Openoffice.org 3.3.0, and OooLilypond 0.4.0. Maybe a change or bug in the latest Openoffice causes it? Anyone else who tried this lately ? -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hello everybody, maybe it's a little late to warm up an old thread, but I had to struggle with a similar problem: Roman Stawski wrote > When I hit the lilypond button the console popped up as usual to run > Lilypond, finished correctly and disappeared. The OOoLP dialogue stayed > open. When I looked at the LP output, everything had compiled fine. > There were no errors. > > Debugging the macro, I found in the OOoLilypond/Make routine that after > compilation it was looking for OOoLilyPond.eps in the temp directory. In > reality I had OOoLilyPond-1.eps, OOoLilyPond-2.eps and OOoLilyPond-3.eps > ... but no OOoLilyPond.eps, so the routine just exited. I commented this > out since the only file I'm interested in is OOoLilyPond.png which was > there, and was included next. Debugging further kept throwing out errors > in LibreBasic ... so I gave up. > > Current state is that its now inserting the image ... but holding the > image source open (even if I delete the image from the document). This > means that the next run of OOoLP fails because it can't delete the > source from the previous run. I have OpenOffice 4.1.3 and OooLilyPond 0.4.0 running on Windows 7, and I use them a lot. Everything works fine as long as I use LilyPond 2.18.2, but I never got it to work with any 2.19 version. Apparently, LP 2.18 produces an EPS file and converts it into a PNG file. Both files are kept. With LP 2.19 (invoked by the same command) there is no EPS file with the same file name. Unfortunately, OooLilyPond always checks the presence of the EPS file (and exits if there's none), no matter if it's told to use the PNG or the EPS file. The easiest way I found was to change the way LilyPond is called, in a way that there really is an EPS file present. In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a function named "CallLilyPond()". For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: -- sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- This line should be replaced by: -- sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- I've tested that with LP 2.18.2, LP 2.19.37 and LP 2.19.51, and it worked with all three versions. By the way, I have no idea of how to use the command line parameters... instead, I simply experimented with Frescobaldi and "stole" its output. ;-) I hope that this information is useful for some people. OooLilyPond is a great tool and has literally saved my life so many times. Cheers, Klaus P.S.: Interestingly enough, the error showed up as complaining about an unknown variable named "CurserPosition", but that seems to be another story... -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198655.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > Hello everybody, > > maybe it's a little late to warm up an old thread, but I had to struggle > with a similar problem: > Roman Stawski wrote >> When I hit the lilypond button the console popped up as usual to run >> Lilypond, finished correctly and disappeared. The OOoLP dialogue stayed >> open. When I looked at the LP output, everything had compiled fine. >> There were no errors. >> >> Debugging the macro, I found in the OOoLilypond/Make routine that after >> compilation it was looking for OOoLilyPond.eps in the temp directory. In >> reality I had OOoLilyPond-1.eps, OOoLilyPond-2.eps and OOoLilyPond-3.eps >> ... but no OOoLilyPond.eps, so the routine just exited. I commented this >> out since the only file I'm interested in is OOoLilyPond.png which was >> there, and was included next. Debugging further kept throwing out errors >> in LibreBasic ... so I gave up. >> >> Current state is that its now inserting the image ... but holding the >> image source open (even if I delete the image from the document). This >> means that the next run of OOoLP fails because it can't delete the >> source from the previous run. > I have OpenOffice 4.1.3 and OooLilyPond 0.4.0 running on Windows 7, and I > use them a lot. > Everything works fine as long as I use LilyPond 2.18.2, but I never got it > to work with any 2.19 version. > > Apparently, LP 2.18 produces an EPS file and converts it into a PNG file. > Both files are kept. > With LP 2.19 (invoked by the same command) there is no EPS file with the > same file name. > > Unfortunately, OooLilyPond always checks the presence of the EPS file (and > exits if there's none), no matter if it's told to use the PNG or the EPS > file. > The easiest way I found was to change the way LilyPond is called, in a way > that there really is an EPS file present. > > In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a > function named "CallLilyPond()". > For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: > > -- > sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & > iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) > -- > > This line should be replaced by: > > -- > sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & > sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly > >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) > -- > > I've tested that with LP 2.18.2, LP 2.19.37 and LP 2.19.51, and it worked > with all three versions. > By the way, I have no idea of how to use the command line parameters... > instead, I simply experimented with Frescobaldi and "stole" its output. > ;-) > > I hope that this information is useful for some people. OooLilyPond is a > great tool and has literally saved my life so many times. > > Cheers, > Klaus > > P.S.: Interestingly enough, the error showed up as complaining about an > unknown variable named "CurserPosition", but that seems to be another > story... Hello. I mainly use Linux but recently I've tried to use OOoLilyPond with my LibreOffice 5 on Windows 10, but it's failing. Windows 10 keeps crashing LibreOffice whenever I try to convert the LP code into my document (as normal). I keep getting BASIC errors, like "BASIC runtime error. Variable not defined". How can I fix this on Windows, I don't understand the make and eps issues mentioned in previous posts. Thank you for helping! - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198659.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Klaus Blum wrote: In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a function named "CallLilyPond()". For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: -- sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- This line should be replaced by: -- sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- Thanks for this info. I used OooLilyPond regularly with LibreOffice and LilyPond on Linux Fedora, until it stopped working with newer releases. This helped me to make it work again :-) (Fedora 25, LilyPond 2.19.53, LibreOffice 5.2.3.3) -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Martin Tarenskeen wrote > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Klaus Blum wrote: > >> In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a >> function named "CallLilyPond()". >> For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: >> >> -- >> sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & >> iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) >> -- >> >> This line should be replaced by: >> >> -- >> sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & >> sBackendOpt >> & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out >> 2>&1" >> &Chr(10) >> -- > > Thanks for this info. I used OooLilyPond regularly with LibreOffice and > LilyPond on Linux Fedora, until it stopped working with newer releases. > This helped me to make it work again :-) > > (Fedora 25, LilyPond 2.19.53, LibreOffice 5.2.3.3) > > -- > > MT > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Ah, I understand now. I edited the macro ITSELF, in LibreOffice 5 and everything is working beautifully! I can confirm that the "variable" error (BASIC) can be fixed by this method: - *In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a function named "CallLilyPond()". For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads:* -- sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- *This line should be replaced by:* -- sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- Thank you so much for this fix! - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198661.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus, On 2016-12-30 07:37, Klaus Blum wrote: Hello everybody, maybe it's a little late to warm up an old thread, but I had to struggle with a similar problem: Roman Stawski wrote When I hit the lilypond button the console popped up as usual to run Lilypond, finished correctly and disappeared. The OOoLP dialogue stayed open. When I looked at the LP output, everything had compiled fine. There were no errors. Debugging the macro, I found in the OOoLilypond/Make routine that after compilation it was looking for OOoLilyPond.eps in the temp directory. In reality I had OOoLilyPond-1.eps, OOoLilyPond-2.eps and OOoLilyPond-3.eps ... but no OOoLilyPond.eps, so the routine just exited. I commented this out since the only file I'm interested in is OOoLilyPond.png which was there, and was included next. Debugging further kept throwing out errors in LibreBasic ... so I gave up. Current state is that its now inserting the image ... but holding the image source open (even if I delete the image from the document). This means that the next run of OOoLP fails because it can't delete the source from the previous run. I have OpenOffice 4.1.3 and OooLilyPond 0.4.0 running on Windows 7, and I use them a lot. Everything works fine as long as I use LilyPond 2.18.2, but I never got it to work with any 2.19 version. Apparently, LP 2.18 produces an EPS file and converts it into a PNG file. Both files are kept. With LP 2.19 (invoked by the same command) there is no EPS file with the same file name. Unfortunately, OooLilyPond always checks the presence of the EPS file (and exits if there's none), no matter if it's told to use the PNG or the EPS file. The easiest way I found was to change the way LilyPond is called, in a way that there really is an EPS file present. In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a function named "CallLilyPond()". For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: -- sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- This line should be replaced by: -- sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) -- I've tested that with LP 2.18.2, LP 2.19.37 and LP 2.19.51, and it worked with all three versions. By the way, I have no idea of how to use the command line parameters... instead, I simply experimented with Frescobaldi and "stole" its output. ;-) I hope that this information is useful for some people. OooLilyPond is a great tool and has literally saved my life so many times. How did OOoLP accomplish this? - by distracting an axe murderer who loves beautiful scores thus giving you enough time to escape? OOoLP giving you external heart massage after a heart attack? Good tip . . bad English . . P. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > This line should be replaced by: > > -- > sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & > sBackendOpt & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly > >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) > -- > > > Cheers, > Klaus > > P.S.: Interestingly enough, the error showed up as complaining about an > unknown variable named "CurserPosition", but that seems to be another > story... One question, hopefully someone knows how to fix this. I really think the font of the macro editor window is too difficult to see in its default font/size. Look at the attachment photo and you'll see what I mean. It looks kind of deformed, squished, and generally difficult to see unless you really stop and squint. Not sure why it looks so rough. Anyone know how to change the font of the macro editor window /itself /in OooLilyPond? Thanks! See here: bad_font.PNG <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n198666/bad_font.PNG> - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198666.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On 29.12.2016 23:17, Philip Rhoades wrote: OooLilyPond is a great tool and has literally saved my life so many times. How did OOoLP accomplish this? - by distracting an axe murderer who loves beautiful scores thus giving you enough time to escape? OOoLP giving you external heart massage after a heart attack? Good tip . . bad English . . Well, it’s an oxymoron to use the word ‘literally’ figuratively… but no reason to deride people for not knowing what ‘literally’ literally means… Easy, man :-) Best, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Shouldn't this go in a real bugreport/patchsuggestion somewhere, so we can expect a new OooLP some day? The latest release is quite old. Is someone maintaining it?MTVerzonden vanaf mijn Huawei mobiele telefoon Oorspronkelijk bericht Onderwerp: Re: OOoLilyPondVan: Martin Tarenskeen Aan: Klaus Blum Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgOn Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Klaus Blum wrote:> In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a> function named "CallLilyPond()".> For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads:>> --> sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" &> iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10)> -->> This line should be replaced by:>> --> sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & sBackendOpt> & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1"> &Chr(10)> --Thanks for this info. I used OooLilyPond regularly with LibreOffice and LilyPond on Linux Fedora, until it stopped working with newer releases. This helped me to make it work again :-)(Fedora 25, LilyPond 2.19.53, LibreOffice 5.2.3.3)-- MT___lilypond-user mailing listlilypond-user@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 30. Dezember 2016 09:32:42 MEZ, schrieb "m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl" : >Shouldn't this go in a real bugreport/patchsuggestion somewhere, so we >can expect a new OooLP some day? The latest release is quite old. Is >someone maintaining it? IIRC it is officially unmaintained. Quite a pity ... Urs > >MT > >Verzonden vanaf mijn Huawei mobiele telefoon > > > > Oorspronkelijk bericht >Onderwerp: Re: OOoLilyPond >Van: Martin Tarenskeen >Aan: Klaus Blum >Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > > > > >On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Klaus Blum wrote: > >> In the OooLilyPond macros, there is a section "LilyPond" containing a >> function named "CallLilyPond()". >> For composing the Windows command, there is a line that reads: >> >> -- >> sCommand = sCommand & " " & sBackendOpt & " -f png -dresolution=" & >> iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out 2>&1" &Chr(10) >> -- >> >> This line should be replaced by: >> >> -- >> sCommand = sCommand & " -dno-delete-intermediate-files --png " & >sBackendOpt >> & " -dresolution=" & iGraphicDPI & " OOoLilyPond.ly >OOoLilyPond.out >2>&1" >> &Chr(10) >> -- > >Thanks for this info. I used OooLilyPond regularly with LibreOffice and > >LilyPond on Linux Fedora, until it stopped working with newer releases. > >This helped me to make it work again :-) > >(Fedora 25, LilyPond 2.19.53, LibreOffice 5.2.3.3) > >-- > >MT > >___ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > >___ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
SoundsFromSound wrote > Anyone know how to change the font of the macro editor window / > itself / > in OooLilyPond? I can only speak for OpenOffice, but I guess it works in a similar way on LibreOffice, so here we go: Open the OooLilyPond macro, just as you did before. There you have some tabs called "Config", "Editor", "LilyPond" etc. Select the tab called "GUI_Editor" and you get the main OLy window. Click on the editor pane to select it. Now right-click on it, a context menu should offer to edit its properties. Here you can change the font and/or font size. Somewhere in the macro editor there should also be a button or menu entry to save your changes. Does that work? Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198682.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi guys, thanks for all the replies! Am 30.12.2016 um 07:36 schrieb Brian Barker: At 09:17 30/12/2016 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote: How did OOoLP accomplish this? - by distracting an axe murderer who loves beautiful scores thus giving you enough time to escape? OOoLP giving you external heart massage after a heart attack? Good tip . . bad English . . Charles Dickens wrote of Nicholas Nickleby "His looks were very haggard, and his limbs and body literally worn to the bone, ...". Will you tell Mr Dickens he wrote "bad English" or should I? James Joyce, in Dubliners: "Lily, the caretaker’s daughter, was literally run off her feet." Will you speak to Mr Joyce? Charlotte Brontë, in Jane Eyre: "Literally, I was (what he often called me) the apple of his eye." Will you approach Ms Brontë about her error? And there we were, thinking these were writers of excellent English! Brian Barker Don't walk away... Bad English doesn't always have to be a shame: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MaO0OAZZUE ;-) (To all Germans: Don't be afraid, it's NOT that famous Oettinger video...) Cheers, Klaus ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > > SoundsFromSound wrote >> Anyone know how to change the font of the macro editor window / >> itself / >> in OooLilyPond? > I can only speak for OpenOffice, but I guess it works in a similar way on > LibreOffice, so here we go: > > Open the OooLilyPond macro, just as you did before. > There you have some tabs called "Config", "Editor", "LilyPond" etc. > Select the tab called "GUI_Editor" and you get the main OLy window. > Click on the editor pane to select it. Now right-click on it, a context > menu should offer to edit its properties. > Here you can change the font and/or font size. > Somewhere in the macro editor there should also be a button or menu entry > to save your changes. > > Does that work? > > Cheers, > Klaus Klaus, I can't believe how easy it was - your advice worked perfectly step by step! Thank you thank you! :) - composer | sound designer LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198686.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 30.12.2016 um 12:59 schrieb Klaus Blum: > Don't walk away... Bad English doesn't always have to be a shame: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MaO0OAZZUE > ;-) > (To all Germans: Don't be afraid, it's NOT that famous Oettinger > video...) LOL. To which of the numerous highlights are you refering? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi, > IIRC it is officially unmaintained. > Quite a pity ... If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author would agree to do so. I don't remember if there is a license with it, but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance might be better than nothing. Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck : >Hi, > >> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. >> Quite a pity ... > >If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >would agree to do so. I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. > I don't remember if there is a license with it, >but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. > >IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the >required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and >published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance >might be better than nothing. So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under https://github.com/openlilylib. I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector graphics (if that still is true)). Best Urs > >Cheers, >Joram > >___ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Urs Liska writes: > Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck : >>Hi, >> >>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. >>> Quite a pity ... >> >>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >>would agree to do so. > > I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. > >> I don't remember if there is a license with it, >>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. >> >>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the >>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and >>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance >>might be better than nothing. > > So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under > https://github.com/openlilylib. > > I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I > don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector > graphics (if that still is true)). I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, Oolilypond did not make any use of it. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 1. Januar 2017 20:49:50 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup : >Urs Liska writes: > >> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck >: >>>Hi, >>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. Quite a pity ... >>> >>>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >>>would agree to do so. >> >> I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. >> >>> I don't remember if there is a license with it, >>>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. >>> >>>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the >>>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and >>>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance >>>might be better than nothing. >> >> So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under >> https://github.com/openlilylib. >> >> I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I >> don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector >> graphics (if that still is true)). > >I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >Oolilypond did not make any use of it. Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. Urs -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: >> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >> >Oolilypond did not make any use of it. > Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to > maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a > huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-) I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures. And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file. I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I don't know where that went. (Oh, and it should be renamed LO-lilypond, seeing as OO is - to all intents and purposes nowadays - dead in the water.) Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists : > On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: >>> I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, Oolilypond did not make any use of it. > >> Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to >> maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a >> huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. > > Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-) > > I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last > year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors > unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures. > And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file. > > I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported > should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I > don't know where that went. Several years ago I looked into OO’s vector drawing structures and found them to be a subset of SVG. Maybe there is a good conversion of LilyPond’s SVG subset to LO’s possible? Greetlings, Hraban --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On 01/01/17 23:34, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists : > >> On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, > Oolilypond did not make any use of it. >> >>> Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to >>> maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a >>> huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. >> >> Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-) >> >> I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last >> year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors >> unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures. >> And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file. >> >> I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported >> should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I >> don't know where that went. > > Several years ago I looked into OO’s vector drawing structures and found them > to be a subset of SVG. > Maybe there is a good conversion of LilyPond’s SVG subset to LO’s possible? > I'm sure there is. I'm just saying that the import procedure was broken such that users were likely to get a substandard experience. I hope it's been fixed by now. Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 02.01.2017 um 00:58 schrieb Wols Lists: > On 01/01/17 23:34, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Am 2017-01-01 um 21:07 schrieb Wols Lists : >> >>> On 01/01/17 19:56, Urs Liska wrote: > I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >> Oolilypond did not make any use of it. Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. >>> Just make sure you look in the right place ... :-) >>> >>> I follow the LO dev mailing list, and last I remember (probably mid last >>> year) it was a bit of a mess with some filters importing vectors >>> unchanged, and other filters converting it to internal LO structures. >>> And it was a bit of a russian roulette which one was applied to your file. >>> >>> I know the aim was to clean it up, and it was clear that stuff imported >>> should NOT be converted unless/until the user tried to edit it, but I >>> don't know where that went. >> Several years ago I looked into OO’s vector drawing structures and found >> them to be a subset of SVG. >> Maybe there is a good conversion of LilyPond’s SVG subset to LO’s possible? >> > I'm sure there is. I'm just saying that the import procedure was broken > such that users were likely to get a substandard experience. I hope it's > been fixed by now. OK, I was on my proper computer for the first time now since this thread restarted. I checked with LibreOffice 5.2.4 and could properly include a LilyPond-generated .eps graphic and export the whole document to PDF without obvious issues. So it should be possible to make OOLilyPond use vector graphics for its snippets. I think this would be a terrific feature for all those who need to include music fragments in text documents and aren't ready to take the plunge to use LaTeX. I think this should be a real incentive for (academic) music teachers to promote the use of LibreOffice and LilyPond. So it would be really great to pick up this extension and make it usable again. Urs > Cheers, > Wol > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 02.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Urs Liska: > So it would be really great to pick up this extension and make it usable > again. For the record: The original package on SourceForge does *not* have a license included, so I have written an email to the original developer. It has been delivered, so the email account still exists - but of course that doesn't mean I will get a response. In the meantime I have extracted the archive and set up a Git repository, and if I get a positive answer I will upload it to Github under the new name LiLily. This still doesn't mean I'm ready to actually develop and maintain it further, as I don't have any experience with LibreOffice extensions. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Urs Liska wrote > The original package on SourceForge does *not* have a license included The macro code itself is preceeded by a comment: > ' OOoLilyPond - using LilyPond in OpenOffice.org > ' > 'Copyright (C) 2005 geoffroy piroux > 'Copyright (C) 2009 Samuel Hartmann > ' > 'This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > 'it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > 'the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > '(at your option) any later version. > ' > 'This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > 'but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > 'MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > 'GNU General Public License for more details. > ' > 'You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > 'along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > 'Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 > USA Maybe this is what you are looking for. Urs Liska wrote > I checked with LibreOffice 5.2.4 and could properly include a > LilyPond-generated .eps graphic and export the whole document to PDF > without obvious issues. Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using literally/figuratively every day. However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in OpenOffice). Right now I'm trying to add an option to use .svg in OooLilyPond. Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198756.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 02.01.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Klaus Blum: > Urs Liska wrote >> The original package on SourceForge does *not* have a license included > The macro code itself is preceeded by a comment: > >> ' OOoLilyPond - using LilyPond in OpenOffice.org >> ' >> 'Copyright (C) 2005 geoffroy piroux >> 'Copyright (C) 2009 Samuel Hartmann >> ' >> 'This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> 'it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> 'the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or >> '(at your option) any later version. >> ' >> 'This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> 'but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> 'MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> 'GNU General Public License for more details. >> ' >> 'You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> 'along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software >> 'Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 >> USA > Maybe this is what you are looking for. Ehm, yes ... > > > Urs Liska wrote >> I checked with LibreOffice 5.2.4 and could properly include a >> LilyPond-generated .eps graphic and export the whole document to PDF >> without obvious issues. > Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps > graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using > literally/figuratively every day. > However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in > OpenOffice). *After* writing my last comment I wrote something (but for OpenOffice) that support for file formats may vary by OS (then it said: .eps is not possible on Windows). > > Right now I'm trying to add an option to use .svg in OooLilyPond. That would be good. While I think on the long run a Python based development from scratch would be the best option this looks like more work than expected, and I think it will only happen if someone with Python knowledge and OOo/LibreOffice experience steps in. OTOH this also may be two different persons collaborating. Urs > > Cheers, > Klaus > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198756.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Urs Liska wrote > Am 02.01.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Klaus Blum: >> Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps >> graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using >> literally/figuratively every day. >> However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in >> OpenOffice). > > *After* writing my last comment I wrote something (but for OpenOffice) > that support for file formats may vary by OS (then it said: .eps is not > possible on Windows). Ooops, I forgot to mention that this only counts for Windows 7. I don't have a Linux installation that could be called up-to-date. ;-) -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198758.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 02.01.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Klaus Blum: > Urs Liska wrote >> Am 02.01.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Klaus Blum: >>> Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps >>> graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using >>> literally/figuratively every day. >>> However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in >>> OpenOffice). >> *After* writing my last comment I wrote something (but for OpenOffice) >> that support for file formats may vary by OS (then it said: .eps is not >> possible on Windows). > Ooops, I forgot to mention that this only counts for Windows 7. > I don't have a Linux installation that could be called up-to-date. ;-) So it might be useful to add an option to use EPS, PNG or SVG. This should accordingly invoke LilyPond and then import the right image file. So users can configure the behaviour to their needs and OS. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
On 02/01/17 13:41, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 02.01.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Klaus Blum: >> Urs Liska wrote >>> Am 02.01.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Klaus Blum: Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using literally/figuratively every day. However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in OpenOffice). >>> *After* writing my last comment I wrote something (but for OpenOffice) >>> that support for file formats may vary by OS (then it said: .eps is not >>> possible on Windows). >> Ooops, I forgot to mention that this only counts for Windows 7. >> I don't have a Linux installation that could be called up-to-date. ;-) > > So it might be useful to add an option to use EPS, PNG or SVG. This > should accordingly invoke LilyPond and then import the right image file. > So users can configure the behaviour to their needs and OS. > Bear in mind that Apache OO hasn't been updated in heaven knows how long. Last I heard it took over six months to get a serious (read "dangerous") bug fixed, because no one knew how to get the build system to work to create a new release. So before you spend time "supporting" OO (that's probably why it still works for OO, because it's not been updated ...) check the release date of the version you are supporting. I think there's only been one proper release of OO since it became Apache OO, and that's how many years ago? otoh, LO is a moving target with regular releases. But the dev list is very active so if you want some help from the LO guys, feel free to join in. If I spot you there I'll try to help, but my involvement with LO code isn't that much. Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 02.01.2017 um 16:27 schrieb Wols Lists: > On 02/01/17 13:41, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> Am 02.01.2017 um 14:38 schrieb Klaus Blum: >>> Urs Liska wrote Am 02.01.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Klaus Blum: > Hmmm... I just installed LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and had no luck with .eps > graphics. In OpenOffice 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 it works. That's what I'm using > literally/figuratively every day. > However, .svg import seems to work fine in LibreOffice (but not in > OpenOffice). *After* writing my last comment I wrote something (but for OpenOffice) that support for file formats may vary by OS (then it said: .eps is not possible on Windows). >>> Ooops, I forgot to mention that this only counts for Windows 7. >>> I don't have a Linux installation that could be called up-to-date. ;-) >> So it might be useful to add an option to use EPS, PNG or SVG. This >> should accordingly invoke LilyPond and then import the right image file. >> So users can configure the behaviour to their needs and OS. >> > Bear in mind that Apache OO hasn't been updated in heaven knows how > long. Last I heard it took over six months to get a serious (read > "dangerous") bug fixed, because no one knew how to get the build system > to work to create a new release. > > So before you spend time "supporting" OO (that's probably why it still > works for OO, because it's not been updated ...) check the release date > of the version you are supporting. I think there's only been one proper > release of OO since it became Apache OO, and that's how many years ago? I didn't intend to support OOo. However, it seems unclear (at least to me) which graphics formats the various versions of LO support on the different platforms. The official help page https://help.libreoffice.org/Writer/Inserting_a_Graphic_From_a_File actually tells *nothing* about supported formats, let alone any platform differences. > > otoh, LO is a moving target with regular releases. But the dev list is > very active so if you want some help from the LO guys, feel free to join > in. If I spot you there I'll try to help, but my involvement with LO > code isn't that much. I met two of them at the GSoC mentors summit but unfortunately I don't recall their names ... otherwise I'd try to write them directly. But as said, I think there should be someone with actual OO/LO experience to start working on this, be it by updating the existing extension or by writing a new one with Python (and python-ly). Urs > > Cheers, > Wol > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Urs Liska wrote > So it might be useful to add an option to use EPS, PNG or SVG. This > should accordingly invoke LilyPond and then import the right image file. > So users can configure the behaviour to their needs and OS. Agreed! I've always wondered why nobody added that option to OLy. Now I know: To auto-crop the images, OLy relies on lilypond-book-preamble.ly which only works with the EPS backend. There's already a thread for that problem, but no solution: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-does-the-lilypond-book-preamble-work-td191523.html It seems that lilypond-book-preamble.ly has lots of abilities... most of which are not needed here. We only need to auto-crop the resulting image. Maybe someone knows how to achieve that? -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198768.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi again, recently I've done some homework... ;-) I've tried to make some additions, and the result is OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc1.oxt - see attached. OOoLilyPond-0.oxt <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> Notice: This is based on the most "recent" release OOoLilyPond-0.4.1rc1.oxt from 2009 which isn't on the official site, but you can find it here: https://sourceforge.net/p/ooolilypond/discussion/614285/thread/d200563d/ On Windows, it worked fine with LibreOffice, but not with OpenOffice. New features: 1.) It's now possible to add include paths in the config dialog. 2.) Ability to save the current code to a temporary LY file and open it in an external editor, e.g. Frescobaldi. The path to the executable can be customized in the config dialog. Another button re-imports code from the temporary file back to the editor window. 3.) LilyPond's svg backend still doesn't support lilypond-book-preamble.ly would be needed for auto-cropping. Any current attempt to use OLy with svg format must work without lilypond-book-preamble.ly, e.g. with the "Direct to Lilypond" template. Paper size must be found by trial-and-error. As line-width must be given anyway, only the paper height would have to be a guess, which is maybe not that bad. Also, text fonts seem to be replaced - don't know where and why. Is there already a discussion about that? That being said: I've added svg support, and on Windows 7 I had no problems with the graphics import. It would be cool if someone also could test it on Linux and report errors. I've added two templates to play with. Attempt.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt.ly> Attempt2.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt2.ly> Cheers, Klaus P.S.: I hope the attachments work, as I'm posting from nabble: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198768.html -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199060.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > Hi again, > > recently I've done some homework... ;-) > I've tried to make some additions, and the result is > OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc1.oxt - see attached. > > New features: > > 1.) It's now possible to add include paths in the config dialog. > > 2.) Ability to save the current code to a temporary LY file and open it in > an external editor, e.g. Frescobaldi. The path to the executable can be > customized in the config dialog. Another button re-imports code from the > temporary file back to the editor window. > > I've added svg support, and on Windows 7 I had no problems with the > graphics import. > > It would be cool if someone also could test it on Linux and report errors. > I've added two templates to play with. > Attempt.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt.ly> > > Attempt2.ly > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt2.ly> > > Cheers, > Klaus > > P.S.: I hope the attachments work, as I'm posting from nabble: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198768.html Thank you so much for working on this extension! I just downloaded it and tried it in Windows LO, but I will now try it on my Linux XFCE machine and let you know how it goes. - composer | sound designer | asmr artist LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199061.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > Hi again, > > recently I've done some homework... ;-) > I've tried to make some additions, and the result is > OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc1.oxt - see attached. > OOoLilyPond-0.oxt > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> > > Notice: This is based on the most "recent" release > OOoLilyPond-0.4.1rc1.oxt from 2009 which isn't on the official site, but > you can find it here: > https://sourceforge.net/p/ooolilypond/discussion/614285/thread/d200563d/ > > On Windows, it worked fine with LibreOffice, but not with OpenOffice. > > New features: > > 1.) It's now possible to add include paths in the config dialog. > > 2.) Ability to save the current code to a temporary LY file and open it in > an external editor, e.g. Frescobaldi. The path to the executable can be > customized in the config dialog. Another button re-imports code from the > temporary file back to the editor window. > > 3.) LilyPond's svg backend still doesn't support lilypond-book-preamble.ly > would be needed for auto-cropping. > Any current attempt to use OLy with svg format must work without > lilypond-book-preamble.ly, e.g. with the "Direct to Lilypond" template. > Paper size must be found by trial-and-error. As line-width must be given > anyway, only the paper height would have to be a guess, which is maybe not > that bad. > Also, text fonts seem to be replaced - don't know where and why. Is there > already a discussion about that? > That being said: I've added svg support, and on Windows 7 I had no > problems with the graphics import. > > It would be cool if someone also could test it on Linux and report errors. > I've added two templates to play with. > Attempt.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt.ly> > > Attempt2.ly > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199060/Attempt2.ly> > > Cheers, > Klaus > > P.S.: I hope the attachments work, as I'm posting from nabble: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p198768.html I cannot get your version of the extension to show up at all in LibreOffice 5 in Windows 10. If I revert to an older "official" version of the OOo, it shows up correctly in add-ons. Not sure why but as of now nothing I can do will make your modified version of OOoLilyPond show up in Windows LibreOffice. Even from the extension manager, it shows a blank instance listed of "OOoLilyPond" with no other information (which is normally would with older version). Do you know what could cause this or how to fix? *See attached images* Older_Extension_(Works).png <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199072/Older_Extension_%28Works%29.png> Your_Extension.png <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199072/Your_Extension.png> - composer | sound designer | asmr artist LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199072.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi Ben, SoundsFromSound wrote > I cannot get your version of the extension to show up at all in > LibreOffice 5 in Windows 10. If I revert to an older "official" version of > the OOo, it shows up correctly in add-ons. > > Not sure why but as of now nothing I can do will make your modified > version of OOoLilyPond show up in Windows LibreOffice. > > Even from the extension manager, it shows a blank instance listed of > "OOoLilyPond" with no other information (which is normally would with > older version). Do you know what could cause this or how to fix? maybe I made some mistakes in composing the oxt file. Here is another attempt. This time I took the version 0.4.0 oxt file and only replaced the updated ingredients. On my LO 5.2.4.2/Win7 it now shows up as expected. BTW: Even with the original 0.4.0, I did not get any automatic creation of a menu entry or toolbar button. I had to manually create a button and link the correct marco with it (see picture). I don't know if there is some secret I have missed... Does it work now? Cheers, Klaus Macros.gif <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/Macros.gif> OOoLilyPond-0.oxt <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199086.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > Hi Ben, > SoundsFromSound wrote >> I cannot get your version of the extension to show up at all in >> LibreOffice 5 in Windows 10. If I revert to an older "official" version >> of the OOo, it shows up correctly in add-ons. >> >> Not sure why but as of now nothing I can do will make your modified >> version of OOoLilyPond show up in Windows LibreOffice. >> >> Even from the extension manager, it shows a blank instance listed of >> "OOoLilyPond" with no other information (which is normally would with >> older version). Do you know what could cause this or how to fix? > maybe I made some mistakes in composing the oxt file. > Here is another attempt. This time I took the version 0.4.0 oxt file and > only replaced the updated ingredients. On my LO 5.2.4.2/Win7 it now shows > up as expected. > BTW: Even with the original 0.4.0, I did not get any automatic creation of > a menu entry or toolbar button. I had to manually create a button and link > the correct marco with it (see picture). > I don't know if there is some secret I have missed... > > Does it work now? > > Cheers, > Klaus > Macros.gif <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/Macros.gif> > > OOoLilyPond-0.oxt > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> Yes you fixed it! This new version is working perfectly :) It shows up automatically as it should and the extension information is intact. Whatever you did just now fixed it, thank you for working on this! Ben - composer | sound designer | asmr artist LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199088.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Dear Klaus, it works here, too. With LibreOffice: 5.1.4.2 on Ubuntu. Also the svg output works for a preamble-free template. Thanks a lot for your changes! Best, Joram > Does it work now? > > Cheers, > Klaus > > Macros.gif <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/Macros.gif> > OOoLilyPond-0.oxt > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Am 2017-01-11 um 15:54 schrieb SoundsFromSound : > Klaus Blum wrote >> Does it work now? >> OOoLilyPond-0.oxt >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n199086/OOoLilyPond-0.oxt> Hi Klaus, I tried it with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on OSX. All messages translated from German. - Installation works. - If I try to check for extension updates, I get a modal dialog "http://extensions.openoffice.org/extension/ooolilypond.xml doesn’t exist.". No wonder, but I can’t close it (probably a bug in LO). - Killed LO, checked extension manager, extension is still there. - Toolbar has a "OLy" button now. Click. - Macro editor opens with an error message "Invalid value or data type. Index out of range." in line 123, function LilyPondVersion(): sLilyPondVersion = Split(sWords(UBound(sWords)), ".") - Same if I open OOoLilyPond via Extras/Add-Ons menu. - I didn’t find the settings dialog. - Updated to LibreOffice 5.2.4.2, first check without language pack: - Icon is gone, check extension manager: OOoLilyPond is gone. - Update fails with the same error message for a different OO extension. - Killed app, restartet. Re-installed OOoLilyPond. - Same error, this time in English: "Inadmissible value or data type. Index out of defined range." - I comment the conflicting lines. - Calling the macro again tells me there was a templates folder created. (Yes it is.) - Error message: "Cannot open the template file: ~/OOoLilyPond-Templates/Default.ly" (Folder is empty) - Error message: "No templates are found at ... LilyPond will not work without a template." OOoLy Editor opens. - Extracted the templates from your OXT. Configured the path to my lilypond binary. - Load Default.ly - Button "Ly Output" shows version statement, seems to be ok. - Button "LilyPond" … waterballing … YES it works! (PNG mode) - SVG mode finds no output, EPS mode places text of EPS file into frame HTH Greetlings, Hraban --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi Henning, thanks for your observations. I have no idea what exactly happens when LO installs an extension. I'm glad you could fix it manually so far. Henning Hraban Ramm-3 wrote > - SVG mode finds no output, EPS mode places text of EPS file into frame I completely forgot to talk about EPS, I only did in an earlier post. EPS didn't work for me on LO, only on OO. SVG mode should work as long as you don't use lilypond-book-preamble which is "hidden" in most of the templates. Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199104.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote > Hi Henning, > > SVG mode should work as long as you don't use lilypond-book-preamble which > is "hidden" in most of the templates. > > Cheers, > Klaus Klaus, This extension is working great on my XFCE LibreOffice, thank you so much for modifying this and sharing with us. - composer | sound designer | asmr artist LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-tp185560p199133.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
...Done some homework again... ;-)
Here is another take on updating OOoLilyPond.
It contains some more additions:
* font name and font size for editor windows can be specified
* user now can choose between two different ways to import graphic into
document (methods from 0.4.0 and 0.4.1rc1).
and, of course, the additions already contained in rc1:
* fixed: Runtime error - Variable not defined: line 40 CurserPosition=1
* additional include paths can be specified
* added button to save the current code into temporary file and open it
in external editor
* added button to re-import code from temporary file back to editor window
* added support for the use of SVG graphics format (with the known
restrictions)
In the attachment, there is also a readme file with more detailed
information.
I'v done some testing with the attached version, but certainly not in an
exhaustive way... ;-)
If there is (or will be) a collaboration to further develop OOoLilyPond,
I'm gladly willing to join in.
However, I have no idea of the python language, so I could never do a
re-write from scratch on my own.
In addition, my knowledge about collaboration with git repositories is
absolutely zero, but I'm always open to learn. Can anyone recommend a
good introduction for Windows users?
Cheers,
Klaus
OOoLilyPond-0.4.2rc4.oxt
Description: application/vnd.openofficeorg.extension
OooLilyPond 0.4.2rc4 ReadMe (January 2017)
===
This release is based on the two most recent versions that have been published
by the original developer Samuel Hartmann.
Version 0.4.0:
---
http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ooolilypond/
http://extensions.openoffice.org/de/project/ooolilypond
(direct download:)
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ooolilypond/ooolilypond/OOoLilyPond-0.4.0/OOoLilyPond-0.4.0.oxt?r=&ts=1484832348&use_mirror=netix
Version 0.4.1rc1:
--
https://sourceforge.net/p/ooolilypond/discussion/614285/thread/d200563d/#52fd/5aef
(direct download:)
http://www.hartmann-weine.ch/OOoLilyPond-0.4.1rc1.oxt
On the LilyPond mailing list, there are some considerations to continue the
OOoLilyPond project.
You can follow the discussion here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OOoLilyPond-td185560.html
Changes to OOoLilyPond 0.4.2rc4 since 0.4.0/0.4.1:
===
* fixed: Runtime error - Variable not defined: line 40 CurserPosition=1
* additional include paths can be specified
* added button to save the current code into temporary file and open it in
external editor
* added button to re-import code from temporary file back to editor window
* added support for the use of SVG graphics format
* user now can choose between two different ways to import graphic into
document
* font name and font size for editor windows can be specified
1.) fixed: Runtime error - Variable not defined: line 40 CurserPosition=1
--
Apparently, a small bug in OOoLilyPond prevented the correct error handling, if
the expected graphics file (produced by LilyPond) could not be found. Instead,
the macro stopped with the mentioned runtime error. This has now been fixed.
Up to LilyPond 2.18, both an EPS file and a PNG file were present if LilyPond
had been executed in PNG format. In LilyPond 2.19, this seems to have changed,
only a PNG file is produced.
Unfortunatly, OOoLilyPond always checked for the presence of an EPS file and
stopped if there was none.
This now has been changed as well: Whatever format is chosen (EPS, PNG or SVG),
OOoLilyPond checks if the corresponding graphics file is present.
2.) Additional include paths can be specified
--
In the configuration dialog, there is a text field where you can specify
statements for additional include paths. Its entire contents is literally
passed to LilyPond as a parameter.
It can simply be left empty, or it can contain one or multiple include path
definitions (i.e. the -I parameter) as described here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage#basic-command-line-options-for-lilypond
for example:
-I"C:/Users/Klaus/" -I"C:/Program Files (x86)/"
(Even in Windows, LilyPond expects the paths given with forward slashes instead
of backward slashes. OOoLilyPond will adapt the path statements, if necessary.)
3.) Save the current code into temporary file / re-import code from temporary
file
-
Working in the small editor window can be somewhat cumbersome.
However, it only contains the portion of the code between the
%{OOoLilyPondCode%} and %{OOoLilyPondEnd%} tags.
Copying its contents into an external editor like Frescobaldi is possible, but
compiling will n
Re: OOoLilyPond
Hi Klaus, Git is cross platform, so unless you want specifically some Windows GUI front ends, it's good to read up in the core git functionality, as it applies universally on any platform. Here is a good free online book: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 Using github and the like - they are just interfaces over core git, and github for example has extensive online help about github specific features. The UNIX man pages for git are clear and helpful, and even include git tutorials, and summary pages of the 20% of commands you use 80% of the time. [They don't put it like that, but you know what I mean.] Andrew On 21 January 2017 at 22:54, Klaus Blum wrote: > > In addition, my knowledge about collaboration with git repositories is > absolutely zero, but I'm always open to learn. Can anyone recommend a > good introduction for Windows users? > > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond
Klaus Blum wrote Saturday, January 21, 2017 11:54 AM > In addition, my knowledge about collaboration with git repositories is > absolutely zero, but I'm always open to learn. Can anyone recommend a > good introduction for Windows users? A fairly basic introduction is here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/git-on-windows Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond trouble
I just downloaded and installed OOoLilyPond. I followed the instructions on the sourceforge.net page for installation/set-up. There were two or three differences in the sub-menus, but I think I got it figured out. When I try to use it, though, it doesnothing. I tried "Testing the Script". I did Crtl-M and the Editor box opened. I keyed in some Lily code and hit the 'lilypond' button. Nothing. I tried the 'configure' button. Noththing. No response at all. I'm running LilyPond 2.8.5 on Fedora Core 3. LilyPond was installed from an auto-installer. Help? -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond problem
Hi Samuel: I'd love to get this working but I hit a problem when I get to the rendering. I've installed everything according to directions, I'm using LP 2.8.4 and OOo 2.0.3 on a Debian Etch system. The dialog panes appear, and I've configured everything properly (AFAICT) but when I click on the LilyPond button I receive this cryptic error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error' what():basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid The error appears to be related to C++. Any suggestions towards a solution ? Best, Dave Phillips ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond question
I've got OOoLilyPond apparently working. I'm collaborating with someone
who prefers to work in a word processing environment. I got him to
install OpenOffice on his WindowBox. That way we can easily pass the
file back and forth.
Now, to the real question: I put in a short musical example as a test.
It was more than one line long. This was intentional. It was a nine
measure snippet. It came out on three lines. Four measures on the
first line, four on the second, and one on the last. Additionally, the
two four-measure lines were not the same width. Why is this? Is
OOoLilyPond limited to one-liners? I hope not. This would be a
show-stopper. Is it because the Lily code is not contained within a
\score {} block? OOoLilyPond chokes on \score {} blocks (at least on my
machine).
Also, I added a symlink to the templates etc. but this is not remembered
by OOoLilyPond when I start it OpenOffice again (or perhaps it's after a
new login or reboot).
Help?
-David
LilyPond 2.8.7
Fedora Core 5
OOoLilyPond 0.2.1 (2006-09-27)
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ooolilypond user
OooLilyPond seems to be EXACTLY what I was looking for to write a book on jazz
improvisation.
I use Window XP and I can get it to insert simple scores in OpenOffice.org such
as:
\key c \minor \relative c'' { c16 es, d es c es d es c' es, d es c es d es }
which is the test given in the sourceforge webpage.
However, other scores that are created in LilyPond without problems, such as
this one given in the LilyPond tutorial:
\version "2.10.10"
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a b c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
harmonies = \chordmode {
a2 c2
}
\score {
<<
\new ChordNames {
\set chordChanges = ##t
\harmonies
}
\new Voice = "one" {
\autoBeamOff
\melody
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \text
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}get quite a lot of "syntax error"s and "unknown escaped string"s and
"unexpected string"s.
Does OooLilyPond have a shorter scope than LilyPond?
I've tried running both "lilypond.exe" and "lilipon-window.exe" as the
executable on "config", with the same results.
Thank you!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ANN: OOoLilyPond 1.0.0
Hi all, I'm happy to announce a new version of OOoLilyPond (OLy), an extension to include LilyPond snippets into LibreOffice/OpenOffice documents. There are several bugfixes and some new and hopefully cool and useful features: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/tag/1.0.0 Here is a presentation of all new features: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/wiki/Whats-new#v-100---whats-new And finally, you can find a tutorial and a detailed documentation in the project's wiki: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/wiki#ooolilypond I hope that there are no more bugs left. If you find some, please don't hesitate to report them. A big THANK YOU to all contributors and previous authors. Happy Easter! Cheers, Klaus -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
OOoLilyPond: new repository
Dear LilyPond community, OOoLilyPond, the extension for LibreOffice and OpenOffice, has a new home: https://github.com/OOoLilyPond In the last few years, it was located inside the openLilyLib repo at GitHub (which is now orphaned as openLilyLib has moved to GitLab). Therefore I decided to create a repo of its own. Apart from that, everything about OOoLilyPond stays the same... except for a new release with some minor changes. :-) Have fun and stay safe, Klaus
Re: OooLilyPond problem
AFAIK OpenOffice 3.3 is still beta. Nick On 12/11/10 20:11, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, It has been some time ago since I used the OooLilyPond extension for Openoffice.org-writer. It worked nicely then. I just upgraded to Fedora 14 and decided to use it again. But now it is not working anymore. I'm getting a screen with error messages beyond my understanding as soon as I click the "Oly" button on the menubar. I'm using Openoffice.org 3.3.0, and OooLilypond 0.4.0. Maybe a change or bug in the latest Openoffice causes it? Anyone else who tried this lately ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OooLilyPond problem
There has been a significant fork which may affect this particular Lilypond project. Many/possibly most of the OOo developers quit the OOo project and have started LibreOffice in protest against the parent company that was paying for OOo development. I don't know the details but they are out there on the interwebs. LibreOffice is also at 3.3.0 beta and does not seem significantly different in any way. For Macs, there is also NeoOffice which is based on OOo, but has various patches applied to use native Mac features. IME OOoLilyPond is very problematic with NeoOffice, although I no longer remember the issues or details. On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Nick Payne wrote: AFAIK OpenOffice 3.3 is still beta. Nick On 12/11/10 20:11, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, It has been some time ago since I used the OooLilyPond extension for Openoffice.org-writer. It worked nicely then. I just upgraded to Fedora 14 and decided to use it again. But now it is not working anymore. I'm getting a screen with error messages beyond my understanding as soon as I click the "Oly" button on the menubar. I'm using Openoffice.org 3.3.0, and OooLilypond 0.4.0. Maybe a change or bug in the latest Openoffice causes it? Anyone else who tried this lately ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OooLilyPond problem
On 12/11/10 20:09, Tim McNamara wrote: > There has been a significant fork which may affect this particular > Lilypond project. Many/possibly most of the OOo developers quit the > OOo project and have started LibreOffice in protest against the parent > company that was paying for OOo development. I don't know the details > but they are out there on the interwebs. > > LibreOffice is also at 3.3.0 beta and does not seem significantly > different in any way. > > For Macs, there is also NeoOffice which is based on OOo, but has > various patches applied to use native Mac features. IME OOoLilyPond > is very problematic with NeoOffice, although I no longer remember the > issues or details. > LibreOffice is afaict the Go-OO version of OpenOffice. The important point is that it is no longer "OOo plus patches", it is an actively maintained project in its own right. All of the patches are now being aggressively merged into the code base (seeing as it is no longer constrained by the Sun/Oracle copyright assignment policy). They are also keen to attract developers (my name is slowly climbing up the stats of people committing changes). But pretty much all of the non-Oracle devs have jumped ship to the new project. And bear in mind that several companies (for example Novell) were expending significant resource maintaining an "OOo plus patches" program - they can now throw those resources at a proper Open Source project. It's *probable* that OpenOffice will fade into obscurity - eclipsed by the new fork. You can see the effort being thrown at it ... And while I can't be a champion for lilypond, I do read a lot of the messages on the list, even when they're outside my sphere of interest (database), so rest assured if I do see anything that I think would affect lilypond, I'll but in and mention it. That said, if you're interested in lilypond integration, go along to the website (www.libreoffice.org will redirect you), join the mailing list, and do something about it ... :-) Cheers, Wol (an unemployed NoSQL database programmer looking for a job :-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OooLilyPond problem
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, It has been some time ago since I used the OooLilyPond extension for Openoffice.org-writer. It worked nicely then. I just upgraded to Fedora 14 and decided to use it again. But now it is not working anymore. I'm getting a screen with error messages beyond my understanding as soon as I click the "Oly" button on the menubar. I'm using Openoffice.org 3.3.0, and OooLilypond 0.4.0. To answer my own question: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openoffice* seems to have fixed my problem. -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Dear LilyPond community, I am happy to announce a new version of OOoLilyPond - an extension for LibreOffice/OpenOffice. OOoLilyPond enables you to enter LilyPond code from within your Office document. Both the resulting image and its source code will be embedded within the document. No need to keep any additional files other than the Writer/Draw/Impress document itself. The project has been unmaintained during the last few years. With the agreement of the original author, the development of the project is now continued under the roof of openlilylib.org: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases Changes since v. 0.4.0: * fixed: Runtime error "Variable not defined: line 40 CurserPosition=1" * additional include paths can be specified * added button to save the current code into temporary file and open it in external editor * added button to re-import code from temporary file back to editor window * added support for the use of SVG graphics format (please read the verbose release notes) * fixed: wrong size of vector graphics in Impress/Draw * size and crop settings of existing graphics can be preserved * user now can choose between two different ways to import graphic into document * font name and font size for editor windows can be specified * user interface can be translated into other languages Compatibility: OOoLilyPond (OLy) works with recent versions of LibreOffice (5.3.0.3) and OpenOffice (4.1.3). Older versions should work as well. It has even been tested with OpenOffice 2.4 without issues. Any content (LilyPond code, templates, OLy configuration files) created with/for OLy 0.4.x will work with OLy 0.5.x - and vice versa. (Fully compatible, forward and backward.) Older snippets created with OLy 0.3.x will also work with 0.4.x and 0.5.x, but not (necessarily) vice versa. Direct download: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/download/0.5.0/OOoLilyPond-0.5.0.oxt Verbose release notes: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/download/0.5.0/OOoLilyPond-0.5.0-Release-Notes.txt The project is also listed in the official extension centers for LibreOffice and OpenOffice: https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/ooolilypond http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/ooolilypond I hope this will be useful for many people. Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-OOoLilyPond-0-5-0-tp200737.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilypond, ChoirStaff, italiano.ly
2008/12/25 :
>
> Hello, I'm Alessandro from Italy. Your Report about OooLilypond is
> interesting but ... I did not solve some problems about using a
> \ChoirStaff template and an \italiano.ly input option. Actually, they both
> give me an error message. Any suggestion? I'm just using openoffice 3.0,
> lilypond 2.10 and the last OooLilypond available...
Greetings,
I think there is something wrong with your code; could you send an
example? For instance, the following syntax should work:
%
\include "italiano.ly"
\new ChoirStaff <<
\new Staff \new Voice = "soprano" \relative { do'1 }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "soprano" \lyricmode { aah }
\new Staff \new Voice = "alto" \relative { do1 }
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "alto" \lyricmode { aah }
>>
%
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond 0.3.3 available
OOoLilyPond 0.3.3 is now available. What's new: The installation of OOoLilyPond is now much easier thanks to Goran Rakic who provided the OpenOffice.org extension package. The new release now works with LilyPond 2.12. Special characters in lyrics like german Umlaute are now possible under Windows. web-site: http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net/ have fun, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond 0.4.0 released
I'm glad to announce version 0.4.0 of OOoLilyPond, the software that combines the power of OpenOffice.org and LilyPond. The new version is now easier to use and it has many new features: - The line width and the staff size can be set in the OLy dialog. - OLy has a built in template editor. - The templates include example code and documentation (comments). - The LilyPond output is parsed and Oly jumps to the location of the error or warning while displaying the corresponding message. About OOoLilyPond: With OOoLilyPond (OLy) you can use musical notation within OpenOffice.org. Use it for writing a book on music theory or for writing down exercises for music instruments or voice which need to be commented with text. OLy is not limited to classic musical notation, you can also create guitar fret diagrams with it. You enter the music notes as text code using the LilyPond language (http://www.lilypond.org) and OLy converts it into an image within OpenOffice.org. You will need some time to get familiar with the LilyPond language but once learned, you can typeset small pieces of music much faster than with any other sofware. More information and download: http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net Samuel Hartmann, July 13 2009 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond "unrecognized option"
Hello list, using OpenOfficeorg 2.0 with OOoLilyPond I get the following message: LilyPond: unrecognized option "-b" and nothing else. Anything I can do about this? Thanks, Thomas Windows XP LilyPond 2.8.6 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond trouble
Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: I just downloaded and installed OOoLilyPond. I followed the instructions on the sourceforge.net page for installation/set-up. There were two or three differences in the sub-menus, but I think I got it figured out. When I try to use it, though, it doesnothing. I tried "Testing the Script". I did Crtl-M and the Editor box opened. I keyed in some Lily code and hit the 'lilypond' button. Nothing. I tried the 'configure' button. Noththing. No response at all. I'm running LilyPond 2.8.5 on Fedora Core 3. LilyPond was installed from an auto-installer. May be this is the problem. The auto installer installs LilyPond under /home/username/bin. Maybe this path is not in your system search path. Try the following commands in bash: $ export PATH="$PATH:home//bin" $ ooffice If this does not help, wait for the next release of OOoLilyPond in one or two weeks. I changed a lot since the last release. regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond problem
Hi Dave, Dave Phillips wrote: I'd love to get this working but I hit a problem when I get to the rendering. I've installed everything according to directions, I'm using LP 2.8.4 and OOo 2.0.3 on a Debian Etch system. The dialog panes appear, and I've configured everything properly (AFAICT) but when I click on the LilyPond button I receive this cryptic error: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error' what():basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid The error appears to be related to C++. Any suggestions towards a solution ? I have no idea, what this error message means. I did not use any C code, only OOoBasic and Bash. I propose, you wait for the next version of OOoLilyPond. I changed most of the code. I will release the next version in one or two weeks. regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond trouble 2
In the midst of having trouble with OOoLilypond I decided it was time to go ahead and update my Linux installation. I did a fresh install of Fedora Core 5 (was using FC3 before). I updated everything and then installed LilyPond 2.8.7 from the install.sh. Then I installed OOoLilyPond. Then I followed the instructions and perhaps got it right this time. I was able to make it work as advertised. Yay! It was pretty cool. New problem. I had saved the small test file in *.doc format as I'm doing some work for someone who is using Word on Windows (this may or may not be relevant). When I reopened the test file and tried to edit one of the little music snippets, or add a new one, I get an error box: A Scripting Framework error occured while running the Basic script vnd.sun.star.script:OOoLilypond.OOoLilyPondMusic.main?language=Basic&locaction=application. Message: BasicProviderlmpl::getScript: no script! What happened? -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond question
Hi David,
David Bobroff wrote:
[...]
Now, to the real question: I put in a short musical example as a test.
It was more than one line long. This was intentional. It was a nine
measure snippet. It came out on three lines. Four measures on the
first line, four on the second, and one on the last. Additionally, the
two four-measure lines were not the same width. Why is this? Is
OOoLilyPond limited to one-liners? I hope not. This would be a
show-stopper. Is it because the Lily code is not contained within a
\score {} block? OOoLilyPond chokes on \score {} blocks (at least on my
machine).
Could you please post the example code?
I think a can create a template for that all the lines have the same
width. This should correspond to the fragment/nofragment option in
lilypond-book code.
Also, I added a symlink to the templates etc. but this is not remembered
by OOoLilyPond when I start it OpenOffice again (or perhaps it's after a
new login or reboot).
Please explain this in more detail, I don't understand where you put a
symlink to which files.
regards,
Samuel
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond question
Samuel Hartmann wrote:
Hi David,
David Bobroff wrote:
[...]
Now, to the real question: I put in a short musical example as a
test. It was more than one line long. This was intentional. It was
a nine measure snippet. It came out on three lines. Four measures
on the first line, four on the second, and one on the last.
Additionally, the two four-measure lines were not the same width.
Why is this? Is OOoLilyPond limited to one-liners? I hope not.
This would be a show-stopper. Is it because the Lily code is not
contained within a \score {} block? OOoLilyPond chokes on \score {}
blocks (at least on my machine).
Could you please post the example code?
Um, I just tried placing my code in a \score {} block and now it's not
objecting. Ah, but that's because I was using 'nofragment20.0y'. I
changed to default16 and it gave me an error box:
*
programming error: Cannot find file for FontConfig cache.
continuing, cross fingers
Processing `tmpfile.ly'
tmpfile.ly:32:0: error: syntax error, unexpected \score
\score{
tmpfile.ly:28:0: error: errors found, ignoring music expression
{
error: failed files: "tmpfile.ly"
*
So this error occurs in "fragment mode" if a \score {} block is
included. Feature or bug? Now that I understand the behavior it's not
a problem for me. I'll be using mostly 'nofragment' anyway.
I think a can create a template for that all the lines have the same
width. This should correspond to the fragment/nofragment option in
lilypond-book code.
Well, I started poking around and found a 'nofragment20.ly' template.
That seems to be what I was after. It also appears simple enough to
create my own templates for different sizes. So, my question about
multi-line music in OOoLilyPond is answered.
Also, I added a symlink to the templates etc. but this is not
remembered by OOoLilyPond when I start it OpenOffice again (or
perhaps it's after a new login or reboot).
Please explain this in more detail, I don't understand where you put a
symlink to which files.
The OOoLilyPond files I put in a user's (mine) home directory. When
running as root, rather than copying the scripts/templates etc. to
root's home I created a symlink to the directory. When I start of
OpenOffice, though, it doesn't find the templates. The 'config' box
shows the path to /root/OOoLilyPond/...and so on, rather than to
/home/david/OOoLilyPond/ But, /root/OOoLilyPond is a symlink to
/home/david/OOoLilyPond. OOoLilyPond does not appear to be convinced
that the symlink works. I have tried simply changing the template and
script paths and saving them, but that doesn't work either. The next
time I start OpenOffice it has reverted back to the old path. I can get
around this by copying the files to the path it wants to search, but
that seems a bit clumsy.
-David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond question
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 23:40, David Bobroff wrote:
> Samuel Hartmann wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
>
> So this error occurs in "fragment mode" if a \score {} block is
> included. Feature or bug?
Feature; lilypond-book does the same. with fragment, you let lilypond-book
place a \score block around your snippet.
--
Erik
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond 0.3 released
The new release of OOoLilyPond can be downloaded now (http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net). The main change is that is does not call a bash script anymore. So on Windows OOoLilyPond can be used with the MinGW-Version of lilypond without the need for installing cygwin. Here is the ChangeLog: * Code cleaned up * No bash script is needed anymore * No cygwin is needed on Windows * Works with MinGW version of LilyPond * cygwin version of LilyPond is not supported anymore * Cleaned up configuration Dialog * LilyPond executable can be specified * Templates can be selected using a pop up menu * on Linux, ~/.ooolilypond-tmp is used for temporary files * on Windows, %SystemRoot%\Temp is used for temporary files * on Linux, Settings are stored in ~/.ooolilypond * on Windows, Settings are stored in %APPDATA%\ooolilypond * Changed the way the LilyPond Code and Template name is stored in the graphic have fun, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond 0.3 trouble
Samuel Hartmann wrote: Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: I've grabbed v0.3 and the install instructions are not consistent with what I'm seeing. When I get to the part where it says: - Select "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/OOoLilyPondMusic" as Functions Category that path is not there. I get: OpenOffice.org/user/OOoLilyPond/ Is there something missing in the distribution, or is there something amiss in the instructions? Maybe you read the wrong instructions. On the web page and in the file offline version which you find in the tar.gz or zip file you find these instructions: Associate a keyboard shortcut with the macro - Create a new writer document - Select from the Menu: "Tools" --> "Customize..." - Go to the tab "Keyboard" - Select "Control-M" as Shortcut key - Select "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/Main" as Functions Category - Select "main" as Funtion - Click "Modify" The path "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/Main" seems to be the correct one. Did you read the instructions on the web page? May be your browser cage had an older version of the web page which was loaded when visiting it. Ok, all was well, but now I'm getting this error box when trying to edit a piece of music: *** A Scripting Framework error occurred while running the Basic script vnd.sun.star.script:OOoLilyPond.Main.main?language=Basic&location=application. Message: BasicProviderlmpl:getScript: no script! *** I tried setting up the macro again but it didn't help. It worked fine for a while. I was able to put in a lot of short bits of music and it was working like a charm. OpenOffice *did* crash at one point (don't know why). Could this have something to do with it? -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond on Windows
I tried to set up OOoLilyPond on Windows XP, OpenOffice.org 2.1, Lilypond 2.11.23, OOoLilyPond 0.3.1 (i.e. all the latest) and when I try to run it I get the following error: lilypond: unrecognized option '-b' Any ideas how to fix this? Is it due to OOoLilypond not being up to date with LilyPond changes? Thanks, Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ooolilypond user
just write this
---cut-
<<
\new ChordNames {
\set chordChanges = ##t
\chordmode { a2 c2 }
}
\new Voice = "one" { \autoBeamOff
\relative c' { \clef treble \key c \major \time 4/4 a b c d }
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \lyricmode { Aaa Bee Cee Dee}
>>
----cut---
OooLilyPond seems to be EXACTLY what I was looking for to write a book
on jazz improvisation.
I use Window XP and I can get it to insert simple scores in
OpenOffice.org such as:
\key c \minor \relative c'' { c16 es, d es c es d es c' es, d es c es d es }
which is the test given in the sourceforge webpage.
However, other scores that are created in LilyPond without problems,
such as this one given in the LilyPond tutorial:
\version "2.10.10"
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a b c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
harmonies = \chordmode {
a2 c2
}
\score {
<<
\new ChordNames {
\set chordChanges = ##t
\harmonies
}
\new Voice = "one" {
\autoBeamOff
\melody
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \text
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
get quite a lot of "syntax error"s and "unknown escaped string"s and
"unexpected string"s.
Does OooLilyPond have a shorter scope than LilyPond?
I've tried running both "lilypond.exe" and "lilipon-window.exe" as the
executable on "config", with the same results.
Thank you!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: ooolilypond user
Yes. The default templates that come with OOoLilyPond automatically insert
everything you type into a \score block, which causes problems if you are
doing more than a little snippet.
Use the following as an outline to create your own template and make it your
default. You will now have to include a \score { } block in your OOoLiliPond
snippet, but it gives you much more flexibility. NOTE: This template is for
doing church bulletins or 8-/12x11 folded booklets. Set the paper size and
margins to your preferences.
\version "2.11.15"
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
#(set-paper-size "letter")
paper-height = 8.5\in
paper-width = 5.5\in
top-margin = 0.25\in
bottom-margin = 0.35\in
left-margin = 0.25\in
line-width = 4.75\in
% between-system-padding = 0.5\in
% between-system-space = 0.25\in
ragged-last = ##f
ragged-bottom = ##t
ragged-right = ##f
% system-count = #1
% print-first-page-number = ##f
% print-page-number = ##t
oddFooterMarkup = \markup { \fill-line { \hspace #0 { \bold \fromproperty
#'page:page-number-string } } }
evenFooterMarkup = \markup { \fill-line { { \bold \fromproperty
#'page:page-number-string } \hspace #0 } }
oddHeaderMarkup = \markup { \fill-line { \hspace #0 { "" } } }
evenHeaderMarkup = \markup { \fill-line { { "" } \hspace #0 } }
}
global = {
#(set-global-staff-size 14)
\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)
% \override Lyrics.LyricText #'font-size = #0.0
% \override Lyrics.LyricText #'word-space = #0.6
% \override Lyrics.LyricSpace #'minimum-distance = #1.0
}
% ly snippet contents follows:
c' d' e'
% end ly snippet
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
PabloZum
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:24 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: ooolilypond user
OooLilyPond seems to be EXACTLY what I was looking for to write a book on
jazz improvisation.
I use Window XP and I can get it to insert simple scores in OpenOffice.org
such as:
\key c \minor \relative c'' { c16 es, d es c es d es c' es, d es c es d es }
which is the test given in the sourceforge webpage.
However, other scores that are created in LilyPond without problems, such as
this one given in the LilyPond tutorial:
\version "2.10.10"
melody = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 4/4
a b c d
}
text = \lyricmode {
Aaa Bee Cee Dee
}
harmonies = \chordmode {
a2 c2
}
\score {
<<
\new ChordNames {
\set chordChanges = ##t
\harmonies
}
\new Voice = "one" {
\autoBeamOff
\melody
}
\new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \text
>>
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
get quite a lot of "syntax error"s and "unknown escaped string"s and
"unexpected string"s.
Does OooLilyPond have a shorter scope than LilyPond?
I've tried running both "lilypond.exe" and "lilipon-window.exe" as the
executable on "config", with the same results.
Thank you!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 1.0.0
On 4/9/2020 6:37 AM, Klaus Blum wrote: Hi all, I'm happy to announce a new version of OOoLilyPond (OLy), an extension to include LilyPond snippets into LibreOffice/OpenOffice documents. There are several bugfixes and some new and hopefully cool and useful features: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/tag/1.0.0 Here is a presentation of all new features: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/wiki/Whats-new#v-100---whats-new And finally, you can find a tutorial and a detailed documentation in the project's wiki: https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/wiki#ooolilypond I hope that there are no more bugs left. If you find some, please don't hesitate to report them. A big THANK YOU to all contributors and previous authors. Happy Easter! Cheers, Klaus -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html Klaus, This is really wonderful. Thank you so much for working on this - it's great! Essential and awesome. :)
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 1.0.0
Dear Klaus, thanks a lot for your work, the great improvements to this extension and for getting out this new version! Happy Easter! Joram
Re: OOoLilyPond: new repository
Hi Klaus, I will be opening the newly revivified openLilyLib repository in the next couple of weeks. I'm sorry I have not been able to do it instantly! It would be great if you could come back over there. I am trying hard to unify the OLL project so that we don't have the balkanisation and fragmentation of LilyPond into many individual git repos. I feel this makes it hard for end users. Tell a beginning user they have to fetch from five or six git repos and they likely won't stay with it long. Welcome to chat about this on the Discourse forum. Andrew On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 01:29, Klaus Blum wrote: > > OOoLilyPond, the extension for LibreOffice and OpenOffice, has a new home: > https://github.com/OOoLilyPond
Re: OOoLilyPond: new repository
Hi Martin, Am 25.10.2020 um 16:17 schrieb lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org: >Hi Klaus, I will be opening the newly revivified openLilyLib repository in the next couple of weeks. I'm sorry I have not been able to do it instantly! It would be great if you could come back over there. I am trying hard to unify the OLL project so that we don't have the balkanisation and fragmentation of LilyPond into many individual git repos. I feel this makes it hard for end users. Tell a beginning user they have to fetch from five or six git repos and they likely won't stay with it long. Please don't feel pushed or criticized in any way. Thanks for taking over the maintainership! OOoLilyPond has never been an OLL package and therefore always has been somewhat out of place in the repo. In the past, Urs already thought about placing it somewhere else. Or course I will stay on board and continue my work on anaLYsis. Cheers, Klaus
Re: OOoLilyPond: new repository
Ooops... Hi Andrew (where did I grab the name "Martin"?) Sorry...
OOoLilyPond-0.5.8 : SVG Issue
Good morning! For those of you who use OOoLilyPond: I am having some problems using the OOoLilyPond extension in LibreOffice and I was just wondering if someone knew how to get this fixed. SVG output into my documents won't work, no matter what changes I make to the template, config, or the file itself. I have plenty of space for the SVG in the paragraph location and all commands are configured correctly to run outside LibreOffice just fine. I noticed no change when using/not using the preamble either. PNG insertion works fine however, it's just SVG on both GNU/Linux and Windows systems. SVG won't seem to work into the document at all. I've included some attachments to show what it looks like now. Has anyone experienced this issue when using SVG and OOoLilyPond? Thanks! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, Klaus Blum wrote: Dear LilyPond community, (...) I hope this will be useful for many people. I am sure it will be, thanks! -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Am 2017-03-05 um 19:26 schrieb Klaus Blum : > I am happy to announce a new version of OOoLilyPond - an extension for > LibreOffice/OpenOffice. Thank you for the effort! > Compatibility: > > OOoLilyPond (OLy) works with recent versions of LibreOffice (5.3.0.3) and > OpenOffice (4.1.3). Older versions should work as well. It has even been > tested with OpenOffice 2.4 without issues. > > Any content (LilyPond code, templates, OLy configuration files) created > with/for OLy 0.4.x will work with OLy 0.5.x - and vice versa. (Fully > compatible, forward and backward.) > Older snippets created with OLy 0.3.x will also work with 0.4.x and 0.5.x, > but not (necessarily) vice versa. In my installation (LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and LilyPond 2.18.2 on OSX 10.9.5) only the SVG mode works; in EPS mode I get an image with two lines of text (Title: ... / Creator: ...) Greetlings, Hraban --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Hi Henning, Henning Hraban Ramm-3 wrote > In my installation (LibreOffice 5.2.4.2 and LilyPond 2.18.2 on OSX 10.9.5) > only the SVG mode works; in EPS mode I get an image with two lines of text > (Title: ... / Creator: ...) yes, that's a known limitation of LibreOffice. EPS graphics only work in OpenOffice (Windows), which is not preferred by everyone. ;-) But we now have SVG versions for all templates inherited from 0.4.0, and working without the auto-crop feature might be easier than it seems at the first glance. Detailed informations can be found in the verbose release notes (https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/download/0.5.0/OOoLilyPond-0.5.0-Release-Notes.txt). Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-OOoLilyPond-0-5-0-tp200737p200740.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Klaus Blum wrote > yes, that's a known limitation of LibreOffice. EPS graphics only work in > OpenOffice (Windows), which is not preferred by everyone. ;-) > But we now have SVG versions for all templates inherited from 0.4.0, and > working without the auto-crop feature might be easier than it seems at the > first glance. > Detailed informations can be found in the verbose release notes > (https://github.com/openlilylib/LO-ly/releases/download/0.5.0/OOoLilyPond-0.5.0-Release-Notes.txt). > > Cheers, > Klaus Hi Klaus! This extension works beautifully on Linux Mint, thank you for sharing this with us! However, not sure if it's user error or a bug or something, but on Windows 10 LibreOffice 5, I am constantly seeing an error when trying to simply enter a small musical example into a document: * Error: No png output found* Just wanted to share this with you, in case you knew what the cause/fix was! - composer | sound designer | asmr artist LilyPond Tutorials (for beginners) --> http://bit.ly/bcl-lilypond -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-OOoLilyPond-0-5-0-tp200737p200741.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Another thought about graphic file formats: The brand new LibreOffice supports importing PDF graphics, *but* embedded fonts are not yet recognized, which makes this feature not (yet?) usable for LilyPond-created PDFs. If this changes in the forseable future, using PDF format might solve all our problems. The developer of this LO feature has already made some changes: https://disqus.com/home/discussion/vmiklos/insert_pdf_as_image_in_libreoffice_53_01/ Maybe his comment means that in LO 5.4.0.0 this might be solved. There is also a bug report on the LO buglist: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106203 A comment there sounds as if someone could confirm the same bug for LO 5.4.0.0... that's all I know about that for the moment. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-OOoLilyPond-0-5-0-tp200737p200742.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: OOoLilyPond 0.5.0
Hi Ben, SoundsFromSound wrote > on Windows 10 LibreOffice 5, I am constantly seeing an error when trying > to simply enter a small musical example into a document: * > Error: No png output found * > > Just wanted to share this with you, in case you knew what the cause/fix > was! could you add the contents of the "Ly Output" window? Maybe this could help. Cheers, Klaus -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ANN-OOoLilyPond-0-5-0-tp200737p200744.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Python LiLily (was: OOoLilyPond)
Am 02.01.2017 um 10:49 schrieb Urs Liska: > > Am 02.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Urs Liska: >> So it would be really great to pick up this extension and make it usable >> again. > For the record: > The original package on SourceForge does *not* have a license included, > so I have written an email to the original developer. It has been > delivered, so the email account still exists - but of course that > doesn't mean I will get a response. > > In the meantime I have extracted the archive and set up a Git > repository, and if I get a positive answer I will upload it to Github > under the new name LiLily. > > This still doesn't mean I'm ready to actually develop and maintain it > further, as I don't have any experience with LibreOffice extensions. > > Urs > One more thought on the issue (hopefully the last for this morning): Looking at the wiki pages for LibreOffice extension development I saw that extensions can be written in a number of languages including Python. The sample project https://github.com/kunaldeo/Py-LibreOffice-Love-Letter-Writer/ also seems to make use of PyQt, so I thought it might be an even better idea to create a LilyPond extension for LibreOffice from scratch. This could then at least provide syntax highlighting (I must say that the visual appearance of the extension was also somewhat off-putting) and over the time one could add lightweight editing features to it (although it should not actually double Frescobaldi's functionality). In this context it would also be straightforward to add UI to configure the output (PNG/EPS, size/resolution etc.). I think that looks promising. What do you think? Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
German Umlaute in OOoLilyPond
In many Postings the Umlaut-Problem is treated to solve with an UTF8-Editor. But in OOoLilypond for OpenOffice, it was quite a difficult problem for me to solve but with a very easy solution. 1. Look at http://www.utf8-zeichentabelle.de/unicode-utf8-table.pl?names=- &utf8=dec&text=2 for the two UTF-8 decimal-Codes 2. Type the two Numbers with ALT+0+xxx at your Numpad. Thats it! For example: ü ALT+0195 AlT+0188 -> ü etc. (Sorry Pro's for disturbing you) Peter ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond 0.3.3 available
Hello, 2009/1/10 Samuel Hartmann : > OOoLilyPond 0.3.3 is now available. Just yesterday my colleague (music teacher) asked me for instructions how to insert music examples into text document. You gave me the extra argument why to use OOoLilyPond. I haven't tested it comprehensively but seems it works. Thank you! Antanas Budriūnas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond 0.4.0 released
Samuel, I have translated the page into Spanish (except the old news). http://www.paconet.org/ooolilypond/ I you want, link it from yours. Later I'll put a Spanish version of the sample ODT file and screenshot. 2009/6/13 Samuel Hartmann : > I'm glad to announce version 0.4.0 of OOoLilyPond, the software that > combines the power of OpenOffice.org and LilyPond. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond 0.4.0 released
Hi Francisco, Thanks for the translation. I have updated the web-site with a link. regards, Samuel 2009/6/15 Francisco Vila : > Samuel, > > I have translated the page into Spanish (except the old news). > > http://www.paconet.org/ooolilypond/ > > I you want, link it from yours. > > Later I'll put a Spanish version of the sample ODT file and screenshot. > > 2009/6/13 Samuel Hartmann : >> I'm glad to announce version 0.4.0 of OOoLilyPond, the software that >> combines the power of OpenOffice.org and LilyPond. > -- > Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) > www.paconet.org > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OOoLilyPond and LilyPond 2.8
Hi,
The OpenOffice.org Plugin OOoLilyPond comes with templates that only
work with lilypond 2.6. I have now built some templates that work with
2.8. You can find the templates attached to this mail.
Unfortunately the music fragments generated with LilyPond 2.8 always
have some margin at the left side. Up to now I was not able to get rid
of it. Does anybody have an idea?
regards,
Samuel
%% Generated by lilypond-book
%% Options: [fragment,alt=[image of music],ragged-right,indent=0\mm]
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
%
% Start cut-&-pastable-section
%
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0\mm
line-width = 6.5\in
}
\layout {
}
{
% ly snippet contents follows:
\relative c'' {
a4 b c d
}
% end ly snippet
}
%% Generated by lilypond-book
%% Options: [indent=0\mm,fragment,staffsize=26,ragged-right,alt=[image of
music]]
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
#(set-global-staff-size 26)
%
% Start cut-&-pastable-section
%
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
indent = 0\mm
ragged-right = ##t
}
\layout {
}
{
% ly snippet contents follows:
\relative c'' {
a4 b c d
}
% end ly snippet
}
%% Generated by lilypond-book
%% Options: [indent=0\mm,fragment,notime,ragged-right,alt=[image of music]]
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
%
% Start cut-&-pastable-section
%
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
indent = 0\mm
ragged-right = ##t
line-width = 6.5\in
}
\layout {
\context {
\Score
timing = ##f
}
\context {
\Staff
\remove Time_signature_engraver
}
}
{
% ly snippet contents follows:
\relative c'' {
a4 b c d
}
% end ly snippet
}
%% Generated by lilypond-book
%% Options: [alt=[image of music],indent=0\mm,line-width=345\pt]
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
%
% Start cut-&-pastable-section
%
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
indent = 0\mm
line-width = 6.5\in
}
\layout {
}
% ly snippet contents follows:
\relative c'' {
a4 b c d
}
% end ly snippet
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond "unrecognized option"
Hi Thomas, Thomas Scharkowski wrote: LilyPond: unrecognized option "-b" LilyPond 2.8.6 on Linux knows this option. On windows this should not be different. Try to run LilyPond directly on the template to see weather there is a problem with your LilyPond installation. $ lilypond -b eps fragment.ly if this does not work try: $ lilypond --backend=eps eps fragment.ly if the later is working, change the lilypond options in the bash script OOoLilyPond.sh. If this does not work. Use lilypond 2.6.4 that comes with the cygwin distribution. regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond "unrecognized option"
Samuel, thanks for your suggestion. $ lilypond -b eps fragment.ly does work from cmd. I tried LilyPond 2.6.4 for cygwin when it came out some time ago, but could not get it to work (someone else also reported). 2.4.6 cygwin still works fine though, but I rarely use it now. Thomas > Thomas Scharkowski wrote: > > LilyPond: unrecognized option "-b" > LilyPond 2.8.6 on Linux knows this option. On windows this should not be > different. Try to run LilyPond directly on the template to see weather > there is a problem with your LilyPond installation. > > $ lilypond -b eps fragment.ly > > if this does not work try: > > $ lilypond --backend=eps eps fragment.ly > > if the later is working, change the lilypond options in the bash script > OOoLilyPond.sh. > > > If this does not work. Use lilypond 2.6.4 that comes with the cygwin > distribution. > > > regards, > > Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond "unrecognized option"
> Samuel- > This is the problem with your potentially great addition, Cygwin > version(s) of lilypond didn't work for me at all- I never could get it to > go while the current (is 2.8x non or not I don't really know)stable > version works great as did the non-cygwin stable version 2.6x. > I'm kinda hoping that you come up with a way to do this without Cygwin Yes, me too! Thomas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond "unrecognized option"
Hi Jay,
I already answered to your personal mail address and forgot to send it
also to the list. Additionally I have corrected some instructions
(single quotes instead of double quotes in the path to lilypond), please
ignore the first mail I sent to you directly.
Jay Hamilton wrote:
Samuel-
This is the problem with your potentially great addition, Cygwin
version(s) of lilypond didn't work for me at all- I never could get it to
go while the current (is 2.8x non or not I don't really know)stable
version works great as did the non-cygwin stable version 2.6x.
The cygwin version 2.6.4 just works out of the box on my Windows XP for
use with OOoLilyPond. Otherwise I'm not using LilyPond on Windows, so
may be there are other problems with the cygwin version.
I'm kinda hoping that you come up with a way to do this without Cygwin
I now installed the mingw-version of LilyPond 2.8.6 and got it to work
with OOoLilyPond. What you must do is the following:
Install the newest OOoLilyPond 0.2.1 (this already has the templates for
LilyPond 2.8 included).
find the bash script and open it with a text editor:
C:\OOoLilyPond\bin\OOoLilyPond
(May be it is in unix format, so notepad is not a suitable editor. I
used notepad plus: http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/de/site.htm)
find the lines:
if [ "$ext" = "eps" ]; then
lilypond -b eps -f eps "${filename}.ly" 2> "${filename%.ly}.out"
fi
if [ "$ext" = "png" ]; then
lilypond -b eps -f png -dresolution=$dpi "${filename}.ly" 2>
"${filename%.ly}.out"
fi
Replace the two words "lilypond" with the full path of your lilypond
executable. For example (line breaks are wrong in the mail):
if [ "$ext" = "eps" ]; then
'C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond' -b eps -f eps
"${filename}.ly" 2> "${filename%.ly}.out"
fi
if [ "$ext" = "png" ]; then
'C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond' -b eps -f png
-dresolution=$dpi "${filename}.ly" 2> "${filename%.ly}.out"
fi
When running OOoLilyPond make sure the template path is set to the
templates for version 2.8.
Note that you still need cygwin. OOoLilyPond calls a bash script which
needs cygwin to run. But you don't need the cygwin lilypond package.
In future versions of OOoLilyPond I also try to get rid of the bash
script. Then it should be completely independent of cygwin.
regards,
Samuel
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond trouble 2
Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: New problem. I had saved the small test file in *.doc format as I'm doing some work for someone who is using Word on Windows (this may or may not be relevant). When I reopened the test file and tried to edit one of the little music snippets, or add a new one, I get an error box: A Scripting Framework error occured while running the Basic script vnd.sun.star.script:OOoLilypond.OOoLilyPondMusic.main?language=Basic&locaction=application. Message: BasicProviderlmpl::getScript: no script! What happened? I tried that too. I don't get the "BasicProviderlmpl::getScript: no script!" Error. And I can start LilyPond to creat new music snippets. But it is not possible to reopen the already existing music snippets which I expected. See below an explanation for this. May be your problem is that script cannot be called. Check the installation of the script. Open the Dialog "Tools --> Macros --> Organize Macros --> OpenOffice.org Basic" and check whether the macro is still there. You can also try to run the macro using this dialog. Now why OOoLilyPond cannot be used in .doc files: OOoLilyPond stores the LilyPond code as additional attribute in the odt file. When unziping and the odt file and opening content.xml you can see the code for the OOoLilyPond Image: OOoLilyPondArgs="default16§AsCharacter§NoWrap§c' d' e'" draw:stroke="none" svg:stroke-width="0in" svg:stroke-color="#00" draw:marker-start="" draw:marker-start-width="0.1181in" draw:marker-start-center="false" draw:marker-end="" draw:marker-end-width="0.1181in" draw:marker-end-center="false" draw:fill="none" draw:fill-color="#99ccff" draw:textarea-horizontal-align="center" draw:textarea-vertical-align="middle" fo:padding-top="0.0492in" fo:padding-bottom="0.0492in" fo:padding-left="0.0984in" fo:padding-right="0.0984in" draw:shadow="hidden" draw:shadow-offset-x="0.1181in" draw:shadow-offset-y="0.1181in" draw:shadow-color="#808080" draw:color-mode="standard" draw:luminance="0%" draw:contrast="0%" draw:gamma="100%" draw:red="0%" draw:green="0%" draw:blue="0%" fo:clip="rect(0in 0in 0in 0in)" draw:image-opacity="100%" style:mirror="none" fo:margin-top="0in" fo:margin-bottom="0in" style:run-through="foreground" style:wrap="none" style:vertical-pos="from-top" style:horizontal-pos="from-left" style:horizontal-rel="paragraph"/> The lilypond code ist stored in the additional graphic-property OOoLilyPondArgs="default16§AsCharacter§NoWrap§c' d' e'" I assume that this property is lost when converting to the .doc format and back again to .odt. I think it is not easy to find a clean way to store the lilypond code such that it remains correct when converting to .doc. I will one have a closer look at this issue, but this does not have priority for the development of OOoLilyPond. regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond trouble 2
Samuel Hartmann wrote: Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: New problem. I had saved the small test file in *.doc format as I'm doing some work for someone who is using Word on Windows (this may or may not be relevant). When I reopened the test file and tried to edit one of the little music snippets, or add a new one, I get an error box: A Scripting Framework error occured while running the Basic script vnd.sun.star.script:OOoLilypond.OOoLilyPondMusic.main?language=Basic&locaction=application. Message: BasicProviderlmpl::getScript: no script! What happened? I tried that too. I don't get the "BasicProviderlmpl::getScript: no script!" Error. And I can start LilyPond to creat new music snippets. But it is not possible to reopen the already existing music snippets which I expected. See below an explanation for this. I could not even create new snippets in a new document. May be your problem is that script cannot be called. Check the installation of the script. Open the Dialog "Tools --> Macros --> Organize Macros --> OpenOffice.org Basic" and check whether the macro is still there. You can also try to run the macro using this dialog. It looked as though the, or at least *a* script was still there. I deleted it and re-did the macro set-up. Now it's working again. Now why OOoLilyPond cannot be used in .doc files: OOoLilyPond stores the LilyPond code as additional attribute in the odt file. When unziping and the odt file and opening content.xml you can see the code for the OOoLilyPond Image: OOoLilyPondArgs="default16§AsCharacter§NoWrap§c' d' e'" draw:stroke="none" svg:stroke-width="0in" svg:stroke-color="#00" draw:marker-start="" draw:marker-start-width="0.1181in" draw:marker-start-center="false" draw:marker-end="" draw:marker-end-width="0.1181in" draw:marker-end-center="false" draw:fill="none" draw:fill-color="#99ccff" draw:textarea-horizontal-align="center" draw:textarea-vertical-align="middle" fo:padding-top="0.0492in" fo:padding-bottom="0.0492in" fo:padding-left="0.0984in" fo:padding-right="0.0984in" draw:shadow="hidden" draw:shadow-offset-x="0.1181in" draw:shadow-offset-y="0.1181in" draw:shadow-color="#808080" draw:color-mode="standard" draw:luminance="0%" draw:contrast="0%" draw:gamma="100%" draw:red="0%" draw:green="0%" draw:blue="0%" fo:clip="rect(0in 0in 0in 0in)" draw:image-opacity="100%" style:mirror="none" fo:margin-top="0in" fo:margin-bottom="0in" style:run-through="foreground" style:wrap="none" style:vertical-pos="from-top" style:horizontal-pos="from-left" style:horizontal-rel="paragraph"/> The lilypond code ist stored in the additional graphic-property OOoLilyPondArgs="default16§AsCharacter§NoWrap§c' d' e'" I assume that this property is lost when converting to the .doc format and back again to .odt. I think it is not easy to find a clean way to store the lilypond code such that it remains correct when converting to .doc. I will one have a closer look at this issue, but this does not have priority for the development of OOoLilyPond. Ok, fair enough. I'll keep that in mind. BUT, can it be safely saved as a *.doc file and still have the surrounding text edited in Word without trouble? I'm also wondering about my Linux installation. I'm getting some random freezes which require a hard reboot. I'm also getting an error box when Gnome starts up. Something about the Settings Daemon restarting too many times. I'm wondering if this is part of this trouble with the macro suddenly not working. Thanks, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond trouble 2
Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: Ok, fair enough. I'll keep that in mind. BUT, can it be safely saved as a *.doc file and still have the surrounding text edited in Word without trouble? You can edit the whole document in Word as you like. But when reopening the document in OpenOffice.org, you will not be able anymore to edit the lilypond code of the music snippets. If you want to write a document in collaboration with somebody else, your collaboration partner should install OpenOffice.org. OpenOffice.org is for free and available for all major platforms. regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond 0.3 released
Samuel Hartmann wrote: The new release of OOoLilyPond can be downloaded now (http://ooolilypond.sourceforge.net). I've grabbed v0.3 and the install instructions are not consistent with what I'm seeing. When I get to the part where it says: - Select "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/OOoLilyPondMusic" as Functions Category that path is not there. I get: OpenOffice.org/user/OOoLilyPond/ Is there something missing in the distribution, or is there something amiss in the instructions? -David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OOoLilyPond 0.3 released
Hi David, David Bobroff wrote: I've grabbed v0.3 and the install instructions are not consistent with what I'm seeing. When I get to the part where it says: - Select "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/OOoLilyPondMusic" as Functions Category that path is not there. I get: OpenOffice.org/user/OOoLilyPond/ Is there something missing in the distribution, or is there something amiss in the instructions? Maybe you read the wrong instructions. On the web page and in the file offline version which you find in the tar.gz or zip file you find these instructions: Associate a keyboard shortcut with the macro - Create a new writer document - Select from the Menu: "Tools" --> "Customize..." - Go to the tab "Keyboard" - Select "Control-M" as Shortcut key - Select "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/Main" as Functions Category - Select "main" as Funtion - Click "Modify" The path "OpenOffice.org Macros/user/OOoLilyPond/Main" seems to be the correct one. Did you read the instructions on the web page? May be your browser cage had an older version of the web page which was loaded when visiting it. Regards, Samuel ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
