Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package
2013/9/2 Urs Liska : > I'm rapidly approaching the first really public release of my 'lilyglyphs' > LaTeX package. [...] This is really good news! I should be able to test your package with LuaLaTeX in the next days. I skimmed through the manual and, as others have already said, your package is really impressive! Best wishes. Davide ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package
Am 02.09.2013 16:42, schrieb Mike Solomon: On 2 sept. 2013, at 16:40, flup2 wrote: Hello, I echo Philippe's compliments - this is truly incredible, Urs. Thanks! I won't have time to test it until later, but I know I will be a frequent user! Then _please_ get it through forking the Git repository. A frequent user will surely add new commands. And many of these will probably be good to go into the package ... Best Urs Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package
Am 02.09.2013 16:40, schrieb flup2: Hello, I'll take some time later this week to look carefully, but a first good news is that I was able to compile the manual after installing the missing fonts on 2 different computers :-) That's very good to know. I didn't have concrete doubts, but LaTeX is always good for a surprise ;-) 2 years ago, I developed such a package (far less complete!) targeted to LaTeX (not Xe- or Lua-) Ah, yes, I recall having looked at that last year when I started on lilyglyphs. and I see your work as an opportunity to look at XeLaTeX. I suggest also looking at LuaLaTeX at this opportunity. One thing I missed from XeLaTeX were a few very advanced typographic features. The fact that out of the blue I got a contribution by Dave Bellows who made lilyglyphs work with LuaLaTeX too actually triggered tackling a release now ... I'll take a look at glyphs combinations that could be usefull; octaviation clefs, for instance. Any contribution is highly welcome, as one part of the task at hand is to increase the glyph coverage. And I'll surely work on that mainly with my own practical needs in mind. So if there are many people submitting predefined commands the package can grow significantly faster. (I wouldn't try to create octaviation clefs on the LaTeX side but definitely through the pdf images BTW). Best Urs Thanks for your awesome work! Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Testers-needed-for-lilyglyphs-package-tp150091p150102.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package
On 2 sept. 2013, at 16:40, flup2 wrote: > Hello, > > I'll take some time later this week to look carefully, but a first good news > is that I was able to compile the manual after installing the missing fonts > on 2 different computers :-) > > 2 years ago, I developed such a package (far less complete!) targeted to > LaTeX (not Xe- or Lua-) and I see your work as an opportunity to look at > XeLaTeX. > > I'll take a look at glyphs combinations that could be usefull; octaviation > clefs, for instance. > > Thanks for your awesome work! > > Philippe > I echo Philippe's compliments - this is truly incredible, Urs. I won't have time to test it until later, but I know I will be a frequent user! Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package
Hello, I'll take some time later this week to look carefully, but a first good news is that I was able to compile the manual after installing the missing fonts on 2 different computers :-) 2 years ago, I developed such a package (far less complete!) targeted to LaTeX (not Xe- or Lua-) and I see your work as an opportunity to look at XeLaTeX. I'll take a look at glyphs combinations that could be usefull; octaviation clefs, for instance. Thanks for your awesome work! Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Testers-needed-for-lilyglyphs-package-tp150091p150102.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
